
Multi-objective sustainable design of reinforced concrete cylindrical tall structures by using metaheuristic algorithms
Melda YÜCEL
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4) : 567-577.
Multi-objective sustainable design of reinforced concrete cylindrical tall structures by using metaheuristic algorithms
While creating structural model, it is required that evaluation different and various alternative scenarios to provide sustainable conditions for the environment, and nature besides that structures have characteristics as strength and serviceability. However, this process needs extremely long times together with much effort to find out the desired properties. Concordantly, optimization technologies can be evaluated to use in overcoming the mentioned disadvantages. Regarding this, in this study, reinforced concrete cylindrical wall was dealt for generating an optimum structure by providing cost-minimization besides making possible eco-friendly design conditions. The best structural models were also evaluated according to variable concrete strengths and wall heights in separate cases as single and multi-objective ones. Meanwhile, a metaheuristic method as flower pollination algorithm was handled to detect the best values of structural parameters including total reinforcement and concrete amount, appropriate spacing between reinforcements, etc. Also, a different optimization methodology was applied for reinforced concrete structures in order to evaluate different aims, like both sustainability and economic conditions, besides independent objectives. In this respect, the minimum cost, and CO2 can be determined together for different structural parameters like concrete compressive strength, wall height, etc. By this regard, multi-objective optimization processes can be utilized to investigate different structural models in order to focus on fundamental purposes like minimum cost, and emission values besides maximum seismic safety of structures.
reinforced concrete / CO2 emission / multi-objective optimization / cost minimization / eco-friendly design
[1] |
Ganzerli S, Pantelides C P, Reaveley L D. Performance-based design using structural optimization. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2000, 29(11): 1677–1690
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Aktas E, Moses F, Ghosn M. Cost and safety optimization of structural design specifications. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2001, 73(3): 205–212
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Sirca G F Jr, Adeli H. Cost optimization of prestressed concrete bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2005, 131(3): 380–388
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Wall W A, Frenzel M A, Cyron C. Isogeometric structural shape optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2008, 197(33–40): 2976–2988
|
[5] |
Zordan T, Briseghella B, Mazzarolo E. Bridge structural optimization through step-by-step evolutionary process. Structural Engineering International, 2010, 20(1): 72–78
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Ghasemi H, Rafiee R, Zhuang X, Muthu J, Rabczuk T. Uncertainties propagation in metamodel-based probabilistic optimization of CNT/polymer composite structure using stochastic multi-scale modeling. Computational Materials Science, 2014, 85: 295–305
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Ghasemi H, Brighenti R, Zhuang X, Muthu J, Rabczuk T. Optimal fiber content and distribution in fiber-reinforced solids using a reliability and NURBS based sequential optimization approach. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2015, 51(1): 99–112
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
YucelMNigdeli S MBekdaşG. Optimum design of tubular columns for different cases by using prediction model generated via artificial neural networks. In: IV. Eurasian Conference on Civil and Environmental Engineering (ECOCEE). İstanbul, 2019, 17–18
|
[9] |
Shaqfa M, Orbán Z. Modified parameter-setting-free harmony search (PSFHS) algorithm for optimizing the design of reinforced concrete beams. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2019, 60(3): 999–1019
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Georgioudakis M, Plevris V. A comparative study of differential evolution variants in constrained structural optimization. Frontiers in Built Environment, 2020, 6: 102
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Yücel M, Kayabekir A E, Bekdaş G, Nigdeli S M, Kim S, Geem Z W. Adaptive-hybrid harmony search algorithm for multi-constrained optimum eco-design of reinforced concrete retaining walls. Sustainability, 2021, 13(4): 1639
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Brandão F D S, de Almeida A K, Miguel L F F. Optimum design of single and multiple tuned mass dampers for vibration control in buildings under seismic excitation. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 2022, 22(8): 2250078
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Ghaderi A, Nouri M, Hoseinzadeh L, Ferdousi A. Hybrid vibration control of tall tubular structures via combining base isolation and mass damper systems optimized by enhanced special relativity search algorithm. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 2024, 48: 3373–3391
|
[14] |
Bekdaş G, Yücel M, Nigdeli S M. Estimation of optimum design of structural systems via machine learning. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2021, 15(6): 1441–1452
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Karimi Sharafshadeh B, Ketabdari M J, Azarsina F, Amiri M, Nehdi M L. New fuzzy-heuristic methodology for analyzing compression load capacity of composite columns. Buildings, 2023, 13(1): 125
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Yucel M, Bekdaş G, Nigdeli S M. Machine learning-based model for prediction of optimum TMD parameters in time-domain history. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2024, 46(4): 192
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Lee M G, An J H, Bae S G, Oh H S, Choi J, Yun D Y, Hong T, Lee D E, Park H S. Multi-objective sustainable design model for integrating CO2 emissions and costs for slabs in office buildings. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2020, 16(8): 1096–1105
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Kaveh A, Izadifard R A, Mottaghi L. Optimal design of planar RC frames considering CO2 emissions using ECBO, EVPS and PSO metaheuristic algorithms. Journal of Building Engineering, 2020, 28: 101014
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Yepes V, Martí J V, García J. Black hole algorithm for sustainable design of counterfort retaining walls. Sustainability (Basel), 2020, 12(7): 2767
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Yücel M, Nigdeli S M, Bekdaş G. Generation of sustainable models with multi-objective optimum design of reinforced concrete (RC) structures. Structures, 2022, 40: 223–236
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Negrin I A, Chagoyén E L. Economic and environmental design optimisation of reinforced concrete frame buildings: A comparative study. Structures, 2022, 38: 64–75
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Tres Junior F L, Yepes V, de Medeiros G F, Kripka M. Multi-objective optimization applied to the design of sustainable pedestrian bridges. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023, 20(4): 3190
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
dos Santos N R, Alves E C, Kripka M. Towards sustainable reinforced concrete beams: multi-objective optimization for cost, CO2 emission, and crack prevention. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2024, 25(1): 575–582
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
YangX S. Flower pollination algorithm for global optimization. In: Proceedings of Unconventional Computation and Natural Computation (UCNC 2012). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2012, 240–249
|
[25] |
TS500
|
[26] |
Paya-Zaforteza I, Yepes V, Hospitaler A, Gonzalez-Vidosa F. CO2-optimization of reinforced concrete frames by simulated annealing. Engineering Structures, 2009, 31(7): 1501–1508
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Yepes V, Gonzalez-Vidosa F, Alcala J, Villalba P. CO2-optimization design of reinforced concrete retaining walls based on a VNS-threshold acceptance strategy. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2012, 26(3): 378–386
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, Directorate of Higher Technical Board. Construction and Installation Unit Prices, 2022
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |