RESEARCH ARTICLE

Impact of polarization mode dispersion and nonlinearities on 2-channel DWDM chaotic communication systems

  • Bushra NAWAZ ,
  • Rameez ASIF
Expand
  • Telecommunication Engineering Department, University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila 47050, Pakistan

Received date: 18 Apr 2013

Accepted date: 14 May 2013

Published date: 05 Sep 2013

Copyright

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Abstract

This paper has designed 2-channel dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) chaotic system at the frequencies of 193.1 and 193.2 THz, respectively. The optical chaotic signals were produced by using the semiconductor laser that is numerically modeled by employing laser rate equations. These two channels were multiplexed and then propagated through single mode optical fiber (SMF) of 80 km length with dispersion compensating fiber of 16 km length. Erbium doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) was used to compensate the power losses in the SMF. In this paper, we investigated the effects of polarization mode dispersion (PMD) and nonlinearities especially stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) on 2 channel DWDM chaotic communication system by varying the length of the SMF and value of differential group delay (DGD).

Cite this article

Bushra NAWAZ , Rameez ASIF . Impact of polarization mode dispersion and nonlinearities on 2-channel DWDM chaotic communication systems[J]. Frontiers of Optoelectronics, 2013 , 6(3) : 312 -317 . DOI: 10.1007/s12200-013-0332-z

Introduction

In the early 1990s, the discovery of possibility of chaotic synchronization by Pecora and Carroll triggers the idea to use chaotic synchronization to provide security in digital and optical communication [1]. Chaos is a complex irregular and un-predictable behavior shown by a simple deterministic system. There are many software algorithms, which provide security using different software encryption techniques. These algorithms provide security to some extent but not enough. A parameter known as key is used to secure the transmission system. The algorithm is more complex and secured if the length of the key is longer. If some hacker tries to hack the system, he can persuade transmitter and receiver to use his own key, which makes transmission of information completely transparent to him. Chaotic communication is a simple and alternative solution. In this type of communication system, chaotic carrier is modulated with the message signal and transmitted along the fiber and at receiver end this chaotic carrier is again produced by performing synchronization to subtract the message plus chaotic signal to obtain the original message signal [2]. The practical demonstration of chaos for secure communication in metropolitan area network of Athens, Greece has marked the start of commercialization of chaos based secure optical networks [3]. Dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) chaos is the promising technique for future providing security and bandwidth [4-6]. DWDM technology gives us maximum utilization of available bandwidth in optical fiber [7]. The available bandwidth can be used optimally by decreasing the channel spacing and increasing data rate per channel. Polarization mode dispersion (PMD) and nonlinearities are the major limiting factors in long distance communication [8-10]. Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) and four wave mixing (FWM) are two main causes of crosstalk in the DWDM system because of narrow channel spacing, whereas the FWM is not apparent at two channels DWDM system. PMD and nonlinearities combined effects cannot be ignored at long distances, at higher bit rate and in the systems where narrow channel spacing is used. It also increases the parameter mismatch between the transmitted and received chaotic signal. Previous studies on the analysis of nonlinear effects have been reported on the phase-encoded transmission that includes the study on different post-processing techniques [11,12], pulse shapes [13] and encoding techniques [14]. However, these studies are limited to evaluate the impact of deterministic impairments, hence neglecting the effect of PMD. In this paper, we have evaluated the combine effect of PMD and nonlinear effect on the on 2-channel DWDM chaotic communication system.

Simulation model

Chaotic signal is generated using semiconductor laser, which is governed by the following laser rate equations. Dynamical behavior of semiconductor laser can be described effectively by laser rate equations. The modulation dynamics of the laser are modeled by coupled rate equations, which describe the relationship between the carrier density N (t), photon density S (t), and optical phase ϕ (t) [15].
dN(t)dt=I(t)q(V)-g0(N(t)-Nt)11+ϵS(t)S(t),
dS(t)dt=Γg0(N(t)-Nt)1(1+ϵS(t))-S(t)S(t)τp=ΓβN(t)/τp,
dφdt=12α[Γg0(N(t)-Nt)-2τp],
g0=vga0,
It=IDC+IINIPK,
where, g0 is the gain slope constant. It is the internal signal current, IIN is the input current, IDC is the parameter bias current (IDC = 33 mA) and IPK is the parameter modulation current (IPK = 10 mA). Table 1 gives the values of the semiconductor laser that is essential to produce the chaos waveform.
Tab.1 Values of parameters of semiconductor laser
symbolparametervalue
a0active layer coefficient1.5e-9
vggroup velocity8.5e9 cm/s
ϵgain compression factor1e-17 cm3
Ntcarrier density transparency1e18 cm-3
βfraction of spontaneous emission coupled into the lasing mode8e-7
Γmode confinement factor0.4
Vactive layer volume1.5e-10 cm3
τpphoton life time3e-12 s
τNelectron life time1e-9 s
Aline width enhancement factor5
Fig.1 Block diagram of chaotic DWDM system

Full size|PPT slide

Figure 1 is the block diagram of the proposed model. We have used frequencies at 193.1 and 193.2 THz with a channel spacing of 0.1 THz, which is recommended by ITU for standard DWDM system while the bit rate is 5 Gbit/s. These two signals are multiplexed using 2×1 multiplexer with 100 GHz bandwidth and 0 dB insertion losses. Afterwards the multiplexed signal is amplified using gain control Erbium doped fiber amplifier (EDFA), and then this amplified signal is propagated through the optical fiber. The length of single mode optical fiber is 80 km with dispersion of 16 ps/nm-km and attenuation of 0.2 dB/km. Dispersion is compensated using dispersion compensation fiber (DCF). DCF length is 16 km with -83.75 ps/nm-km to counter balance the dispersion of single mode optical fiber.
Fig.2 Chaotic signal at transmitter (a) and receiver (b)

Full size|PPT slide

The chaotic signal produced from our numerical model is plotted as a function of the signal output power and time. Figure 2(a) is the transmitted chaotic signal and Fig. 2(b) is the received chaotic signal in the absence of polarization mode dispersion and nonlinearities effects. An ideal fiber has perfect core and symmetry so two modes of light which are perpendicular to each traveling in the ideal optical fiber will not suffer PMD effects. But in real fiber, the core is not perfect so these two perpendicular modes will not travel with the same speed resulting in spreading of the pulses. Differential group delay is directly proportional to the square root of distance.
Δτ=DPMDsqrt(L),
where DPMD is the PMD parameter of the fiber, typically measured in ps/sqrt (km), a measure of the strength and frequency of the imperfection of the real fibers (sqrt stands for square root of the variable). PMD is a stochastic process with a random differential group delay (DGD) value. In this work, we vary the values of DGD to examine the effects of polarization mode dispersion. The combined effects of PMD and nonlinearities are also numerically investigated. SRS causes the power leakage from the shorter wavelength to the higher wavelength due to Raman scattering in the optical fiber. The power fractions leaked from the higher frequencies components to the lower frequency components [16] are given in Eq. (7).
D=n=1N-1(f0pngnLeffnAef),
where, pn is the original power of the lowest frequency component, f0 is channel with lowest frequency, i.e., 1551.72 nm, fn is the highest frequency channel, i.e., 1552.52 nm, N is the total number of channels, i.e., 2, Lef is the effective length of fiber, i.e., 20 km Aef is the effective area of fiber, i.e., 80 μm2 and gn is the Raman gain coefficient relating the high frequency component to the lowest frequency component, i.e., 3.15 dB/(km∙W). The remaining power at the lowest frequency channel is given by Eq. (8).
Prem=-10log(1-D).

Results and discussion

Synchronization graphs

In this paper, system performance is analyzed by evaluating the synchronization graphs. The synchronization graphs were plotted between the power of the transmitted chaotic signal and power of the received chaotic signal. If there is straight line, it shows that system is synchronized; but if deviates from the straight line, then the signal is effected by nonlinear effects and PMD.
Fig.3 Synchronization graphs with parameter of PMD at (a) 0; (b) 0.5 and (c) 1.0 ps/km

Full size|PPT slide

Figure 3 is the synchronization graph of channel 1 plotted between the received and transmitted power of chaotic signal, which is propagated at a distance of 80 km and at a bit rate of 5 Gbit/s. In these synchronization graphs, we neglect the nonlinear effects to only observe the PMD effects. In Fig. 3(a), the value of DGD is 0 ps/km and we can see that synchronization is better, and it is only affected by the high value of attenuation in DCF. In Figs. 3(b) and 3(c), the value of DGD is 0.5 and 1.0 ps/km respectively from the given figures. It is clear that with the increase in the value of DGD, the parameter mismatch increases and greatly affecting the chaotic synchronization.
Fig.4 Synchronization graphs with parameter of PMD at (a) 0; (b) 0.5 and (c) 1.0 ps/km including nonlinear effects

Full size|PPT slide

Figure 4 is the synchronization graph plotted in the presence of PMD and nonlinear effects simultaneously, while the values of DGD are 0, 0.5 and 1.0 ps/km are kept in Figs. 4(a), 4(b) and 4(c) respectively. By analyzing these graphs, we can say that polarization mode dispersion and nonlinear effects are major degrading sources and severely affect the chaotic signal during transmission through the optical fiber.
Crosstalk in the DWDM is important degrading factor, and it is induced by the presence of FWM mixing and SRS. In 2-channel DWDM systems, FWM is not apparent because for FWM at least 3 signals should be presented, so the crosstalk in this system is presented mainly due to SRS [16]. Figure 5 is the frequency spectrum of our system that shows the power leakage from the channel 2 to channel 1, while the channels 1 and 2 are at frequency of 193.1 and 193.2 THz respectively.
Fig.5 Frequency spectrum showing SRS

Full size|PPT slide

Correlation coefficient

To determine the chaotic synchronization, correlation coefficient (CC) [15] can be defined in Eq. (9).
CC=[PT(t)-PT(t)][PR(t)-PR(t)][PT(t)-PT(t)]2[PR(t)-PR(t)]2,
where, PT(t) and PR(t) are the transmitted and received powers of the chaotic signal. The value of CC varies from -1 to 1. The more the value approaches to 1, the better the synchronization. CC graphs are plotted against various length of the optical fiber at different value of PMD. We have plotted the values CCs factor versus distance at different values of DGD with a bit rate of 5 Gbit/s. The main reason of adopting this performance comparison methodology is that due to the statistical properties of the optical chaos (that are usually not Gaussian) and hidden nature of a digital message in secure transmission schemes, therefore it is not advisable to directly calculate BER of the chaotic transmission.
In Fig. 6(a), we have only considered the PMD effects and neglected the nonlinear effects, while in Fig. 6(b) the nonlinear effects are also included. DGD of 0, 0.5 and 1.0 ps/km are shown here with marker color of red, yellow and green respectively. It can be observed from Fig. 6 that at the smaller distances, e.g., at 10 km, the higher values of DGD is effecting the chaotic synchronization in small extent but with the increase in distance correlation coefficient values decreases results in more degradation in system performances. The combined effects of PMD and nonlinearities are making chaotic synchronization worse than the alone effects of PMD on chaotic synchronization. In both the cases of DGD 0 and 0.5 ps/km at 100 km transmission distance, we have observed a clear degradation in CC values. However, for the higher values of DGD such as 1 ps/km, the transmission performance is highly degraded and it is hard to differentiate and estimate the signal quality at this point for both the cases.
Fig.6 Correlation coefficient versus distance. (a) Only PMD effects; (b) both PMD and nonlinear effects

Full size|PPT slide

Conclusions

In this paper, we have numerically investigated the effects of PMD and nonlinearities on the DWDM chaotic system. We have designed a 2-channel DWDM system, in which channels are transmitting at channel spacing set by international standards. We have analyzed the effects of PMD and nonlinearities at various distance and DGD. It is observed that with the increase in DGD and distance of the installed fiber, these effects will highly degraded the signal quality, which result in the increase of parameter mismatch between the transmitter and receiver. Chaos based encryption is a promising technology, although it is still under experimental setup. PMD is a stochastic process and it can be compensated using polarization-tracking devices, but these techniques are not highly recommendable. Nonlinearities can be mitigated by increasing channel spacing, decreasing power and using different signal processing methods to avert the effects of self phase modulation, cross phase modulation and SRS.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Prof. Dr. Bernhard Schmauss for his ever-lasting support during the research stay at University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany. We will also thank Mr. Fazal Abbas, Department of Physics, IIU Islamabad, Pakistan for the value discussion and his guidance.
1
Pecora L M, Carroll T L. Synchronization in chaotic systems. Physical Review Letters, 1990, 64(8): 821-824

DOI PMID

2
Donati S, Mirasso C R. Introduction to the feature section on optical chaos and applications to cryptography. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2002, 38(9): 1138-1140

DOI

3
Argyris A, Syvridis D, Larger L, Annovazzi-Lodi V, Colet P, Fischer I, Garcı´a-Ojalvo J, Mirasso C R, Pesquera L, Shore K A.Chaos-based communications at high bit rates using commercial fibre-optic links. Nature, 2005, 438(7066): 343-346

DOI

4
Ali S Z, Islam M K, Zafrullah M. Effect of parametric variation on generation and enhancement of chaos in erbium-doped fiber-ring lasers. Optical Engineering (Redondo Beach, Calif.), 2010, 49(10): 105002-1-105002-12

5
Zhang F, Chu P L, Lai R, Chen G R. Dual-wavelength chaos generation and synchronisation in erbium-doped fiber lasers. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 2005, 17(3): 549-551

DOI

6
Zhang J Z, Wang A B, Wang J F, Wang Y C. Wavelength division multiplexing of chaotic secure and fiber-optic communications. Optics Express, 2009, 17(8): 6357-6367

DOI PMID

7
Luo L G, Chu P L. Optical secure communications with chaotic erbium-doped fiber lasers. Journal of the Optical Society of America B, Optical Physics, 1998, 15(10): 2524-2530

DOI

8
Menyuk C R, Marks B S. Interaction of polarization mode dispersion and nonlinearity in optical fiber transmission systems. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2006, 24(7): 2806-2826

DOI

9
Zhang F, Chu P L. Effect of transmission fiber on chaos communication system based on erbium-doped fiber ring laser. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2003, 21(12): 3334-3343

DOI

10
Argyris A, Grivas E, Bogris A, Syvridis D. Transmission effects in wavelength division multiplexed chaotic optical communication systems. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2010, 28(21): 3107-3114

11
Asif R, Lin C Y, Holtmannspoetter M, Schmauss B. Multi-span digital non-linear compensation for dual-polarization quadrature phase shift keying long-haul communication systems. Optics Communications, 2012, 285(7): 1814-1818

DOI

12
Asif R, Lin C Y, Schmauss B. Impact of channel baudrate on logarithmic digital backward propagation in DP-QPSK system with uncompensated transmission links. Optics Communications, 2011, 284(24): 5673-5677

DOI

13
Asif R, Usman M, Lin C Y, Schmauss B. Application of a digital non-linear compensation algorithm for evaluating the performance of root-raised-cosine pulses in 112 Gbit/s DP-QPSK transmission. Journal of Optics, 2012, 14(9): 095402

DOI

14
Asif R, Lin C Y, Holtmannspoetter M, Schmauss B. Evaluation of correlative coding and DP-16QAM n-channel 112 Gbit/s coherent transmission: digital non-linear compensation perspective. Optics Express, 2013, 21(1): 781-788

DOI PMID

15
Agrawal G P. Nonlinear Fiber Optics. 3rd ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 2001

16
Pietrzyk S, Szczesny W, Marciniak M. Power penalty caused by stimulated Raman scattering in WDM systems. Journal of Telecommunications And Information Technology, 2000, 1(2): 52-58

Outlines

/