We then simulate the transistor at another two cases, where
= 0.08 nm and
= 0.10 nm as shown in Fig. 3(a). When
is increased, the cutoff region is extended, the saturate region is gradually distinct and the maximum normalized output power is improved as well. All these good trends are attributed to the fast transition of equilibrium displacement. Figure 3(b) shows the stable displacement of the arc as a function of the input control power. When the input optical power is in a low level, the greater displacement is realized by small wavelength detuning, and when the input optical power is in a high level, the greater displacement is realized by large wavelength detuning. In fact, the characteristic curve in Fig. 3(a) results from a comprehensive behavior between the shift of transmission spectrum and stable displacement. Thus, the characteristic curve can be optimized by the amount of wavelength detuning, but there is a compromise since the Pull-Back Instability [
12] will be induced to make the trace of the stable position of the arc more complicate when the wavelength detuning is large enough. To illustrate the performance of the optical transistor specifically, we assume the optical power of the control light is time-varying, of which the waveform is a sinusoid. Figure 3(c) demonstrates the output waveforms of the probe light when the input control light lies in the different optical power levels. When the power level is in the cutoff region (0<
<2 mW), the output power is attenuated to null. When the power level is in the saturation region (
>3 mW), the output optical power is up to the maximum but the magnitude of the sine waveform is diminished. When the power level is in the amplified region (2 mW<
<3 mW), the magnitude of the waveform is amplified perfectly.