Climate effects on performance of free space optical communication systems in Yemen

Abdulsalam G. ALKHOLIDI, Khalil S. ALTOWIJ

PDF(898 KB)
PDF(898 KB)
Front. Optoelectron. ›› 2014, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) : 91-101. DOI: 10.1007/s12200-014-0392-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Climate effects on performance of free space optical communication systems in Yemen

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Free space optical (FSO) communication has been considered as an alternative to radio relay link line-of-sight (LOS) communication systems. The total attenuation is a combination of atmospheric attenuation in the atmosphere and geometric losses. The purpose of this paper is to study the geometric loss versus link range (in km), divergence angle, transmitter aperture diameter, and receiver aperture diameter. Total attenuation versus low visibility, average visibility, beam divergence, link range and rainfall rate were presented in this paper. Atmospheric attenuation (in dB) and scattering coefficient (in km-1) for several Yemeni main cities were explored. The study was concentrated on received power versus low and average visibilities and link range. Series of related simulation results were illustrated and discussed in this paper about the climate effects on performance of FSO communication systems in Yemen.

Keywords

free space optics (FSO) / total attenuation / geometric losses / haze / fog / rain / receive power

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Abdulsalam G. ALKHOLIDI, Khalil S. ALTOWIJ. Climate effects on performance of free space optical communication systems in Yemen. Front Optoelec, 2014, 7(1): 91‒101 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12200-014-0392-8

References

[1]
AltowijK S, Alkholidi A, Hamam H. Effect of clear atmospheric turbulence on the quality of the free space optical communications in Yemen. Frontiers of Optoelectronics in China, 2010, 3(4): 423–428
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
AlkholidiA, AltowijK S. Effect of clear atmospheric turbulence on quality of free space optical communications in Western Asia. In: DasN, ed, Optical Communications Systems. Croatia: InTech, 2012
[3]
Norhanis AidaM, IslamM R, Al-KhateebW. Atmospheric effects on free space earth-to-satellite optical links in tropical climate. International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Applications, 2013, 3(1): 17–36
[4]
RouissatM, BorsaliA R, MohammadE.Free space optical channel characterization and modeling with focus on Algeria weather conditions. International Journal of Computer Network and Information Security, 2012, 4(3): 17–23
[5]
YangG, KhalighiM A, GhassemlooyZ, BourennaneS. Performance evaluation of receive-diversity free-space optical communications over correlated Gamma-Gamma fading channels. Applied Optics, 2013, 52(24): 5903–5911
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[6]
ZvanovecS, PerezJ, GhassemlooyZ, RajbhandariS, LibichJ. Route diversity analyses for free-space optical wireless links within turbulent scenarios. Optics Express, 2013, 21(6): 7641–7650
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7]
KumarN, RanaA K. Simulative analysis of various parameters on free space optical communication system. Journal of Optical Communications, 2013, 34(3): 237–241
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
FadhilH A, AmphawanA, ShamsuddinH A B, AbdT H, Al-KhafajiH M R, AljunidS A, AhmedN. Optimization of free space optics parameters: an optimum solution for bad weather conditions. Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 2013, 124(19): 3969–3973
[9]
Willebrand HA, GhumanB S. Fiber optic without fiber. Spectrum, IEEE, 2001, 38(8): 40–45
[10]
KimI I, KorevaarE. Availability of free space optics (FSO) and hybrid FSO/RF systems. In: Proceedings of Optical Wireless Communications IV, SPIE2001, 4530: 84–95
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
TangX. Polarisation shift keying modulation free-space optical communication systems. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Newcastle: University of Northumbria at Newcastle, 2012
[12]
MazinA. Atmospheric turbulence effect on free space optical communications. International Journal of Emerging Technology in Computational and Applied Sciences (IJETCAS), 2013, 5(4): 345–351
[13]
HemmatiH. Near-Earth Laser Communications. California: CRC Press, 2008
[14]
KimI I, McArthurB, KorevaarE J. Comparison of laser beam propagation at 785 nm and 1550 nm in fog and haze for optical wireless communications. In: Proceedings of Optical Wireless Communications III, SPIE. 2001, 4214: 26–37
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Civil Aviation and Meteorology Authority (CAMA) data recorded report, 2008

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(898 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/