Quality assessment method for geometrically distorted images

Abstract

The objective assessment of image quality is important for image processing, which has been paid much attention to in recent years. However, there were few reports about objective quality assessment methods for geometrically distorted images. Different from the routine image degradation processing (for example, noise addition, contrast change and lossy compression), the geometric distortion results in the changes of the spatial relationship of image pixels, which makes the traditional quality assessment algorithms, such as mean square error (MSE) and peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) failure to obtain expected assessment results. In this paper, a full reference image quality assessment algorithm is proposed specifically for the quality evaluation of geometrically distorted images. This assessment algorithm takes into account three key factors, such as distortion intensity, distortion change rate and line feature index for perceptual quality assessment of images. Experimental results in this study show that the proposed assessment algorithm not only is significantly better than those of the traditional objective assessment methods such as PSNR and structural similarity index measurement (SSIM), but also has significant correlation with human subjective assessment.

Keywords

image quality assessment / geometrical distortion / displacement vector field / line feature index / Hough transform

References

[1] Supriyanto E, Lau E X, Seow S C. Automatic image quality monitoring system for low cost ultrasound machine. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine (ITAB 2008), 2008, 183–186

[2] Nezhadarya E, Wang Z J, Ward R K. Image quality monitoring using spread spectrum watermarking. In: Proceedings of 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP 2009), 2009, 2233–2236

[3] Wang Z. Applications of objective image quality assessment methods. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2011, 28(6): 137–142

[4] Gupta P, Srivastava P, Bhardwaj S, Bhateja V. A modified PSNR metric based on HVS for quality assessment of color images. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Communication and Industrial Application (ICCIA), 2011, 1-4

[5] Wang Z, Bovik A C. A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2002, 9(3): 81–84

[6] Wang Z, Bovik A C, Sheikh H R, Simoncelli E P. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2004, 13(4): 600–612

[7] Xie R S, Zhou M, Huang C L, Li Y M. Anti-geometrical attacks image watermarking scheme based on template watermark. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Computer Network and Multimedia Technology (CNMT 2009), 2009, 1–4

[8] Kim H S, Lee H K. Invariant image watermark using zernike moments. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2003, 13(8): 766–775

[9] Mishra A, Jain A, Narwaria M, Agarwal C. An experimental study into objective quality assessment of watermarked images. International Journal of Image Processing, 2011, 5(2): 199–219

[10] Wang Z, Simoncelli E P. Translation insensitive image similarity in complex wavelet domain. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP’05), 2005, 573–576

[11] Sampat M P, Wang Z, Gupta S, Bovik A C, Markey M K. Complex wavelet structural similarity: a new image similarity index. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2009, 18(11): 2385–2401

[12] Setyawan I, Delannay D, Macq B M M, Lagendijk R L. Perceptual quality evaluation of geometrically distorted images using relevant geometric transformation modeling. In: Proceedings of SPIE Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents, 2003, 5020: 85–94

[13] D’Angelo A, Zhaoping L, Barni M. A full-reference quality metric for geometrically distorted images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2010, 19(4): 867–881

[14] D’Angelo A, Menegaz G, Barni M. Perceptual quality evaluation of geometric distortions in images. In: Proceedings of SPIE Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, 2007, 6492: 64920J-12

[15] Periaswamy S, Farid H. Medical image registration with partial data. Medical Image Analysis, 2006, 10(3): 452–464

[16] Ebling J, Scheuermann G. Clifford Fourier transform on vector fields. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2005, 11(4): 469–479

[17] Ji J, Chen G, Sun L. A novel Hough transform method for line detection by enhancing accumulator array. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2011, 32(11): 1503–1510

[18] Terrades O R, Valveny E. A new use of the Ridgelets transform for describing linear singularities in images. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2006, 27(6): 587–596

[19] Sheikh H R, Wang Z, Cormackl L, Bovik A C. Live image quality assessment databases release2. http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality/

[20] International Telecommunication Union. Subjective Video Quality Assesment Methods for Multimedia Applications. Recommendation P.910. Geneva, Switzerland, 1996

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Professor Zhenyu Yang for insightful comments as well as all the volunteers for participating in the MOS test.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg