data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84af8/84af8104f97213f8f3342f5d61bd3a72ad65603c" alt=""
Analyses and calculations of noise in optical coherence tomography systems
Xiaonong ZHU, Yanmei LIANG, Youxin MAO, Yaqing JIA, Yiheng LIU, Guoguang MU
Front. Optoelectron. ›› 2008, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (3-4) : 247-257.
Analyses and calculations of noise in optical coherence tomography systems
Significant progress has been made in the study of optical coherence tomography (OCT) - a non-invasive, high resolution, and in vivo diagnostic method for medical imaging applications. In this paper, the principles of noise analyses for OCT systems have been described. Comparisons are made of signal-to-noise ratios for both balanced and unbalanced detection schemes under the ideal no-stray light situation as well as the non-ideal situation where residual reflections and scatterings are presented. Numerical examples of noise calculation accompanied by detailed comparison of the main characteristics of both time-domain and frequency-domain OCT systems are also presented. It is shown that a larger dynamic range can be achieved for a Fourier-domain OCT system even under the circumstances of high-speed image acquisition. The main results presented in this paper should be useful for the development of high performance OCT systems.
optical coherence tomography (OCT) / noise analyses / sensitivity / signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)
[1] |
HuangD, SwansonE A, LinC P,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
SchmittJ M. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT): a review. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 1999, 5(4): 1205–1215
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
FercherA F, DrexlerW, HitzenbergerC K,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
De BoerJ F, MilnerT E, Van GemertM J C,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
OhJ-T, KimS-W. Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography for photoelasticity testing of glass/epoxy composites. Optics Express, 2003, 11(14): 1669–1676
|
[6] |
ChenZ P, MilnerT E, DaveD,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
ChenZ P, MilnerT E, SrinivasS,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
SchmittJ M, XiangS H, YungK M. Differential absorption imaging with optical coherence tomography. Journal of the Optical Society of American A, 1998, 15(9): 2288–2296
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
WojtkowskiM, BajraszewskiT, TargowskiP,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
JiaY Q, LiangY M, MuG G,
|
[11] |
LeitgebR, HitzenbergerC K, FercherA F. Performance of Fourier domain vs. time domain optical coherence tomography. Optics Express, 2003, 11(8): 889–894
|
[12] |
YunS H, TearneyG J, BoumaB E,
|
[13] |
MansuripurM. The Physical Principles of Magneto-optical Recording. London: Cambridge University Press, 1998, 295–306
|
[14] |
RollinsA M, IzattJ A. Optimal interferometer designs for optical coherence tomography. Optics Letters, 1999, 24(21): 1484–1486
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
PodoleanuA G. Unbalanced versus balanced operation in an optical coherence tomography system. Applied Optics, 2000, 39(1): 173–182
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
TakadaK. Noise in optical low-coherence reflectometry. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 1998, 34(7): 1098–1108
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
SchmittJ M, XiangS H, YungK M. Speckle in optical coherence tomography. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 1999, 4(1): 95–105
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
YunS H, TearneyG J, De BoerJ F,
|
[19] |
NassifN A, CenseB, ParkB H,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
WojtkowskiM, SrinivasanV J, KoT H,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
ChomaM A, SarunicM V, YangC,
|
[22] |
De BoerJ F, CenseB, ParkB H,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
HuberR, AdlerD C, FujimotoJ G. Buffered Fourier domain mode locking: unidirectional swept laser sources for optical coherence tomography imaging at 370,000 lines/s. Optics Letters, 2006, 31(20): 2975–2977
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |