Analyses and calculations of noise in optical coherence tomography systems
Xiaonong ZHU, Yanmei LIANG, Youxin MAO, Yaqing JIA, Yiheng LIU, Guoguang MU
Analyses and calculations of noise in optical coherence tomography systems
Significant progress has been made in the study of optical coherence tomography (OCT) - a non-invasive, high resolution, and in vivo diagnostic method for medical imaging applications. In this paper, the principles of noise analyses for OCT systems have been described. Comparisons are made of signal-to-noise ratios for both balanced and unbalanced detection schemes under the ideal no-stray light situation as well as the non-ideal situation where residual reflections and scatterings are presented. Numerical examples of noise calculation accompanied by detailed comparison of the main characteristics of both time-domain and frequency-domain OCT systems are also presented. It is shown that a larger dynamic range can be achieved for a Fourier-domain OCT system even under the circumstances of high-speed image acquisition. The main results presented in this paper should be useful for the development of high performance OCT systems.
optical coherence tomography (OCT) / noise analyses / sensitivity / signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)
[1] |
HuangD, SwansonE A, LinC P,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
SchmittJ M. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT): a review. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 1999, 5(4): 1205–1215
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
FercherA F, DrexlerW, HitzenbergerC K,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
De BoerJ F, MilnerT E, Van GemertM J C,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
OhJ-T, KimS-W. Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography for photoelasticity testing of glass/epoxy composites. Optics Express, 2003, 11(14): 1669–1676
|
[6] |
ChenZ P, MilnerT E, DaveD,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
ChenZ P, MilnerT E, SrinivasS,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
SchmittJ M, XiangS H, YungK M. Differential absorption imaging with optical coherence tomography. Journal of the Optical Society of American A, 1998, 15(9): 2288–2296
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
WojtkowskiM, BajraszewskiT, TargowskiP,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
JiaY Q, LiangY M, MuG G,
|
[11] |
LeitgebR, HitzenbergerC K, FercherA F. Performance of Fourier domain vs. time domain optical coherence tomography. Optics Express, 2003, 11(8): 889–894
|
[12] |
YunS H, TearneyG J, BoumaB E,
|
[13] |
MansuripurM. The Physical Principles of Magneto-optical Recording. London: Cambridge University Press, 1998, 295–306
|
[14] |
RollinsA M, IzattJ A. Optimal interferometer designs for optical coherence tomography. Optics Letters, 1999, 24(21): 1484–1486
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
PodoleanuA G. Unbalanced versus balanced operation in an optical coherence tomography system. Applied Optics, 2000, 39(1): 173–182
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
TakadaK. Noise in optical low-coherence reflectometry. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 1998, 34(7): 1098–1108
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
SchmittJ M, XiangS H, YungK M. Speckle in optical coherence tomography. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 1999, 4(1): 95–105
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
YunS H, TearneyG J, De BoerJ F,
|
[19] |
NassifN A, CenseB, ParkB H,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
WojtkowskiM, SrinivasanV J, KoT H,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
ChomaM A, SarunicM V, YangC,
|
[22] |
De BoerJ F, CenseB, ParkB H,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
HuberR, AdlerD C, FujimotoJ G. Buffered Fourier domain mode locking: unidirectional swept laser sources for optical coherence tomography imaging at 370,000 lines/s. Optics Letters, 2006, 31(20): 2975–2977
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |