A weighted DJP-MMD based deep transfer metric learning for the fault diagnosis of bearing under variable working conditions

Zengbing XU, Gaige DING, Yaxin NIE, Xiaoli SUN, Zhigang WANG

Front. Mech. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2) : 16.

PDF(4598 KB)
PDF(4598 KB)
Front. Mech. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2) : 16. DOI: 10.1007/s11465-025-0836-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A weighted DJP-MMD based deep transfer metric learning for the fault diagnosis of bearing under variable working conditions

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The change of working conditions not only makes the data distribution inconsistent, but also increases the diagnosis difficulty of fuzzy samples at the fault boundary. The traditional distance-based deep metric learning cannot effectively classify the fuzzy samples at the fault boundary. In the traditional transfer learning models, the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) and joint maximum mean discrepancy only increase the transferability of same-class samples, and neglect the discriminability of different-class samples across different domains. The discriminative joint probability MMD (DJP-MMD) increases the transferability of same-class samples and the discriminability of different-class samples across different domains, but it only considers the global transferability of all fault classes, ignoring the different transferability of each same fault class. Therefore, a Yu norm-based deep transfer metric learning based on weighted DJP-MMD is proposed to further improve the diagnosis accuracy of bearings under variable working conditions. The deep transfer metric learning model adopts the Yu norm-based similarity instead of the distance-based similarity to effectively classify the data samples, especially those at the fault boundary, and uses the weighted DJP-MMD to measure the data distribution discrepancy between the source and target domains to increase the transferability of each same-class samples and discriminability of different-class samples across different domains. Through the fault diagnosis analysis on bearings under variable working conditions, the diagnosis results demonstrate that the proposed deep transfer metric learning model can diagnose bearing faults with higher accuracy, stronger generalization and anti-noise capabilities compared with other fault diagnosis methods based on transfer learning.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Yu norm / weighted DJP-MMD / deep transfer metric learning / fault diagnosis / variable working conditions

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zengbing XU, Gaige DING, Yaxin NIE, Xiaoli SUN, Zhigang WANG. A weighted DJP-MMD based deep transfer metric learning for the fault diagnosis of bearing under variable working conditions. Front. Mech. Eng., 2025, 20(2): 16 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-025-0836-4

References

[1]
Jiang H K, Li C L, Li H X. An improved EEMD with multiwavelet packet for rotating machinery multi-fault diagnosis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2013, 36(2): 225–239
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Qin Y, Qian Q, Wang Y, Zhou J H. Intermediate distribution alignment and its application into mechanical fault transfer diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2022, 18(10): 7305–7315
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Li S, Ji J C, Feng K, Zhang K, Ni Q, Xu Y D. Neuro-fuzzy system-guided cross-modal zero-sample diagnostic framework using multisource heterogeneous noncontact sensing data. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2025, 33(1): 302–313
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Feng K, Ji J C, Ni Q. A novel gear fatigue monitoring indicator and its application to remaining useful life prediction for spur gear in intelligent manufacturing systems. International Journal of Fatigue, 2023, 168: 107459
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Feng K, Ji J C, Zhang Y C, Ni Q, Liu Z, Beer M. Digital twin-driven intelligent assessment of gear surface degradation. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2023, 186: 109896
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Wang J, Shao H D, Peng Y, Liu B. PSparseFormer: enhancing fault feature extraction based on parallel sparse self-attention and multiscale broadcast feed-forward block. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024, 11(13): 22982–22991
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Zhang W, Hao H S, Zhang Y W. State of charge prediction of lithium-ion batteries for electric aircraft with swin transformer. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2023, 12(3): 645–647
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Yan S, Shao H D, Wang X D, Wang J. Few-shot class-incremental learning for system-level fault diagnosis of wind turbine. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2024,
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Qin Y, Wu X G, Luo J. Data-model combined driven digital twin of life-cycle rolling bearing. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2022, 3(18): 1530–1540
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Li X Q, Jiang H K, Niu M G, Wang R X. An enhanced selective ensemble deep learning method for rolling bearing fault diagnosis with beetle antennae search algorithm. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2020, 142: 106752
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Shao H D, Jiang H K, Zhang H Z, Liang T C. Electric locomotive bearing fault diagnosis using a novel convolutional deep belief network. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2018, 65(3): 2727–2736
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Zhao K, Jiang H K, Li X Q, Wang R X. An optimal deep sparse autoencoder with gated recurrent unit for rolling bearing fault diagnosis. Measurement Science & Technology, 2020, 31(1): 015005
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Lei Y G, Yang B, Du Z J, Lv N. Deep transfer diagnosis method for machinery in big data era. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 55(7): 1–8
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Shao H D, Zhang X Y, Cheng J S, Yang Y. Intelligent fault diagnosis of bearing using enhanced deep transfer auto-encoder. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56(9): 84–90
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Zhou Y X, Dong Y N, Zhou H K, Tang G. Deep dynamic adaptive transfer network for rolling bearing fault diagnosis with considering cross-machine instance. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2021, 70: 1–11
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Wang R X, Jiang H K, Zhu K, Wang Y F, Liu C Q. A deep feature enhanced reinforcement learning method for rolling bearing fault diagnosis. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2022, 54: 101750
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Liu B, Li R L, Feng J F. A brief introduction to deep metric learning. CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems, 2019, 14(6): 1064–1072
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Li X J, Xu Z B, Xiong W, Wang Z G, Tan J J. Bearing fault diagnosis method based on deep metric learning. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(15): 25–31
[19]
Chen K Y, Zhang J Y, Chen S, Zhang S N. Deep metric learning for robust radar signal recognition. Digital Signal Processing, 2023, 137: 104017
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Li W Z, Zhou J W, Li X, Cao Y, Jin G. Few-shot object detection on aerial imagery via deep metric learning and knowledge inheritance. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2023, 122: 103397
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Biswas C, Ganguly D, Roy D, Bhattacharya U. Weakly supervised deep metric learning on discrete metric spaces for privacy-preserved clustering. Information Processing & Management, 2023, 60(1): 103109
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Xu Z B, Li X J, Lin H, Wang Z G, Peng T. Fault diagnosis of rolling bearing based on modified deep metric learning method. Shock and Vibration, 2021, 2021(1): 6635008
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Jia S Y, Deng Y F, Jun L, Du S C, Xie Z Y. Joint distribution adaptation with diverse feature aggregation: a new transfer learning framework for bearing diagnosis across different machines. Measurement, 2022, 187: 110332
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Wen H R, Guo W, Li X. A novel deep clustering network using multi-representation autoencoder and adversarial learning for large cross-domain fault diagnosis of rolling bearings. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 225: 120066
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Li X, Yu S P, Lei Y G, Li N P, Yang B. Dynamic vision-based machinery fault diagnosis with cross-modality feature alignment. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2024, 11(10): 2068–2081
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Li X, Zhang W, Li X, Hao H S. Partial domain adaptation in remaining useful life prediction with incomplete target data. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2024, 29(3): 1903–1913
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Zhu Y Y, Pei Y, Wang A Q, Xie B, Qian Z. A partial domain adaptation scheme based on weighted adversarial nets with improved CBAM for fault diagnosis of wind turbine gearbox. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 125: 106674
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Chu L X, Li Q, Yang B R, Chen L, Shen C Q, Wang D. Exploring the essence of compound fault diagnosis: a novel multi-label domain adaptation method and its application to bearings. Heliyon, 2023, 9(3): e14545
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Wu Z H, Jiang H K, Wang X, Zhu H X. Knowledge correlation graph-guided multi-source interaction domain adaptation network for rotating machinery fault diagnosis. ISA Transactions, 2023, 142: 663–682
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Chen J, Liu H. A multi-gradient hierarchical domain adaptation network for transfer diagnosis of bearing faults. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 225: 120139
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Li Y, Liu Y F, Zheng D R, Huang Y H, Tang Y L. Discriminable feature enhancement for unsupervised domain adaptation. Image and Vision Computing, 2023, 137: 104755
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Weng X X, Huang Y C, Li Y, Yang H, Yu S H. Unsupervised domain adaptation for crack detection. Automation in Construction, 2023, 153: 104939
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Wang S D, Rong R C, Gu Z F, Fujimoto J Y, Zhan X W, Xie Y, Xiao G H. Unsupervised domain adaptation for nuclei segmentation: adapting from hematoxylin & eosin stained slides to immunohistochemistry stained slides using a curriculum approach. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2023, 241: 107768
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Pereira L A M, da Silva Torres R. Semi-supervised transfer subspace for domain adaptation. Pattern Recognition, 2018, 75: 235–249
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Wang P, Li P F, Li Y M, Xu J, Jiang M F. Classification of histopathological whole slide images based on multiple weighted semi-supervised domain adaptation. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2022, 73: 103400
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Wang W, Wang H, Zhang Z X, Zhang C, Gao Y. Semi-supervised domain adaptation via Fredholm integral based kernel methods. Pattern Recognition, 2019, 85: 185–197
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
LongM S, Cao Y, WangJ M, JordanM. Learning transferable features with deep adaptation networks. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). JMLR, 2015, 97–105
[38]
LongM S, Zhu H, WangJ M, JordanM I. Deep transfer learning with joint adaptation networks. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning. JMLR, 2017, 2208–2217
[39]
SunB C, Saenko K. Deep CORAL: correlation alignment for deep domain adaptation. In: Hua G, Jégou H, eds. Computer Vision – ECCV 2016 Workshops. Cham: Springer, 2016, 443–450
[40]
Wen L, Gao L, Li X Y. A new deep transfer learning based on sparse auto-encoder for fault diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2019, 49(1): 136–144
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Guo L, Lei Y G, Xing S B, Yan T, Li N P. Deep convolutional transfer learning network: a new method for intelligent fault diagnosis of machines with unlabeled data. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2019, 66(9): 7316–7325
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Han T, Liu C, Yang W G, Jiang D X. Deep transfer network with joint distribution adaptation: a new intelligent fault diagnosis framework for industry application. ISA Transactions, 2020, 97: 269–281
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Ma P, Zhang H L, Fan W H, Wang C. A diagnosis framework based on domain adaptation for bearing fault diagnosis across diverse domains. ISA Transactions, 2020, 99: 465–478
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
ZhangW, Wu D R. Discriminative joint probability maximum mean discrepancy for domain adaptation. In: Proceedings of 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Glasgow: IEEE, 2020, 1–8
[45]
Yan S C, Xu D, Zhang B Y, Zhang H J, Yang Q, Lin S. Graph embedding and extensions: a general framework for dimensionality reduction. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2007, 29(1): 40–51
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Luukka P. Similarity classifier using similarity measure derived from Yu’s norms in classification of medical data sets. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2007, 37(8): 1133–1140
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Daga A P, Fasana A, Marchesiello S, Garibaldi L. The Politecnico di Torino rolling bearing test rig: description and analysis of open access data. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2019, 120: 252–273
CrossRef Google scholar

Nomenclature

Abbreviations
DA Domain adaptation
DBN Deep belief network
DDA Deep domain adaptation
DJP-MMD Discriminative joint probability maximum mean discrepancy
DML Deep metric learning
DNN Deep neural network
Euc_DML Euclidean distance-based deep metric learning
Euc_DTML Euclidean distance-based deep transfer metric learning
Euc_DTML(WDJP-MMD) Euclidean distance-based deep transfer metric learning model based on WDJP-MMD
JMMD Joint maximum mean discrepancy
JPD Joint probability discrepancy
JP-MMD Joint probability maximum mean discrepancy
MFA Marginal fisher analysis
MMD Maximum mean discrepancy
P Precision
R Recall
SGD Stochastic gradient descent
SNR Signal-to-noise ratio
TCA Transfer component analysis
TCA+DBN Deep belief network based on TCA
WDJP-MMD Weighted discriminative joint probability maximum mean discrepancy
Yu_DML Yu norm-based deep metric learning
Yu_DTML Yu norm-based deep transfer metric learning
Yu_DTML(DJP-MMD) Yu norm-based deep transfer metric learning model based on WDJP-MMD
Yu_DTML(JMMD) Yu norm-based deep transfer metric learning model based on JMMD
Yu_DTML(MMD) Yu norm-based deep transfer metric learning model based on MMD
Variables
b(m) Bias of the mth layer
C Number of fault classes
df( n)2( xi, xj) Square of the Euclidean distance between f(n)(xi) and f(n)(xj)
Ds Source domain
Dt Target domain
f(n)(xi) Corresponding features of xi at the nth layer
h(m) mth layer of the network
JYu_DML Loss function of deep metric learning model Yu_DML
JYu_DTML Loss function of deep transfer metric learning model Yu_DTML based on WDJP-MMD
LDA Loss function of deep domain adaptation
MD JPD between different classes across different domains
MT JPD on the same class between the source and target domains
M′T JPD on each same-class between the source and target domains
N Number of layers of DNN
P(n) Number of neurons in the nth layer
P(X|Y) Class conditional probability
P(Y) Class prior probability
Rd Real numbers of dimension d
Sb Inter-class separability
Sc Intra-class compactness
W(m) Learning weight of the mth layer
|| W(n )| |F2 Frobenius norm of the matrix W(n )
X Input data sample
Ys One-hot label matrix of the source domain dataset
Yt One-hot label matrix of a small number labeled samples of the target domain data set
ϕ Nonlinear activation function
α Free parameter used to balance the importance of intra-class compactness and inter-class separability
γ Tunable regularization parameter
μ Balance parameter
λc Transferability weight of the fault class c
β Weight of domain adaptation

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51775391).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(4598 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/