Analysis of 100 consecutive cases of resectable pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: clinicopathological characteristics and long-term outcomes

Yugang Cheng, Hanxiang Zhan, Lei Wang, Jianwei Xu, Guangyong Zhang, Zongli Zhang, Sanyuan Hu

PDF(197 KB)
PDF(197 KB)
Front. Med. ›› 2016, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4) : 444-450. DOI: 10.1007/s11684-016-0471-x
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Analysis of 100 consecutive cases of resectable pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: clinicopathological characteristics and long-term outcomes

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The incidence rate of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) has increased rapidly in recent years. However, the clinicopathological characteristics of pNENs are poorly understood. Medical records of patients who underwent surgery and were confirmed as pNENs by pathological examination from January 2003 to February 2015 in Qilu Hospital were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 100 patients, 36 males and 64 females, were included with a mean operation age of 46.26±13.41 years. Among the 100 cases, 76 had insulinomas and 24 had non-functional pNENs. Tumor size ranged from 0.5 cm to 9 cm, and the mean size was 2.20±1.40 cm. The percentages of TNM stages I, II, III, and IV tumors were 89.0%, 8.0%, 0.0%, and 3.0%, respectively. Based on the WHO classification, pNENs were classified into three grades: G1, G2, and G3. G1, G2, and G3 tumors were confirmed in 72.9%, 23.7%, and 3.4% patients, respectively. The positive rates of CgA and Syn immunohistochemical staining were 94.5% (69/73) and 100% (74/74), respectively. Compared with insulinoma, non-functional pNENs have larger tumor sizes, more advanced TNM staging, a higher Ki-67 index, and a higher rate of liver metastasis (P<0.05). In conclusion, pNENs are heterogeneous tumors with varying clinical manifestations, diverse tumor biological characteristics, and different prognoses. Non-functional pNENs present a more aggressive behavioral model and have poorer prognosis than functional pNENs.

Keywords

pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms / clinicopathological characteristic / Ki-67 / liver metastasis / outcomes

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yugang Cheng, Hanxiang Zhan, Lei Wang, Jianwei Xu, Guangyong Zhang, Zongli Zhang, Sanyuan Hu. Analysis of 100 consecutive cases of resectable pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: clinicopathological characteristics and long-term outcomes. Front. Med., 2016, 10(4): 444‒450 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-016-0471-x

References

[1]
Zhang J, Francois R, Iyer R, Seshadri M, Zajac-Kaye M, Hochwald SN. Current understanding of the molecular biology of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013; 105(14): 1005–1017
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[2]
Khagi S, Saif MW. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: targeting the molecular basis of disease. Curr Opin Oncol 2015; 27(1): 38–43
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[3]
Metz DC, Jensen RT. Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: pancreatic endocrine tumors. Gastroenterology 2008; 135(5): 1469–1492
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
Vinik AI. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endocr Pract 2014; 20(11):1222–1230
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[5]
Öberg K, Eriksson B. Endocrine tumours of the pancreas. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2005; 19(5): 753–781
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[6]
Zhao YP, Zhan HX, Zhang TP, Cong L, Dai MH, Liao Q, Cai LX. Surgical management of patients with insulinomas: result of 292 cases in a single institution. J Surg Oncol 2011; 103(2): 169–174
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7]
Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, Dagohoy C, Leary C, Mares JE, Abdalla EK, Fleming JB, Vauthey JN, Rashid A, Evans DB. One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26(18): 3063–3072
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[8]
Valle JW, Eatock M, Clueit B, Gabriel Z, Ferdinand R, Mitchell S. A systematic review of non-surgical treatments for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Cancer Treat Rev 2014; 40(3): 376–389
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[9]
D’Haese JG, Tosolini C, Ceyhan GO, Kong B, Esposito I, Michalski CW, Kleeff J. Update on surgical treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(38): 13893–13898
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[10]
Rossi RE, Massironi S, Conte D, Peracchi M. Therapy for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Ann Transl Med 2014; 2(1): 8
Pubmed
[11]
Bosman F, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Thelse ND. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System. Lyon, France: IARC Press, 2010
[12]
Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (7 ed). Chicago: Springer, 2010
[13]
Rindi G, Klöppel G, Alhman H, Caplin M, Couvelard A, de Herder WW, Erikssson B, Falchetti A, Falconi M, Komminoth P, Körner M, Lopes JM, McNicol AM, Nilsson O, Perren A, Scarpa A, Scoazec JY, Wiedenmann B; all other Frascati Consensus Conference participants; European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS). TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 2006; 449(4): 395–401
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[14]
Falconi M, Bartsch DK, Eriksson B, Klöppel G, Lopes JM, O’Connor JM, Salazar R, Taal BG, Vullierme MP, O’Toole D; Barcelona Consensus Conference participants. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system: well-differentiated pancreatic non-functioning tumors. Neuroendocrinology 2012; 95(2): 120–134
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[15]
Jensen RT, Cadiot G, Brandi ML, de Herder WW, Kaltsas G, Komminoth P, Scoazec JY, Salazar R, Sauvanet A, Kianmanesh R; Barcelona Consensus Conference participants. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms: functional pancreatic endocrine tumor syndromes. Neuroendocrinology 2012; 95(2): 98–119
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[16]
Kulke MH, Anthony LB, Bushnell DL, de Herder WW, Goldsmith SJ, Klimstra DS, Marx SJ, Pasieka JL, Pommier RF, Yao JC, Jensen RT; North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (NANETS). NANETS treatment guidelines: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach and pancreas. Pancreas 2010; 39(6): 735–752
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17]
Oberg K, Knigge U, Kwekkeboom D, Perren A; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Neuroendocrine gastro-entero-pancreatic tumors: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2012; 23 (Suppl 7):vii124–130
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[18]
Ramage JK, Ahmed A, Ardill J, Bax N, Breen DJ, Caplin ME, Corrie P, Davar J, Davies AH, Lewington V, Meyer T, Newell-Price J, Poston G, Reed N, Rockall A, Steward W, Thakker RV, Toubanakis C, Valle J, Verbeke C, Grossman AB; UK and Ireland Neuroendocrine Tumour Society. Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (including carcinoid) tumours (NETs). Gut 2012; 61(1): 6–32
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[19]
Janson ET, Sorbye H, Welin S, Federspiel B, Grønbæk H, Hellman P, Ladekarl M, Langer SW, Mortensen J, Schalin-Jäntti C, Sundin A, Sundlöv A, Thiis-Evensen E, Knigge U. Nordic guidelines 2014 for diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Acta Oncol 2014; 53(10): 1284–1297
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[20]
Singh S, Dey C, Kennecke H, Kocha W, Maroun J, Metrakos P, Mukhtar T, Pasieka J, Rayson D, Rowsell C, Sideris L, Wong R, Law C. Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: guidelines from a Canadian National Expert Group. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22(8): 2685–2699
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[21]
Scarpa A, Mantovani W, Capelli P, Beghelli S, Boninsegna L, Bettini R, Panzuto F, Pederzoli P, delle Fave G,Falconi M. Pancreatic endocrine tumors: improved TNM staging and histopathological grading permit a clinically efficient prognostic stratification of patients. Mod Pathol 2010; 23(6): 824–833
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[22]
Strosberg JR, Cheema A, Weber J, Han G, Coppola D, Kvols LK. Prognostic validity of a novel American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Classification for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29(22): 3044–3049
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[23]
Rindi G, Falconi M, Klersy C, Albarello L, Boninsegna L, Buchler MW, Capella C, Caplin M, Couvelard A, Doglioni C, Delle Fave G, Fischer L, Fusai G, de Herder WW, Jann H, Komminoth P, de Krijger RR, La Rosa S, Luong TV, Pape U, Perren A, Ruszniewski P, Scarpa A, Schmitt A, Solcia E, Wiedenmann B. TNM staging of neoplasms of the endocrine pancreas: results from a large international cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012; 104(10): 764–777
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[24]
Zerbi A, Falconi M, Rindi G, Delle Fave G, Tomassetti P, Pasquali C, Capitanio V, Boninsegna L, Di Carlo V; AISP-Network Study Group. Clinicopathological features of pancreatic endocrine tumors: a prospective multicenter study in Italy of 297 sporadic cases. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105(6): 1421–1429
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[25]
Fischer L, Kleeff J, Esposito I, Hinz U, Zimmermann A, Friess H, Büchler MW. Clinical outcome and long-term survival in 118 consecutive patients with neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas. Br J Surg 2008; 95(5): 627–635
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[26]
Singh S, Law C. Chromogranin A: a sensitive biomarker for the detection and post-treatment monitoring of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 6(3): 313–334
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[27]
Wang YH, Yang QC, Lin Y, Xue L, Chen MH, Chen J. Chromogranin A as a marker for diagnosis, treatment, and survival in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm. Medicine (Baltimore) 2014; 93(27): e247
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[28]
Oberg K. Circulating biomarkers in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Endocr Relat Cancer 2011; 18(Suppl 1): S17–S25
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (No. ZR2013HQ049).

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Yugang Cheng, Hanxiang Zhan, Lei Wang, Jianwei Xu, Guangyong Zhang, Zongli Zhang, and Sanyuan Hu declare that they have no conflict of interest. This study was approved by the authors’ institutional review board and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards and the Declaration of Helsinki.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2016 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(197 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/