Anatomy and embryology of umbilicus in newborns: a review and clinical correlations

Abstract

Umbilicus is considered a mirror of the abdomen in newborns. Despite its importance, the umbilicus has been stated in literature and textbooks as discrete subjects with many body systems, such as the urinary, digestive, and cardiovascular ones. This article aimed to address the basic knowledge of the umbilicus in relation to clinical disorders under one integrated topic to aid physicians and surgeons in assessing newborns and infants. The umbilicus appears as early as the fourth week of fetal life when the folding of the embryonic plate occurs. The umbilicus appears initially as a primitive umbilical ring on the ventral aspect of the body. The primitive umbilicus contains the connecting stalk, umbilical vessels, vitelline duct and vessels, allantois, and loop of the intestine. Changes occur to form the definitive cord, which contains three umbilical vessels, namely, “one vein and two arteries,” embedded in Wharton’s jelly. After birth, the umbilical vessels inside the body obliterate and gradually form ligaments. Congenital disorders at the umbilicus include herniation, bleeding, and discharge of mucous, urine, or feces. Some of these disorders necessitate emergent surgical interference, whereas others may be managed conservatively. The umbilicus has many embryological remnants. Thus, the umbilicus is prone to various clinical disorders. Detecting these disorders as early as possible is essential to prevent or minimize possible complications.

Keywords

anatomy / embryology / newborns / umbilicus

References

[1] Tamilselvan K, Mohan A, Cheslyn-Curtis S, Eisenhut M. Persistent Umbilical Discharge from an Omphalomesenteric Duct Cyst Containing Gastric Mucosa. Case Rep Pediatr, 2012; 2012: 482185

[2] Abhyankar A, Lander AD. Umbilical disorders. Surgery (Oxford) 2004; 22(9): 214–217

[3] Shaw WW, Aston SJ, Zide BM. Reconstruction of the trunk. In: McCarthy JG. Plastic Surgery. Vol. 6. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1990. 3675–3796

[4] Marconi F. Reconstruction of the umbilicus: a simple technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 95(6): 1115–1117

[5] Fawkner-Corbett D, Nicholson JA, Bullen T, Cross P, Bailey D, Scott MH. Anatomical variation in the position of the umbilicus and the implications for laparoscopic surgery. Int J Surg 2010; 8(7): 540–578

[6] Du-Plessis DJ. A Synopsis of Surgical Anatomy. 11th ed. Bristol: John Wright and Son Ltd., 1975

[7] Smith T. Fundamentals of Anesthesia. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009

[8] Williams AM, Brain JL. The normal position of the umbilicus in the newborn: an aid to improving the cosmetic result in exomphalos major. J Pediatr Surg 2001; 36(7): 1045–1046

[9] Snell R. Clinical Anatomy by Regions. 9th ed. Lippincott, 2012

[10] Sellers J, Newman JH. Disinfection of the umbilicus for abdominal surgery. Lancet 1971; 298(7737): 1276–1278

[11] April EW. Anatomy: the National Medical Series for Independent Study. 2nd ed. A Wily medical publication, 1990

[12] Hegazy AA. Clinical Embryology for Medical Students and Postgraduate Doctors. Berlin: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing, 2014

[13] Schoenwolf GC, Bleyl SB, Brauer PR, Francis-West PH. Larsens Human Embryology. 5th ed. Churchill Livingstone, 2015

[14] Sadler TW. Langman’s Medical Embryology. 13th ed. Baltimore, 2015

[15] Steding G. The Anatomy of the Human Embryo: Scanning Electron-Microscopic Atlas. Karger, Basel, 2008

[16] Khati NJ, Enquist EG, Javitt MC. Imaging of the umbilicus and periumbilical region. Radiographics 1998; 18(2): 413–431

[17] Sinnatamby CS. Last’s Anatomy: Regional and Applied. 11th ed. Churchill Livingstone, 2006

[18] Merkle EM, Gilkeson RC. Remnants of fetal circulation: appearance on MDCT in adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185(2): 541–549

[19] Razvi S, Murphy R, Shlasko E, Cunningham-Rundles C. Delayed separation of the umbilical cord attributable to urachal anomalies. Pediatrics 2001; 108(2): 493–494

[20] Joseph T, Lander AD. Childhood hernias related to the umbilicus. Surgery 2005; 23(9): 326–327

[21] Poenaru D. Disorders of the umbilicus in infants and children: A consensus statement of the Canadian Association of Paediatric Surgeons. Paediatr Child Health 2001; 6(6): 312–313

[22] Poddar R, Hartley L. Exomphalos and gastroschisis. BJA: CEACCP 2009; 9(2): 48–51

[23] Durakbasa CU, Okur H, Mutus HM, Bas A, Ozen MA, Sehiralti V, Tosyali AN, Zemheri IE. Symptomatic omphalomesenteric duct remnants in children. Pediatr Int 2010; 52(3): 480–484

[24] Morresey PR. Umbilical Problems. Focus on the first year of life proceedings/2014. Available at: http://www.aaep.org/custdocs/5%20Morresey%20-%20Umbilical%20Problems.pdf

[25] Farhat AS, Mohammadzadeh A. Comparison between two and twenty-four hours salt powder in treatment of infant umbilical granuloma. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2008; 10(4): 267–269

[26] Nagar H. Umbilical granuloma: a new approach to an old problem. Pediatr Surg Int 2001; 17(7): 513–514

[27] Pierce BT, Dance VD, Wagner RK, Apodaca CC, Nielsen PE, Calhoun BC. Perinatal outcome following fetal single umbilical artery diagnosis. J Matern Fetal Med 2001; 10(1): 59–63

[28] Jones KL, Benirschke K, Chambers CD. Gastroschisis: etiology and developmental pathogenesis. Clin Genet 2009; 75(4): 322–325

[29] Kravitz H. Temperature of the umbilicus. J Pediatr 1966; 68(3): 418–422

[30] Cameron GS, Lau GYP. The umbilicus as a site for temporary colostomy in infants. J Pediatr Surg 1982; 17(4): 362–364

Acknowledgments

No external funding was provided.

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Abdelmonem A. Hegazy declares that he has no conflict of interest. This manuscript is a review article and does not involve a research protocol requiring approval by the relevant institutional review board or ethics committee. All diagrams were made by the author.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2016 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg