Introduction
The prevalence of fatty liver disease is estimated to be 5%-18% in Asia and 20%-30% in Western societies [
1-
7]. An early and simple form of fatty liver disease is hepatic steatosis, which is characterized by accumulation of triglyceride (TG)-rich lipid droplets (LDs) within hepatocytes, but without hepatic inflammation or evidence of liver injury. Steatosis is diagnosed if hepatic TG content exceeds the 95th percentile for healthy individuals (i.e.,>55 mg per g of liver) or when cytoplasmic LDs exist in more than 5% of hepatocytes [
8,
9]. The etiology of hepatic steatosis is multifactorial and involves genetic determinants [
10] as well as lifestyle or environmental factors, such as overnutrition, alcohol consumption, virus infection, drugs, or altered immune function. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common fatty liver disease. NAFLD covers a full spectrum of liver pathologies, including hepatic steatosis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and cirrhosis. Simple hepatic steatosis is relatively benign; however, a small proportion of subjects with steatosis develop NASH, which may progress to hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis, or cancer [
11]. The absolute number of patients with these advanced liver abnormalities is estimated to be large because obesity is the most predominant cause of NAFLD [
1-
7], and obesity has been increasing alarmingly worldwide. In this work, we reviewed the molecular mechanisms of NAFLD, with focus on hepatic steatosis associated with obesity.
Hepatic TG metabolism in obesity-associated NAFLD
The liver plays a central role in lipid metabolism. Hepatic steatosis arises from an imbalance between TG formation and utilization. The free fatty acids (FFAs) used for hepatic TG formation are derived from three sources (Fig. 1): (1) diet, (2)
de novo lipogenesis (DNL), and (3) adipose tissue lipolysis. About 60% of hepatic TG accumulated in the livers of NAFLD patients is derived from FFAs mobilized from peripheral adipose depots, 25% from DNL, and the remaining 15% from dietary lipids [
12], which indicates that dysregulation of adipose lipolysis and hepatic DNL plays major roles in the pathogenesis of NAFLD. DNL normally occurs in the postprandial state and is stimulated by elevated blood glucose and insulin; lipolysis occurs in the fasting state; is induced by catecholamines, natriuretic peptides, and glucagon; and suppressed by insulin [
13]. Therefore, disturbance of the endocrine system also directly contributes to the development and progression of NAFLD.
Increased hepatic fatty acid uptake
After eating, dietary lipids are packaged into chylomicrons as TGs and cholesterol esters and transported into the blood circulation. Chylomicron-TGs are then hydrolyzed by lipoprotein lipase localized at the luminal surface of tissue capillaries, releasing FFAs to adipose tissue for storage and other tissue for oxidation. Approximately 20% of chylomicron-derived FFAs are delivered to the liver [
14]. In the fasting state, a decline of insulin level stimulates adipocyte TG hydrolysis to mobilize FFAs for use by nonadipose tissue, including the liver. However, in the insulin-resistant state, which is a condition often associated with central obesity, adipocyte lipolysis increases regardless of nutritional fluctuations, leading to the release of abundant FFAs into the blood [
12]. In the liver, several membrane-bound proteins are responsible for transporting circulating FFAs into hepatocytes, including fatty acid transporter protein (FATP)-2 [
15], FATP-5 [
16], fatty acid translocase (FAT/CD36) [
17-
19], caveolins [
20,
21], fatty acid binding proteins (FABP)-1, FABP-4, and FABP-5 [
22,
23]. Upregulation of several FFA transporters is associated with increased insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis in NAFLD patients [
24-
27]. The expression levels of many FFA transporters are regulated by insulin and nuclear receptors, such as liver X receptor (LXR) [
28,
29], farnesoid X receptor (FXR) [
30], pregnane X receptor (PXR) [
31], peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α, and PPAR-γ [
32] (see Table 1 for the functions and alterations of these nuclear receptors and other regulators in hepatic steatosis). Therefore, targeting these nuclear receptors is an attractive approach for NAFLD prevention.
Enhanced hepatic de novo lipogenesis
Although increased circulating levels of FFAs play a predominant role in driving hepatic steatosis in obesity, locally synthesized FFAs from glucose (DNL) also contribute a significant proportion (about one-third) of the total TGs deposited in the livers of NAFLD patients [
12] (Fig. 1). In healthy subjects, DNL postprandially increases, which is mainly mediated by two transcriptional factors: sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c) [
33], which is activated by insulin; and carbohydrate response element binding protein (ChREBP), which is activated by glucose [
34,
35]. SREBP-1c activation by insulin during carbohydrate feeding involves two mechanisms: transcriptional upregulation and proteolytic cleavage activation of SREBP-1c precursor [
36-
38]. SREBP-1c precursor resides at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane where it interacts with SREBP cleavage-activating protein (SCAP) [
39,
40]. SCAP interacts with insulin-induced gene (INSIG) protein, which retains the SREBP-1c/SCAP complex in the ER when cellular cholesterol is high [
41]. After cholesterol depletion or in the presence of insulin, SCAP dissociates from INSIG, and the SREBP-1c/SCAP complex is transported to the Golgi apparatus by coat protein II vesicles [
42,
43]. In the Golgi apparatus, SREBP-1c precursor is sequentially cleaved by two proteases, namely, S1P and S2P, releasing its N terminus as the mature active form of the transcription factor to enter the nucleus and turn on lipogenic gene expression [
44]. Paradoxically, in the insulin-resistant liver, lipogenesis is selectively enhanced despite resistance to insulin-mediated suppression of gluconeogenesis [
45]. Emerging evidence suggests that ER stress activates the cleavage of insulin-independent SREBP-1c [
46,
47]. Inhibition of ER stress in obese rodents decreases SREBP-1c activation and lipogenesis and improves hepatic steatosis and insulin sensitivity [
48]. This observation may explain the paradoxical stimulation of lipogenesis in insulin-resistant liver.
ChREBP localizes in the cytoplasm when cellular glucose is low and enters into the nucleus when cellular glucose is high [
35]. Glucose activates ChREBP [
35,
49] by stimulating its expression, regulating its translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, and promoting its binding to carbohydrate responsive element (ChoRE). ChoRE is present in the promoters of glycolytic and lipogenic genes, such as acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1, fatty acid synthase (FAS), and stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD-1) [
35,
50,
51]. ChREBP-mediated activation of lipogenic genes may increase TG synthesis. Consistently, NAFLD patients display increased hepatic enzyme activities for TG synthesis, including glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase, 1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase, and diacylglycerol acyltransferase [
52-
54]. In NAFLD patients, DNL is augmented under fasting condition and does not further increase postprandially, suggesting that the liver of these individuals may have reached its maximal capacity in DNL [
12,
55].
Altered hepatic TG secretion
Hepatic TGs can be packaged as a constituent of very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) for secretion into the blood circulation. The assembly of VLDL particles occurs in the ER and involves interactions between lipids and apolipoprotein (apo) B100 (apoB100) [
56]. This process is facilitated by microsomal TG transfer protein (MTP), an ER resident protein that has both apoB100 binding and lipid transfer activities [
57]. The rate of VLDL secretion depends not only on the availability of hepatic lipids, particularly TGs, but also on the overall capacity of hepatocytes for VLDL assembly. When TGs are unavailable, lipid-free apoB100 is degraded via proteasomal and nonproteasomal pathways [
58]. Insulin plays an important role in regulating the capacity of VLDL assembly. In response to insulin action, apoB100 is degraded [
58], and MTP expression is suppressed [
59]. Impaired VLDL assembly and secretion may cause excessive lipid accumulation in the liver, as seen in patients with hypobetalipoproteinemia because of apoB mutation [
60] or abetalipoproteinemia because of MTP mutations [
61]. However, NAFLD is characterized by increased expression of hepatic apoB100 and MTP [
62,
63]. NAFLD is also characterized by overproduction of VLDL particles, which may reflect enhanced lipid availability from fat lipolysis and hepatic DNL, and the failure of insulin to suppress VLDL production. Augmented VLDL secretion may be a compensatory mechanism to protect the liver from steatosis under overnutritional conditions. However, under the condition of prolonged overnutrition, this mechanism may fail to counter-balance chronic increases in liver TG synthesis, thereby resulting in hepatic steatosis.
Roles of hepatic TG hydrolysis and fatty acid oxidation in NAFLD
Another metabolic pathway for the disposal of hepatic TGs is fatty acid β-oxidation, which mainly occurs in the mitochondria. Excessive TGs are stored in cytosolic LDs, and these stored TGs have to be mobilized via hydrolytic process to release FFAs for utilization. TG hydrolysis requires functional hydrolases. The deletion of adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) directly induces hepatic steatosis [
64]. The full activation of ATGL requires a coactivator named comparative gene identification-58 (CGI-58) (also known as α/β-hydrolase domain-containing 5 or Abhd5) [
65]. Although CGI-58 may function via activating ATGL, liver-specific deletion of CGI-58 relative to ATGL in mice causes a more advanced NAFLD, including NASH and hepatic fibrosis [
66]. Liver-specific ATGL knockout mice develop simple steatosis but not NASH and fibrosis [
64]. Therefore, CGI-58 plays a vital role in the development and progression of NAFLD. Future studies are required to delineate the underlying molecular mechanisms.
Human genetic studies have identified certain genetic variations in human patatin-like phospholipase domain containing protein 3 (PNPLA3) gene that predispose susceptibility to NAFLD and disease severity [
67,
68]. PNPLA3 is a homolog of ATGL (also known as PNPLA2). Interestingly, these PNPLA3 mutants are sequestered to the cytosolic LDs where they may interfere with LD homeostasis [
69]. Collectively, animal and human studies support a critical role of intracellular LD homeostasis in regulating hepatic fat content.
FFAs released from cytosolic LDs may enter the mitochondria for oxidation. This oxidative process progressively shortens FFAs to generate two carbon acetyl-CoAs. Acetyl-CoAs either condense into ketone bodies as energy substrates for extrahepatic tissue or enter the tricarboxylic acid cycle for ATP production. Other oxidative pathways of FFAs include peroxisomal-β-oxidation and microsomal-ω-oxidation. In general, short- (<C8), medium- (C8-C12), and long-chain (C12-C20) fatty acids are oxidized within the mitochondria, whereas very-long-chain (>C20) fatty acids are oxidized within peroxisomes. In diabetes or during FFA overload, cytochrome P450-dependent ω-oxidation of long-chain fatty acids occurs in the ER, which induces reactive oxygen species production and lipid peroxidation [
70]. In the fed state, FFA oxidation is inhibited while DNL is activated, allowing storage and distribution of lipids. This phenomenon occurs because malonyl-CoA generated in the lipogenic pathway is a potent allosteric inhibitor of carnitine palmitoyl transferase I [
71], a rate-limiting enzyme in transporting acyl-CoA from cytosol into the mitochondria. During fasting or caloric restriction, members of the sirtuin (SIRT) gene family, especially SIRT1 and SIRT3 [
72,
73], are increased to promote fatty acid oxidation by activating PPAR-α [
74], PPAR-γ coactivator 1α [
75], and their target genes that are mainly involved in mitochondrial and peroxisomal fatty acid oxidation. Hepatocyte-specific deletion of SIRT1 impairs PPAR-α signaling and decreases fatty acid β-oxidation, resulting in hepatic steatosis [
76,
77], whereas SIRT1 overexpression attenuates hepatic steatosis and ameliorates systemic insulin resistance in obese mice [
78]. SIRT1 also reduces hepatic lipogenesis by inhibiting SREBP-1c [
79], increases energy expenditure by inducing fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 21 [
80], and promotes lipolysis in adipocytes via FOXO1-mediated increase in ATGL expression [
81]. Degradation of SIRT1 protein contributes to hepatic steatosis in obese mice [
82]. FGF21 is a hepatocyte-derived hormone that exhibits many beneficial effects on lipid and energy metabolism, such as increasing fat utilization and lipid excretion, inhibiting hepatic steatosis, stimulating energy expenditure, and reducing body weight [
83-
87]. FGF21 is an atypical member of the FGF family that shows no undesirable tumor-promoting effects and therefore has a potential for therapeutic use in diabetes and obesity-related metabolic disorders.
PPARs are nuclear receptors critically implicated in both fatty acid oxidation and lipid synthesis. The PPAR family has three members, namely, PPAR-α (NR1C1), PPAR-γ (NR1C3), and PPAR-δ (NP1C2) [
88]. Each PPAR is encoded by a different gene and activates its target genes after binding to the PPAR-response elements of target genes as a heterodimer with retinoid X receptor<FootNote>
See comment in PubMed Commons below
</FootNote>. PPAR-α is predominantly expressed in tissue capable of oxidizing fatty acids, such as liver, heart, muscle, brown adipose tissue, and kidney. FFAs are believed to be the endogenous ligands for PPARs. Synthetic PPAR-α ligands, such as fibrates, have been approved for clinical use in subjects with hypertriglyceridemia. PPAR-α activation results in increased fatty acid uptake and oxidation through mitochondrial- and peroxisomal-β oxidation. Similar with PPAR-α, PPAR-δ is also a potent metabolic regulator with actions on fat, macrophage, skeletal muscle, liver, and heart. PPAR-δ activation enhances fatty acid transport and oxidation, improves glucose homeostasis, reduces macrophage inflammatory responses, and increases circulating high-density lipoprotein levels [
89]. PPAR-γ is a master regulator of adipogenesis, thereby playing an important role in lipid storage. PPAR-γ is most highly expressed in adipocytes, macrophages, muscle, and to a less degree in hepatocytes. Activation of PPAR-γ by the agonist thiazolidinediones has multiple benefits, including improving insulin resistance, reducing circulating levels of FFAs and aminotransferases, and suppressing hepatic inflammation and fibrosis [
90,
91]. Improved insulin sensitivity is expected to reduce lipid deposition in the liver.
Interestingly, rodent and human studies suggest that lipid disposal through β-oxidation or export has limited effect on TG accumulation in NAFLD [
92]. The DNA-binding activity and expression levels of PPAR-α in human hepatocytes are 10-fold less than those observed in mice; several PPAR target genes, such as acyl-CoA oxidase, which is the rate-limiting enzyme in peroxisomal fatty acid β-oxidation, do not respond to PPAR ligands in humans as they do in rodent models [
93]. Additionally, alterations in rates of hepatic fatty acid oxidation in humans with NAFLD are not conclusive, and both increased and decreased fatty acid oxidation have been reported [
94,
95]. In agreement, a clinical study showed that two common pharmacological drugs used to treat hypertriglyceridemia (i.e., fibrate and nicotic acid derivatives that target fatty acid oxidation and hepatic VLDL secretion) exert no effects on hepatic TG content in obesity-associated NAFLD [
96].
miRNAs and fatty liver
Recently, a class of small noncoding microRNAs (miRNAs or miRs) has emerged as crucial regulators of hepatic lipid homeostasis [
97]. miR-122 consists of ~70% of the total miRNAs in the liver and is a completely conserved liver-specific miRNA in vertebrates [
98,
99]. miR-122 increases the hepatic expression levels of several lipogenic genes, such as FAS, ACC, and SCD-1 [
100,
101]. Patients with simple steatosis or NASH display significantly elevated serum levels of miR-122 [
102]. The hepatic expression of miR-122 is reduced in NASH compared with simple steatosis in humans [
102,
103]. Decreased hepatic levels of miR-122 have been proposed to contribute to liver inflammation during NAFLD progression. In agreement, liver-specific deletion of miR-122 causes NASH, hepatic fibrosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma [
104,
105].
Other miRNAs, such as miR-33 [
106], miR-34 [
107], miR-370 [
108], and miR-613 [
109], also affect hepatic expression levels of genes related to DNL regulation or fatty acid oxidation. Emerging evidence suggests that dysregulation of these miRNAs is associated with liver inflammation, cirrhosis, and cancer [
96]. The miRNAs known to participate in multiple aspects of hepatic TG metabolism and their alterations in obesity-associated NAFLD are summarized in Table 1.
Autophagy and fatty liver
Autophagy is a catabolic process that targets the constituents of a cell, such as damaged organelles and LDs to lysosomes, for degradation. Under physiological conditions, autophagy participates in the basal turnover of lipids and other cellular components. In response to environmental cues such as prolonged starvation, autophagic turnover increases to maintain cellular energy homeostasis. A recent study has demonstrated that downregulation of lipophagy, a lipid-specific macroautophagy, promotes steatosis in the liver of genetic and dietary obese mice [
110]. In addition, hepatic autophagy is decreased in obese mice [
111]. Several mechanisms may account for this decline in autophagy [
112]: (1) increased degradation of autophagy-related gene-7 by an obesity-induced calcium-dependent protease calpain-2 [
111]; (2) hyperactivation of the mammalian/mechanistic target of rapamycin signaling, a major autophagy inhibitory pathway, by increased amino acid flux into hepatocytes following overnutrition [
113]; and (3) a defect in lysosomal acidification and reduction in cathepsin L that impairs substrate degradation in autolysosomes [
114]. Cathepsin B, D, and L expression levels are significantly decreased in the liver of NAFLD patients [
115]. Obesity-associated alterations in other signaling pathways may also regulate autophagy to influence NAFLD development and progression, particularly pathways involved in energy sensing of cells, such as AMPK and PI3K.
Adipose dysfunction and hepatic steatosis
Even though the causes for NAFLD may include drugs, genetic disorders, parenteral nutritions, etc., the vast majority of NAFLD cases are seen in the obese population [
1-
7]. The strong positive association between obese adipose tissue and NAFLD is supported by several lines of evidence: (1) epidemiological data show that the prevalence of hepatic steatosis is 70%-90% in obese adults, which is much higher than 20%-30% in general population [
1-
7]; (2) quantitative metabolic studies in humans reveal that about 60% of hepatic lipids in NAFLD patients originated from adipose-derived FFAs [
12]; and (3) weight-loss bariatric surgeries are, so far, the most efficient way in reducing hepatic TG content in obese subjects [
116]. In addition, diet-induced weight loss or increased physical activity also reduces hepatic TG [
117]. The fact that patients with lipodystrophy exhibit severe hepatic steatosis [
53] supports the important role of adipose tissue in regulating the pathogenesis of NAFLD.
Adipose tissue lipolysis
Recent years have witnessed tremendous progresses in identifying enzymes and factors that regulate fat lipolysis [
118]. We now know that adipose lipolysis is mediated by three distinct lipases, namely ATGL [
119], hormone sensitive lipase (HSL) [
120] and monoacylglycerol lipase (MGL) [
121]. Under basal lipolytic conditions, hydrophobic TGs in LDs are surrounded by a phospholipid monolayer and unphosphorylated perilipin 1 (PLIN1), a LD coat protein [
122]. PLIN1 interacts with CGI-58 in adipocytes [
123,
124]. Unphosphorylated PLIN1 was hypothesized to prevent ATGL activation by sequestering its co-activator, CGI-58 [
125,
126]. Upon stimulation of lipolysis, PLIN1 phosphorylation causes dissociation of CGI-58 with PLIN1, allowing CGI-58 to bind and activate ATGL [
126]. ATGL activation is negatively regulated by G
0/G
1 switch gene 2 protein [
127,
128]. In addition, lipolysis is influenced by intracellular proteins controlling the size of LDs, such as members of the cell-death inducing DNA fragmentation factor-α-like effector family [
129-
131]. Major positive regulators of human lipolysis include catecholamines and natriuretic peptides, whereas the major antilipolytic factor is insulin.
Under physiological conditions, adipose lipolysis is regulated by fasting/fed states. In the fasting state, FFA mobilization is stimulated because of reduced insulin and increased adrenaline and noradrenaline in the blood. On the surface of adipocyte, the binding of adrenaline and noradrenaline to their specific β-adrenergic receptors (G-protein-coupled receptors) causes G-proteins to interact with adenylyl cyclase, generating cAMP from ATP substrate. cAMP subsequently activates protein kinase A (PKA), leading to PLIN1 phosphorylation and initiation of a lipolytic cascade [
13,
126,
132,
133]. In addition, PKA-mediated phosphorylation of HSL causes the rapid activation and translocation of HSL from the cytosol to the surface of LDs where HSL interacts with the phoshorylated PLIN1 and gains access to diacylglycerol substrate generated by ATGL [
132,
133]. After eating, increased plasma insulin suppresses lipolysis to promote storage of dietary lipids. Binding of insulin to its receptor induces autophosphorylation of insulin receptor, leading to phosphorylation of Akt via a signaling cascade. Akt then activates phosphodiesterase 3B, resulting in conversion of cAMP to 5′-AMP and inactivation of PKA, which reduces HSL and PLIN1 phosphorylation and suppresses lipolysis. Akt-independent pathway may also mediate the antilipolytic activity of insulin [
134]. During expression and enzymatic activity of MGL, the lipase that cleaves the last fatty acyl chain from monoacylglycerols does not seem to be affected by hormonal signals or the nutritional status [
13].
Enhanced lipolysis and insulin resistance in obesity-associated NAFLD
Alterations in adipose lipolysis are expected to influence NAFLD by controlling blood levels of FFAs. Consistently, a recent exciting human genetic study has identified the critical role of HSL in regulating lipid and energy metabolism, as well as in the development of hepatic steatosis and type 2 diabetes [
135]. In addition, studies of rare genetic diseases have established PLIN1, ATGL, and its coactivator, CGI-58, as key players in regulating adipose release of FFAs and “ectopic” fat deposition, including hepatic steatosis [
65,
136-
138].
Insulin resistance is a pathological condition in which cells fail to respond to the normal actions of insulin. Insulin resistance is characterized by reduced efficiency of insulin to suppress hepatic glucose production and to stimulate glucose uptake in insulin-sensitive tissue. Epidemiological studies have shown that insulin resistance is more frequently seen in overweight individuals [
139,
140]. A study examined the correlation between body fat and “ectopic” lipid deposition in the liver and skeletal muscle of 314 subjects, in which both insulin resistance and fat mass positively correlate with liver fat [
141]. Additionally, subjects with mutations in Akt2, a key kinase in the insulin-signaling pathway, exhibit insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis [
142]. These observations demonstrate the key role of insulin resistance in hepatic steatosis and underlie the development of insulin sensitizers for the control of this liver disorder. Indeed, clinical improvement on insulin sensitivity by use of pioglitazone, a synthetic PPAR-γ agonist, lowers blood insulin levels and decreases hepatic fat [
143].
Unanswered questions
Although NAFLDs are often associated with obesity, some obese subjects do not develop insulin resistance and NAFLD. About 35% of obese adults display normal intrahepatic TG content [
4], and 2%-50% of obese adults are “metabolically normal” [
144-
150]. Molecular mechanisms for these observations are largely unknown. Although genetic landscape may shape the susceptibility of individuals to develop hepatic steatosis under various conditions [
10], the interaction of genetics and epigenetics with environmental/metabolic cues to modulate NAFLD etiology is unknown. A recent study about the role of gut microbiota in NAFLD [
151] further increases the complexity of molecular dissection of the pathogenesis of NAFLD. More importantly, we still do not understand the detailed mechanisms responsible for the progression of hepatic steatosis to NASH and fibrosis. Although “two hits” hypothesis was proposed to explain the etiology of NASH [
152], the “two hits” likely include multiple hits. These “multiple hits” perhaps determine the fate of the disease, especially in obese individuals. Limiting these “hits” may not only slow down the progression but also induce the regression of NAFLD.
Conclusions
Chronic overnutrition and sedentary lifestyle drive the epidemic of central obesity in modern societies. As a result, the body has to adjust its metabolism and signaling pathways to compensate for these environmental cues. The duration of this compensatory period may depend on the interactions of multiple factors. When the causes continue to exist, compensatory mechanisms will fail, leading to common metabolic disorders, including insulin resistance and NAFLD. This failure in compensation at least includes lipotoxicity-associated damage of insulin signaling, mitochondrial overload, oxidative stress, and dysregulation of lipid transport and metabolism in adipose and nonadipose tissue. The crosstalk between fat and liver is obvious. Preventive and therapeutic approaches should focus on integrated pathophysiology of organ-organ communications.
Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg