Comparison of surgical indications for hysterectomy by age and approach in 4653 Chinese women
Jingjing Jiang, Ting Ding, Aiyue Luo, Yunping Lu, Ding Ma, Shixuan Wang
Comparison of surgical indications for hysterectomy by age and approach in 4653 Chinese women
Approximately one million hysterectomies are performed each year in China. However, national data regarding the indications and the surgical approaches for hysterectomy are lacking. The aim of this study was to examine the surgical indications for hysterectomy in different age groups and the relative merits of different surgical approaches for hysterectomy in Chinese women. Clinical data from 4653 cases of hysterectomy performed in Tongji Hospital from 2004 to 2009 were analysed. Hysterectomy was most commonly performed among women aged 40--49 years (2299; 49.4%). Overall, colporrhagia and abdominal pain were the two most common indications for hysterectomy. The most common indications by age groups were as follows: malignant ovarian tumour,<20 years; malignant uterine tumour, 20--29 and 30--39 years; uterine myoma, 40--49 and 50--59 years; and uterine prolapse, 60--69 and>70 years. The proportion of malignant aetiology also varied by age, being the highest in women aged<20 years (75.0%) and the lowest in those aged 40--49 years (19.9%). Approximately 35% women who had hysterectomies also had concomitant bilateral oophorectomy. The lowest rate of oophorectomy occurred in women aged 30--39 years (15.8%), whereas the highest rate was in those aged 50--59 years (75.9%). The abdominal surgical approach was used in 84% of all hysterectomies. Surgeries using the vaginal approach required a significantly shorter operating time (118 min average) than all other approaches (P<0.05). Both the amount of bleeding and the blood transfusion volume required were smaller in vaginal approaches, with no significant differences between the others. The surgical approaches used were also related to the scope of surgery. Both the surgical indications and the rates of bilateral oophorectomy varied by age. In terms of both operating time and the amount of bleeding and blood transfusion volume required, the vaginal approach was superior to all other surgical approaches.
hysterectomy / surgical indications / surgical approach / bilateral oophorectomy
[1] |
Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Morrow B, Podgornik MN, Brett KM, Marchbanks PA. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol2008; 198: 34.e1-e7
|
[2] |
Clarke-Pearson DL, Geller EJ. Complications of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol2013; 121(3): 654-673
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Schaffer JI, Word A. Hysterectomy—still a useful operation. N Engl J Med2002; 347(17): 1360-1362
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Kuppermann M, Learman LA, Schembri M, Gregorich SE, Jackson RA, Jacoby A, Lewis J, Washington AE. Contributions of hysterectomy and uterus-preserving surgery to health-related quality of life. Obstet Gynecol2013; 122(1): 15-25
Pubmed
|
[5] |
Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, van Voorst S, Mol BW, Kluivers KB. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2009; (3): CD003677
Pubmed
|
[6] |
Baskett TF. Hysterectomy: evolution and trends. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol2005; 19(3): 295-305
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Shifren JL, Avis NE. Surgical menopause: effects on psychological well-being and sexuality. Menopause2007; 14(3 Pt 2 Suppl. 1): 586-591
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Lieng M, Lomo AB, Qvigstad E. Long-term outcomes following laparoscopic and abdominal supracervical hysterectomies. Obstet Gynecol Int 2010; 2010: 989127
|
[9] |
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol2009; 114(5): 1156-1158
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Liu H, Lu D, Wang L, Shi G, Song H, Clarke J. Robotic surgery for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2012; 2: CD008978
Pubmed
|
[11] |
O’Neill M, Moran PS, Teljeur C, O’Sullivan OE, O’Reilly BA, Hewitt M, Flattery M, Ryan M. Robot-assisted hysterectomy compared to open and laparoscopic approaches: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet2013; 287(5): 907-918
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, Burke WM, Lu YS, Neugut AI, Herzog TJ, Hershman DL. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA2013; 309(7): 689-698
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Parker WH. Ovarian conservation versus bilateral oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease. Menopause2014; 21(2): 192-194
Pubmed
|
[14] |
Borghese B, Chapron C. Treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med2007; 356(21): 2218-2219, author reply 2219
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Carlson KJ, Nichols DH, Schiff I. Indications for hysterectomy. N Engl J Med1993; 328(12): 856-860
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Merrill RM. Hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 1997 through 2005. Med Sci Monit2008; 14(1): CR24-CR31
Pubmed
|
[17] |
Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L, Garry R. Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ2005; 330(7506): 1478
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Hanwright PJ, Mioton LM, Thomassee MS, Bilimoria KY, Van Arsdale J, Brill E, Kim JY. Risk profiles and outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol2013; 121(4): 781-787
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Hickey M, Ambekar M, Hammond I. Should the ovaries be removed or retained at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease? Hum Reprod Update2010; 16(2): 131-141
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Perera HK, Ananth CV, Richards CA, Neugut AI, Lewin SN, Lu YS, Herzog TJ, Hershman DL, Wright JD. Variation in ovarian conservation in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications. Obstet Gynecol2013; 121(4): 717-726
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Korbly NB, Kassis NC, Good MM, Richardson ML, Book NM, Yip S, Saguan D, Gross C, Evans J, Lopes VV, Harvie HS, Sung VW. Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol2013; 209: 470.e1-e6
|
[22] |
Shuster LT, Gostout BS, Grossardt BR, Rocca WA. Prophylactic oophorectomy in premenopausal women and long-term health. Menopause Int2008; 14(3): 111-116
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Özdemir S, Celik C, Görkemli H, Kiyici A, Kaya B. Compared effects of surgical and natural menopause on climacteric symptoms, osteoporosis, and metabolic syndrome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet2009; 106(1): 57-61
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Henderson VW, Sherwin BB. Surgical versus natural menopause: cognitive issues. Menopause2007; 14(3 Pt 2 Suppl. 1): 572-579
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Jacoby VL, Vittinghoff E, Nakagawa S, Jackson R, Richter HE, Chan J, Kuppermann M. Factors associated with undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign conditions. Obstet Gynecol2009; 113(6): 1259-1267
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |