A road-map for energy-neutral wastewater treatment plants of the future based on compact technologies (including MBBR)

Abstract

In the paper concepts for wastewater treatment of the future are discussed by the use of a) one flow diagram based on established, compact, proven technologies (i.e. nitrification/denitrification for N-removal in the mainstream) and b) one flow diagram based on emerging, compact technologies (i.e. de-ammonification in the main stream).The latter (b) will give an energy-neutral wastewater treatment plant, while this cannot be guaranteed for the first one (a). The example flow diagrams show plant concepts that a) minimize energy consumption by using compact biological and physical/chemical processes combined in an optimal way, for instance by using moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) processes for biodegradation and high-rate particle separation processes, and de-ammonification processes for N-removal and b)maximize energy (biogas) production through digestion by using wastewater treatment processes that minimize biodegradation of the sludge (prior to digestion) and pretreatment of the sludge prior to digestion by thermal hydrolysis. The treatment plant of the future should produce a water quality (for instance bathing water quality) that is sufficient for reuse of some kind (toilet flushing, urban use, irrigation etc.). The paper outlines compact water reclamation processes based on ozonation in combination with coagulation as pretreatment before ceramic membrane filtration.

In the paper concepts for domestic wastewater treatment plants of the future are discussed by the use of a) one flow diagram based on established, compact, proven technologies (i.e. nitrification/denitrification for N-removal in the mainstream) and b) one flow diagram based on emerging, compact technologies (i.e. de-ammonification in the main stream).The latter (b) will give an energy-neutral wastewater treatment plant, while this cannot be guaranteed for the first one (a). The example flow diagrams show plant concepts that a) minimize energy consumption by using compact biological and physical/chemical processes combined in an optimal way, for instance by using moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) processes for biodegradation and high-rate particle separation processes, and de-ammonification processes for N-removal and b)maximize energy (biogas) production through digestion by using wastewater treatment processes that minimize biodegradation of the sludge (prior to digestion) and pretreatment of the sludge prior to digestion by thermal hydrolysis. The treatment plant of the future should produce a water quality (for instance bathing water quality) that is sufficient for reuse of some kind (toilet flushing, urban use, irrigation etc.). The paper outlines compact water reclamation processes based on ozonation in combination with coagulation as pretreatment before ceramic membrane filtration.

Key words： China concept WWTP; Energy-neutrality; De-ammonification; moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR)

References

1 Qu J, Wang K, Wang H, Yu G, Ke B, Yu H. Ideas for Building the Concept Wastewater Treatment Plants in China. In: Proceedings from DSD International Conference 2014 (DSDIC 2014), Hong Kong, 2014

2 Kroiss H, Svardal K.Energiebedarf von Abwasserreinigungsanlagen, Österreichische Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaft, 2009, 61(11–12): 170–177

3 Balmér P, Hellström D. Performance indicators for wastewater treatment plants. Water Science and Technology, 2012, 65(7): 1304–1310

PMID

4 Stinson B, Murthy S, Bott C, Wett B, Al-Omari A, Bowden G, Mokhtari Y, De Clippeleir H. Roadmap Toward Energy Neutrality & Chemical Optimization at Enhanced Nutrient Removal Facilities. In: Proceedings of WEF/IWA Nutrient Removal and Recovery Conference, Vancouver, 2013

5 Wett B, Buchauer K, Fimml C. Energy self-sufficiency as a feasible concept for wastewater treatment systems. In: Proceedings of IWA Leading Edge Technology conference, Singapore, 2007

6 Nutrient Challenge W E R F. Deammonification, Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF) 2014, http://www.werf.org

7 Balmat J L. Biochemical oxidation of various particulate fractions of sewage. Sewage and Industrial Wastes, 1957, 29(7): 757

8 Heukelekian H, Balmat J L. Chemical composition of the particulate fractions of domestic sewage. Sewage and Industrial Wastes, 1959, 31(4): 413

9 Wang X, Jin P, Zhao H, Meng L. Classification of contaminants and treatability evaluation of domestic wastewater. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 2007, 1(1): 57–62

10 Melin E, Helness H, Ødegaard H. Dissolved air flotation of bioreactor effluent using low dosages of polymer and iron. In: Hahn H H, Hoffmann E, Ødegaard H, eds. Chemical Water and Wastewater Treatment VII. London: IWA Publishing, 2002, 261–272

11 Melin E, Helness H, Kenakkala T, Ødegaard H. High-rate wastewater treatment based on moving bed biofilm reactor, polymer coagulation and flotation. In: Hahn H H, Hoffmann E, Ødegaard H, eds. Chemical Water and Wastewater Treatment VIII. London: IWA Publishing, 2004, 39–48

12 Helness H, Melin E, Ulgenes Y, Järvinen P, Rasmussen V, Ødegaard H. High-rate wastewater treatment combining a moving bed biofilm reactor and enhanced particle separation. Water Science and Technology, 2005, 52(10–11): 117–127

PMID

13 Ødegaard H. Sludge minimization technologies—an overview. Water Science and Technology, 2004, 49(10): 31–40

PMID

14 Barlindhaug J, Ødegaard H. Thermal hydrolysate as a carbon source for denitrification. Water Science and Technology, 1996, 33(12): 99–108

15 Ødegaard H, Rusten B, Westrum T. A new moving bed biofilm reactor—Applications and results. Water Science and Technology, 1994, 29(10–11): 157–165

16 Ødegaard H. Compact wastewater treatment with MBBR. In: Proceedings International DSD Conference on Sustainable Stormwater and Wastewater Management, Hong Kong, 2014http://www.dsdic2014.hk/program2.html

17 Christensson M. Moving on with MBBR. In: Proceedings WEF/IWA Conference on Nutrient Recovery and Management, Miami, 2011

18 Ødegaard H, Gisvold B, Strickland J. The influence of carrier size and shape in the moving bed biofilm process. Water Science and Technology, 2000, 41(4–5): 383–392

19 Ødegaard H. Norwegian experiences with chemical treatment of raw wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 1992, 25(12): 255–264

20 Nedland K T. Personal communication, 2002

21 Helness H, Sjøvold F. Degradation of particulate organic matter in a moving bed biofilm reactor. SINTEF report STF66 F01104, 2001, SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway (restricted)

22 Ødegaard H, Rusten B, Wessman F. State of the art in Europe of the moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) process. In: Proceedings WEFTEC Conference, New Orleans, 2004

23 Hem L, Rusten B, Ødegaard H. Nitrification in a moving bed biofilm reactor. Water Research, 1994, 28(6): 1425–1433

24 Rusten B, Hem L, Ødegaard H. Nitrification of municipal wastewater in novel moving bed biofilm reactors. Water Environment Research, 1995, 67(1): 75–86

25 Rusten B, Hem L, Ødegaard H. Nitrogen removal from dilute wastewater in cold climate using novel moving bed biofilm reactors. Water Environment Research, 1995, 67(1): 65–74

26 Rusten B, Paulsrud B. Environmental technology verification of a biofilm process for high efficiency nitrogen removal from wastewater. In: CD Proceedings of the WEFTEC 2009, Orlando, 2009, 4378–4391.

27 Rosenwinkel K, Cornelius A. Deammonification in the Moving-Bed Process for the Treatment of Wastewater with High Ammonia Content. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2005, 28(1): 49–52

28 Jardin N, Hennerkes J. Full-scale experience with the deammonification process to treat high strength sludge water — a case study. Water Science and Technology, 2012, 65(3): 447–455

PMID

29 Christensson M, Ekström S, Andersson Chan A, Le Vaillant E, Lemaire R. Experience from start-ups of the first ANITA Mox plants. Water Science and Technology, 2013, 67(12): 2677–2684

PMID

30 Cema G. Comparative study on different Anammox systems. PhD Thesis, KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 2009. http://rymd.lwr.kth.se/Publikationer/PDF_Files/LWR_PHD_1053.pdf

31 Cema G, Trela J, Plaza E, Surmacz-Górska J. Partial nitritation/Anammox process—from two-step towards one-step process. In: Proceedings IWA World Water Congress, Montreal, 2010

32 Fernández I, Dosta J, Fajardo C, Campos J L, Mosquera-Corral A, Méndez R. Short- and long-term effects of ammonium and nitrite on the Anammox process. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 95(Suppl1): S170–S174

PMID

33 Lotti T, van der Star W R L, Kleerebezem R, Lubello C, van Loosdrecht M C M. The effect of nitrite inhibition on the anammox process. Water Research, 2012, 46(8): 2559–2569

PMID

34 Plaza E. Personal communication, 2015

35 Veuillet F, Lacroix S, Bausseron A, Gonidec E, Ochoa J, Christensson M, Lemaire R. IFAS ANITA™Mox process—A new perspective for advanced N-removal. In: Proceedings of 9th IWA conference on Biofilm Reactors, Paris, 2013

36 Veuillet F, Bausseron A, Gonidec E, Chastrusse S, Christensson M, Lemaire R, Ochoa J. ANITA™Mox Deammonification Process: Possibility to Handle High COD Level Using the IFAS Configuration. In: Proceedings of IWA Water Congress & Exhibition, Lisbon, 2014

37 Trela J, Malovanyy A, Yang J, Plaza E, Trojanowicz K, Sultana R, Wilén B M, Persson F, Baresel C. De-ammonification. Synthesis report 2014 R&D at Hammarby Sjöstadsverk. IVL-report No. B 2210 2014. http://www.ivl.se/download/18.1acdfdc8146d949da6d43f9/1413294579949/B2210+Synthesis+report+2014.pdf

38 Lemaire R, Veuillet F, Zozor P, Stefansdottir D, Christensson M, Skonieczny T, Ochoa J. Mainstream deammonification using ANITA™Mox Process. In: Proceedings IWA conference on Nutrient Removal and Recovery, Gdansk, Poland, 2015

39 Malovanyy A, Yang J, Trela J, Plaza E. Combination of UASB reactor and partial nitritation/Anammox MBBR for municipal wastewater treatment. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 180: 144–153

PMID

40 Piculell M, Christensson M, Jönsson K, Welander T. Partial nitrification in MBBRs for mainstream deammonification with thin biofilms and alternating feed supply. Water Science and Technology, 2016, 73(6): 1253–1260

41 Falås P, Baillon-Dhumez A, Andersen H R, Ledin A, la Cour Jansen J. Suspended biofilm carrier and activated sludge removal of acidic pharmaceuticals. Water Research, 2012, 46(4): 1167–1175

PMID

42 Falås P, Longrée P, la Cour Jansen J, Siegrist H, Hollender J, Joss A. Micropollutant removal by attached and suspended growth in a hybrid biofilm-activated sludge process. Water Research, 2013, 47(13): 4498–4506

PMID

43 Ødegaard H, Cimbritz M, Christensson M, Dahl P C. Separation of biomass from moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs). In: Proceedings WEF/IWA Biofilm Reactor Technology Conference, Portland, 2010

44 Abegglen C, Joss A, Siegrist H. Spurenstoffe eliminieren: Kläranlagentechnik. Eawag News, 2009, 67: 25–27

45 EAWAG. Ozonung von gereinigtem Abwasser, Schlussbericht Pilotversuch Regensdorf. EAWAG, Dübendorf, Switzerland, 2009.https://www.micropoll.ch/dokumente/berichte/

46 Hollender J, Zimmermann S G, Koepke S, Krauss M, McArdell C S, Ort C, Singer H, von Gunten U, Siegrist H. Elimination of organic micropollutants in a municipal wastewater treatment plant upgraded with a full-scale post-ozonation followed by sand filtration. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(20): 7862–7869

PMID

47 Gimbel R, Panglisch S, Loi-Bruegger A, Hobby R, Lerch A, Strugholtz S. New Approaches in Particle Separation with UF/MF—Membranes in Water Treatment. In: Proceedings IWA conference on Particle Separation, Toulouse, 2007

48 Noguchi M. Application of MF ceramic membrane for water reclamation. In: Proceedings of 1st. Nagasaki University Membrane Workshop, Nagasaki, 2015

49 Liao Z, Panter K, Mills N, Huang O, Kleiven M, Yang X. Thermal hydrolysis pre-treatment for advanced anaerobic digestion for sludge treatment and disposal in large scale projects. In: Proceedings of International DSD Conference on Sustainable Stormwater and Wastewater Management, Hong Kong, 2014. http://www.dsdic2014.hk/program2.html

50 Panter K, Liao Z. Personal communication, 2015