A road-map for energy-neutral wastewater treatment plants of the future based on compact technologies (including MBBR)
Hallvard Ødegaard
A road-map for energy-neutral wastewater treatment plants of the future based on compact technologies (including MBBR)
In the paper concepts for wastewater treatment of the future are discussed by the use of a) one flow diagram based on established, compact, proven technologies (i.e. nitrification/denitrification for N-removal in the mainstream) and b) one flow diagram based on emerging, compact technologies (i.e. de-ammonification in the main stream).The latter (b) will give an energy-neutral wastewater treatment plant, while this cannot be guaranteed for the first one (a). The example flow diagrams show plant concepts that a) minimize energy consumption by using compact biological and physical/chemical processes combined in an optimal way, for instance by using moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) processes for biodegradation and high-rate particle separation processes, and de-ammonification processes for N-removal and b)maximize energy (biogas) production through digestion by using wastewater treatment processes that minimize biodegradation of the sludge (prior to digestion) and pretreatment of the sludge prior to digestion by thermal hydrolysis. The treatment plant of the future should produce a water quality (for instance bathing water quality) that is sufficient for reuse of some kind (toilet flushing, urban use, irrigation etc.). The paper outlines compact water reclamation processes based on ozonation in combination with coagulation as pretreatment before ceramic membrane filtration.
In the paper concepts for domestic wastewater treatment plants of the future are discussed by the use of a) one flow diagram based on established, compact, proven technologies (i.e. nitrification/denitrification for N-removal in the mainstream) and b) one flow diagram based on emerging, compact technologies (i.e. de-ammonification in the main stream).The latter (b) will give an energy-neutral wastewater treatment plant, while this cannot be guaranteed for the first one (a). The example flow diagrams show plant concepts that a) minimize energy consumption by using compact biological and physical/chemical processes combined in an optimal way, for instance by using moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) processes for biodegradation and high-rate particle separation processes, and de-ammonification processes for N-removal and b)maximize energy (biogas) production through digestion by using wastewater treatment processes that minimize biodegradation of the sludge (prior to digestion) and pretreatment of the sludge prior to digestion by thermal hydrolysis. The treatment plant of the future should produce a water quality (for instance bathing water quality) that is sufficient for reuse of some kind (toilet flushing, urban use, irrigation etc.). The paper outlines compact water reclamation processes based on ozonation in combination with coagulation as pretreatment before ceramic membrane filtration.
China concept WWTP / Energy-neutrality / De-ammonification / moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR)
[1] |
Qu J, Wang K, Wang H, Yu G, Ke B, Yu H. Ideas for Building the Concept Wastewater Treatment Plants in China. In: Proceedings from DSD International Conference 2014 (DSDIC 2014), Hong Kong, 2014
|
[2] |
Kroiss H, Svardal K.Energiebedarf von Abwasserreinigungsanlagen, Österreichische Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaft, 2009, 61(11–12): 170–177
|
[3] |
Balmér P, Hellström D. Performance indicators for wastewater treatment plants. Water Science and Technology, 2012, 65(7): 1304–1310
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Stinson B, Murthy S, Bott C, Wett B, Al-Omari A, Bowden G, Mokhtari Y, De Clippeleir H. Roadmap Toward Energy Neutrality & Chemical Optimization at Enhanced Nutrient Removal Facilities. In: Proceedings of WEF/IWA Nutrient Removal and Recovery Conference, Vancouver, 2013
|
[5] |
Wett B, Buchauer K, Fimml C. Energy self-sufficiency as a feasible concept for wastewater treatment systems. In: Proceedings of IWA Leading Edge Technology conference, Singapore, 2007
|
[6] |
Nutrient Challenge W E R F. Deammonification, Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF) 2014, http://www.werf.org
|
[7] |
Balmat J L. Biochemical oxidation of various particulate fractions of sewage. Sewage and Industrial Wastes, 1957, 29(7): 757
|
[8] |
Heukelekian H, Balmat J L. Chemical composition of the particulate fractions of domestic sewage. Sewage and Industrial Wastes, 1959, 31(4): 413
|
[9] |
Wang X, Jin P, Zhao H, Meng L. Classification of contaminants and treatability evaluation of domestic wastewater. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 2007, 1(1): 57–62
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Melin E, Helness H, Ødegaard H. Dissolved air flotation of bioreactor effluent using low dosages of polymer and iron. In: Hahn H H, Hoffmann E, Ødegaard H, eds. Chemical Water and Wastewater Treatment VII. London: IWA Publishing, 2002, 261–272
|
[11] |
Melin E, Helness H, Kenakkala T, Ødegaard H. High-rate wastewater treatment based on moving bed biofilm reactor, polymer coagulation and flotation. In: Hahn H H, Hoffmann E, Ødegaard H, eds. Chemical Water and Wastewater Treatment VIII. London: IWA Publishing, 2004, 39–48
|
[12] |
Helness H, Melin E, Ulgenes Y, Järvinen P, Rasmussen V, Ødegaard H. High-rate wastewater treatment combining a moving bed biofilm reactor and enhanced particle separation. Water Science and Technology, 2005, 52(10–11): 117–127
Pubmed
|
[13] |
Ødegaard H. Sludge minimization technologies—an overview. Water Science and Technology, 2004, 49(10): 31–40
Pubmed
|
[14] |
Barlindhaug J, Ødegaard H. Thermal hydrolysate as a carbon source for denitrification. Water Science and Technology, 1996, 33(12): 99–108
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Ødegaard H, Rusten B, Westrum T. A new moving bed biofilm reactor—Applications and results. Water Science and Technology, 1994, 29(10–11): 157–165
|
[16] |
Ødegaard H. Compact wastewater treatment with MBBR. In: Proceedings International DSD Conference on Sustainable Stormwater and Wastewater Management, Hong Kong, 2014http://www.dsdic2014.hk/program2.html
|
[17] |
Christensson M. Moving on with MBBR. In: Proceedings WEF/IWA Conference on Nutrient Recovery and Management, Miami, 2011
|
[18] |
Ødegaard H, Gisvold B, Strickland J. The influence of carrier size and shape in the moving bed biofilm process. Water Science and Technology, 2000, 41(4–5): 383–392
|
[19] |
Ødegaard H. Norwegian experiences with chemical treatment of raw wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 1992, 25(12): 255–264
|
[20] |
Nedland K T. Personal communication, 2002
|
[21] |
Helness H, Sjøvold F. Degradation of particulate organic matter in a moving bed biofilm reactor. SINTEF report STF66 F01104, 2001, SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway (restricted)
|
[22] |
Ødegaard H, Rusten B, Wessman F. State of the art in Europe of the moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) process. In: Proceedings WEFTEC Conference, New Orleans, 2004
|
[23] |
Hem L, Rusten B, Ødegaard H. Nitrification in a moving bed biofilm reactor. Water Research, 1994, 28(6): 1425–1433
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Rusten B, Hem L, Ødegaard H. Nitrification of municipal wastewater in novel moving bed biofilm reactors. Water Environment Research, 1995, 67(1): 75–86
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Rusten B, Hem L, Ødegaard H. Nitrogen removal from dilute wastewater in cold climate using novel moving bed biofilm reactors. Water Environment Research, 1995, 67(1): 65–74
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Rusten B, Paulsrud B. Environmental technology verification of a biofilm process for high efficiency nitrogen removal from wastewater. In: CD Proceedings of the WEFTEC 2009, Orlando, 2009, 4378–4391.
|
[27] |
Rosenwinkel K, Cornelius A. Deammonification in the Moving-Bed Process for the Treatment of Wastewater with High Ammonia Content. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2005, 28(1): 49–52
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Jardin N, Hennerkes J. Full-scale experience with the deammonification process to treat high strength sludge water — a case study. Water Science and Technology, 2012, 65(3): 447–455
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Christensson M, Ekström S, Andersson Chan A, Le Vaillant E, Lemaire R. Experience from start-ups of the first ANITA Mox plants. Water Science and Technology, 2013, 67(12): 2677–2684
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Cema G. Comparative study on different Anammox systems. PhD Thesis, KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 2009. http://rymd.lwr.kth.se/Publikationer/PDF_Files/LWR_PHD_1053.pdf
|
[31] |
Cema G, Trela J, Plaza E, Surmacz-Górska J. Partial nitritation/Anammox process—from two-step towards one-step process. In: Proceedings IWA World Water Congress, Montreal, 2010
|
[32] |
Fernández I, Dosta J, Fajardo C, Campos J L, Mosquera-Corral A, Méndez R. Short- and long-term effects of ammonium and nitrite on the Anammox process. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 95(Suppl1): S170–S174
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Lotti T, van der Star W R L, Kleerebezem R, Lubello C, van Loosdrecht M C M. The effect of nitrite inhibition on the anammox process. Water Research, 2012, 46(8): 2559–2569
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Plaza E. Personal communication, 2015
|
[35] |
Veuillet F, Lacroix S, Bausseron A, Gonidec E, Ochoa J, Christensson M, Lemaire R. IFAS ANITA™Mox process—A new perspective for advanced N-removal. In: Proceedings of 9th IWA conference on Biofilm Reactors, Paris, 2013
|
[36] |
Veuillet F, Bausseron A, Gonidec E, Chastrusse S, Christensson M, Lemaire R, Ochoa J. ANITA™Mox Deammonification Process: Possibility to Handle High COD Level Using the IFAS Configuration. In: Proceedings of IWA Water Congress & Exhibition, Lisbon, 2014
|
[37] |
Trela J, Malovanyy A, Yang J, Plaza E, Trojanowicz K, Sultana R, Wilén B M, Persson F, Baresel C. De-ammonification. Synthesis report 2014 R&D at Hammarby Sjöstadsverk. IVL-report No. B 2210 2014. http://www.ivl.se/download/18.1acdfdc8146d949da6d43f9/1413294579949/B2210+Synthesis+report+2014.pdf
|
[38] |
Lemaire R, Veuillet F, Zozor P, Stefansdottir D, Christensson M, Skonieczny T, Ochoa J. Mainstream deammonification using ANITA™Mox Process. In: Proceedings IWA conference on Nutrient Removal and Recovery, Gdansk, Poland, 2015
|
[39] |
Malovanyy A, Yang J, Trela J, Plaza E. Combination of UASB reactor and partial nitritation/Anammox MBBR for municipal wastewater treatment. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 180: 144–153
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Piculell M, Christensson M, Jönsson K, Welander T. Partial nitrification in MBBRs for mainstream deammonification with thin biofilms and alternating feed supply. Water Science and Technology, 2016, 73(6): 1253–1260
|
[41] |
Falås P, Baillon-Dhumez A, Andersen H R, Ledin A, la Cour Jansen J. Suspended biofilm carrier and activated sludge removal of acidic pharmaceuticals. Water Research, 2012, 46(4): 1167–1175
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[42] |
Falås P, Longrée P, la Cour Jansen J, Siegrist H, Hollender J, Joss A. Micropollutant removal by attached and suspended growth in a hybrid biofilm-activated sludge process. Water Research, 2013, 47(13): 4498–4506
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[43] |
Ødegaard H, Cimbritz M, Christensson M, Dahl P C. Separation of biomass from moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs). In: Proceedings WEF/IWA Biofilm Reactor Technology Conference, Portland, 2010
|
[44] |
Abegglen C, Joss A, Siegrist H. Spurenstoffe eliminieren: Kläranlagentechnik. Eawag News, 2009, 67: 25–27
|
[45] |
EAWAG. Ozonung von gereinigtem Abwasser, Schlussbericht Pilotversuch Regensdorf. EAWAG, Dübendorf, Switzerland, 2009.https://www.micropoll.ch/dokumente/berichte/
|
[46] |
Hollender J, Zimmermann S G, Koepke S, Krauss M, McArdell C S, Ort C, Singer H, von Gunten U, Siegrist H. Elimination of organic micropollutants in a municipal wastewater treatment plant upgraded with a full-scale post-ozonation followed by sand filtration. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(20): 7862–7869
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[47] |
Gimbel R, Panglisch S, Loi-Bruegger A, Hobby R, Lerch A, Strugholtz S. New Approaches in Particle Separation with UF/MF—Membranes in Water Treatment. In: Proceedings IWA conference on Particle Separation, Toulouse, 2007
|
[48] |
Noguchi M. Application of MF ceramic membrane for water reclamation. In: Proceedings of 1st. Nagasaki University Membrane Workshop, Nagasaki, 2015
|
[49] |
Liao Z, Panter K, Mills N, Huang O, Kleiven M, Yang X. Thermal hydrolysis pre-treatment for advanced anaerobic digestion for sludge treatment and disposal in large scale projects. In: Proceedings of International DSD Conference on Sustainable Stormwater and Wastewater Management, Hong Kong, 2014. http://www.dsdic2014.hk/program2.html
|
[50] |
Panter K, Liao Z. Personal communication, 2015
|
/
〈 | 〉 |