Performances, mechanisms, and strategies for methane removal via gas biofiltration

Xin Wu, Chunping Yang, Yan Lin, Xiang Li, Shaohua Wu, Piotr Rybarczyk, Jacek Gębicki

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (5) : 67.

PDF(2439 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. All Journals
PDF(2439 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (5) : 67. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-025-1987-6
REVIEW ARTICLE

Performances, mechanisms, and strategies for methane removal via gas biofiltration

Author information +
History +

Highlights

● Mechanisms and removal pathways of CH4 via biofiltration were reviewed and discussed.

● Interactions between methane and coexisting substances were examined and described.

● Applications and inspirations of CH4 biofiltration were put presented and analyzed.

● Strategies for enhanced removal of methane by biofiltration are proposed.

Abstract

Control of methane emissions has attracted widespread attention in the context of worldwide efforts to alleviate the greenhouse effect. Biofiltration, a green and cost-effective treatment process, has been widely used for the purification of methane. Currently, there is still a lack of comprehensive information on methane biofiltration. Herein, the state-of-the-art development trends of methane removal via biofiltration were comprehensively reviewed and commented on. First of all, this article reviewed the mechanisms of methane removal and the possible degradation pathways in biofilters. Secondly, the removal characteristics of single methane, methane mixed with volatile organic compounds or gaseous inorganic compounds by biofiltration, were summarized and discussed. Thirdly, the practical applications of methane biofiltration were summed up and some inspirations were proposed. Finally, the effective measures to improve the performance of methane biofiltration were put forward, and corresponding insights and future research directions for methane biofiltration were provided. This article can provide references for the practical applications of methane biofiltration and the mitigation of greenhouse effects.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Biofilter / Methane / VOC / Greenhouse effect / Carbon reduction

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xin Wu, Chunping Yang, Yan Lin, Xiang Li, Shaohua Wu, Piotr Rybarczyk, Jacek Gębicki. Performances, mechanisms, and strategies for methane removal via gas biofiltration. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2025, 19(5): 67 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-025-1987-6
This is a preview of subscription content, contact us for subscripton.

References

[1]
Aita B C, Mayer F D, Muratt D T, Brondani M, Pujol S B, Denardi L B, Hoffmann R, da Silveira D D. (2016). Biofiltration of H2S-rich biogas using Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 18(3): 689–703
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Aleshina S, Delgado-Antequera L, Gemar G. (2024). Assessing the economic implications of carbon emissions on climate change: Estimating the impact using methane-adjusted DICE model. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 71: 35–44
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Amlinger F, Peyr S, Cuhls C. (2008). Green house gas emissions from composting and mechanical biological treatment. Waste Management & Research, 26(1): 47–60
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Arslan M, Gamal El-Din M. (2021). Bacterial diversity in petroleum coke based biofilters treating oil sands process water. Science of the Total Environment, 782: 146742
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Arslan M, Müller J A, Gamal El-Din M. (2022). Aerobic naphthenic acid-degrading bacteria in petroleum-coke improve oil sands process water remediation in biofilters: DNA-stable isotope probing reveals methylotrophy in Schmutzdecke. Science of the Total Environment, 815: 151961
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Avalos Ramirez A, García-Aguilar B P, Jones J P, Heitz M. (2012a). Improvement of methane biofiltration by the addition of non-ionic surfactants to biofilters packed with inert materials. Process Biochemistry, 47(1): 76–82
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Avalos Ramirez A, Jones J P, Heitz M. (2012b). Methane treatment in biotrickling filters packed with inert materials in presence of a non-ionic surfactant. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 87(6): 848–853
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Barzgar S, Hettiaratchi J P, Pearse L, Kumar S. (2017). Inhibitory effects of acidic pH and confounding effects of moisture content on methane biofiltration. Bioresource Technology, 245: 633–640
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Brandt E M F, Duarte F V, Vieira J P R, Melo V M, Souza C L, Araújo J C, Chernicharo C A L. (2016). The use of novel packing material for improving methane oxidation in biofilters. Journal of Environmental Management, 182: 412–420
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Cáceres M, Dorado A D, Gentina J C, Aroca G. (2017). Oxidation of methane in biotrickling filters inoculated with methanotrophic bacteria. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 24(33): 25702–25712
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Cáceres M, Gentina J C, Aroca G. (2014). Oxidation of methane by Methylomicrobium album and Methylocystis sp. in the presence of H2S and NH3. Biotechnology Letters, 36(1): 69–74
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Chen Y Y, Soma Y, Ishikawa M, Takahashi M, Izumi Y, Bamba T, Hori K. (2021). Metabolic alteration of Methylococcus capsulatus str. Bath during a microbial gas-phase reaction. Bioresource Technology, 330: 125002
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Cheng Y, He H J, Yang C P, Zeng G M, Li X, Chen H, Yu G L. (2016). Challenges and solutions for biofiltration of hydrophobic volatile organic compounds. Biotechnology Advances, 34(6): 1091–1102
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Cheng Y T, Li X, Liu H Y, Yang C P, Wu S H, Du C, Nie L J, Zhong Y Y. (2020). Effect of presence of hydrophilic volatile organic compounds on removal of hydrophobic n-hexane in biotrickling filters. Chemosphere, 252: 126490
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Clemens J, Cuhls C. (2003). Greenhouse gas emissions from mechanical and biological waste treatment of municipal waste. Environmental Technology, 24(6): 745–754
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Deng Y, Yang G, Lens P N L, He Y, Qie L, Shen X, Chen J, Cheng Z, Chen D. (2023). Enhanced removal of mixed VOCs with different hydrophobicities by Tween 20 in a biotrickling filter: kinetic analysis and biofilm characteristics. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 450: 131063
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Dewidar A A, Sorial G A. (2021). Effect of surfactin on removal of semi-volatile organic compound: emphasis on enhanced biofiltration performance. Environmental Research, 193: 110532
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Duan Z, Scheutz C, Kjeldsen P. (2022). Mitigation of methane emissions from three Danish landfills using different biocover systems. Waste Management, 149: 156–167
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Farrokhzadeh H, Hettiaratchi J P A, Jayasinghe P, Kumar S. (2017). Aerated biofilters with multiple-level air injection configurations to enhance biological treatment of methane emissions. Bioresource Technology, 239: 219–225
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Ferdowsi M, Desrochers M, Jones J P, Heitz M. (2019). Moving from alcohol to methane biofilters: an experimental study on biofilter performance and carbon distribution. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 94(10): 3315–3324
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Ferdowsi M, Khabiri B, Buelna G, Jones J P, Heitz M. (2023). Air biofilters for a mixture of organic gaseous pollutants: an approach for industrial applications. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 43(7): 1019–1034
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Ferdowsi M, Veillette M, Avalos Ramirez A, Jones J P, Heitz M. (2016). Performance evaluation of a methane biofilter under steady state, transient state and starvation conditions. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 227(6): 168
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Fjelsted L, Scheutz C, Christensen A G, Larsen J E, Kjeldsen P. (2020). Biofiltration of diluted landfill gas in an active loaded open-bed compost filter. Waste Management, 103: 1–11
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Frasi N, Rossi E, Pecorini I, Iannelli R. (2020). Methane oxidation efficiency in biofiltration systems with different moisture content treating diluted landfill gas. Energies, 13(11): 2872
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Ganendra G, Mercado-Garcia D, Hernandez-Sanabria E, Boeckx P, Ho A, Boon N. (2015). Methane biofiltration using autoclaved aerated concrete as the carrier material. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 99(17): 7307–7320
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Gebert J, Groengroeft A, Miehlich G. (2003). Kinetics of microbial landfill methane oxidation in biofilters. Waste Management, 23(7): 609–619
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
GebertJ, Röwer I U, ScharffH, RoncatoC D L, CabralA R (2011). Can soil gas profiles be used to assess microbial CH4 oxidation in landfill covers? Waste Management, 31(5): 987–994
[28]
Giang H M, Huyen Nga N T, Rene E R, Ha H N, Varjani S. (2023). Performance and neural modeling of a compost-based biofilter treating a gas-phase mixture of benzene and xylene. Environmental Research, 217: 114788
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Girard M, Avalos Ramirez A, Buelna G, Heitz M. (2011). Biofiltration of methane at low concentrations representative of the piggery industry-Influence of the methane and nitrogen concentrations. Chemical Engineering Journal, 168(1): 151–158
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Girard M, Viens P, Avalos Ramirez A, Brzezinski R, Buelna G, Heitz M. (2012). Simultaneous treatment of methane and swine slurry by biofiltration. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 87(5): 697–704
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Gómez-Borraz T L, González-Sánchez A, Cabello J, Noyola A. (2022). Model assessment on the non-isothermal methane biofiltration at ambient conditions. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 163: 283–297
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Gómez-Cuervo S, Alfonsín C, Hernández J, Feijoo G, Moreira M T, Omil F. (2017). Diffuse methane emissions abatement by organic and inorganic packed biofilters: assessment of operational and environmental indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143: 1191–1202
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Gómez-Cuervo S, Hernández J, Omil F. (2016). Identifying the limitations of conventional biofiltration of diffuse methane emissions at long-term operation. Environmental Technology, 37(15): 1947–1958
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Gunasekera S S, Hettiaratchi J P, Bartholameuz E M, Farrokhzadeh H, Irvine E. (2018). A comparative evaluation of the performance of full-scale high-rate methane biofilter (HMBF) systems and flow-through laboratory columns. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 25(36): 35845–35854
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Guo K, Hakobyan A, Glatter T, Paczia N, Liesack W. (2022). Methylocystis sp. strain SC2 acclimatizes to increasing NH4+ levels by a precise rebalancing of enzymes and osmolyte composition. mSystems, 7(5): e00403–22
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Haubrichs R, Widmann R. (2006). Evaluation of aerated biofilter systems for microbial methane oxidation of poor landfill gas. Waste Management, 26(4): 408–416
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
He S Y, Ni Y Q, Lu L, Chai Q W, Yu T, Shen Z Q, Yang C P. (2020). Simultaneous degradation of n-hexane and production of biosurfactants by Pseudomonas sp. strain NEE2 isolated from oil-contaminated soils. Chemosphere, 242: 125237
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Huang Z W, Niu Q Y, Nie W K, Li X, Yang C P. (2022). Effects of heavy metals and antibiotics on performances and mechanisms of anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technology, 361: 127683
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Ibrahim R, El Hassni A, Navaee-Ardeh S, Cabana H. (2022). Biological elimination of a high concentration of hydrogen sulfide from landfill biogas. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(1): 431–443
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Jawad J, Khalil M J, Sengar A K, Zaidi S J. (2021). Experimental analysis and modeling of the methane degradation in a three stage biofilter using composted sawdust as packing media. Journal of Environmental Management, 286: 112214
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Karthikeyan O P, Chidambarampadmavathy K, Cirés S, Heimann K. (2015). Review of sustainable methane mitigation and biopolymer production. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 45(15): 1579–1610
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Khabiri B, Ferdowsi M, Buelna G, Jones J P, Heitz M. (2020a). ‏Methane biofiltration under different strategies of nutrient solution addition. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 11(1): 85–93
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Khabiri B, Ferdowsi M, Buelna G, Jones J P, Heitz M. (2020b). Simultaneous biodegradation of methane and styrene in biofilters packed with inorganic supports: experimental and macrokinetic study. Chemosphere, 252: 126492
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Khabiri B, Ferdowsi M, Buelna G, Jones J P, Heitz M. (2022). Bioelimination of low methane concentrations emitted from wastewater treatment plants: a review. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 42(3): 450–467
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Kim J H, Rene E R, Park H S. (2008). Biological oxidation of hydrogen sulfide under steady and transient state conditions in an immobilized cell biofilter. Bioresource Technology, 99(3): 583–588
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Kim T G, Jeong S Y, Cho K S. (2014). Characterization of tobermolite as a bed material for selective growth of methanotrophs in biofiltration. Journal of Biotechnology, 173: 90–97
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Kim T G, Lee E H, Cho K S. (2013). Effects of nonmethane volatile organic compounds on microbial community of methanotrophic biofilter. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 97(14): 6549–6559
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Kumdhitiahutsawakul L, Jirachaisakdeacha D, Kantha U, Pholchan P, Sattayawat P, Chitov T, Tragoolpua Y, Bovonsombut S. (2022). Removal of hydrogen sulfide from swine-waste biogas on a pilot scale using immobilized Paracoccus versutus CM1. Microorganisms, 10(11): 2148
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
La H, Hettiaratchi J P A, Achari G, Dunfield P F. (2018a). Biofiltration of methane. Bioresource Technology, 268: 759–772
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
La H, Hettiaratchi J P A, Achari G, Kim J J, Dunfield P F. (2018b). Investigation of biologically stable biofilter medium for methane mitigation by Methanotrophic Bacteria. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive Waste, 22(3): 04018013
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
La H, Hettiaratchi J P A, Achari G, Verbeke T J, Dunfield P F. (2018c). Biofiltration of methane using hybrid mixtures of biochar, lava rock and compost. Environmental Pollution, 241: 45–54
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Lebrero R, López J C, Lehtinen I, Pérez R, Quijano G, Muñoz R. (2016). Exploring the potential of fungi for methane abatement: performance evaluation of a fungal-bacterial biofilter. Chemosphere, 144: 97–106
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Lee Y Y, Jung H, Ryu H W, Oh K C, Jeon J M, Cho K S. (2018). Seasonal characteristics of odor and methane mitigation and the bacterial community dynamics in an on-site biocover at a sanitary landfill. Waste Management, 71: 277–286
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Liew F J, Schilling J S. (2020). High‐efficiency methane capture by living fungi and dried fungal hyphae (necromass). Journal of Environmental Quality, 49(6): 1467–1476
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Liu F, Wienke C, Fiencke C, Guo J B, Dong R J, Pfeiffer E M. (2018). Biofilter with mixture of pine bark and expanded clay as packing material for methane treatment in lab-scale experiment and field-scale implementation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 25(31): 31297–31306
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Liu J, Han Y Y, Dou X N, Liang W J. (2024). Effect of toluene on m-xylene removal in a biotrickling filter: performance, biofilm characteristics, and microbial analysis. Environmental Research, 245: 117978
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Liu J W, Yue P, Zang N N, Lu C, Chen X Y. (2021). Removal of odors and VOCs in municipal solid waste comprehensive treatment plants using a novel three-stage integrated biofilter: performance and bioaerosol emissions. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(3): 48
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
López J C, Merchán L, Lebrero R, Muñoz R. (2018). Feast-famine biofilter operation for methane mitigation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170: 108–118
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
López J C, Porca E, Collins G, Clifford E, Quijano G, Muñoz R. (2019). Ammonium influences kinetics and structure of methanotrophic consortia. Waste Management, 89: 345–353
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Lund P, Tramonti A, De Biase D. (2014). Coping with low pH: molecular strategies in neutralophilic bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 38(6): 1091–1125
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Maia G D N, Day v G B, Gates R S, Taraba J L. (2012). Ammonia biofiltration and nitrous oxide generation during the start-up of gas-phase compost biofilters. Atmospheric Environment, 46: 659–664
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Marycz M, Brillowska-Dabrowska A, Muñoz R, Gebicki J. (2022). A state of the art review on the use of fungi in biofiltration to remove volatile hydrophobic pollutants. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 21(1): 225–246
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Melse R W, van der Werf A W. (2005). Biofiltration for mitigation of methane emission from animal husbandry. Environmental Science & Technology, 39(14): 5460–5468
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Meng F Z, Han S Y, Lin L, Li J L, Chen K L, Jiang J G. (2024). Process optimization and mechanism study of ionic liquid-based mixed amine biphasic solvents for CO2 capture in biogas upgrading procedure. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 18(8): 95
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Merouani E F O, Khabiri B, Ferdowsi M, Benyoussef E H, Malhautier L, Buelna G, Jones J P, Heitz M. (2022). Biofiltration of methane in presence of ethylbenzene or xylene. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 13(1): 101271
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Modin O. (2018). A mathematical model of aerobic methane oxidation coupled to denitrification. Environmental Technology, 39(9): 1217–1225
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
Nelson B, Zytner R G, Dulac Y, Cabral A R. (2022). Mitigating fugitive methane emissions from closed landfills: a pilot-scale field study. Science of the Total Environment, 851: 158351
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Nisbet-Jones P B R, Fernandez J M, Fisher R E, France J L, Lowry D, Waltham D A, Woolley Maisch C A W, Nisbet E G. (2022). Is the destruction or removal of atmospheric methane a worthwhile option? Philosophical Transactions-Royal Society. Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 380(2215): 20210108
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
Oliver J P, Schilling J S. (2016). Capture of methane by fungi: evidence from laboratory-scale biofilter and chromatographic isotherm studies. Transactions of the ASABE, 59(6): 1791–1801
CrossRef Google scholar
[70]
Pecorini I, Iannelli R. (2020). Landfill GHG reduction through different microbial methane oxidation biocovers. Processes, 8(5): 591
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
Pecorini I, Rossi E, Iannelli R. (2020). Mitigation of methane, NMVOCs and odor emissions in active and passive biofiltration systems at municipal solid waste landfills. Sustainability, 12(8): 3203
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
Pereira J L S, Perdigão A, Marques F, Coelho C, Mota M, Fangueiro D. (2021). Evaluation of tomato-based packing material for retention of ammonia, nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide and methane in gas phase biofilters: a laboratory study. Agronomy, 11(2): 360
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
Preble C V, Chen S S, Hotchi T, Sohn M D, Maddalena R L, Russell M L, Brown N J, Scown C D, Kirchstetter T W. (2020). Air pollutant emission rates for dry anaerobic digestion and composting of organic municipal solid waste. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(24): 16097–16107
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
Reyes J, Gutiérrez M C, Toledo M, Vera L, Sánchez L, Siles J A, Martín M A. (2020). Environmental performance of an industrial biofilter: relationship between photochemical oxidation and odorous impacts. Environmental Research, 183: 109168
CrossRef Google scholar
[75]
Rezaei M, Moussavi G, Naddafi K, Johnson M S. (2020). Enhanced biodegradation of styrene vapors in the biotrickling filter inoculated with biosurfactant-generating bacteria under H2O2 stimulation. Science of the Total Environment, 704: 135325
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
Rodríguez E, López J C, Prieto P, Merchán L, García-Encina P A, Lebrero R, Muñoz R. (2018). Quantitative analysis of methane monooxygenase (MMO) explains process robustness in continuous and feast-famine bioreactors treating methane. Chemosphere, 212: 319–329
CrossRef Google scholar
[77]
Rossi E, Pecorini I, Iannelli R. (2021). Methane oxidation of residual landfill gas in a full-scale biofilter: human health risk assessment of volatile and malodours compound emissions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(19): 24419–24431
CrossRef Google scholar
[78]
Rybarczyk P, Cichon K, Kucharska K, Dobrzyniewski D, Szulczyński B, Gębicki J. (2024). Packing incubation and addition of rot fungi extracts improve BTEX elimination from air in biotrickling filters. Molecules, 29(18): 4431
CrossRef Google scholar
[79]
Rybarczyk P, Marycz M, Szulczyński B, Brillowska-Dąbrowska A, Rybarczyk A, Gębicki J. (2021). Removal of cyclohexane and ethanol from air in biotrickling filters inoculated with Candida albicans and Candida subhashii. Archives of Environmental Protection, 47: 26–34
[80]
Rybarczyk P, Szulczyński B, Gębicki J. (2020). Simultaneous removal of hexane and ethanol from air in a biotrickling filter-process performance and monitoring using electronic nose. Sustainability, 12(1): 387
CrossRef Google scholar
[81]
Sadasivam B Y, Reddy K R. (2014). Landfill methane oxidation in soil and bio-based cover systems: a review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 13(1): 79–107
CrossRef Google scholar
[82]
Saunois M, Stavert A R, Poulter B, Bousquet P, Canadell J G, Jackson R B, Raymond P A, Dlugokencky E J, Houweling S, Patra P K. . (2020). The global methane budget 2000–2017. Earth System Science Data, 12(3): 1561–1623
CrossRef Google scholar
[83]
Scheutz C, Kjeldsen P, Bogner J E, de Visscher A, Gebert J, Hilger H A, Huber-Humer M, Spokas K. (2009). Microbial methane oxidation processes and technologies for mitigation of landfill gas emissions. Waste Management & Research, 27(5): 409–455
CrossRef Google scholar
[84]
Schirmer W N, Stroparo E C, Gueri M V D, Capanema M A, Mazur D L, Jucá J F T, Martins K G. (2022). Biofiltration of fugitive methane emissions from landfills using scum from municipal wastewater treatment plants as alternative substrate. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 24(5): 2041–2053
CrossRef Google scholar
[85]
Shang B, Zhou T, Tao X, Chen Y. (2022). Greenhouse gas emissions from biofilters for composting exhaust ammonia removal. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 10: 918365
CrossRef Google scholar
[86]
Shangari S, Agamuthu P. (2012). Enhancing methane oxidation in landfill cover using brewery spent grain as biocover. Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences: MJMS, 31: 91–97
[87]
Shatalin K, Shatalina E, Mironov A, Nudler E. (2011). H2S: a universal defense against antibiotics in bacteria. Science, 334(6058): 986–990
CrossRef Google scholar
[88]
Sun M T, Yang Z M, Fan X L, Wang F, Guo R B, Xu D Y. (2019). Improved methane elimination by methane-oxidizing bacteria immobilized on modified oil shale semicoke. Science of the Total Environment, 655: 915–923
CrossRef Google scholar
[89]
Sun M T, Yang Z M, Fu S F, Fan X L, Guo R B. (2018a). Improved methane removal in exhaust gas from biogas upgrading process using immobilized methane-oxidizing bacteria. Bioresource Technology, 256: 201–207
CrossRef Google scholar
[90]
Sun M T, Yang Z M, Lu J, Fan X L, Guo R B, Fu S F. (2018b). Improvement of bacterial methane elimination using porous ceramsite as biocarrier. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 93(8): 2406–2414
CrossRef Google scholar
[91]
Sun M T, Zhao Y Z, Yang Z M, Shi X S, Wang L, Dai M, Wang F, Guo R B. (2020a). Methane elimination using biofiltration packed with fly ash ceramsite as support material. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 8: 351
CrossRef Google scholar
[92]
Sun Z, Ding C, Xi J, Lu L, Yang B. (2020b). Enhancing biofilm formation in biofilters for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene removal by modifying the packing material surface. Bioresource Technology, 296: 122335
CrossRef Google scholar
[93]
Truong D H, Eghbal M A, Hindmarsh W, Roth S H, O’Brien P J. (2006). Molecular mechanisms of hydrogen sulfide toxicity. Drug Metabolism Reviews, 38(4): 733–744
CrossRef Google scholar
[94]
Valdebenito-Rolack E, Díaz R, Marín F, Gómez D, Hansen F. (2021). Markers for the comparison of the performances of anoxic biotrickling filters in biogas desulphurisation: a critical review. Processes, 9(3): 567
CrossRef Google scholar
[95]
Valenzuela-Heredia D, Aroca G. (2023). Methane biofiltration for the treatment of a simulated diluted biogas emission containing ammonia and hydrogen sulfide. Chemical Engineering Journal, 469: 143704
CrossRef Google scholar
[96]
Vergara-Fernández A, Hernández S, Revah S. (2008). Phenomenological model of fungal biofilters for the abatement of hydrophobic VOCs. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 101(6): 1182–1192
CrossRef Google scholar
[97]
Vergara-Fernández A, Morales P, Scott F, Guerrero S, Yañez L, Mau S, Aroca G. (2019). Methane biodegradation and enhanced methane solubilization by the filamentous fungi Fusarium solani. Chemosphere, 226: 24–35
CrossRef Google scholar
[98]
Vergara-Fernández A, Scott F, Carreno-Lopez F, Aroca G, Moreno-Casas P, Gonzalez-Sanchez A, Munoz R. (2020). A comparative assessment of the performance of fungal-bacterial and fungal biofilters for methane abatement. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 8(5): 104421
CrossRef Google scholar
[99]
Wang J J, Yang B R, Sun Z Q, Shang Q Q, Zhang J H. (2023). Enhanced treatment of m-dichlorobenzene waste gas in biotrickling filters: performance, mass transfer and microbial community. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 11(2): 109439
CrossRef Google scholar
[100]
Wei Z, Hessler C M, Sorial G, Seo Y. (2016). Influence of nonionic surfactants on fungal and bacterial degradation of hexane. Clean, 44(7): 745–752
CrossRef Google scholar
[101]
Wu X, He H J, Yang W L, Yu J P, Yang C P. (2018). Efficient removal of atrazine from aqueous solutions using magnetic Saccharomyces cerevisiae bionanomaterial. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 102(17): 7597–7610
CrossRef Google scholar
[102]
Wu X, Lin Y, Wang Y Y, Dai M, Wu S H, Li X, Yang C P. (2024). Chemical structure of hydrocarbons significantly affects removal performance and microbial responses in gas biotrickling filters. Bioresource Technology, 398: 130480
CrossRef Google scholar
[103]
Wu X, Lin Y, Wang Y Y, Wu S H, Li X, Yang C P. (2022). Enhanced removal of hydrophobic short-chain n-alkanes from gas streams in biotrickling filters in presence of surfactant. Environmental Science & Technology, 56(14): 10349–10360
CrossRef Google scholar
[104]
Wu X, Lin Y, Wang Y Y, Wu S H, Yang C P. (2023a). Volatile organic compound removal via biofiltration: influences, challenges, and strategies. Chemical Engineering Journal, 471: 144420
CrossRef Google scholar
[105]
Wu X, Lin Y, Wang Y Y, Yang C P. (2023b). Interactive effects of dual short-chain n-alkanes on removal performances and microbial responses of biotrickling filters. Chemical Engineering Journal, 461: 141747
CrossRef Google scholar
[106]
Xi J Y, Kang I S, Hu H Y, Zhang X. (2015). A biofilter model for simultaneous simulation of toluene removal and bed pressure drop under varied inlet loadings. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 9(3): 554–562
CrossRef Google scholar
[107]
Yang B R, Wang J J, Wu M L, Shang Q Q, Zhang H. (2022). Effect of rhamnolipids on the biodegradation of m-dichlorobenzene in biotrickling filters: performance and mechanism. Journal of Environmental Management, 320: 115951
CrossRef Google scholar
[108]
Yang C P, Chen F Y, Luo S L, Xie G X, Zeng G M, Fan C Z. (2010). Effects of surfactants and salt on Henry’s constant of n-hexane. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 175(1−3): 187–192
CrossRef Google scholar
[109]
Yao X Z, Chu Y X, Wang C, Li H J, Kang Y R, He R. (2019). Enhanced removal of methanethiol and its conversion products in the presence of methane in biofilters. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215: 75–83
CrossRef Google scholar
[110]
Zheng R, Zhang K, Kong L R, Liu S T. (2024). Research progress and prospect of low-carbon biological technology for nitrate removal in wastewater treatment. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 18(7): 80
CrossRef Google scholar

CRediT Authorship Contribution Statement

Xin Wu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing. Chunping Yang: Conceptualization, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing. Yan Lin: Conceptualization, Resources, Validation, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing. Xiang Li: Resources, Writing-review and editing. Shaohua Wu: Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing. Piotr Rybarczyk: Methodology, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing. Jacek Gębicki: Conceptualization, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province of China (No. 2024A1515010837), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 52200093, 52270064, 51978178, and 51521006), the Program for Innovative Research Teams of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes of China (No. 2021KCXTD043), the Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province of China (No. 2023RC3120), the Startup Fund of Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology (China) (No. 2018rc63), and the Postgraduate Scientific Research Innovation Project of Hunan Province (China) (No. QL20230078).

Data Availability Statement

The data will be made available on request.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 Higher Education Press 2025
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(2439 KB)

64

Accesses

0

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/