Stormwater management model based cost-benefit analysis of integrated grey-green infrastructure scenarios

Changqing Xu , Jingran Huang , Yinxiao Xiao , Tianyu Jia , Yifei Zhu , Xinfei Li , Haifeng Jia

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (5) : 62

PDF (3564KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (5) : 62 DOI: 10.1007/s11783-025-1982-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Stormwater management model based cost-benefit analysis of integrated grey-green infrastructure scenarios

Author information +
History +
PDF (3564KB)

Abstract

This study promotes the integration of ecological green infrastructure with traditional gray infrastructure to tackle urban water management challenges and safety issues. Using the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM), we simulated runoff control in Beijing Tongzhou District Sponge City Pilot Area across 15 gray-green infrastructure scenarios and identified the optimal strategy through a cost-benefit analysis focusing on scenarios that meet runoff control standards. A cost-benefit evaluation framework was developed for gray-green infrastructure projects, employing payback period and net present value methods to assess cost-effectiveness. Findings revealed notable operational benefits, particularly in temperature and humidity regulation, which accounted for 88% of the total benefits. A standout scenario with a rapid payback period of 7.16 years and a net benefit of 1957.7 million yuan was highlighted. The research provides a holistic assessment, integrating environmental, ecological, and economic aspects of gray-green infrastructure, offering insights for effective green infrastructure deployment and evaluation in sponge city construction.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Green infrastructure / Life cycle assessment / Stormwater management model / Cost-benefit analysis / Sponge city

Highlight

● SWMM was used to evaluate 15 scenarios and to compare their various benefits.

● Temperature and humidity regulation accounted for over 88% of the total benefits.

● All gray-green scenarios had positive net benefits in a 30-year operational period.

● Scenario 9 had the highest net benefit of 1957.7 million yuan.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Changqing Xu, Jingran Huang, Yinxiao Xiao, Tianyu Jia, Yifei Zhu, Xinfei Li, Haifeng Jia. Stormwater management model based cost-benefit analysis of integrated grey-green infrastructure scenarios. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2025, 19(5): 62 DOI:10.1007/s11783-025-1982-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abdeljaber A, Adghim M, Abdallah M, Ghanima R, Aljassem F. (2022). Comparative performance and cost-integrated life cycle assessment of low impact development controls for sustainable stormwater management. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 95: 106805

[2]

Bal M, Dandpat A, Naik B. (2021). Hydrological modeling with respect to impact land-use and land-cover change on the runoff dynamics in Budhabalanga river basing using ArcGIS and SWAT model. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 23: 100527

[3]

Casal-Campos A, Fu G, Butler D, Moore A. (2015). An integrated environmental assessment of green and gray infrastructure strategies for robust decision making. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(14): 8307–8314

[4]

Costanza R, d’Arge R, De Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill R V, Paruelo J, Raskin R G, Sutton P, van den Belt M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630): 253–260

[5]

Demuzere M, Orru K, Heidrich O, Olazabal E, Geneletti D, Orru H, Bhave A G, Mittal N, Feliu E, Faehnle M. (2014). Mitigating and adapting to climate change: multi-functional and multi-scale assessment of green urban infrastructure. Journal of Environmental Management, 146: 107–115

[6]

Elliott A H, Trowsdale S. (2005). A review of models for low impact urban stormwater drainage. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22(3): 394–405

[7]

Flynn K M, Traver R G. (2013). Green infrastructure life cycle assessment: a bio-infiltration case study. Ecological Engineering, 55: 9–22

[8]

Li P, Wang Z H. (2021). Environmental co-benefits of urban greening for mitigating heat and carbon emissions. Journal of Environmental Management, 293: 112963

[9]

LiuY (2020). Research on Rainwater Runoff Regulation in Sponge-Reconstructed Communities Based on SWMM. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Beijing: Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture (in Chinese)

[10]

LongF, Bi F, LianC, DongZ, GeC (2021). Analysis of a pricing mechanism based on full coverage of sewage treatment costs. Environmental Protection, 49(7): 38–42 (in Chinese)

[11]

Ministry of Housing, Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. (2015). Sponge city construction technical guidelines (trial)–constructing low impact development rainwater systems. Structures Units & Units Architecture, 01: 45–50

[12]

Prokešová R, Horáčková Š, Snopková Z. (2022). Surface runoff response to long-term land use changes: spatial rearrangement of runoff-generating areas reveals a shift in flash flood drivers. Science of the Total Environment, 815: 151591

[13]

Sagrelius P Ö, Blecken G, Hedström A, Ashley R, Viklander M. (2023). Sustainability performance of bioretention systems with various designs. Journal of Environmental Management, 340: 117949

[14]

ShangX (2020). Study on the Value Change of Green Infrastructure Ecosystem Services-Take the Yangtze River Delta Integration Demonstration Zone as an Example. Thesis for the Master Degree. Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University (in Chinese)

[15]

Tongzhou Water Bureau (2018). Systematic plan for the sponge city construction pilot in Tongzhou District, Beijing. Beijing: Tongzhou District Government

[16]

Wang R, Eckelman M J, Zimmerman J B. (2013). Consequential environmental and economic life cycle assessment of green and gray stormwater infrastructures for combined sewer systems. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(19): 11189–11198

[17]

Xia J, Zhang Y, Xiong L, He S, Wang L, Yu Z. (2017). Opportunities and challenges of the sponge city construction related to urban water issues in China. Science China. Earth Sciences, 60(4): 652–658

[18]

Xu C, Hong J, Jia H, Liang S, Xu T. (2017). Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of a LID-BMP treatment train system: a case study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149: 227–237

[19]

Xu C, Jia M, Xu M, Long Y, Jia H. (2019). Progress on environmental and economic evaluation of low-impact development type of best management practices through a life cycle perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213: 1103–1114

[20]

Zhang P, Chen L, Hou X, Wei G, Zhang X, Shen Z. (2020). Detailed quantification of the reduction effect of roof runoff by low impact development practices. Water, 12(3): 795

[21]

Zhu Y, Xu C, Liu Z, Yin D, Jia H, Guan Y. (2023). Spatial layout optimization of green infrastructure based on life-cycle multi-objective optimization algorithm and SWMM model. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 191: 106906

[22]

Zhu Y, Xu C, Yin D, Jia X, Wu Y, Jia H. (2022). Environmental and economic cost-benefit comparison of Sponge City construction in different urban functional regions. Journal of Environmental Management, 304: 114230

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press 2025

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (3564KB)

Supplementary files

FSE-25016-OF-XCQ_suppl_1

694

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/