Compaction as a cost-effective strategy to upgrade the disposal of MSWI fly ash: feasibility and potential

Shijin Dai, Fafa Xia, Bo Yang, Deli Wu, Dongjie Niu, Youcai Zhao, Xunchang Fei, Zhanbo Cheng, Hongping He

PDF(6328 KB)
PDF(6328 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3) : 35. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-025-1955-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Compaction as a cost-effective strategy to upgrade the disposal of MSWI fly ash: feasibility and potential

Author information +
History +

Highlights

● Cost-effective compaction is introduced into the stabilized fly ash disposal process.

● After compaction, SFA density is more than doubled, and > 60% of the volume is saved.

Huang Peiyun & Heckel equations are the most suitable to describe compaction process.

● The mechanical strength of the green compact meets the MU10 lime-sand brick standard.

Abstract

Landfilling remains the primary disposal method for fly ash produced from municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) following stabilization/solidification. However, the increasing generation of stabilized fly ash (SFA) is accelerating the depletion of landfill capacity. Furthermore, the small particle size and low bulk density of SFA present significant environmental risks during handling and transportation. To mitigate these issues, a cost-effective compaction method was introduced into the SFA disposal process. The results show that SFA from both grate furnaces and fluidized bed incinerators exhibited high porosity, loose structure, and irregular particle morphology, indicating substantial potential for compaction. Key parameters influencing compaction effectiveness included compaction pressure, holding duration, and moisture content, with optimal values identified as 100–200 MPa, 20 s, and 10%–15% moisture, respectively, depending on the incinerator type. After compaction treatment, the density of SFA more than doubled, while its volume was reduced by over 60%, significantly increasing landfill capacity and enhancing the efficiency of SFA disposal. The compaction process was effectively modeled using the Huang Peiyun equation for gerate furnace ash and the Heckel equation for fluidized bed ash. Furthermore, the unconfined compressive strength and three-point bending strength of compacted SFA met the MU10 standard for lime-sand bricks, making the material suitable for transportation and disposal. Finally, the compaction-based disposal method for SFA demonstrated clear techno-economic advantages and significant potential for broader application in waste management strategies.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Stabilized fly ash / Compaction process / Volume reduction / Disposal upgrading

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shijin Dai, Fafa Xia, Bo Yang, Deli Wu, Dongjie Niu, Youcai Zhao, Xunchang Fei, Zhanbo Cheng, Hongping He. Compaction as a cost-effective strategy to upgrade the disposal of MSWI fly ash: feasibility and potential. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2025, 19(3): 35 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-025-1955-1

References

[1]
Alimardani M, Razzaghi-Kashani M, Karimi R, Mahtabani A. (2016). Contribution of mechanical engagement and energetic interaction in reinforcement of SBR-silane–treated silica composites. Rubber Chemistry and Technology, 89(2): 292–305
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Chang F Y, Wey M Y. (2006). Comparison of the characteristics of bottom and fly ashes generated from various incineration processes. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 138(3): 594–603
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Chang Y, Cao J, Song W, Wang Z, Xu C, Long M. (2023). Effects of sulfur on variations in the chemical speciation of heavy metals from fly ash glass. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 17(10): 128
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Cheerarot R, Jaturapitakkul C. (2004). A study of disposed fly ash from landfill to replace Portland cement. Waste Management, 24(7): 701–709
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Çomoğlu T. (2007). An overview of compaction equations. Journal of Faculty of Pharmacy of Ankara University, 36: 123–134
[6]
Deng C, Jiang Y, Yuan K, Tian T, Yi Y. (2020). Mechanical properties of vertical vibration compacted lime–fly ash-stabilized macadam material. Construction & Building Materials, 251: 119089
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Denny P. (2002). Compaction equations: a comparison of the Heckel and Kawakita equations. Powder Technology, 127(2): 162–172
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Ferreira C, Ribeiro A, Ottosen L. (2003). Possible applications for municipal solid waste fly ash. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 96(2−3): 201–216
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Gupt C B, Bordoloi S, Sahoo R K, Sekharan S. (2021). Mechanical performance and micro-structure of bentonite-fly ash and bentonite-sand mixes for landfill liner application. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292: 126033
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Hafizpour H, Simchi A, Parvizi S. (2010). Analysis of the compaction behavior of Al–SiC nanocomposites using linear and non-linear compaction equations. Advanced Powder Technology, 21(3): 273–278
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
HuJ Z (1987). Applications of Huang Peiyun’s double logarithmic equation of powder compacting. Powder Metallurgy Technology, 3: 137–146
[12]
John S K, Nadir Y, Girija K. (2021). Effect of source materials, additives on the mechanical properties and durability of fly ash and fly ash-slag geopolymer mortar: a review. Construction & Building Materials, 280: 122443
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Justnes H, Skocek J, Østnor T A, Engelsen C J, Skjølsvold O S. (2020). Microstructural changes of hydrated cement blended with fly ash upon carbonation. Cement and Concrete Research, 137: 106192
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Kaladharan G, Gholizadeh-Vayghan A, Rajabipour F. (2019). Review, sampling, and evaluation of landfilled fly ash. ACI Materials Journal, 116(4): 113–122
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Kaniraj S R, Havanagi V G. (2001). Correlation analysis of laboratory compaction of fly ashes. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management, 5(1): 25–32
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Kawakita K, Lüdde K H. (1971). Some considerations on powder compression equations. Powder Technology, 4(2): 61–68
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Li X, Ren Y, Chen X, Li Y, Chertow M R. (2023). Exploring the development of municipal solid waste disposal facilities in Chinese cities: patterns and drivers. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 17(11): 139
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Lin K L. (2006). Feasibility study of using brick made from municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash slag. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 137(3): 1810–1816
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Lin S, Jiang X, Zhao Y, Yan J. (2022). Disposal technology and new progress for dioxins and heavy metals in fly ash from municipal solid waste incineration: a critical review. Environmental Pollution, 311: 119878
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Lu M, Ge W Z, Xia Y, Sun C, Lin X Q, Tsang D, Ling T, Hu Y J, Wang L, Yan J H. (2024). Upcycling MSWI fly ash into green binders via flue gas-enhanced wet carbonation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 440: 141013
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Ma W, Chen D, Pan M, Gu T, Zhong L, Chen G, Yan B, Cheng Z. (2019). Performance of chemical chelating agent stabilization and cement solidification on heavy metals in MSWI fly ash: a comparative study. Journal of Environmental Management, 247: 169–177
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Matzenbacher C A, Garcia A L H, dos Santos M S, Nicolau C C, Premoli S, Corrêa D S, de Souza C T, Niekraszewicz L, Dias J F, Delgado T V. . (2017). DNA damage induced by coal dust, fly and bottom ash from coal combustion evaluated using the micronucleus test and comet assay in vitro. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 324: 781–788
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Patel S, Kaushal A M, Bansal A K. (2007). Effect of particle size and compression force on compaction behavior and derived mathematical parameters of compressibility. Pharmaceutical Research, 24(1): 111–124
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Schneider M, Romer M, Tschudin M, Bolio H. (2011). Sustainable cement production-present and future. Cement and Concrete Research, 41(7): 642–650
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Shao Y, Hou H, Wang G, Wan S, Zhou M. (2016). Characteristics of the stabilized/solidified municipal solid wastes incineration fly ash and the leaching behaviours of Cr and Pb. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 10(1): 192–200
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Singh A, Singh J, Sinha M K, Kumar R, Verma V. (2021). Compaction and densification characteristics of iron powder/coal fly ash mixtures processed by powder metallurgy technique. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 30(2): 1207–1220
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Sua-Iam G, Makul N. (2015). Utilization of coal- and biomass-fired ash in the production of self-consolidating concrete: a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 100: 59–76
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Suescum-Morales D, Bravo M, Silva R V, Jimenez J R, Fernandez-Rodriguez J M, de Brito J. (2022). Effect of reactive magnesium oxide in alkali-activated fly ash mortars exposed to accelerated CO2 curing. Construction & Building Materials, 342: 127999
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Turgut P. (2012). Manufacturing of building bricks without Portland cement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 37: 361–367
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Wang F H, Zhang F, Chen Y J, Gao J, Zhao B. (2015). A comparative study on the heavy metal solidification/stabilization performance of four chemical solidifying agents in municipal solid waste incineration fly ash. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 300: 451–458
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Wang P, Li J S, Hu Y N, Cheng H F. (2023). Solidification and stabilization of Pb-Zn mine tailing with municipal solid waste incineration fly ash and ground granulated blast-furnace slag for unfired brick fabrication. Environmental Pollution, 321: 121135
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Wang Y T, Hu Y, Xue C, Khan A, Zheng X Y, Cai L K. (2022). Risk assessment of lead and cadmium leaching from solidified/stabilized MSWI fly ash under long-term landfill simulation test. Science of the Total Environment, 816: 151555
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Wu H, Zhu Y, Bian S, Ko J H, Li S F Y, Xu Q. (2018). H2S adsorption by municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) fly ash with heavy metals immobilization. Chemosphere, 195: 40–47
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Xiao Z, Ke M, Fang L, Shao M, Li Y. (2009). Die wall lubricated warm compacting and sintering behaviors of pre-mixed Fe-Ni-Cu-Mo-C powders. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209(9): 4527–4530
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Xin M X, Sun Y J, Li W H, Yin J Q, Wu Y K, Long Y Y, Bian R X, Wang Y N, Wang H W, Yang Y F. . (2023). Exposure levels of PCDD/Fs from co-landfill scenario with MSW and stabilized fly ash during hydrolysis-acidogenesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 394: 136343
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Yakubu Y, Zhou J, Ping D, Shu Z, Chen Y. (2018). Effects of pH dynamics on solidification/stabilization of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash. Journal of Environmental Management, 207: 243–248
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Zabielska-Adamska K. (2008). Laboratory compaction of fly ash and fly ash with cement additions. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 151(2−3): 481–489
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Zhang J, Guo Y. (2014). Physical properties of solid fuel briquettes made from Caragana korshinskii Kom. Powder Technology, 256: 293–299
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Zhang M, Guo M, Zhang B, Li F, Wang H, Zhang H. (2020). Stabilization of heavy metals in MSWI fly ash with a novel dithiocarboxylate-functionalized polyaminoamide dendrimer. Waste Management, 105: 289–298
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Zhang Y, Cetin B, Likos W, Edil T. (2016). Impacts of pH on leaching potential of elements from MSW incineration fly ash. Fuel, 184: 815–825
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Zhao Y C, Song L J, Li G J. (2002). Chemical stabilization of MSW incinerator fly ashes. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 95(1−2): 47–63
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Zheng L, Gao X, Wang W, Li Z, Zhang L, Cheng S. (2020). Utilization of MSWI fly ash as partial cement or sand substitute with focus on cementing efficiency and health risk assessment. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(5): 1–11
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Zhou X, Chen X, Peng Z, Zhou Y, Li Y, Jian W, Fan Z, Chen Y. (2023). Cleaner geopolymer prepared by co-activation of gasification coal fly ash and steel slag: durability properties and economic assessment. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 17(12): 150
CrossRef Google scholar

CRediT Authorship Contribution Statement

Shijin Dai: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft. Fafa Xia: Visualization. Bo Yang: Review & editing. Deli Wu: Review & editing. Dongjie Niu: Funding acquisition, Review & editing. Youcai Zhao: Review & editing. Xunchang Fei: Writing - review and editing. Zhanbo Cheng: Writing - review and editing. Hongping He: Funding acquisition, Writing - review and editing.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52100152), the Natural Science Foundation of Shenzhen Science and Technology Commission (China) (No. RCBS20210609103644013), and the Stable Support Program of Shenzhen Colleges and Universities (China) (No. 20220810172813001). The Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse Foundation (Tongji University, China) is also acknowledged (PCRRF20013).

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-025-1955-1 and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 Higher Education Press 2025
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(6328 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/