Machine learning for membrane bioreactor research: principles, methods, applications, and a tutorial

Yizhe Lai, Kang Xiao, Yifan He, Xian Liu, Jihua Tan, Wenchao Xue, Aiqian Zhang, Xia Huang

PDF(5722 KB)
PDF(5722 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3) : 34. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-025-1954-2
REVIEW ARTICLE

Machine learning for membrane bioreactor research: principles, methods, applications, and a tutorial

Author information +
History +

Highlights

● Principles and methods of machine learning for MBR application are summarized.

● Available models for MBR pollutant removal and membrane fouling are reviewed.

● A tutorial is given to illustrate machine learning models for fouling prediction.

● Limitations and future improvements for MBR intelligent operation are discussed.

Abstract

Membrane fouling poses a significant challenge to the sustainable development of membrane bioreactor (MBR) technologies for wastewater treatment. The accurate prediction of the membrane filtration process is of great importance for identifying and controlling fouling. Machine learning methods address the limitations of traditional statistical approaches, such as low accuracy, poor generalization ability, and slow convergence, particularly in predicting complex filtration and fouling processes within the realm of big data. This article provides an in-depth exposition of machine learning theory. The study then reviews advances in MBRs that utilize machine learning methods, including artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), decision trees, and ensemble learning. Based on current literature, this study summarizes and compares the model input and output characteristics (including foulant characteristics, solution environments, filtration conditions, operating conditions, and time factors), as well as the selection of models and optimization algorithms. The modeling procedures of SVM, random forest (RF), back propagation neural network (BPNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and genetic algorithm-back propagation (GA-BP) methods are elucidated through a tutorial example. The simulation results demonstrated that all five methods yielded accurate predictions with R2 > 0.8. Finally, the existing challenges in the implementation of machine learning models in MBRs were analyzed. It is notable that integration of deep learning, automated machine learning (AutoML) and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) may facilitate the deployment of models in practical engineering applications. The insights presented here are expected to facilitate the establishment of an intelligent control framework for MBR processes in future endeavors.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Membrane bioreactor / Machine learning / Pollutant removal / Membrane fouling / Model prediction

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yizhe Lai, Kang Xiao, Yifan He, Xian Liu, Jihua Tan, Wenchao Xue, Aiqian Zhang, Xia Huang. Machine learning for membrane bioreactor research: principles, methods, applications, and a tutorial. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2025, 19(3): 34 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-025-1954-2

References

[1]
Abbott A S, Turney J M, Zhang B, Smith D G A, Altarawy D, Schaefer H F III. (2019). PES-learn: an open-source software package for the automated generation of machine learning models of molecular potential energy surfaces. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 15(8): 4386–4398
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Abdul Wahab N, Mahmod N, Vilanova R. (2020). Permeate flux control in SMBR system by using neural network internal model control. Processes, 8(12): 1672
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Ahmed I, Kajol M, Hasan U, Datta P P, Roy A, Reza M R. (2024). ChatGPT versus Bard: a comparative study. Engineering Reports, 6(11): 12890
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Aidan A, Abdel-Jabbar N, Ibrahim T H, Nenov V, Mjalli F. (2008). Neural network modeling and optimization of scheduling backwash for membrane bioreactor. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 10(4): 389–395
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Akaike H. (1974). New look at statistical-model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6): 716–723
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Al-Ghazawi Z, Alawneh R. (2021). Use of artificial neural network for predicting effluent quality parameters and enabling wastewater reuse for climate change resilience: a case from Jordan. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 44: 102423
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Aldrees A, Javed M F, Khan M, Siddiq B. (2024a). Optimized prediction modeling of micropollutant removal efficiency in forward osmosis membrane systems using explainable machine learning algorithms. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 66: 105937
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Aldrees A, Khan M, Taha A T B, Ali M. (2024b). Evaluation of water quality indexes with novel machine learning and SHapley Additive ExPlanation (SHAP) approaches. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 58: 104789
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Alexandridis A K, Zapranis A D. (2013). Wavelet neural networks: a practical guide. Neural Networks, 42: 1–27
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Alkmim A R, De Almeida G M, De Carvalho D M, Amaral M C S, Oliveira S. (2020). Improving knowledge about permeability in membrane bioreactors through sensitivity analysis using artificial neural networks. Environmental Technology, 41(19): 2424–2438
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
BeckM, Poppel K, SpanringM, AuerA, Prudnikova O, KoppM K, KlambauerG, Brandstetter J, HochreiterS J A (2024). xLSTM: Extended long short-term memory. ArVix, abs/2405.04517
[12]
Bi K, Xie L, Zhang H, Chen X, Gu X, Tian Q. (2023). Accurate medium-range global weather forecasting with 3D neural networks. Nature, 619(7970): 533–538
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Bindal S, Singh C K. (2019). Predicting groundwater arsenic contamination: regions at risk in highest populated state of India. Water Research, 159: 65–76
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
BishopC M (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer New York, NY
[15]
Breiman L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1): 5–32
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
BreimanL, Friedman J, OlshenR A, StoneC J (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC
[17]
Browne M W. (2000). Cross-validation methods. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44(1): 108–132
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Byeon H. (2023). Advances in value-based, policy-based, and deep learning-based reinforcement learning. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 14(8): 348–354
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Cai Y H, Ben T, Zaidi A A, Shi Y, Zhang K, Lin A Q, Liu C. (2019a). Effect of pH on pollutants removal of ship sewage treatment in an innovative aerobic-anaerobic micro-sludge MBR system. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 230(7): 163
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Cai Y H, Zaidi A A, Shi Y, Zhang K, Li X, Xiao S H, Lin A Q. (2019b). Influence of salinity on the biological treatment of domestic ship sewage using an air-lift multilevel circulation membrane reactor. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 26(36): 37026–37036
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Castillo O, Aguilar L, Cazarez N, Cardenas S. (2008). Systematic design of a stable type-2 fuzzy logic controller. Applied Soft Computing, 8(3): 1274–1279
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Chang H M, Xu Y, Chen S S, He Z. (2022). Enhanced understanding of osmotic membrane bioreactors through machine learning modeling of water flux and salinity. Science of the Total Environment, 838: 156009
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Chen C, Sun M Z, Chang J, Liu Z W, Zhu X Z, Xiao K, Song G Q, Wang H, Liu G L, Huang X. (2022). Unravelling temperature-dependent fouling mechanism in a pilot-scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor via statistical modelling. Journal of Membrane Science, 644: 120145
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Chen J C, Ng W J, Luo R, Mu S, Zhang Z, Andersen M, Jorgensen P E. (2012). Membrane bioreactor process modeling and optimization: ULU Pandan water reclamation plant. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 138(12): 1218–1226
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
ChenT, Guestrin C (2016). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. San Francisco: Association for Computing Machinery, 785–794
[26]
Chen W, Ran H, Cao X, Wang J, Teng D, Chen J, Zheng X. (2020). Estimating PM2.5 with high-resolution 1-km AOD data and an improved machine learning model over Shenzhen, China. Science of the Total Environment, 746: 141093
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Choi J G, Bae T H, Kim J H, Tak T M, Randall A A. (2002). The behavior of membrane fouling initiation on the crossflow membrane bioreactor system. Journal of Membrane Science, 203(1−2): 103–113
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Cortez P, Embrechts M J. (2013). Using sensitivity analysis and visualization techniques to open black box data mining models. Information Sciences, 225: 1–17
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
de Campos Souza P V. (2020). Fuzzy neural networks and neuro-fuzzy networks: a review the main techniques and applications used in the literature. Applied Soft Computing, 92: 106275
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Dorigo M, Birattari M, Stützle T. (2006). Ant colony optimization. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 1(4): 28–39
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Espel D, Courty S, Auda Y, Sheeren D, Elger A. (2020). Submerged macrophyte assessment in rivers: an automatic mapping method using Pleiades imagery. Water Research, 186: 116353
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Gao Q, Li Z, Pan J. (2019). A convolutional neural network for airport security inspection of dangerous goods. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, December 27–29, 2019, Guangzhou , China, 252(4): 042042
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Garson G D. (1991). Interpreting neural-network connection weights. AI Expert, 6(4): 46–51
[34]
Gedeon T D. (1997). Data mining of inputs: analysing magnitude and functional measures. International Journal of Neural Systems, 8(2): 209–218
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Geissler S, Wintgens T, Melin T, Vossenkaul K, Kullmann C. (2005). Modelling approaches for filtration processes with novel submerged capillary modules in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. Desalination, 178(1−3): 125–134
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Gideon S. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2): 461–464
[37]
Goh A T C. (1995). Backpropagation neural networks for modeling complex-systems. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 9(3): 143–151
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Greff K, Srivastava R K, Koutník J, Steunebrink B R, Schmidhuber J. (2017). LSTM: a search space odyssey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 28(10): 2222–2232
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Grömping U. (2015). Variable importance in regression models. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 7(2): 137–152
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Hamedi H, Ehteshami M, Mirbagheri S A, Zendehboudi S. (2019). New deterministic tools to systematically investigate fouling occurrence in membrane bioreactors. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 144: 334–353
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Hannan E J, Quinn B G. (1979). The determination of the order of an autoregression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical Methodology, 41(2): 190–195
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Hazrati H, Moghaddam A H, Rostamizadeh M. (2017). The influence of hydraulic retention time on cake layer specifications in the membrane bioreactor: experimental and artificial neural network modeling. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 5(3): 3005–3013
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Hosseinzadeh A, Zhou J L, Altaee A, Baziar M, Li X. (2020). Modeling water flux in osmotic membrane bioreactor by adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system and artificial neural network. Bioresource Technology, 310: 123391
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
HuangG, Liu Z, MaatenL V D, WeinbergerK Q (2017). Densely connected convolutional networks. Honolulu, HI, USA: IEEE, 2261–2269
[45]
Huang Z, Ong S L, Ng H Y. (2011). Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for low-strength wastewater treatment: effect of HRT and SRT on treatment performance and membrane fouling. Water Research, 45(2): 705–713
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Irfan M, Waqas S, Arshad U, Khan J A, Legutko S, Kruszelnicka I, Ginter-Kramarczyk D, Rahman S, Skrzypczak A. (2022). Response surface methodology and artificial neural network modelling of membrane rotating biological contactors for wastewater treatment. Materials, 15(5): 1932
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Jiang M, He Y, Song C, Pan Y, Qiu T, Tian S. (2021). Disaggregating climatic and anthropogenic influences on vegetation changes in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China. Science of the Total Environment, 786: 147574
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Juntawang C, Rongsayamanont C, Khan E. (2017). Entrapped cells-based-anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating domestic wastewater: performances, fouling, and bacterial community structure. Chemosphere, 187: 147–155
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Karaboga D, Basturk B. (2007). A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. Journal of Global Optimization, 39(3): 459–471
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Katoch S, Chauhan S S, Kumar V. (2021). A review on genetic algorithm: past, present, and future. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80(5): 8091–8126
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Kawakatsu T, Nakao S, Kimura S. (1993). Effects of size and compressibility of suspended particles and surface pore-size of membrane on flux in cross-flow filtration. Journal of Membrane Science, 81(1−2): 173–190
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Kim J H, Shin J K, Lee H, Lee D H, Kang J H, Cho K H, Lee Y G, Chon K, Baek S S, Park Y. (2021a). Improving the performance of machine learning models for early warning of harmful algal blooms using an adaptive synthetic sampling method. Water Research, 207: 117821
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Kim S Y, Ćurko J, Gajdoš Kljusurić J, Matošić M, Crnek V, López-Vázquez C M, Garcia H A, Brdjanović D, Valinger D. (2021b). Use of near-infrared spectroscopy on predicting wastewater constituents to facilitate the operation of a membrane bioreactor. Chemosphere, 272: 129899
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Kiranyaz S, Avci O, Abdeljaber O, Ince T, Gabbouj M, Inman D J. (2021). 1D convolutional neural networks and applications: a survey. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 151: 107398
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Kruskal W. (1987). Relative importance by averaging over orderings. American Statistician, 41(1): 6–10
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Krzeminski P, Leverette L, Malamis S, Katsou E. (2017). Membrane bioreactors: a review on recent developments in energy reduction, fouling control, novel configurations, LCA and market prospects. Journal of Membrane Science, 527: 207–227
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Kulkarni P, Chellam S. (2010). Disinfection by-product formation following chlorination of drinking water: artificial neural network models and changes in speciation with treatment. Science of the Total Environment, 408(19): 4202–4210
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Kurita T, Kimura K, Watanabe Y. (2014). The influence of granular materials on the operation and membrane fouling characteristics of submerged MBRs. Journal of Membrane Science, 469: 292–299
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Kurita T, Kimura K, Watanabe Y. (2015). Energy saving in the operation of submerged MBRs by the insertion of baffles and the introduction of granular materials. Separation and Purification Technology, 141: 207–213
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Li C Q, Yang Z X, Yan H Y, Wang T. (2014). The application and research of the GA-BP neural network algorithm in the MBR membrane fouling. Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2014(1): 673156
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Li G Y, Ji J Y, Ni J L, Wang S R, Guo Y T, Hu Y S, Liu S W, Huang S F, Li Y Y. (2022). Application of deep learning for predicting the treatment performance of real municipal wastewater based on one-year operation of two anaerobic membrane bioreactors. Science of the Total Environment, 813: 151920
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Li H M, Wang J H, Wang Q G, Tian C H, Qian X, Leng X Z. (2017). Magnetic properties as a proxy for predicting fine-particle-bound heavy metals in a support vector machine approach. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(12): 6927–6935
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Li S, Shi Z, Chen S C, Ji W J, Zhou L Q, Yu W, Webster R. (2015). In situ measurements of organic carbon in soil profiles using vis-NIR spectroscopy on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(8): 4980–4987
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Li W W, Li C Q, Wang T. (2020). Application of machine learning algorithms in MBR simulation under big data platform. Water Practice & Technology, 15(4): 1238–1247
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Li X A, Wu J, Tai X, Xu J, Wang Y G. (2024a). Solving a class of multi-scale elliptic PDEs by Fourier-based mixed physics informed neural networks. Journal of Computational Physics, 508: 113012
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Li Y, Fan L, Liu Y, Huang Z, Chen Y, Wang N, Zhang Z. (2024b). Fully sparse fusion for 3D object detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 46(11): 7217–7231
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
Lin H J, Zhang M J, Wang F Y, Meng F G, Liao B Q, Hong H C, Chen J R, Gao W J. (2014). A critical review of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) in membrane bioreactors: characteristics, roles in membrane fouling and control strategies. Journal of Membrane Science, 460: 110–125
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Liu C Q, Xiao J W, Li H Y, Chen Q, Sun D Z, Cheng X, Li P S, Dang Y, Smith J A, Holmes D E. (2021). High efficiency in-situ biogas upgrading in a bioelectrochemical system with low energy input. Water Research, 197: 117055
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
Liu J, Kang X, Luan X, Gao L, Tian H, Liu X. (2020a). Performance and membrane fouling behaviors analysis with SVR-LibSVM model in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating low-strength domestic sewage. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 19: 100844
CrossRef Google scholar
[70]
LiuZ, WangY, VaidyaS, Ruehle F, HalversonJ, SoljacicM, HouT Y, TegmarkM J A (2024). KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks. ArXiv,
[71]
Liu Z W, Yu J L, Xiao K, Chen C, Ma H, Liang P, Zhang X Y, Huang X. (2020b). Quantitative relationships for the impact of gas sparging conditions on membrane fouling in anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276: 123139
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
Lundberg S M, Erion G, Chen H, Degrave A, Prutkin J M, Nair B, Katz R, Himmelfarb J, Bansal N, Lee S I. (2020). From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(1): 56–67
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
Ma K, Tang C, Zhang W, Cui B, Ji K, Chen Z, Abraham A. (2023). DC-CNN: Dual-channel Convolutional Neural Networks with attention-pooling for fake news detection. Applied Intelligence, 53(7): 8354–8369
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
MadniH A, Umer M, IshaqA, AbuzinadahN, Saidani O, AlsubaiS, HamdiM, AshrafI (2023). Water-quality prediction based on H2O autoML and explainable AI techniques, Water, 15(3): 475
[75]
Mallet A, Charnier C, Latrille E, Bendoula R, Roger J M, Steyer J P. (2022). Fast and robust NIRS-based characterization of raw organic waste: using non-linear methods to handle water effects. Water Research, 227: 119308
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
McMillan L, Fayaz J, Varga L. (2024). Domain-informed variational neural networks and support vector machines based leakage detection framework to augment self-healing in water distribution networks. Water Research, 249: 120983
CrossRef Google scholar
[77]
Meireles M, Aimar P, Sanchez V. (1991). Effects of protein fouling on the apparent pore-size distribution of sieving membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 56(1): 13–28
CrossRef Google scholar
[78]
Meng F G, Zhang S Q, Oh Y, Zhou Z B, Shin H S, Chae S R. (2017). Fouling in membrane bioreactors: an updated review. Water Research, 114: 151–180
CrossRef Google scholar
[79]
Mirbagheri S A, Bagheri M, Bagheri Z, Kamarkhani A M. (2015a). Evaluation and prediction of membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor with simultaneous upward and downward aeration using artificial neural network-genetic algorithm. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 96: 111–124
CrossRef Google scholar
[80]
Mirbagheri S A, Bagheri M, Boudaghpour S, Ehteshami M, Bagheri Z. (2015b). Performance evaluation and modeling of a submerged membrane bioreactor treating combined municipal and industrial wastewater using radial basis function artificial neural networks. Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering, 13(1): 17
CrossRef Google scholar
[81]
Mirjalili S, Mirjalili S M, Lewis A. (2014). Grey Wolf Optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 69: 46–61
CrossRef Google scholar
[82]
Mohammadi E, Stokholm-Bjerregaard M, Hansen A A, Nielsen P H, Ortiz-Arroyo D, Durdevic P. (2024). Deep learning based simulators for the phosphorus removal process control in wastewater treatment via deep reinforcement learning algorithms. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 133: 107992
CrossRef Google scholar
[83]
MolnarC (2019). Interpretable Machine Learning: a Guide for Making Black Box Models Explainable. München: Digital Reserch Academy
[84]
Nguyen P C H, Nguyen Y T, Choi J B, Seshadri P K, Udaykumar H S, Baek S S. (2023). PARC: physics-aware recurrent convolutional neural networks to assimilate meso scale reactive mechanics of energetic materials. Science Advances, 9(17): eadd6868
CrossRef Google scholar
[85]
Nguyen X C, Ly Q V, Nguyen T T H, Ngo H T T, Hu Y X, Zhang Z H. (2022). Potential application of machine learning for exploring adsorption mechanisms of pharmaceuticals onto biochars. Chemosphere, 287: 132203
CrossRef Google scholar
[86]
Niu C, Zhang Z, Cai T, Pan Y, Lu X, Zhen G. (2024). Sludge bound-EPS solubilization enhance CH4 bioconversion and membrane fouling mitigation in electrochemical anaerobic membrane bioreactor: insights from continuous operation and interpretable machine learning algorithms. Water Research, 264: 122243
CrossRef Google scholar
[87]
Niu C X, Li X S, Dai R B, Wang Z W. (2022). Artificial intelligence-incorporated membrane fouling prediction for membrane-based processes in the past 20 years: a critical review. Water Research, 216: 118299
CrossRef Google scholar
[88]
Olden J D, Joy M K, Death R G. (2004). An accurate comparison of methods for quantifying variable importance in artificial neural networks using simulated data. Ecological Modelling, 178(3−4): 389–397
CrossRef Google scholar
[89]
Oliker N, Ostfeld A. (2014). A coupled classification: evolutionary optimization model for contamination event detection in water distribution systems. Water Research, 51: 234–245
CrossRef Google scholar
[90]
Panda S R, Bhandaru N, Mukherjee R, De S. (2015). Ultrafiltration of oily waste water: contribution of surface roughness in membrane properties and fouling characteristics of polyacrylonitrile membranes. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 93(11): 2031–2042
CrossRef Google scholar
[91]
Peter B, Yoav F, Wee Sun L, Robert E S. (1998). Boosting the margin: a new explanation for the effectiveness of voting methods. Annals of Statistics, 26(5): 1651–1686
[92]
Qian Y G, Zhou W Q, Yan J L, Li W F, Han L J. (2015). Comparing machine learning classifiers for object-based land cover classification using very high resolution imagery. Remote Sensing (Basel), 7(1): 153–168
CrossRef Google scholar
[93]
Qu J H, Dai X H, Hu H Y, Huang X, Chen Z, Li T, Cao Y S, Daigger G T. (2022). Emerging trends and prospects for municipal wastewater management in China. ACS ES&T Engineering, 2(3): 323–336
CrossRef Google scholar
[94]
QuinlanJ R (1993). C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
[95]
RaychaudhuriS (2008). Introduction to Monte Carlo simulation, 2008 Winter Simulation Conference, 91–100, December 7–10, 2008, Miami, FL, USA,
[96]
Rouet-Leduc B, Hulbert C. (2024). Automatic detection of methane emissions in multispectral satellite imagery using a vision transformer. Nature Communications, 15(1): 3801
CrossRef Google scholar
[97]
Sadeghi I, Aroujalian A, Raisi A, Dabir B, Fathizadeh M. (2013). Surface modification of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes by corona air plasma for separation of oil/water emulsions. Journal of Membrane Science, 430: 24–36
CrossRef Google scholar
[98]
Salehin I, Islam M S, Saha P, Noman S M, Tuni A, Hasan M M, Baten M A. (2024). AutoML: a systematic review on automated machine learning with neural architecture search. Journal of Information and Intelligence, 2(1): 52–81
CrossRef Google scholar
[99]
Samek W. (2020). Learning with explainable trees. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(1): 16–17
CrossRef Google scholar
[100]
Schmitt F, Banu R, Yeom I T, Do K U. (2018). Development of artificial neural networks to predict membrane fouling in an anoxic-aerobic membrane bioreactor treating domestic wastewater. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 133: 47–58
CrossRef Google scholar
[101]
Senthil Kumar D, Arumugam S S, Lordwin Cecil Prabhaker M, Daisy Merina R. (2024). Eamlm: Enhanced automated machine learning model for IoT based water quality analysis with real-time dataset. Automatic Control and Computer Sciences, 58(1): 66–77
CrossRef Google scholar
[102]
Shi Y K, Wang Z W, Du X J, Ling G B, Jia W C, Lu Y R. (2022). Research on the membrane fouling diagnosis of MBR membrane module based on ECA-CNN. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 10(3): 107649
CrossRef Google scholar
[103]
Shimizu Y, Rokudai M, Tohya S, Kayawake E, Yazawa T, Tanaka H, Eguchi K. (1990). Effect of membrane resistance on filtration characteristics for methanogenic waste. Kagaku Kogaku Ronbunshu, 16(1): 145–151
CrossRef Google scholar
[104]
Silver D, Huang A, Maddison C J, Guez A, Sifre L, Van Den Driessche G, Schrittwieser J, Antonoglou I, Panneershelvam V, Lanctot M. . (2016). Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529(7587): 484–489
CrossRef Google scholar
[105]
Suman B, Kumar P. (2006). A survey of simulated annealing as a tool for single and multiobjective optimization. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(10): 1143–1160
CrossRef Google scholar
[106]
Sun X, Wang P, Lu W, Zhu Z, Lu X, He Q, Li J, Rong X, Yang Z, Chang H. . (2023). RingMo: a remote sensing foundation model with masked image modeling. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 61: 1–22
CrossRef Google scholar
[107]
SzegedyC, Ioffe S, VanhouckeV, Alemi A a J A (2016). Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the impact of residual connections on learning. ArXiv,
[108]
SzegedyC, Wei L, YangqingJ, SermanetP, ReedS, AnguelovD, Erhan D, VanhouckeV, RabinovichA (2015). Going deeper with convolutions. 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 1–9, June 7–12, 2015, Boston, MA, USA
[109]
Taheri E, Amin M M, Fatehizadeh A, Rezakazemi M, Aminabhavi T M. (2021). Artificial intelligence modeling to predict transmembrane pressure in anaerobic membrane bioreactor-sequencing batch reactor during biohydrogen production. Journal of Environmental Management, 292: 112759
CrossRef Google scholar
[110]
TaoY, LiC (2018). Application of PSO-RBF neural network in MBR membrane pollution prediction. 2018 Eighth International Conference on Instrumentation & Measurement, Computer, Communication and Control (IMCCC), 873–877, July 19–21, 2018, Harbin, China
[111]
TellaA, Balogun A L, AdebisiN, AbdullahS (2021). Spatial assessment of PM10 hotspots using random forest, k-nearest neighbour and Naive Bayes. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 12(10): 101202
[112]
Tu S, Xu L. (2012). A theoretical investigation of several model selection criteria for dimensionality reduction. Pattern Recognition Letters, 33(9): 1117–1126
CrossRef Google scholar
[113]
Uddin M G, Nash S, Rahman A, Olbert A I. (2023). Performance analysis of the water quality index model for predicting water state using machine learning techniques. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 169: 808–828
CrossRef Google scholar
[114]
Vasilaki V, Conca V, Frison N, Eusebi A L, Fatone F, Katsou E. (2020). A knowledge discovery framework to predict the N2O emissions in the wastewater sector. Water Research, 178: 115799
CrossRef Google scholar
[115]
VasuP K A, Gabriel J, ZhuJ, TuzelO, RanjanA (2023). FastViT: A fast hybrid vision Transformer using structural reparameterization. Paris, France: IEEE, 5762–5772
[116]
Vatanpour V, Madaeni S S, Moradian R, Zinadini S, Astinchap B. (2011). Fabrication and characterization of novel antifouling nanofiltration membrane prepared from oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotube/polyethersulfone nanocomposite. Journal of Membrane Science, 375(1−2): 284–294
CrossRef Google scholar
[117]
Viet N D, Im S J, Kim C M, Jang A. (2021). An osmotic membrane bioreactor-clarifier system with a deep learning model for simultaneous reduction of salt accumulation and membrane fouling. Chemosphere, 272: 129872
CrossRef Google scholar
[118]
Viet N D, Jang A. (2021). Development of artificial intelligence-based models for the prediction of filtration performance and membrane fouling in an osmotic membrane bioreactor. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 9(4): 105337
CrossRef Google scholar
[119]
Wang H, Zeng J, Dai R, Wang Z. (2024a). Understanding rejection mechanisms of trace organic contaminants by polyamide membranes via data-knowledge codriven machine learning. Environmental Science & Technology, 58(13): 5878–5888
CrossRef Google scholar
[120]
Wang X T, Sun X, Wu Y B, Gao F, Yang Y. (2024b). Optimizing reverse osmosis desalination from brackish waters: predictive approach employing response surface methodology and artificial neural network models. Journal of Membrane Science, 704: 122883
CrossRef Google scholar
[121]
Wang Z W, Wu X H. (2015). Mathematical and artificial neural network models to predict the membrane fouling behavior of an intermittently-aerated membrane bioreactor under sub-critical flux. Clean, 43(7): 1002–1009
CrossRef Google scholar
[122]
WeiS, KangY, PengZ, Xiao X, WangL, YangY, SalimF D J A (2024). STEMO: early spatio-temporal forecasting with multi-objective reinforcement learning. ArXiv,
[123]
Wolf G, Almeida J S, Crespo J G, Reis M A M. (2003). Monitoring of biofilm reactors using natural fluorescence fingerprints. Water Science and Technology, 47(5): 161–167
CrossRef Google scholar
[124]
Wolf G, Almeida J S, Pinheiro C, Correia V, Rodrigues C, Reis M A M, Crespo J G. (2001). Two-dimensional fluorometry coupled with artificial neural networks: a novel method for on-line monitoring of complex biological processes. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 72(3): 297–306
CrossRef Google scholar
[125]
Woo T, Nam K, Heo S, Lim J Y, Kim S, Yoo C. (2022). Predictive maintenance system for membrane replacement time detection using AI-based functional profile monitoring: application to a full-scale MBR plant. Journal of Membrane Science, 649: 120400
CrossRef Google scholar
[126]
Wu J L, Chen F T, Huang X, Geng W Y, Wen X H. (2006). Using inorganic coagulants to control membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Desalination, 197(1−3): 124–136
CrossRef Google scholar
[127]
Wu J L, Huang X. (2008). Effect of dosing polymeric ferric sulfate on fouling characteristics, mixed liquor properties and performance in a long-term running membrane bioreactor. Separation and Purification Technology, 63(1): 45–52
CrossRef Google scholar
[128]
Wu Q, Ye Y, Liu Y, Ng M K. (2012). SNP selection and classification of genome-wide SNP data using stratified sampling random forests. IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience, 11(3): 216–227
CrossRef Google scholar
[129]
Xiao K, Liang S, Wang X M, Chen C S, Huang X. (2019). Current state and challenges of full-scale membrane bioreactor applications: a critical review. Bioresource Technology, 271: 473–481
CrossRef Google scholar
[130]
Xiao K, Xu Y, Liang S, Lei T, Sun J Y, Wen X H, Zhang H X, Chen C S, Huang X. (2014). Engineering application of membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment in China: current state and future prospect. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 8(6): 805–819
CrossRef Google scholar
[131]
Xie L, Luo S, Liu Y, Ruan X, Gong K, Ge Q, Li K, Valev V K, Liu G, Zhang L. (2023). Automatic identification of individual nanoplastics by Raman spectroscopy based on machine learning. Environmental Science & Technology, 57(46): 18203–18214
CrossRef Google scholar
[132]
Xu H, Xiao K, Wang X M, Liang S, Wei C H, Wen X H, Huang X. (2020). Outlining the roles of membrane-foulant and foulant-foulant interactions in organic fouling during microfiltration and ultrafiltration: a mini-review. Frontiers in Chemistry, 8: 417
CrossRef Google scholar
[133]
Xu J, Xu Z, Kuang J, Lin C, Xiao L, Huang X, Zhang Y. (2021). An alternative to laboratory testing: random forest-based water quality prediction framework for inland and nearshore water bodies. Water, 13(22): 3262
CrossRef Google scholar
[134]
Xu Y R, Zeng X H, Bernard S, He Z. (2022). Data-driven prediction of neutralizer pH and valve position towards precise control of chemical dosage in a wastewater treatment plant. Journal of Cleaner Production, 348: 131360
CrossRef Google scholar
[135]
Yamamoto K, Hiasa M, Mahmood T, Matsuo T. (1989). Direct solid-liquid separation using hollow fiber membrane in an activated-sludge aeration tank. Water Science and Technology, 21(4−5): 43–54
CrossRef Google scholar
[136]
Yamato N, Kimura K, Miyoshi T, Watanabe Y. (2006). Difference in membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) caused by membrane polymer materials. Journal of Membrane Science, 280(1−2): 911–919
CrossRef Google scholar
[137]
Yang F, Lu W H, Luo L K, Li T. (2012). Margin optimization based pruning for random forest. Neurocomputing, 94: 54–63
CrossRef Google scholar
[138]
YangX S (2009). Firefly algorithms for multimodal optimization. Watanabe O and Zeugmann T, eds. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 169–178
[139]
YangX S (2010). Nature inspired cooperative strategies for optimization (NICSO 2010). González J R, Pelta D A, Cruz C, Terrazas G, Krasnogor N, eds. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 65–74
[140]
Yao J Q, Wu Z Y, Liu Y, Zheng X Y, Zhang H B, Dong R J, Qiao W. (2022). Predicting membrane fouling in a high solid AnMBR treating OFMSW leachate through a genetic algorithm and the optimization of a BP neural network model. Journal of Environmental Management, 307: 114585
CrossRef Google scholar
[141]
Yaqub M, Asif H, Kim S, Lee W. (2020). Modeling of a full-scale sewage treatment plant to predict the nutrient removal efficiency using a long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 37: 101388
CrossRef Google scholar
[142]
YasminN S A, Wahab N A, YusufZ (2017). Modeling of membrane bioreactor of wastewater treatment using support vector machine. Melaka, MALAYSIA: Springer, Singapore, 485–495
[143]
YoonS H (2015). Membrane Bioreactor Processes: Principles and applications. Boca Raton: Membrane Bioreactor Processes: Principles and Applications
[144]
YuZ, RuanJ, XingD (2023). Explainable reinforcement learning via a causal world model. ArXiv,
[145]
ZadehL A (2023). Granular, Fuzzy, And Soft Computing. Lin T Y, Liau C J, Kacprzyk J, eds. New York: Springer US, 19–49
[146]
ZagoruykoS, Komodakis N J A (2016). Wide residual networks. ArXiv,
[147]
Zeiler M D, Fergus R. (2014). Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks. Fleet D, Pajdla T, Schiele B, Tuytelaars T, eds. Computer Vision – ECCV 2014. ECCV 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Cham: Springer, 8689: 818–833
[148]
Zhang B, Mao X, Tang X M, Tang H L, Zhang B, Shen Y, Shi W X. (2022). Effect of modified microbial flocculant on membrane fouling alleviation in a hybrid aerobic granular sludge membrane system for wastewater reuse. Separation and Purification Technology, 290: 120819
CrossRef Google scholar
[149]
Zhang G J, Ji S L, Gao X, Liu Z Z. (2008). Adsorptive fouling of extracellular polymeric substances with polymeric ultrafiltration membrances. Journal of Membrane Science, 309(1−2): 28–35
[150]
ZhangH, Ma Y, JiangT, ZhangG, YangF (2012). Influence of activated sludge properties on flux behavior in osmosis membrane bioreactor (OMBR). Journal of Membrane Science, 390–391: 270–276
[151]
Zhang Q, Yang L T, Chen Z, Li P. (2018). A survey on deep learning for big data. Information Fusion, 42: 146–157
CrossRef Google scholar
[152]
Zhang Q Y, Singh S, Stuckey D C. (2017). Fouling reduction using adsorbents/flocculants in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Bioresource Technology, 239: 226–235
CrossRef Google scholar
[153]
Zhang X, Long T, Deng S, Chen Q, Chen S, Luo M, Yu R, Zhu X. (2023). Machine learning modeling based on microbial community for prediction of natural attenuation in groundwater. Environmental Science & Technology, 57(50): 21212–21223
CrossRef Google scholar
[154]
Zhao B, Chen H, Gao D K, Xu L Z, Zhang Y Y. (2020). Cleaning decision model of MBR membrane based on Bandelet neural network optimized by improved Bat algorithm. Applied Soft Computing, 91: 106211
CrossRef Google scholar
[155]
Zhao Z, Lou Y, Chen Y, Lin H, Li R, Yu G. (2019). Prediction of interfacial interactions related with membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor based on radial basis function artificial neural network (ANN). Bioresource Technology, 282: 262–268
CrossRef Google scholar
[156]
Zhong H, Yuan Y, Luo L, Ye J, Chen M, Zhong C. (2022). Water quality prediction of MBR based on machine learning: a novel dataset contribution analysis method. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 50: 103296
CrossRef Google scholar
[157]
Zhong S F, Guan X H. (2023). Count-based Morgan fingerprint: a more efficient and interpretable molecular representation in developing machine learning-based predictive regression models for water contaminants: activities and properties. Environmental Science & Technology, 57(46): 18193–18202
CrossRef Google scholar
[158]
Zhong S F, Zhang K, Bagheri M, Burken J G, Gu A, Li B K, Ma X M, Marrone B L, Ren Z J, Schrier J. . (2021). Machine learning: New ideas and tools in environmental science and engineering. Environmental Science & Technology, 55(19): 12741–12754
CrossRef Google scholar
[159]
Zhou M, Li Y. (2024). Spatial distribution and source identification of potentially toxic elements in Yellow River Delta soils, China: an interpretable machine-learning approach. Science of the Total Environment, 912: 169092
CrossRef Google scholar
[160]
Zhuang L P, Tang B, Bin L Y, Li P, Huang S S, Fu F L. (2021). Performance prediction of an internal-circulation membrane bioreactor based on models comparison and data features analysis. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 166: 107850
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52370059), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. JQ22027), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. E2EG0502X2).

Conflict of Interests

Kang Xiao and Xia Huang are editorial board members of Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering. The authors declare that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-025-1954-2 and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 Higher Education Press 2025
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(5722 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/