Variations in summertime ozone in Nanjing between 2015 and 2020: roles of meteorology, radical chain length and ozone production efficiency

Lin Li, Jingyi Li, Momei Qin, Xiaodong Xie, Jianlin Hu, Yuqiang Zhang

PDF(13327 KB)
PDF(13327 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (11) : 137. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-024-1897-z
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Variations in summertime ozone in Nanjing between 2015 and 2020: roles of meteorology, radical chain length and ozone production efficiency

Author information +
History +

Highlights

● Temperature, relative humidity and wind field are influential meteorological factors.

● OH radical chain length and OPE are dominated by the NO x decline.

● The O3 formation is controlled by VOCs and NO x in 2020 summertime.

Abstract

Changes in ozone (O3) can be evaluated to inform policy effectiveness and develop reasonable emissions reduction measures. This study investigated the causes of summertime maximum daily 8-h average (MDA8) O3 variation between 2015 and 2020 in Nanjing, China, a megacity in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region, from the perspective of meteorological conditions and anthropogenic emissions of O3 precursors (VOCs and NOx). Compared with 2015, the observed MDA8 O3 decreased by 19.1 μg/m3 in August 2020. The indirect and indirect impacts of meteorological conditions contributed 44% of the decline, with temperature, relative humidity, and wind playing important roles in the O3 variation. The O3 drop by 10.7 μg/m3 (56% of the total decrease) may have been due to the decreases in anthropogenic emissions of VOCs and NOx by 7.8% and 11.7%, respectively. The longer hydroxyl (OH) radical chain length and higher ozone production efficiency (OPE) indicated that the reduction of anthropogenic emissions accelerated the ROx (ROx = OH + HO2 + RO2) and NOx cycles in O3 production, making O3 more sensitive to NOx. This corresponded to the O3 formation shifting from a VOC-limited regime in 2015 to a transition regime in 2020 and O3 decrease with anthropogenic emission reduction. Hence, the joint control of O3 precursor emissions can effectively mitigate O3 pollution in Nanjing.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Ozone / Meteorological condition / Anthropogenic emission / OH radical chain length / OPE

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Lin Li, Jingyi Li, Momei Qin, Xiaodong Xie, Jianlin Hu, Yuqiang Zhang. Variations in summertime ozone in Nanjing between 2015 and 2020: roles of meteorology, radical chain length and ozone production efficiency. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(11): 137 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-024-1897-z

References

[1]
An J, Zou J, Wang J, Lin X, Zhu B. (2015). Differences in ozone photochemical characteristics between the megacity Nanjing and its suburban surroundings, Yangtze River Delta, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(24): 19607–19617
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Cao J, Qiu X, Liu Y, Yan X, Gao J, Peng L. (2022). Identifying the dominant driver of elevated surface ozone concentration in North China plain during summertime 2012–2017. Environmental Pollution, 300: 118912
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Chen L, Zhu J, Liao H, Yang Y, Yue X. (2020). Meteorological influences on PM2.5 and O3 trends and associated health burden since China’s clean air actions. Science of the Total Environment, 744: 140837
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Dang R, Liao H, Fu Y. (2021). Quantifying the anthropogenic and meteorological influences on summertime surface ozone in China over 2012–2017. Science of the Total Environment, 754: 142394
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Ding A J, Fu C B, Yang X Q, Sun J N, Zheng L F, Xie Y N, Herrmann E, Nie W, Petäjä T, Kerminen V M. . (2013). Ozone and fine particle in the western Yangtze River Delta: an overview of 1 yr data at the SORPES station. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 13(11): 5813–5830
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Ding J, Dai Q, Fan W, Lu M, Zhang Y, Han S, Feng Y. (2023). Impacts of meteorology and precursor emission change on O3 variation in Tianjin, China from 2015 to 2021. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 126: 506–516
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Fan M Y, Zhang Y L, Lin Y C, Li L, Xie F, Hu J, Mozaffar A, Cao F. (2021). Source apportionments of atmospheric volatile organic compounds in Nanjing, China during high ozone pollution season. Chemosphere, 263: 128025
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Guenther A, Jiang X, Heald C, Sakulyanontvittaya T, Duhl T, Emmons L, Wang X. (2012). The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions. Geoscientific Model Development, 5(6): 1471–1492
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Hembeck L, He H, Vinciguerra T P, Canty T P, Dickerson R R, Salawitch R J, Loughner C. (2019). Measured and modelled ozone photochemical production in the Baltimore-Washington airshed. Atmospheric Environment: X, 2: 100017
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Hirsch A I, Munger J W, Jacob D J, Horowitz L W, Goldstein A H. (1996). Seasonal variation of the ozone production efficiency per unit NOx at Harvard Forest, Massachusetts. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101(D7): 12659–12666
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Huang C, Chen C H, Li L, Cheng Z, Wang H L, Huang H Y, Streets D G, Wang Y J, Zhang G F, Chen Y R. (2011). Emission inventory of anthropogenic air pollutants and VOC species in the Yangtze River Delta region, China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11(9): 4105–4120
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Jin X, Holloway T. (2015). Spatial and temporal variability of ozone sensitivity over China observed from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument. Journal of Geophysical Research. Atmospheres, 120(14): 7229–7246
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Li K, Jacob D J, Liao H, Shen L, Zhang Q, Bates K H. (2019). Anthropogenic drivers of 2013–2017 trends in summer surface ozone in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(2): 422–427
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Li K, Jacob D J, Shen L, Lu X, De Smedt I, Liao H. (2020). Increases in surface ozone pollution in China from 2013 to 2019: anthropogenic and meteorological influences. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20(19): 11423–11433
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Li L, Hu J, Li J, Gong K, Wang X, Ying Q, Qin M, Liao H, Guo S, Hu M. . (2021). Modelling air quality during the EXPLORE-YRD campaign. Part II. Regional source apportionment of ozone and PM2.5. Atmospheric Environment, 247: 118063
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Li L, Xie F, Li J, Gong K, Xie X, Qin Y, Qin M, Hu J. (2022). Diagnostic analysis of regional ozone pollution in Yangtze River Delta, China: a case study in summer 2020. Science of the Total Environment, 812: 151511
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Ling Z H, Guo H, Lam S H M, Saunders S M, Wang T. (2014). Atmospheric photochemical reactivity and ozone production at two sites in Hong Kong: application of a Master Chemical Mechanism–photochemical box model. Journal of Geophysical Research. Atmospheres, 119(17): 10567–10582
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Liu H, Liu S, Xue B, Lv Z, Meng Z, Yang X, Xue T, Yu Q, He K. (2018). Ground-level ozone pollution and its health impacts in China. Atmospheric Environment, 173: 223–230
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Liu Y, Geng G, Cheng J, Liu Y, Xiao Q, Liu L, Shi Q, Tong D, He K, Zhang Q. (2023). Drivers of increasing ozone during the two phases of clean air actions in China 2013–2020. Environmental Science & Technology, 57(24): 8954–8964
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Liu Y, Wang T. (2020). Worsening urban ozone pollution in China from 2013 to 2017. Part 1: The complex and varying roles of meteorology. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20(11): 6305–6321
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Lu X, Hong J, Zhang L, Cooper O R, Schultz M G, Xu X, Wang T, Gao M, Zhao Y, Zhang Y. (2018). Severe surface ozone pollution in China: a global perspective. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 5(8): 487–494
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Lu X, Zhang L, Chen Y, Zhou M, Zheng B, Li K, Liu Y, Lin J, Fu T M, Zhang Q. (2019). Exploring 2016–2017 surface ozone pollution over China: source contributions and meteorological influences. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19(12): 8339–8361
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Mao J, Li L, Li J, Sulaymon I D, Xiong K, Wang K, Zhu J, Chen G, Ye F, Zhang N. . (2022). Evaluation of long-term modeling fine particulate matter and ozone in China during 2013–2019. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10: 872249
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Nalam A, Lupascu A, Ansari T, Butler T. (2024). Regional and sectoral contributions of NOx and reactive carbon emission sources to global trends in tropospheric ozone during the 2000–2018 period. EGUsphere, 2024: 1–39
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Ninneman M, Lu S, Lee P, Mcqueen J, Huang J, Demerjian K, Schwab J. (2017). Observed and model-derived ozone production efficiency over urban and rural New York state. Atmosphere (Basel), 8(7): 126
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Nussbaumer C M, Cohen R C. (2020). The role of temperature and NOx in ozone trends in the Los Angeles Basin. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(24): 15652–15659
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Qi L, Tian Z, Jiang N, Zheng F, Zhao Y, Geng Y, Duan X. (2023). Collaborative control of fine particles and ozone required in China for health benefit. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 17(8): 92
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Romer P S, Duffey K C, Wooldridge P J, Edgerton E, Baumann K, Feiner P A, Miller D O, Brune W H, Koss A R, De Gouw J A. . (2018). Effects of temperature-dependent NOx emissions on continental ozone production. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18(4): 2601–2614
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Shen Y, Jiang F, Feng S, Zheng Y, Cai Z, Lyu X. (2021). Impact of weather and emission changes on NO2 concentrations in China during 2014–2019. Environmental Pollution, 269: 116163
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Sun Y, Yin H, Lu X, Notholt J, Palm M, Liu C, Tian Y, Zheng B. (2021). The drivers and health risks of unexpected surface ozone enhancements over the Sichuan Basin, China, in 2020. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 21(24): 18589–18608
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Tang K, Zhang H, Feng W, Liao H, Hu J, Li N. (2022). Increasing but variable trend of surface ozone in the Yangtze River Delta region of China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10: 836191
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Tonnesen G S, Dennis R L. (2000). Analysis of radical propagation efficiency to assess ozone sensitivity to hydrocarbons and NOx: 1. Local indicators of instantaneous odd oxygen production sensitivity. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105(D7): 9213–9225
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Wang M, Chen W, Zhang L, Qin W, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Xie X. (2020a). Ozone pollution characteristics and sensitivity analysis using an observation-based model in Nanjing, Yangtze River Delta region of China. Journal of Environmental Sciences-China, 93: 13–22
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Wang N, Lyu X, Deng X, Huang X, Jiang F, Ding A. (2019a). Aggravating O3 pollution due to NOx emission control in eastern China. Science of the Total Environment, 677: 732–744
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Wang P, Guo H, Hu J, Kota S H, Ying Q, Zhang H. (2019b). Responses of PM2.5 and O3 concentrations to changes of meteorology and emissions in China. Science of the Total Environment, 662: 297–306
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Wang T, Xue L, Brimblecombe P, Lam Y F, Li L, Zhang L. (2017). Ozone pollution in China: a review of concentrations, meteorological influences, chemical precursors, and effects. Science of the Total Environment, 575: 1582–1596
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Wang Y, Gao W, Wang S, Song T, Gong Z, Ji D, Wang L, Liu Z, Tang G, Huo Y. . (2020b). Contrasting trends of PM2.5 and surface-ozone concentrations in China from 2013 to 2017. National Science Review, 7(8): 1331–1339
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Wang Y, Yang X, Wu K, Mei H, De Smedt I, Wang S, Fan J, Lyu S, He C. (2022). Long-term trends of ozone and precursors from 2013 to 2020 in a megacity (Chengdu), China: evidence of changing emissions and chemistry. Atmospheric Research, 278: 106309
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Wiedinmyer C, Akagi S K, Yokelson R J, Emmons L K, Al-Saadi J A, Orlando J J, Soja A J. (2011). The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN): a high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning. Geoscientific Model Development, 4(3): 625–641
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Xie M, Liao J, Wang T, Zhu K, Zhuang B, Han Y, Li M, Li S. (2016a). Modeling of the anthropogenic heat flux and its effect on regional meteorology and air quality over the Yangtze River Delta region, China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 16(10): 6071–6089
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Xie M, Shu L, Wang T J, Liu Q, Gao D, Li S, Zhuang B L, Han Y, Li M M, Chen P L. (2017). Natural emissions under future climate condition and their effects on surface ozone in the Yangtze River Delta region, China. Atmospheric Environment, 150: 162–180
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
XieM, ZhuK, WangT, Chen P, HanY, LiS, ZhuangB, ShuL (2016b). Temporal characterization and regional contribution to O3 and NOx at an urban and a suburban site in Nanjing, China. Science of the Total Environment, 551–552: 533–545
[43]
Xu Z, Huang X, Nie W, Chi X, Xu Z, Zheng L, Sun P, Ding A. (2017). Influence of synoptic condition and holiday effects on VOCs and ozone production in the Yangtze River Delta region, China. Atmospheric Environment, 168: 112–124
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Xue J, Wang F, Zhang K, Zhai H, Jin D, Duan Y, Yaluk E, Wang Y, Huang L, Li Y. . (2023). Elucidate long-term changes of ozone in Shanghai based on an integrated machine learning method. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 17(11): 138
[45]
Yang X, Lu K, Ma X, Liu Y, Wang H, Hu R, Li X, Lou S, Chen S, Dong H. . (2021). Observations and modeling of OH and HO2 radicals in Chengdu, China in summer 2019. Science of the Total Environment, 772: 144829
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Yin H, Lu X, Sun Y, Li K, Gao M, Zheng B, Liu C. (2021). Unprecedented decline in summertime surface ozone over eastern China in 2020 comparably attributable to anthropogenic emission reductions and meteorology. Environmental Research Letters, 16(12): 124069
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Yin P, Chen R, Wang L, Meng X, Liu C, Niu Y, Lin Z, Liu Y, Liu J, Qi J. . (2017). Ambient ozone pollution and daily mortality: a nationwide study in 272 Chinese cities. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125(11): 117006
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Yue X, Unger N, Harper K, Xia X, Liao H, Zhu T, Xiao J, Feng Z, Li J. (2017). Ozone and haze pollution weakens net primary productivity in China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 17(9): 6073–6089
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Zhang H, Wang Y, Hu J, Ying Q, Hu X M. (2015). Relationships between meteorological parameters and criteria air pollutants in three megacities in China. Environmental Research, 140: 242–254
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Zhang Q, Zheng Y, Tong D, Shao M, Wang S, Zhang Y, Xu X, Wang J, He H, Liu W. . (2019). Drivers of improved PM2.5 air quality in China from 2013 to 2017. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(49): 24463–24469
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Zhao Y, Nielsen C P, Lei Y, Mcelroy M B, Hao J. (2011). Quantifying the uncertainties of a bottom-up emission inventory of anthropogenic atmospheric pollutants in China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11(5): 2295–2308
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Zheng J, Zhang L, Che W, Zheng Z, Yin S. (2009). A highly resolved temporal and spatial air pollutant emission inventory for the Pearl River Delta region, China and its uncertainty assessment. Atmospheric Environment, 43(32): 5112–5122
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 42277095, 42021004).

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Electronic Supplementary Material

is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-024-1897-z and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 Higher Education Press 2024
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(13327 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/