Socioeconomic drivers of the human microbiome footprint in global sewage

Minglei Ren, Shaojuan Du, Jianjun Wang

PDF(8840 KB)
PDF(8840 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (10) : 129. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-024-1889-z
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Socioeconomic drivers of the human microbiome footprint in global sewage

Author information +
History +

Highlights

● We built a read-mapping framework to profile human microbes from sewages (HSM).

● There were 95.03% human microbial species successfully recaptured from sewages.

● The HSM composition showed a distance-decay pattern at a global scale.

● The HSM communities from developed regions were separated from developing regions.

● Economy was the key socioeconomic factors driving the HSM diversity.

Abstract

The human microbiome leaves a legacy in sewage ecosystems, also referred to as the human sewage microbiomes (HSM), and could cause potential risk to human health and ecosystem service. However, these host-associated communities remain understudied, especially at a global scale, regarding microbial diversity, community composition and the underlying drivers. Here, we built a metagenomic read mapping-based framework to estimate HSM abundance in 243 sewage samples from 60 countries across seven continents. Our approach revealed that 95.03% of human microbiome species were identified from global sewage, demonstrating the potential of sewage as a lens to explore these human-associated microbes while bypassing the limitations of human privacy concerns. We identified significant biogeographic patterns for the HSM community, with species richness increasing toward high latitudes and composition showing a distance-decay relationship at a global scale. Interestingly, the HSM communities were mainly clustered by continent, with those from Europe and North America being separated from Asia and Africa. Furthermore, global HSM diversity was shown to be shaped by both climate and socioeconomic variables. Specifically, the average annual temperature was identified as the most important factor for species richness (33.18%), whereas economic variables such as country export in goods and services contributed the most to the variation in community composition (27.53%). Economic and other socioeconomic variables, such as education, were demonstrated to have direct effects on the HSM, as indicated by structural equation modeling. Our study provides the global biogeography of human sewage microbiomes and highlights the economy as an important socioeconomic factor driving host-associated community composition.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Human sewage microbiome / Biogeography / Socioeconomic factors / Climate factors

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Minglei Ren, Shaojuan Du, Jianjun Wang. Socioeconomic drivers of the human microbiome footprint in global sewage. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(10): 129 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-024-1889-z

References

[1]
Ahn J, Hayes R B. (2021). Environmental influences on the human microbiome and implications for noncommunicable disease. Annual Review of Public Health, 42(1): 277–292
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Amaruddin A I, Hamid F, Koopman J P R, Muhammad M, Brienen E A T, van Lieshout L, Geelen A R, Wahyuni S, Kuijper E J, Sartono E. . (2020). The bacterial gut microbiota of schoolchildren from high and low socioeconomic status: a study in an urban area of Makassar, Indonesia. Microorganisms, 8(6): 961
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
AndrewsS (2010). FastQC: a Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. Cambridge: Babraham Institute
[4]
Bastian S, M M. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 3(1): 361–362
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Belstrøm D, Holmstrup P, Nielsen C H, Kirkby N, Twetman S, Heitmann B L, Klepac-Ceraj V, Paster B J, Fiehn N E (2014). Bacterial profiles of saliva in relation to diet, lifestyle factors, and socioeconomic status. Journal of Oral Microbiology, 6(1): 09
[6]
Bibby K, Viau E, Peccia J. (2010). Pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene to reveal bacterial pathogen diversity in biosolids. Water Research, 44(14): 4252–4260
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Bolger A M, Lohse M, Usadel B. (2014). Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics, 30(15): 2114–2120
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Bowyer R C, Jackon M A, Le Roy C I, Lochlainn M N, Spector T D, Dowd J B, Steves C J. (2019). . , 7(1):
[9]
Bradley R H, Corwyn R F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1): 371–399
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Cai L, Ju F, Zhang T. (2014). Tracking human sewage microbiome in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 98(7): 3317–3326
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Catania F, Baedke J, Fábregas-Tejeda A, Nieves Delgado A, Vitali V, Long L A N. (2021). Global climate change, diet, and the complex relationship between human host and microbiome: towards an integrated picture. BioEssays, 43(6): 2100049
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Chen X, Chen X, Zhao Y, Zhou H, Xiong X, Wu C. (2020). Effects of microplastic biofilms on nutrient cycling in simulated freshwater systems. Science of the Total Environment, 719: 137276
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Crits-Christoph A, Kantor R S, Olm M R, Whitney O N, Al-Shayeb B, Lou Y C, Flamholz A, Kennedy L C, Greenwald H, Hinkle A J. (2020). . ,
[14]
Deschasaux M, Bouter K E, Prodan A, Levin E, Groen A K, Herrema H, Tremaroli V, Bakker G J, Attaye I, Pinto-Sietsma S J. . (2018). Depicting the composition of gut microbiota in a population with varied ethnic origins but shared geography. Nature Medicine, 24(10): 1526–1531
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
DixonP (2003). VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14: 927-930
[16]
Dowd J B, Renson A. (2018). “Under the skin” and into the gut: social epidemiology of the microbiome. Current Epidemiology Reports, 5(4): 432–441
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Eren A M, Sogin M L, Morrison H G, Vineis J H, Fisher J C, Newton R J, McLellan S L. (2015). A single genus in the gut microbiome reflects host preference and specificity. ISME Journal, 9(1): 90–100
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
García-Aljaro C, Blanch A R, Campos C, Jofre J, Lucena F. (2019). Pathogens, faecal indicators and human-specific microbial source-tracking markers in sewage. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 126(3): 701–717
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Gudda F O, Waigi M G, Odinga E S, Yang B, Carter L, Gao Y. (2020). Antibiotic-contaminated wastewater irrigated vegetables pose resistance selection risks to the gut microbiome. Environmental Pollution, 264: 114752
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Gunawan W B, Abadi M N P, Fadhillah F S, Nurkolis F, Pramono A. (2023). The interlink between climate changes, gut microbiota, and aging processes. Human Nutrition & Metabolism, 32: 200193
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Hendriksen R S, Munk P, Njage P, van Bunnik B, McNally L, Lukjancenko O, Röder T, Nieuwenhuijse D, Pedersen S K, Kjeldgaard J. . (2019). Global monitoring of antimicrobial resistance based on metagenomics analyses of urban sewage. Nature Communications, 10(1): 1124
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Hijmans J, R S E, Cameron J L, Parra P G, Jones A. (2005). Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25: 1965–1978
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Hu J, A H, Wang B, Sun G, Niu J, Si C, Wang X, Yeh X, Zhu J. . (2020). Mountain biodiversity and ecosystem functions: interplay between geology and contemporary environments. ISME Journal, 14: 1–14
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Ji M, Liu Z, Sun K, Li Z, Fan X, Li Q. (2021). Bacteriophages in water pollution control: advantages and limitations. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(5): 84
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Jones E R, van Vliet M T H, Qadir M, Bierkens M F P. (2021). Country-level and gridded estimates of wastewater production, collection, treatment and reuse. Earth System Science Data, 13(2): 237–254
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
LaMartina E L, Mohaimani A A, Newton R J. (2021). Urban wastewater bacterial communities assemble into seasonal steady states. Microbiome, 9(1): 116
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Langmead B, Salzberg S L. (2012). Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature Methods, 9(4): 357–359
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Li B, Ju F, Cai L, Zhang T. (2015). Profile and fate of bacterial pathogens in sewage treatment plants revealed by high-throughput metagenomic approach. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(17): 10492–10502
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R. (2009). The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics, 25(16): 2078–2079
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Li M, Song G, Liu R, Huang X, Liu H. (2022). Inactivation and risk control of pathogenic microorganisms in municipal sludge treatment: a review. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 16(6): 70
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Martínez I, Stegen J C, Maldonado-Gómez M X, Eren A M, Siba P M, Greenhill A R, Walter J. (2015). The gut microbiota of rural Papua New Guineans: composition, diversity patterns, and ecological processes. Cell Reports, 11(4): 527–538
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Mateo-Sagasta J, Raschid-sally L, Thebo A (2015). Global wastewater and sludge production, treatment and use. In: Drechsel P, Qadir M, Wichelns D, eds. Wastewater. Dordrecht: Springer
[33]
Matus M, Duvallet C, Soule M K, Kearney S M, Endo N, Ghaeli N, Brito I, Ratti C, Kujawinski E B, Alm E J. (2019). . ,
[34]
Miller G E, Engen P A, Gillevet P M, Shaikh M, Sikaroodi M, Forsyth C B, Mutlu E, Keshavarzian A. (2016). Lower neighborhood socioeconomic status associated with reduced diversity of the colonic microbiota in healthy adults. PLoS One, 11(2): e0148952
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Nadimpalli M L, Marks S J, Montealegre M C, Gilman R H, Pajuelo M J, Saito M, Tsukayama P, Njenga S M, Kiiru J, Swarthout J. . (2020). Urban informal settlements as hotspots of antimicrobial resistance and the need to curb environmental transmission. Nature Microbiology, 5(6): 787–795
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Newton R J, Mclellan S, Dila D K, Vineis J H, Morrison H G, Eren A M, Sogin M L. (2015). Sewage reflects the microbiomes of human populations. mBio, 6(2): e02574
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Nowak P, Troseid M, Avershina E, Barqasho B, Neogi U, Holm K, Hov J R, Noyan K, Vesterbacka J, Svärd J. . (2015). Gut microbiota diversity predicts immune status in HIV-1 infection. AIDS, 29(18): 2409–2418
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Nowrotek M, Jałowiecki Ł, Harnisz M, Płaza G A. (2019). Culturomics and metagenomics: in understanding of environmental resistome. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13: 40
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Parizadeh M, Arrieta M C. (2023). The global human gut microbiome: genes, lifestyles, and diet. Trends in Molecular Medicine, 29(10): 789–801
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Pasolli E, Asnicar F, Manara S, Zolfo M, Karcher N, Armanini F, Beghini F, Manghi P, Tett A, Ghensi P. . (2019). Extensive unexplored human microbiome diversity revealed by over 150,000 genomes from metagenomes spanning age, geography, and lifestyle. Cell, 176(3): 649–662.e20
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Pipek O A, Medgyes-Horváth A, Dobos L, Stéger J, Szalai-Gindl J, Visontai D, Kaas R S, Koopmans M, Hendriksen R S, Aarestrup F M. . (2019). Worldwide human mitochondrial haplogroup distribution from urban sewage. Scientific Reports, 9(1): 11624
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf K S, Manichanh C, Nielsen T, Pons N, Levenez F, Yamada T J. . (2010). A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature, 464(7285): 59–65
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Schneeberger P H H, Fuhrimann S, Becker S L, Pothier J F, Duffy B, Beuret C, Frey J E, Utzinger J. (2019). Qualitative microbiome profiling along a wastewater system in Kampala, Uganda. Scientific Reports, 9(1): 17334
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Sidhu J P S, Hodgers L, Ahmed W, Chong M N, Toze S. (2012). Prevalence of human pathogens and indicators in stormwater runoff in Brisbane, Australia. Water Research, 46(20): 6652–6660
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Staley C, Reckhow K H, Lukasik J, Harwood V J. (2012). Assessment of sources of human pathogens and fecal contamination in a Florida freshwater lake. Water Research, 46(17): 5799–5812
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Tisza M, Javornik C S, Avadhanula V, Zhang P, Ayvaz T, Feliz K, Hoffman K L, Clark J R, Terwilliger A, Ross M C. . (2023). Wastewater sequencing reveals community and variant dynamics of the collective human virome. Nature Communications, 14(1): 6878
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Tiwari A, Krolicka A, Tran T T, Räisänen K, Ásmundsdóttir Á M, Wikmark O G, Lood R, Pitkänen T. (2024). Antibiotic resistance monitoring in wastewater in the Nordic countries: a systematic review. Environmental Research, 246: 118052
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Wu L, Ning D, Zhang B, Li Y, Zhang P, Shan X, Zhang Q, Brown M R, Li Z, Van Nostrand J D. . (2019). Global diversity and biogeography of bacterial communities in wastewater treatment plants. Nature Microbiology, 4(7): 1183–1195
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Yatsunenko T, Rey F E, Manary M J, Trehan I, Dominguez-Bello M G, Contreras M, Magris M, Hidalgo G, Baldassano R N, Anokhin A P. (2012). Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature, 486(7402): 222–227
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Zhao J, Li B, Lv P, Hou J, Qiu Y, Huang X. (2022). Distribution of antibiotic resistance genes and their association with bacteria and viruses in decentralized sewage treatment facilities. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 16(3): 35
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Prof. Zongjun Du from Shandong University for helpful comments about the early version of the manuscript. This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 42225708, 42372353, 92251304, 92351303, and 42002304).

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-024-1889-z and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 Higher Education Press 2024
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(8840 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/