Rapid monitoring of indoor airborne influenza and coronavirus with high air flowrate electrostatic sampling and PCR analysis
Sanggwon An, Sangsoo Choi, Hyeong Rae Kim, Jungho Hwang
Rapid monitoring of indoor airborne influenza and coronavirus with high air flowrate electrostatic sampling and PCR analysis
● Electrostatic virus sampler was designed and evaluated in a pandemic scenario and real indoor field environment.
● Airborne virus was gently sampled with high aerosol sampling performance.
● Viral samples detectable for PCR were produced within 40 min.
The World Health Organization has raised concerns about the possibility of airborne transmission in enclosed and poorly ventilated areas. Therefore, rapid monitoring of airborne viruses is necessary in multi-use facilities with dense population. Accordingly, an electrostatic air sampler (250 L/min) was developed in this work to obtain indoor viral aerosol samples for analysis via the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Aerosol tests with H1N1 and HCoV-229E were performed to evaluate the sample collection efficiency. PCR analysis, along with another aerosol test, was conducted to evaluate the recovery of the virus particles collected by the sampler. In laboratory tests, our electrostatic sampler obtained viral samples that were detectable by PCR under the simulated viral pandemic scenario (3000 RNA copies per cubic meter of air) within 40 min. The resulting cycle threshold (Ct) values were 35.07 and 37.1 for H1N1 and HCoV-229E, respectively. After the performance evaluation in the laboratory, field tests were conducted in a university classroom from October 28 to December 2, 2022. Influenza A and HCoV-229E were detected in two air samples, and the corresponding Ct values were 35.3 and 36.8. These PCR results are similar to those obtained from laboratory tests, considering the simulated viral pandemic scenario.
Airborne virus / Electrostatic sampler / Rapid monitoring / Indoor environment / Field test
[1] |
Ahn J Y, An S, Sohn Y, Cho Y, Hyun J H, Baek Y J, Kim M H, Jeong S J, Kim J H, Ku N S.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Brlek A, Vidovic S, Vuzem S, Turk K, Simonovic Z. (2020). Possible indirect transmission of COVID-19 at a squash court, Slovenia, March 2020: case report. Epidemiology and Infection, 148: e120
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Cai J, Sun W J, Huang J P, Gamber M, Wu J, He G Q. (2020). Indirect Virus Transmission in Cluster of COVID-19 Cases, Wenzhou, China, 2020. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 26(6): 1343–1345
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
CDC (2021). Science brief: SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Available online at the website of cdc.gov (Accessed 2023, February 08)
|
[5] |
Chan J F W, Yuan S F, Kok K H, To K K W, Chu H, Yang J, Xing F F, Liu J L, Yip C C Y, Poon R W S.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Chia P Y, Coleman K K, Tan Y K, Ong S W X, Gum M, Lau S K, Lim X F, Lim A S, Sutjipto S, Lee P H.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Conte M, Feltracco M, Chirizzi D, Trabucco S, Dinoi A, Gregoris E, Barbaro E, La Bella G, Ciccarese G, Belosi F.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Dinoi A, Feltracco M, Chirizzi D, Trabucco S, Conte M, Gregoris E, Barbaro E, La Bella G, Ciccarese G, Belosi F.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Ge X Y, Pu Y, Liao C H, Huang W F, Zeng Q, Zhou H, Yi B, Wang A M, Dou Q Y, Zhou P C.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
HindsW C (1999). Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles. New York: John Wiley & Sons
|
[11] |
Holmes K V, Lai M M C. (1996). Coronaviridae: the viruses and their replication. Fields Virol, 1: 1075–1093
|
[12] |
Johansson M A, Quandelacy T M, Kada S, Prasad P V, Steele M, Brooks J T, Slayton R B, Biggerstaff M, Butler J C. (2021). SARS-CoV-2 transmission from people without COVID-19 symptoms. JAMA Network Open, 4(2): e2035057
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Katelaris A L, Wells J, Clark P, Norton S, Rockett R, Arnott A, Sintchenko V, Corbett S, Bag S K. (2021). Epidemiologic evidence for airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 during church singing, Australia, 2020. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 27(6): 1677–1680
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Kenarkoohi A, Noorimotlagh Z, Falahi S, Amarloei A, Mirzaee S A, Pakzad I, Bastani E. (2020). Hospital indoor air quality monitoring for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus. Science of the Total Environment, 748: 141324
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Kim H R, An S, Hwang J. (2021). High air flow-rate electrostatic sampler for the rapid monitoring of airborne coronavirus and influenza viruses. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 412: 125219
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Lee I S, Kim H J, Lee D H, Hwang G B, Jung J H, Lee M, Lim J, Lee B U. (2011). Aerosol particle size distribution and genetic characteristics of aerosolized influenza A H1N1 virus vaccine particles. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 11(3): 230–237
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Li J Y, Leavey A, Wang Y, O’Neil C, Wallace M A, Burnham C A D, Boon A C M, Babcock H, Biswas P. (2018). Comparing the performance of 3 bioaerosol samplers for influenza virus. Journal of Aerosol Science, 115: 133–145
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Li Q, Guan X H, Wu P, Wang X Y, Zhou L, Tong Y Q, Ren R Q, Leung K S M, Lau E H Y, Wong J Y.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Li Y G, Qian H, Hang J, Chen X G, Cheng P, Ling H, Wang S Q, Liang P, Li J S, Xiao S L.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Lin G Y, Chen T M, Tsai C J. (2012). A modified Deutsch-Anderson equation for predicting the nanoparticle collection efficiency of electrostatic precipitators. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 12(5): 697–706
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Liu J Y, Liao X J, Qian S, Yuan J, Wang F X, Liu Y X, Wang Z Q, Wang F S, Liu L, Zhang Z. (2020). Community transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2, Shenzhen, China, 2020. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 26(6): 1320–1323
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Mullis K B, Faloona F A. (1987). Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction. Methods in Enzymology, 155: 335–350
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Park J W, Kim H R, Hwang J. (2016). Continuous and real-time bioaerosol monitoring by combined aerosol-to-hydrosol sampling and ATP bioluminescence assay. Analytica Chimica Acta, 941: 101–107
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Relova D, Rios L, Acevedo A M, Coronado L, Perera C L, Perez L J. (2018). Impact of RNA degradation on viral diagnosis: an understated but essential step for the successful establishment of a diagnosis network. Veterinary Sciences, 5(1): 19
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Rustad M, Eastlund A, Jardine P, Noireaux V. (2018). Cell-free TXTL synthesis of infectious bacteriophage T4 in a single test tube reaction. Synthetic Biology, 3(1): ysy002
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
ShenT T, Pereira N C (2012), Electrostatic precipitator. Wang L K, Norman C P, eds. Air and Noise Pollution Control. New York: Springer Science & Business Media
|
[27] |
WHO (2020). Modes of transmission of virus causing COVID-19: implications for IPC precaution recommendations. Available online at the website of
|
[28] |
Yao M S, Zhang H L, Dong S F, Zhen S Q, Chen X D. (2009). Comparison of electrostatic collection and liquid impinging methods when collecting airborne house dust allergens, endotoxin and (1,3)-beta-d-glucans. Journal of Aerosol Science, 40(6): 492–502
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
ZogningC, Lobry J, MoinyF (2020). Comparison between positive and negative corona discharges by hydrodynamic plasma simulations. Proceedings of 2020 International Symposium on Electrical Insulating Materials (ISEIM 2020): 552–560
|
[30] |
Zukeran A, Sawano H, Ito K, Oi R, Kobayashi I, Wada R, Sawai J. (2018). Investigation of inactivation process for microorganism collected in an electrostatic precipitator. Journal of Electrostatics, 93: 70–77
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Zuo Z L, Kuehn T H, Verma H, Kumar S, Goyal S M, Appert J, Raynor P C, Ge S, Pui D Y H. (2013). Association of airborne virus infectivity and survivability with its carrier particle size. Aerosol Science and Technology, 47(4): 373–382
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |