Numerical modeling and performance evaluation of passive convergence-permeable reactive barrier (PC-PRB)

Abstract

● A 2D finite-element solute transport model, PRB-Trans, is developed.

● PC-PRB can significantly improve the remediation efficiency of PRB.

● PC-PRB can considerably reduce the required PRB dimensions and materials costs.

● The required PRB length decreases with the increase of pipe length, L _p.

The passive convergence-permeable reactive barrier (PC-PRB) was proposed to address the limitations of traditional PRB configurations. To evaluate the hydraulic and pollutant removal performance of the PC-PRB system, we developed a simulation code named PRB-Trans. This code uses the two-dimensional (2D) finite element method to simulate groundwater flow and solute transport. Case studies demonstrate that PC-PRB technology is more efficient and cost-effective than continuous permeable reactive barrier (C-PRB) in treating the same contaminated plume. Implementation of PC-PRB technology results in a 33.3% and 72.7% reduction in PRB length (L_PRB) and height (H_PRB), respectively, while increasing 2D horizontal and 2D vertical pollutant treatment efficiencies of PRB by 87.8% and 266.8%, respectively. In addition, the PC-PRB technology has the ability to homogenize the pollutant concentration and pollutant flux through the PRB system, which can mitigate the problems arising from uneven distribution of pollutants in the C-PRB to some extent. The L_PRB required for PC-PRB decreases as the water pipe length (L_p) increases, while the H_PRB required initially decreases and then increases with increasing L_p. The effect of passive well height (H_w) on H_PRB is not as significant as that of L_p on H_PRB. Overall, PC-PRB presents a promising and advantageous PRB configuration in the effective treatment of various types of contaminated plumes.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Passive convergence-permeable reactive barrier / Numerical modeling / Hydraulic behavior assessment / Pollutant treatment performance evaluation / Influential factors analysis

References

[1] Ali A F , Abd Ali Z T . (2020). Sustainable use of concrete demolition waste as reactive material in permeable barrier for remediation of groundwater: batch and continuous study. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 146(7): 04020048

[2] Bortone I , Chianese S , Erto A , Di Nardo A , De Crescenzo C , Karatza D , Santonastaso G F , Musmarra D . (2019). An optimized configuration of adsorptive wells for the remediation of an aquifer contaminated by multiple aromatic hydrocarbon pollutants. Science of the Total Environment, 696: 133731

[3] Bortone I , Di Nardo A , Di Natale M , Erto A , Musmarra D , Santonastaso G . (2013). Remediation of an aquifer polluted with dissolved tetrachloroethylene by an array of wells filled with activated carbon. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 260: 914–920

[4] Bortone I , Erto A , Santonastaso G , Di Nardo A , Di Natale M , Musmarra D . (2015). Design of Permeable Adsorptive Barriers (PABs) for groundwater remediation by COMSOL multi-physics simulations. Desalination and Water Treatment, 55(12): 3231–3240

[5] Cheng Y , Shan Y , Xue Y , Zhu Y , Wang X , Xue L , Liu Y , Qiao F , Zhang M . (2022). Variation characteristics of atmospheric methane and carbon dioxide in summertime at a coastal site in the South China Sea. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 16(11): 139

[6] Courcelles B . (2015). Guidelines for preliminary design of funnel-and-gate reactive barriers. International Journal of Environment and Pollution Remediation, 3(1): 16–26

[7] Elder Carl R , Benson Craig H . (2019). Performance and economic comparison of PRB types in heterogeneous aquifers. Environmental Geotechnics, 6(4): 214–224

[8] Faisal A , Sulaymon A , Khaliefa Q . (2018). A review of permeable reactive barrier as passive sustainable technology for groundwater remediation. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 15(5): 1123–1138

[9] Falciglia P P , Gagliano E , Brancato V , Malandrino G , Finocchiaro G , Catalfo A , De Guidi G , Romano S , Roccaro P , Vagliasindi F G . (2020). Microwave based regenerating permeable reactive barriers (MW-PRBs): proof of concept and application for Cs removal. Chemosphere, 251: 126582

[10] GavaskarA R (1999). Design and construction techniques for permeable reactive barriers. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 68(1-2): 41-71

[11] GillhamR WVoganJGuiLDucheneMSonJ (2010). Iron barrier walls for chlorinated solvent remediation. In: Stroo H F, Ward C H, eds. In situ Remediation of Chlorinated Solvent Plumes. New York: Springer, 537–571

[12] GuptaNFoxT C (1999). Hydrogeologic modeling for permeable reactive barriers. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 68(1–2): 19–39

[13] Higgins M R , Olson T M . (2009). Life-cycle case study comparison of permeable reactive barrier versus pump-and-treat remediation. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(24): 9432–9438

[14] Jiang Y , Xi B , Li R , Li M , Xu Z , Yang Y , Gao S . (2019). Advances in Fe (III) bioreduction and its application prospect for groundwater remediation: a review. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13(6): 89

[15] Kheirandish M , An C , Chen Z , Geng X , Boufadel M . (2022). Numerical simulation of benzene transport in shoreline groundwater affected by tides under different conditions. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 16(5): 61

[16] Li Y , Huang Y , Wu W , Yan M , Xie Y . (2021). Research and application of arsenic-contaminated groundwater remediation by manganese ore permeable reactive barrier. Environmental Technology, 42(13): 2009–2020

[17] Liu S , Li X , Wang H . (2011). Hydraulics analysis for groundwater flow through permeable reactive barriers. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 16(6): 591–598

[18] Lu X , Li M , Deng H , Lin P , Matsumoto M R , Liu X . (2016). Application of electrochemical depassivation in PRB systems to recovery Fe⁰ reactivity. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 10(4): 4

[19] Maamoun I , Eljamal O , Falyouna O , Eljamal R , Sugihara Y . (2020). Multi-objective optimization of permeable reactive barrier design for Cr(VI) removal from groundwater. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 200: 110773

[20] Obiri-Nyarko F , Grajales-Mesa S J , Malina G . (2014). An overview of permeable reactive barriers for in situ sustainable groundwater remediation. Chemosphere, 111: 243–259

[21] PainterB D (2005). Optimisation of Permeable Reactive Barrier Systems for the Remediation of Contaminated Groundwater. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Lincoln: Lincoln University

[22] Phillips D (2009). Permeable reactive barriers: a sustainable technology for cleaning contaminated groundwater in developing countries. Desalination, 248(1−3): 352−359

[23] SantonastasoGBortoneIChianeseSErtoADiNardo ADiNatale MMusmarraD (2016). Application of a discontinuous permeable adsorptive barrier for aquifer remediation: a comparison with a continuous adsorptive barrier. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(48–49): 248–491

[24] Santonastaso G F , Bortone I , Chianese S , Di Nardo A , Di Natale M , Erto A , Karatza D , Musmarra D . (2018). Discontinuous permeable adsorptive barrier design and cost analysis: a methodological approach to optimisation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 25(27): 26793–26800

[25] Song K , Zhu S , Lu Y , Dao G , Wu Y , Chen Z , Wang S , Liu J , Zhou W , Hu H . (2022). Modelling the thresholds of nitrogen/phosphorus concentration and hydraulic retention time for bloom control in reclaimed water landscape. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 16(10): 129

[26] Thakur A K , Vithanage M , Das D B , Kumar M . (2020). A review on design, material selection, mechanism, and modelling of permeable reactive barrier for community-scale groundwater treatment. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 19: 100917

[27] Thiruvenkatachari R , Vigneswaran S , Naidu R . (2008). Permeable reactive barrier for groundwater remediation. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 14(2): 145–156

[28] Torregrosa M , Schwarz A , Nancucheo I , Balladares E . (2019). Evaluation of the bio-protection mechanism in diffusive exchange permeable reactive barriers for the treatment of acid mine drainage. Science of the Total Environment, 655: 374–383

[29] VanStone N , Przepiora A , Vogan J , Lacrampe-Couloume G , Powers B , Perez E , Mabury S , Sherwood Lollar B . (2005). Monitoring trichloroethene remediation at an iron permeable reactive barrier using stable carbon isotopic analysis. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 78(4): 313–325

[30] Vermeul V R , Szecsody J E , Fritz B G , Williams M D , Moore R C , Fruchter J S . (2014). An injectable apatite permeable reactive barrier for in situ 90Sr immobilization. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, 34(2): 28–41

[31] Wan H , Bian J , Zhang H , Li Y . (2021). Assessment of future climate change impacts on water-heat-salt migration in unsaturated frozen soil using CoupModel. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(1): 10

[32] Wilson R D , Mackay D M , Cherry J A . (1997). Arrays of unpumped wells for plume migration control by semi-passive in situ remediation. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, 17(3): 185–193

[33] Yin Z , Lin Q , Xu S . (2021). Using hydrochemical signatures to characterize the long-period evolution of groundwater information in the Dagu River Basin, China. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(5): 105

[34] Zhang R , Sun H , Yin J . (2008). Arsenic and chromate removal from water by iron chips: effects of anions. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 2(2): 203–208

[35] Zhao B , Sun Z , Liu Y . (2022). An overview of in-situ remediation for nitrate in groundwater. Science of the Total Environment, 804: 149981

[36] ZhengKHuangJLuoXWangHChenT (2022a). Application progress of numerical simulation in permeable reactive barrier engineering design. Environmental Engineering, 40(6): 22–30 (in Chinese)

[37] Zheng K , Luo X , Tan Y , Li Z , Wang H , Chen T , Zhao L , Zhan L . (2022b). Passive convergence-permeable reactive barrier (PC-PRB): an effective configuration to enhance hydraulic performance. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 16(12): 156

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press