Approaching the upper boundary of driver-response relationships: identifying factors using a novel framework integrating quantile regression with interpretable machine learning

Zhongyao Liang, Yaoyang Xu, Gang Zhao, Wentao Lu, Zhenghui Fu, Shuhang Wang, Tyler Wagner

PDF(1646 KB)
PDF(1646 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (6) : 76. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-023-1676-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Approaching the upper boundary of driver-response relationships: identifying factors using a novel framework integrating quantile regression with interpretable machine learning

Author information +
History +

Highlights

● A novel framework integrating quantile regression with machine learning is proposed.

● It aims to identify factors driving observations to upper boundary of relationship.

● Increasing N:P and TN concentration help fulfill the effect of TP on CHL.

● Wetter and warmer decrease potential and increase eutrophication control difficulty.

● The framework advances applications of quantile regression and machine learning.

Abstract

The identification of factors that may be forcing ecological observations to approach the upper boundary provides insight into potential mechanisms affecting driver-response relationships, and can help inform ecosystem management, but has rarely been explored. In this study, we propose a novel framework integrating quantile regression with interpretable machine learning. In the first stage of the framework, we estimate the upper boundary of a driver-response relationship using quantile regression. Next, we calculate “potentials” of the response variable depending on the driver, which are defined as vertical distances from the estimated upper boundary of the relationship to observations in the driver-response variable scatter plot. Finally, we identify key factors impacting the potential using a machine learning model. We illustrate the necessary steps to implement the framework using the total phosphorus (TP)-Chlorophyll a (CHL) relationship in lakes across the continental US. We found that the nitrogen to phosphorus ratio (N׃P), annual average precipitation, total nitrogen (TN), and summer average air temperature were key factors impacting the potential of CHL depending on TP. We further revealed important implications of our findings for lake eutrophication management. The important role of N׃P and TN on the potential highlights the co-limitation of phosphorus and nitrogen and indicates the need for dual nutrient criteria. Future wetter and/or warmer climate scenarios can decrease the potential which may reduce the efficacy of lake eutrophication management. The novel framework advances the application of quantile regression to identify factors driving observations to approach the upper boundary of driver-response relationships.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Driver-response / Upper boundary of relationship / Interpretable machine learning / Quantile regression / Total phosphorus / Chlorophyll a

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhongyao Liang, Yaoyang Xu, Gang Zhao, Wentao Lu, Zhenghui Fu, Shuhang Wang, Tyler Wagner. Approaching the upper boundary of driver-response relationships: identifying factors using a novel framework integrating quantile regression with interpretable machine learning. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(6): 76 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1676-2

References

[1]
Abatzoglou J T, Dobrowski S Z, Parks S A, Hegewisch K C. (2018). TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015. Scientific Data, 5(1): 170191
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Alhamzawi R, Ali H T M. (2020). Brq: an R package for Bayesian quantile regression. Metron, 78(3): 313–328
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Altmann A, Toloşi L, Sander O, Lengauer T. (2010). Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 26(10): 1340–1347
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Araya S N, Ghezzehei T A. (2019). Using machine learning for prediction of saturated hydraulic conductivity and its sensitivity to soil structural perturbations. Water Resources Research, 55(7): 5715–5737
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
BeckerMBinder MBischlBLangMPfisterer FReichN GRichterJSchratzP SonabendR (2021). mlr3 book
[6]
Benoit D F, den Poel D V. (2010). Binary quantile regression: a Bayesian approach based on the asymmetric Laplace distribution. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 27(7): 1174–1188
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
BiecekPBurzykowski T (2021). Explanatory Model Analysis. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC
[8]
Breiman L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1): 5–32
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Cade B S, Noon B R. (2003). A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1(8): 412–420
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Cade B S, Terrell J W, Schroeder R L. (1999). Estimating effects of limiting factors with regression quantiles. Ecology, 80(1): 311–323
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Carvalho L, McDonald C, de Hoyos C, Mischke U, Phillips G, Borics G, Poikane S, Skjelbred B, Solheim A L, Wichelen J V. . (2013). Sustaining recreational quality of European lakes: minimizing the health risks from algal blooms through phosphorus control. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50(2): 315–323
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Castrillo M, García Á L. (2020). Estimation of high frequency nutrient concentrations from water quality surrogates using machine learning methods. Water Research, 172: 115490
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Cha Y, Shin J, Go B, Lee D S, Kim Y, Kim T, Park Y S. (2021). An interpretable machine learning method for supporting ecosystem management: application to species distribution models of freshwater macroinvertebrates. Journal of Environmental Management, 291: 112719
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Chandrashekar G, Sahin F. (2014). A survey on feature selection methods. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 40(1): 16–28
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Chen K, Chen H, Zhou C, Huang Y, Qi X, Shen R, Liu F, Zuo M, Zou X, Wang J, Zhang Y, Chen D, Chen X, Deng Y, Ren H. (2020). Comparative analysis of surface water quality prediction performance and identification of key water parameters using different machine learning models based on big data. Water Research, 171: 115454
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Chen M, Fan M, Liu R, Wang X, Yuan X, Zhu H. (2015). The dynamics of temperature and light on the growth of phytoplankton. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 385: 8–19
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Chen X, Li X. (2014). Using quantile regression to analyze the stressor-response relationships between nutrient levels and algal biomass in three shallow lakes of the lake Taihu Basin, China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 59(28): 3621–3629
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
CheruvelilK SWebsterK EKingK B S PoissonA CWagner T (2022). Taking a macroscale perspective to improve understanding of shallow lake total phosphorus and chlorophyll a. Hydrobiologia, 849(17–18): 3663–3677
[19]
Collins S M, Yuan S, Tan P N, Oliver S K, Lapierre J F, Cheruvelil K S, Fergus C E, Skaff N K, Stachelek J, Wagner T. . (2019). Winter precipitation and summer temperature predict lake water quality at macroscales. Water Resources Research, 55(4): 2708–2721
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Conley D J, Paerl H W, Howarth R W, Boesch D F, Seitzinger S P, Havens K E, Lancelot C, Likens G E. (2009). Controlling eutrophication: nitrogen and phosphorus. Science, 323(5917): 1014–1015
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Das K, Krzywinski M, Altman N. (2019). Quantile regression. Nature Methods, 16(6): 451–452
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
de Vries J, Kraak M H, Skeffington R A, Wade A J, Verdonschot P F. (2021). A Bayesian network to simulate macroinvertebrate responses to multiple stressors in lowland streams. Water Research, 194: 116952
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Dewitz JU.S.. Geological Survey (2021). National land cover database (NLCD) 2019 products (Ver. 2.0, June 2021). Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey Data Release
[24]
Dillon P J, Rigler F H. (1974). The phosphorus-chlorophyll relationship in lakes. Limnology and Oceanography, 19(5): 767–773
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Dugan H A, Skaff N K, Doubek J P, Bartlett S L, Burke S M, Krivak-Tetley F E, Summers J C, Hanson P C, Weathers K C. (2020). Lakes at risk of chloride contamination. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(11): 6639–6650
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Elser J J, Bracken M E, Cleland E E, Gruner D S, Harpole W S, Hillebrand H, Ngai J T, Seabloom E W, Shurin J B, Smith J E. (2007). Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology Letters, 10(12): 1135–1142
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Filstrup C T, Downing J A. (2017). Relationship of chlorophyll to phosphorus and nitrogen in nutrient-rich lakes. Inland Waters, 7(4): 385–400
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Fornaroli R, Cabrini R, Sartori L, Marazzi F, Vracevic D, Mezzanotte V, Annala M, Canobbio S. (2015). Predicting the constraint effect of environmental characteristics on macroinvertebrate density and diversity using quantile regression mixed model. Hydrobiologia, 742(1): 153–167
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Fornaroli R, Ippolito A, Tolkkinen M J, Mykra H, Muotka T, Balistrieri L S, Schmidt T S. (2018). Disentangling the effects of low pH and metal mixture toxicity on macroinvertebrate diversity. Environmental Pollution, 235: 889–898
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Freeman A M, Lamon E C III, Stow C A. (2009). Nutrient criteria for lakes, ponds, and reservoirs: a Bayesian TREED model approach. Ecological Modelling, 220(5): 630–639
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
GuildfordS JHeckyR E (2000). Total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and nutrient limitation in lakes and oceans: is there a common relationship? Limnology and Oceanography, 45(6): 1213–1223
[32]
Hammer K J, Kragh T, Sand-Jensen K. (2019). Inorganic carbon promotes photosynthesis, growth, and maximum biomass of phytoplankton in eutrophic water bodies. Freshwater Biology, 64(11): 1956–1970
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Havens K E, James R, East T L, Smith V H. (2003). N׃P ratios, light limitation, and cyanobacterial dominance in a subtropical lake impacted by non-point source nutrient pollution. Environmental Pollution, 122(3): 379–390
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Havens K E, Nürnberg G K. (2004). The phosphorus-chlorophyll relationship in lakes: potential influences of color and mixing regime. Lake and Reservoir Management, 20(3): 188–196
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Hunsicker M E, Kappel C V, Selkoe K A, Halpern B S, Scarborough C, Mease L, Amrhein A. (2015). Characterizing driver-response relationships in marine pelagic ecosystems for improved ocean management. Ecological Applications, 26(3): 651–663
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Huo S, Xi B, Ma C, Liu H. (2013). Stressor-response models: a practical application for the development of lake nutrient criteria in China. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(21): 11922–11923
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Jones J R, Knowlton M F, Kaiser M S. (1998). Effects of aggregation on chlorophyll-phosphorus relations in Missouri Reservoirs. Lake and Reservoir Management, 14(1): 1–9
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Jones J R, Obrecht D V, Thorpe A P. (2011). Chlorophyll maxima and chlorophyll: total phosphorus ratios in Missouri reservoirs. Lake and Reservoir Management, 27(4): 321–328
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Kalcic M M, Muenich R L, Basile S, Steiner A L, Kirchhoff C, Scavia D. (2019). Climate change and nutrient loading in the western Lake Erie basin: warming can counteract a wetter future. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(13): 7543–7550
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
KoenkerR (2021). Quantreg: Quantile Regression. R Package Version 5.85
[41]
Koenker R, Bassett G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1): 33–50
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Koenker R, Ng P, Portnoy S. (1994). Quantile smoothing splines. Biometrika, 81(4): 673–680
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
KoenkerRPark B J (1996). An interior point algorithm for nonlinear quantile regression. Journal of Econometrics, 71(1–2): 265–283
[44]
Konrad C P, Brasher A M D, May J T. (2008). Assessing streamflow characteristics as limiting factors on benthic invertebrate assemblages in streams across the western United States. Freshwater Biology, 53(10): 1983–1998
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Kragh T, Sand-Jensen K. (2018). Carbon limitation of lake productivity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Biological Sciences, 285(1891): 20181415
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
LangMSchratz P (2021). mlr3verse: Easily Install and Load the ‘mlr3’ Package Family. R Package Version 0.2.1
[47]
Larned S T, Schallenberg M. (2019). Stressor-response relationships and the prospective management of aquatic ecosystems. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 53(4): 489–512
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Lee D, Neocleous T. (2010). Bayesian quantile regression for count data with application to environmental epidemiology. Applied Statistics, 59(5): 905–920
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Li J, Cheng K, Wang S, Morstatter F, Trevino R P, Tang J, Liu H. (2018). Feature selection. ACM Computing Surveys, 50(6): 1–45
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Li L, Jamieson K, DeSalvo G, Rostamizadeh A, Talwalkar A. (2017). Hyperband: a novel bandit-based approach to hyperparameter optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 18(1): 1–52
[51]
Liang Z, Liu Y, Xu Y, Wagner T. (2021a). Bayesian change point quantile regression approach to enhance the understanding of shifting phytoplankton-dimethyl sulfide relationships in aquatic ecosystems. Water Research, 201: 117287
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Liang Z, Soranno P A, Wagner T. (2020). The role of phosphorus and nitrogen on chlorophyll a: evidence from hundreds of lakes. Water Research, 185: 116236
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Liang Z, Wu S, Chen H, Yu Y, Liu Y. (2018). A probabilistic method to enhance understanding of nutrient limitation dynamics of phytoplankton. Ecological Modelling, 368: 404–410
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Liang Z, Xu Y, Qiu Q, Liu Y, Lu W, Wagner T. (2021b). A framework to develop joint nutrient criteria for lake eutrophication management in eutrophic lakes. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 594: 125883
CrossRef Google scholar
[55]
Loiselle S A, C’ozar A, Dattilo A, Bracchini L, G’alvez J A. (2007). Light limitations to algal growth in tropical ecosystems. Freshwater Biology, 52(2): 305–312
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Lucas T C D. (2020). A translucent box: interpretable machine learning in ecology. Ecological Monographs, 90(4): e01422
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
McDowell R W, Schallenberg M, Larned S. (2018). A strategy for optimizing catchment management actions to stressor-response relationships in freshwaters. Ecosphere, 9(10): e02482
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Hein M. (1997). Inorganic carbon limitation of photosynthesis in lake phytoplankton. Freshwater Biology, 37(3): 545–552
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Moon D L, Scott J T, Johnson T R. (2021). Stoichiometric imbalances complicate prediction of phytoplankton biomass in U.S. lakes: implications for nutrient criteria. Limnology and Oceanography, 66(8): 2967–2978
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Motew M, Booth E G, Carpenter S R, Chen X, Kucharik C J. (2018). The synergistic effect of manure supply and extreme precipitation on surface water quality. Environmental Research Letters, 13(4): 044016
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Murdoch W J, Singh C, Kumbier K, Abbasi-Asl R, Yu B. (2019). Definitions, methods, and applications in interpretable machine learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(44): 22071–22080
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Niu W, Feng Z, Li S, Wu H, Wang J. (2021). Short-term electricity load time series prediction by machine learning model via feature selection and parameter optimization using hybrid cooperation search algorithm. Environmental Research Letters, 16(5): 055032
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Nyenje P, Foppen J, Uhlenbrook S, Kulabako R, Muwanga A. (2010). Eutrophication and nutrient release in urban areas of sub-Saharan Africa: a review. Science of the Total Environment, 408(3): 447–455
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Obenour D R, Gronewold A D, Stow C A, Scavia D. (2014). Using a Bayesian hierarchical model to improve Lake Erie cyanobacteria bloom forecasts. Water Resources Research, 50(10): 7847–7860
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Paerl H W, Havens K E, Xu H, Zhu G, McCarthy M J, Newell S E, Scott J T, Hall N S, Otten T G, Qin B. (2020). Mitigating eutrophication and toxic cyanobacterial blooms in large lakes: the evolution of a dual nutrient (N and P) reduction paradigm. Hydrobiologia, 847(21): 4359–4375
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Paerl H W, Paul V J. (2012). Climate change: Links to global expansion of harmful cyanobacteria. Water Research, 46(5): 1349–1363
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
Paerl H W, Scott J T, McCarthy M J, Newell S E, Gardner W S, Havens K E, Hoffman D K, Wilhelm S W, Wurtsbaugh W A. (2016). It takes two to tango: when and where dual nutrient (N & P) reductions are needed to protect lakes and downstream ecosystems. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(20): 10805–10813
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Probst P, Wright M N, Boulesteix A L. (2019). Hyperparameters and tuning strategies for random forest. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 9(3): e1301
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
QianS S (2009). Environmental and Ecological Statistics with R. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC
[70]
Quinlan R, Filazzola A, Mahdiyan O, Shuvo A, Blagrave K, Ewins C, Moslenko L, Gray D K, O’Reilly C M, Sharma S. (2021). Relationships of total phosphorus and chlorophyll in lakes worldwide. Limnology and Oceanography, 66(2): 392–404
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
RCore Team (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
[72]
Redfield A C. (1958). The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. American Scientist, 46(3): 205–221
[73]
Rousso B Z, Bertone E, Stewart R, Hamilton D P. (2020). A systematic literature review of forecasting and predictive models for cyanobacteria blooms in freshwater lakes. Water Research, 182: 115959
CrossRef Google scholar
[74]
Rowland F E, Stow C A, Johengen T H, Burtner A M, Palladino D, Gossiaux D C, Davis T W, Johnson L T, Ruberg S. (2020). Recent patterns in Lake Erie phosphorus and chlorophyll a concentrations in response to changing loads. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(2): 835–841
CrossRef Google scholar
[75]
Rudin C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5): 206–215
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
Ryo M, Angelov B, Mammola S, Kass J M, Benito B M, Hartig F. (2021). Explainable artificial intelligence enhances the ecological interpretability of black-box species distribution models. Ecography, 44(2): 199–205
CrossRef Google scholar
[77]
Sankaran M, Hanan N P, Scholes R J, Ratnam J, Augustine D J, Cade B S, Gignoux J, Higgins S I, Roux X L, Ludwig F. . (2005). Determinants of woody cover in African savannas. Nature, 438(7069): 846–849
CrossRef Google scholar
[78]
Schallenberg M. (2021). The application of stressor-response relationships in the management of lake eutrophication. Inland Waters, 11(1): 1–12
CrossRef Google scholar
[79]
Sinha E, Michalak A M, Balaji V. (2017). Eutrophication will increase during the 21st century as a result of precipitation changes. Science, 357(6349): 405–408
CrossRef Google scholar
[80]
SøndergaardMJensenJ PJeppesenE (2003). Role of sediment and internal loading of phosphorus in shallow lakes. Hydrobiologia, 506–509(1–3): 506–509
[81]
Soranno P A, Cheruvelil K S, Bissell E G, Bremigan M T, Downing J A, Fergus C E, Filstrup C T, Henry E N, Lottig N R, Stanley E H. . (2014). Cross-scale interactions: quantifying multi-scaled cause-effect relationships in macrosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12(1): 65–73
CrossRef Google scholar
[82]
Stockwell J D, Doubek J P, Adrian R, Anneville O, Carey C C, Carvalho L, Domis L N D S, Dur G, Frassl M A, Grossart H P. . (2020). Storm impacts on phytoplankton community dynamics in lakes. Global Change Biology, 26(5): 2756–2784
CrossRef Google scholar
[83]
Stow C A, Cha Y (2013). Are chlorophyll a–total phosphorus correlations useful for inference and prediction? Environmental Science & Technology, 47(8): 3768–3773
[84]
Sun A Y, Scanlon B R. (2019). How can big data and machine learning benefit environment and water management: a survey of methods, applications, and future directions. Environmental Research Letters, 14(7): 073001
CrossRef Google scholar
[85]
Tiyasha T M, Tung Z M. (2020). A survey on river water quality modelling using artificial intelligence models: 2000–2020. Journal of Hydrology, 585: 124670
CrossRef Google scholar
[86]
Tong Y, Xu X, Qi M, Sun J, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Wang M, Wang X, Zhang Y. (2021). Lake warming intensifies the seasonal pattern of internal nutrient cycling in the eutrophic lake and potential impacts on algal blooms. Water Research, 188: 116570
CrossRef Google scholar
[87]
Wagner T, Soranno P A, Webster K E, Cheruvelil K S. (2011). Landscape drivers of regional variation in the relationship between total phosphorus and chlorophyll in lakes. Freshwater Biology, 56(9): 1811–1824
CrossRef Google scholar
[88]
Wang R, Kim J H, Li M H. (2021). Predicting stream water quality under different urban development pattern scenarios with an interpretable machine learning approach. Science of the Total Environment, 761: 144057
CrossRef Google scholar
[89]
Woolway R I, Kraemer B M, Lenters J D, Merchant C J, O’Reilly C M, Sharma S. (2020). Global lake responses to climate change. Nature Reviews. Earth & Environment, 1(8): 388–403
CrossRef Google scholar
[90]
Wright M N, Ziegler A. (2017). Ranger: a fast implementation of random forests for high dimensional data in C++ and R. Journal of Statistical Software, 77(1): 1–17
CrossRef Google scholar
[91]
Xu Y, Schroth A W, Isles P D F, Rizzo D M. (2015). Quantile regression improves models of lake eutrophication with implications for ecosystem-specific management. Freshwater Biology, 60(9): 1841–1853
CrossRef Google scholar
[92]
YadavSShukla S (2016). Analysis of k-fold cross-validation over hold-out validation on colossal datasets for quality classification. In: 2016 IEEE 6th International Conference on Advanced Computing (IACC). IEEE
[93]
Yang L, Shami A. (2020). On hyperparameter optimization of machine learning algorithms: theory and practice. Neurocomputing, 415: 295–316
CrossRef Google scholar
[94]
Yuan L L, Jones J R. (2020). Rethinking phosphorus–chlorophy Ⅱ relationships in lakes. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(8): 1847–1857
CrossRef Google scholar
[95]
Yusta S C. (2009). Different metaheuristic strategies to solve the feature selection problem. Pattern Recognition Letters, 30(5): 525–534
CrossRef Google scholar
[96]
Zagarese H E, de los Ángeles Gonźalez Sagrario M, Wolf-Gladrow D, Nõges P, Nõges T, Kangur K, Matsuzaki S I S, Kohzu A, Vanni M J, Õzkundakci D. . (2021). Patterns of CO2 concentration and inorganic carbon limitation of phytoplankton biomass in agriculturally eutrophic lakes. Water Research, 190: 116715
CrossRef Google scholar
[97]
Zhang Y, Qin B, Zhu G, Shi K, Zhou Y. (2018). Profound changes in the physical environment of Lake Taihu from 25 years of long-term observations: implications for algal bloom outbreaks and aquatic macrophyte loss. Water Resources Research, 54(7): 4319–4331
CrossRef Google scholar
[98]
Zou W, Zhu G, Cai Y, Xu H, Zhu M, Gong Z, Zhang Y, Qin B. (2020). Quantifying the dependence of cyanobacterial growth to nutrient for the eutrophication management of temperate-subtropical shallow lakes. Water Research, 177: 115806
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71761147001 and 42030707), the International Partnership Program by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. 121311KYSB20190029), the Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities (No. 20720210083), and the National Science Foundation (Nos. EF-1638679, EF-1638554, EF-1638539, and EF-1638550). Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.

Data Accessibility Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials. The code that support the findings of this study are available from the first author (Z. Liang, liangzhongyao@xmu.edu.cn), upon reasonable request.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1676-2 and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1646 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/