Water quality soft-sensor prediction in anaerobic process using deep neural network optimized by Tree-structured Parzen Estimator

Junlang Li, Zhenguo Chen, Xiaoyong Li, Xiaohui Yi, Yingzhong Zhao, Xinzhong He, Zehua Huang, Mohamed A. Hassaan, Ahmed El Nemr, Mingzhi Huang

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (6) : 67.

PDF(8318 KB)
PDF(8318 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (6) : 67. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-023-1667-3
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Water quality soft-sensor prediction in anaerobic process using deep neural network optimized by Tree-structured Parzen Estimator

Author information +
History +

Highlights

● Hybrid deep-learning model is proposed for water quality prediction.

● Tree-structured Parzen Estimator is employed to optimize the neural network.

● Developed model performs well in accuracy and uncertainty.

● Usage of the proposed model can reduce carbon emission and energy consumption.

Abstract

Anaerobic process is regarded as a green and sustainable process due to low carbon emission and minimal energy consumption in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). However, some water quality metrics are not measurable in real time, thus influencing the judgment of the operators and may increase energy consumption and carbon emission. One of the solutions is using a soft-sensor prediction technique. This article introduces a water quality soft-sensor prediction method based on Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit (BiGRU) combined with Gaussian Progress Regression (GPR) optimized by Tree-structured Parzen Estimator (TPE). TPE automatically optimizes the hyperparameters of BiGRU, and BiGRU is trained to obtain the point prediction with GPR for the interval prediction. Then, a case study applying this prediction method for an actual anaerobic process (2500 m3/d) is carried out. Results show that TPE effectively optimizes the hyperparameters of BiGRU. For point prediction of CODeff and biogas yield, R2 values of BiGRU, which are 0.973 and 0.939, respectively, are increased by 1.03%–7.61% and 1.28%–10.33%, compared with those of other models, and the valid prediction interval can be obtained. Besides, the proposed model is assessed as a reliable model for anaerobic process through the probability prediction and reliable evaluation. It is expected to provide high accuracy and reliable water quality prediction to offer basis for operators in WWTPs to control the reactor and minimize carbon emission and energy consumption.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Water quality prediction / Soft-sensor / Anaerobic process / Tree-structured Parzen Estimator

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Junlang Li, Zhenguo Chen, Xiaoyong Li, Xiaohui Yi, Yingzhong Zhao, Xinzhong He, Zehua Huang, Mohamed A. Hassaan, Ahmed El Nemr, Mingzhi Huang. Water quality soft-sensor prediction in anaerobic process using deep neural network optimized by Tree-structured Parzen Estimator. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(6): 67 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1667-3

References

[1]
Chen Q L, Chai W, Qiao J F. (2010). Modeling of Wastewater Treatment Process Using Recurrent Neural Network. Jinan: IEEE, 5872–5876
[2]
Ching P M L, So R H Y, Morck T. (2021). Advances in soft sensors for wastewater treatment plants: a systematic review. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 44: 102367
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Darvishi H, Ciuonzo D, Eide E R, Rossi P S. (2021). Sensor-fault detection, isolation and accommodation for digital twins via modular data-driven architecture. IEEE Sensors Journal, 21(4): 4827–4838
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Di Maria F, Micale C. (2015). The contribution to energy production of the aerobic bioconversion of organic waste by an organic Rankine cycle in an integrated anaerobic-aerobic facility. Renewable Energy, 81: 770–778
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Ferro C A T. (2014). Fair scores for ensemble forecasts. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 140(683): 1917–1923
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Han H G, Zhang J C, Du S L, Sun H Y, Qiao J F. (2021). Robust optimal control for anaerobic-anoxic-oxic reactors. Science China. Technological Sciences, 64(7): 1485–1499
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
HauckM, Maalcke-Luesken F A, JettenM S M, HuijbregtsM A J (2016). Removing nitrogen from wastewater with side stream anammox: What are the trade-offs between environmental impacts? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 107: 212–219
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Heydari B, Sharghi E A, Rafiee S, Mohtasebi S S. (2021). Use of artificial neural network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for prediction of biogas production from spearmint essential oil wastewater treatment in up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Fuel, 306: 121734
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8): 1735–1780
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[10]
Jiang Y, Yin S, Dong J, Kaynak O. (2021). A review on soft sensors for monitoring, control, and optimization of industrial processes, control, and optimization of industrial processes. IEEE Sensors Journal, 21(11): 12868–12881
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Jupp P E, Kume A. (2020). Measures of goodness of fit obtained by almost-canonical transformations on Riemannian manifolds. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 176: 104579
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Kadlec P, Gabrys B, Strandt S. (2009). Data-driven Soft Sensors in the process industry. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 33(4): 795–814
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Kang L, Chen R S, Xiong N, Chen Y C, Hu Y X, Chen C M. (2019). Selecting hyper-parameters of gaussian process regression based on non-inertial particle swarm optimization in Internet of things. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 7: 59504–59513
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Kim M, Yang Y N, Morikawa-Sakura M S, Wang Q H, Lee M V, Lee D Y, Feng C P, Zhou Y L, Zhang Z Y. (2012). Hydrogen production by anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and sewage sludge. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(4): 3142–3149
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Laio F, Tamea S. (2007). Verification tools for probabilistic forecasts of continuous hydrological variables. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11(4): 1267–1277
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Li X Y, Yi X H, Liu Z H, Liu H B, Chen T, Niu G Q, Yan B, Chen C, Huang M Z, Ying G G. (2021). Application of novel hybrid deep leaning model for cleaner production in a paper industrial wastewater treatment system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 294: 126343
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Newhart K B, Holloway R W, Hering A S, Cath T Y. (2019). Data-driven performance analyses of wastewater treatment plants: a review. Water Research, 157: 498–513
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[18]
Nguyen H P, Liu J, Zio E. (2020). A long-term prediction approach based on long short-term memory neural networks with automatic parameter optimization by Tree-structured Parzen Estimator and applied to time-series data of NPP steam generators. Applied Soft Computing, 89: 106116
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Ozcan G, Pajovic M, Sahinoglu Z, Wang Y B, Orlik P V, Wada T. (2016). Online State of Charge Estimation for Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Gaussian Process Regression. Florence: IEEE, 998–1003
[20]
Pham V, Bluche T, Kermorvant C, Louradour J. (2014). Dropout Improves Recurrent Neural Networks for Handwriting Recognition. Hersonissos, Greece: IEEE, 285–290
[21]
PutatundaS, Rama K, Acm (2018). A Comparative Analysis of Hyperopt as Against Other Approaches for Hyper-Parameter Optimization of XGBoost. Shanghai: ACM
[22]
Qiao S, Wang Q, Zhang J, Pei Z. (2020). Detection and classification of early decay on blueberry based on improved deep residual 3D convolutional neural network in hyperspectral images. Scientific Programming, 2020: 1–12
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Safari M a M, Masseran N, Majid M H A. (2020). Robust reliability estimation for lindley distribution: a probability integral transform statistical approach. Mathematics, 8(9): 1634
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Samuelsson O, Björk A, Zambrano J, Carlsson B. (2017). Gaussian process regression for monitoring and fault detection of wastewater treatment processes. Water Science and Technology, 75(12): 2952–2963
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[25]
Şenol H. (2021). Methane yield prediction of ultrasonic pretreated sewage sludge by means of an artificial neural network. Energy, 215: 119173
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Srivastava N, Hinton G, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Salakhutdinov R. (2014). Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15: 1929–1958
[27]
Szelag B, Gawdzik A, Gawdzik A. (2017). Application of selected methods of black box for modelling the settleability process in wastewater treatment plant. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S-Chemia I Inzynieria Ekologiczna S, 24(1): 119–127
[28]
Wang H T, Yang Y, Keller A A, Li X, Feng S J, Dong Y N, Li F T. (2016). Comparative analysis of energy intensity and carbon emissions in wastewater treatment in USA, Germany, China and South Africa. Applied Energy, 184: 873–881
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Wang J, Cui Q, Sun X. (2021). A novel framework for carbon price prediction using comprehensive feature screening, bidirectional gate recurrent unit and Gaussian process regression. Journal of Cleaner Production, 314: 128024
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Wei J P, Liang G F, Alex J, Zhang T C, Ma C B. (2020). Research progress of energy utilization of agricultural waste in China: Bibliometric analysis by citespace. Sustainability (Basel), 12(3): 812
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Wu X, Wang Y, Wang C, Wang W, Dong F. (2021). Moving average convergence and divergence indexes based online intelligent expert diagnosis system for anaerobic wastewater treatment process. Bioresource Technology, 324: 124662
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[32]
Xu Y, Gao W, Qian F, Li Y. (2021). Potential analysis of the attention-based LSTM model in ultra-short-term forecasting of building HVAC energy consumption. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9: 730640
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Yaginuma K, Tanabe S, Kano M. (2022). Gray-box soft sensor for water content monitoring in fluidized bed granulation. Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 70(1): 74–81
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[34]
Zeng G M, Li X D, Jiang R, Li J B, Huang G H. (2006). Fault diagnosis of WWTP based on improved support vector machine. Environmental Engineering Science, 23(6): 1044–1054
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Zhang C, Wei H, Zhao X, Liu T, Zhang K. (2016). A Gaussian process regression based hybrid approach for short-term wind speed prediction. Energy Conversion and Management, 126: 1084–1092
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Zhang Z, Ye L, Qin H, Liu Y, Wang C, Yu X, Yin X, Li J. (2019). Wind speed prediction method using shared weight long short-term memory network and gaussian process regression. Applied Energy, 247: 270–284
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41977300 and 41907297), the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (China) (No. 202002020055) and the Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation (China) (No. 2020I1001).

CRediT Author Contribution Statement

Junlang Li: Algorithm design, Writing – Original draft. Zhenguo Chen: Code debugging, Writing – Review & Editing, Investigation. Xiaoyong Li: Algorithm optimization, Writing – Review & Editing. Xiaohui Yi: Conceptualization. Yingzhong Zhao: Experimental data visualization. Xinzhong He: Dataset resources. Zehua Huang: Formal analysis. Mohamed A. Hassaan: Writing – Review & Editing. Ahmed El Nemr: Writing – Review & Editing. Mingzhi Huang: Project administration, Funding acquisition.

Data Accessibility Statement

Data not available due to commercial restrictions.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1667-3 and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(8318 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/