Removal of virus aerosols by the combination of filtration and UV-C irradiation

Min Shang , Yadong Kong , Zhijuan Yang , Rong Cheng , Xiang Zheng , Yi Liu , Tongping Chen

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3) : 27

PDF (12627KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3) : 27 DOI: 10.1007/s11783-023-1627-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Removal of virus aerosols by the combination of filtration and UV-C irradiation

Author information +
History +
PDF (12627KB)

Abstract

● The removal of virus aerosols by filtration and UV-C irradiation was proposed.

● The filtration efficiency for virus aerosols was affected by the filtration rate.

● The inactivation rate by UV-C was not linear with irradiation intensity or time.

● The virus trapped by filter material had a shielding effect on UV-C irradiation.

The COVID-19 pandemic remains ever prevalent and afflicting—partially because one of its transmission pathways is aerosol. With the widely used central air conditioning systems worldwide, indoor virus aerosols can rapidly migrate, thus resulting in rapid infection transmission. It is therefore important to install microbial aerosol treatment units in the air conditioning systems, and we herein investigated the possibility of combining such filtration with UV irradiation to address virus aerosols. Results showed that the removal efficiency of filtration towards f2 and MS2 phages depended on the type of commercial filter material and the filtration speed, with an optimal velocity of 5 cm/s for virus removal. Additionally, it was found that UV irradiation had a significant effect on inactivating viruses enriched on the surfaces of filter materials; MS2 phages had greater resistance to UV-C irradiation than f2 phages. The optimal inactivation time for UV-C irradiation was 30 min, with higher irradiation times presenting no substantial increase in inactivation rate. Moreover, excessive virus enrichment on the filters decreased the inactivation effect. Timely inactivation is therefore recommended. In general, the combined system involving filtration with UV-C irradiation demonstrated a significant removal effect on virus aerosols. Moreover, the system is simple and economical, making it convenient for widespread implementation in air-conditioning systems.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Filtration system / UV-C irradiation / Virus aerosol / Public health / COVID-19

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Min Shang, Yadong Kong, Zhijuan Yang, Rong Cheng, Xiang Zheng, Yi Liu, Tongping Chen. Removal of virus aerosols by the combination of filtration and UV-C irradiation. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(3): 27 DOI:10.1007/s11783-023-1627-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Bazant M Z , Bush J W M . (2021). A guideline to limit indoor airborne transmission of COVID-19. PNAS, 118( 17): 1– 12

[2]

Berry G , Parsons A , Morgan M , Rickert J , Cho H . (2022). A review of methods to reduce the probability of the airborne spread of COVID-19 in ventilation systems and enclosed spaces. Environmental Research, 203 : 111765

[3]

Castrillón S R V , De Lasa H I . (2007). Performance evaluation of photocatalytic reactors for air purification using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 46( 18): 5867– 5880

[4]

Cecchini C , Verdenelli M C , Orpianesi C , Dadea G M , Cresci A . (2004). Effects of antimicrobial treatment on fiberglass-acrylic filters. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 97( 2): 371– 377

[5]

Chen Q . (2021). Can we migrate covid-19 spreading risk. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15( 3): 35

[6]

Cheng R , Li G , Cheng C , Liu P , Shi L , Ma Z , Zheng X . (2014). Removal of bacteriophage f2 in water by nanoscale zero-valent iron and parameters optimization using response surface methodology. Chemical Engineering Journal, 252 : 150– 158

[7]

Correia G , Rodrigues L , Gameiro da Silva M , Gonçalves T . (2020). Airborne route and bad use of ventilation systems as non-negligible factors in SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Medical Hypotheses, 141 : 109781

[8]

Curiel G J Lelieveld H (2014). Process hygiene | risk and control of airborne contamination. In: Batt C, Patel P, eds. Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology (2nd Edition). New York: Academic Press, 200– 206

[9]

Dancer S J , Tang J W , Marr L C , Miller S , Morawska L , Jimenez J L . (2020). Putting a balance on the aerosolization debate around SARS-CoV-2. Journal of Hospital Infection, 105( 3): 569– 570

[10]

Jeong S B , Ko H S , Seo S C , Jung J H . (2019). Evaluation of filtration characteristics and microbial recovery rates of commercial filtering facepiece respirators against airborne bacterial particles. Science of the Total Environment, 682( 10): 729– 736

[11]

Jiang G , Wang C , Song L , Wang X , Zhou Y , Fei C , Liu H . (2021). Aerosol transmission, an indispensable route of covid-19 spread: case study of a department-store cluster. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 15( 3): 46

[12]

Kalogerakis N , Paschali D , Lekaditis V , Pantidou A , Eleftheriadis K , Lazaridis M . (2005). Indoor air quality—bioaerosol measurements in domestic and office premises. Journal of Aerosol Science, 36( 5–6): 751– 761

[13]

Kelkar U , Bal A M , Kulkarni S . (2005). Fungal contamination of air conditioning units in operating theatres in India. Journal of Hospital Infection, 60( 1): 81– 84

[14]

Kemp P C , Neumeister-Kemp H G , Lysek G , Murray F . (2001). Survival and growth of micro-organisms on air filtration media during initial loading. Atmospheric Environment, 35( 28): 4739– 4749

[15]

Klepeis N E , Nelson W C , Ott W R , Robinson J P , Tsang A M , Switzer P , Behar J V , Hern S C , Engelmann W H . (2001). The national human activity pattern survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 11( 3): 231– 252

[16]

Lee B U , Yun S H , Jung J H , Bae G N . (2010). Effect of relative humidity and variation of particle number size distribution on the inactivation effectiveness of airborne silver nanoparticles against bacteria bioaerosols deposited on a filter. Journal of Aerosol Science, 41( 5): 447– 456

[17]

Leung W W F , Sun Q . (2020). Electrostatic charged nanofiber filter for filtering airborne novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and nano-aerosols. Separation and Purification Technology, 250 : 116886

[18]

Majchrzycka K . (2014). Evaluation of a new bioactive nonwoven fabric for respiratory protection. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 22( 1): 81– 88

[19]

Maus R , Goppelsröder A , Umhauer H . (2001). Survival of bacterial and mold spores in air filter media. Atmospheric Environment, 35( 1): 105– 113

[20]

McDonnell G , Burke P . (2011). Disinfection: Is it time to reconsider Spaulding. Journal of Hospital Infection, 78( 3): 163– 170

[21]

Moreno E , Klochok G , García S . (2021). Active versus passive flow control in UVC filters for COVID-19 containment. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 49( 9): 2554– 2565

[22]

Peters A , Parneix P , Otter J , Pittet D . (2020). Putting some context to the aerosolization debate around SARS-CoV-2. Journal of Hospital Infection, 105( 2): 381– 382

[23]

Pigeot-Remy S , Lazzaroni J C , Simonet F , Petinga P , Vallet C , Petit P , Vialle P J , Guillard C . (2014). Survival of bioaerosols in HVAC system photocatalytic filters. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 144 : 654– 664

[24]

Raynor P C . (2016). Chapter 7—Controlling nanoparticle exposures. In: Ramachandran G, ed. Assessing Nanoparticle Risks to Human Health (2nd Edition). Norwich, NY: William Andrew, 167– 193

[25]

Santos A F , Gaspar P D , Hamandosh A , Aguiar E B , Guerra Filho A C , Souza H J L . (2020). Best practices on HVAC design to minimize the risk of COVID-19 infection within indoor environments. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 63 : e20200335

[26]

Schnell E , Karamooz E , Harriff M J , Yates J E , Pfeiffer C D , Smith S M . (2021). Construction and validation of an ultraviolet germicidal irradiation system using locally available components. PLoS One, 16( 7): e0255123

[27]

Technical committee CEN/TC 79 “Respiratory protective devices”, ( 2009). European standard EN 149:2001+A1: Respiratory protective devices – Filtering half masks to protect against particles – Requirements, testing, marking. London: British Standards Institution.

[28]

Thurston-Enriquez J A , Haas C N , Jacangelo J , Gerba C P . (2005). Inactivation of enteric adenovirus and feline calicivirus by ozone. Water Research, 39( 15): 3650– 3656

[29]

Tseng C C , Li C S . (2006). Ozone for inactivation of aerosolized bacteriophages. Aerosol Science and Technology, 40( 9): 683– 689

[30]

Xie W , Li Y , Bai W , Hou J , Ma T , Zeng X , Zhang L , An T . (2021). The source and transport of bioaerosols in the air: a review. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 15( 3): 44

[31]

Yang H , Hu J , Li P , Zhang C . (2020). Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation for filtering facepiece respirators disinfection to facilitate reuse during COVID-19 pandemic: a review. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, 31 : 101943

[32]

Zhu N , Zhang D , Wang W , Li X , Yang B , Song J , Zhao X , Huang B , Shi W , Lu R , . China Novel Coronavirus Investigating , the Team . . (2020). A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in china, 2019. New England Journal of Medicine, 382( 8): 727– 733

[33]

Zou Z , Yao M . (2014). Airflow resistance and bio-filtering performance of carbon nanotube filters and current facepiece respirators. Journal of Aerosol Science, 79( 2015): 61– 71

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (12627KB)

3694

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/