Win-Win: Anthropogenic circularity for metal criticality and carbon neutrality
Xianlai Zeng
Win-Win: Anthropogenic circularity for metal criticality and carbon neutrality
● Anthropogenic circularity science is an emerging interdisciplinary field.
● Anthropogenic circularity was one effective strategy against metal criticality.
● Carbon neutrality is becoming the new industry paradigm around the world.
● Growing circularity could potentially minimize the CO2 emission.
Resource depletion and environmental degradation have fueled a burgeoning discipline of anthropogenic circularity since the 2010s. It generally consists of waste reuse, remanufacturing, recycling, and recovery. Circular economy and “zero-waste” cities are sweeping the globe in their current practices to address the world’s grand concerns linked to resources, the environment, and industry. Meanwhile, metal criticality and carbon neutrality, which have become increasingly popular in recent years, denote the material's feature and state, respectively. The goal of this article is to determine how circularity, criticality, and neutrality are related. Upscale anthropogenic circularity has the potential to expand the metal supply and, as a result, reduce metal criticality. China barely accomplished 15 % of its potential emission reduction by recycling iron, copper, and aluminum. Anthropogenic circularity has a lot of room to achieve a win-win objective, which is to reduce metal criticality while also achieving carbon neutrality in a near closed-loop cycle. Major barriers or challenges for conducting anthropogenic circularity are deriving from the inadequacy of life-cycle insight governance and the emergence of anthropogenic circularity discipline. Material flow analysis and life cycle assessment are the central methodologies to identify the hidden problems. Mineral processing and smelting, as well as end-of-life management, are indicated as critical priority areas for enhancing anthropogenic circularity.
Anthropogenic circularity / Material flow analysis / Criticality / Carbon neutrality / Solid waste / Circular economy
Dr. Xianlai Zeng is currently an associate professor in the School of Environment at Tsinghua University, China. He obtained his Bachelor (2002) and Master (2005) degrees from Northwest A&F University, and Ph. D (2014) from Tsinghua University. He worked as a technical advisor for the United Nations Development Programme (2015), visiting staff at Coventry University (2012), visiting professor at Macquarie University (2017), and Fulbright fellow at Yale University (2018–2019). His areas of specialization and interest include waste recycling and circular economy. He proposed the emerging concept and framework of anthropogenic circularity. He has published around 100 articles and books, which have been cited for more than 8000 times with an H-index of 38 (Google Scholar). As the PI, he has chaired over 20 international and national competitive projects related to waste management, metal sustainability, and circular economy. In addition, Dr. Zeng has received 10 granted patents and led one group standard of resource and environmental properties of industrial solid waste. He has chaired or organized a dozen leading international academic meetings or workshops on material flow and waste management
[1] |
Al-ObaidyM, SantosM C, BaskarM, AttiaS. (2021). Assessment of the circularity and carbon neutrality of an office building: The case of Centrum in Westerlo, Belgium. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 855( 1): 012025
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
AliS H, GiurcoD, ArndtN, NicklessE, BrownG, DemetriadesA, DurrheimR, EnriquezM A, KinnairdJ, LittleboyA.
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[3] |
AnctilA, FthenakisV. (2013). Critical metals in strategic photovoltaic technologies: abundance versus recyclability. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 21( 6): 1253– 1259
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
AshbyM F, JohnsonK. (2014). Materials and design: the art and science of material selection in product design. Waltham, USA : Butterworth– Heinemann
|
[5] |
AwasthiA K, CheelaV R S, D’adamoI, IacovidouE, IslamM R, JohnsonM, MillerT R, ParajulyK, ParchomenkoA, RadhakrishanL, ZhaoM, ZhangC, LiJ. (2021). Zero waste approach towards a sustainable waste management. Resources. Environment and Sustainability, 3 : 100014
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
AzadiM, NortheyS A, AliS H, EdrakiM. (2020). Transparency on greenhouse gas emissions from mining to enable climate change mitigation. Nature Geoscience, 13( 2): 100– 104
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
BabbittC W, AlthafS, Cruz RiosF, BilecM M, GraedelT E. (2021). The role of design in circular economy solutions for critical materials. One Earth, 4( 3): 353– 362
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
BacciniP, BrunnerP H ( 2012). Metabolism of the Anthroposphere: Analysis, Evaluation, Design. Cambridge: MIT Press
|
[9] |
BiermannF, AbbottK, AndresenS, BäckstrandK, BernsteinS, BetsillM M, BulkeleyH, CashoreB, ClappJ, FolkeC.
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[10] |
BloodworthA. (2014). Resources: Track flows to manage technology-metal supply. Nature, 505( 7481): 19– 20
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[11] |
BrunnerP H, RechbergerH ( 2016). Handbook of Material Flow Analysis: For Environmental, Resource, and Waste Engineers. Boca Raton: CRC Press
|
[12] |
Charpentier PonceletA, HelbigC, LoubetP, BeylotA, MullerS, VilleneuveJ, LaratteB, ThorenzA, TumaA, SonnemannG ( 2022). Losses and lifetimes of metals in the economy. Nature Sustainability,
|
[13] |
ChenJ M. (2021). Carbon neutrality: toward a sustainable future. Innovation, 2( 3): 100127
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
ChenM, OgunseitanO A. (2021). Zero E-waste: regulatory impediments and blockchain imperatives. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15( 6): 114
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
ChenW, WangM, LiX ( 2016). Analysis of copper flows in the United States: 1975–2012. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 111: 67– 76
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
CiacciL, VassuraI, PassariniF. (2017). Urban mines of copper: size and potential for recycling in the EU. Resources, 6( 1): 6
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
ColonC, HallegatteS, RozenbergJ. (2021). Criticality analysis of a country’s transport network via an agent-based supply chain model. Nature Sustainability, 4( 3): 209– 215
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
DaigoI, HashimotoS, MatsunoY, AdachiY ( 2009). Material stocks and flows accounting for copper and copper-based alloys in Japan. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53( 4): 208– 217
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
DasS. (2012). Achieving carbon neutrality in the global aluminum industry. Journal of the Minerals Metals & Materials Society, 64( 2): 285– 290
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
DieterleM, ViereT. (2022). Life cycle gap analysis for product circularity and sustainability: a case study with three different products. Materials Circular Economy, 4( 1): 12
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
EheliyagodaD, LiJ, GengY, ZengX. (2022). The role of China’s aluminum recycling on sustainable resource and emission pathways. Resources Policy, 76 : 102552
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
EheliyagodaD, ZengX, LiJ. (2020). A method to assess national metal criticality: the environment as a foremost measurement. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7( 1): 43
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
ErdmannL, GraedelT E. (2011). Criticality of non-fuel minerals: a review of major approaches and analyses. Environmental Science & Technology, 45( 18): 7620– 7630
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[24] |
GengY, SarkisJ, BleischwitzR. (2019). How to globalize the circular economy. Nature, 565( 7738): 153– 155
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[25] |
BîrgovanA L, LakatosE S, SzilagyiA, CiocaL I, PacurariuR L, CiobanuG, RadaE C. (2022). How should we measure? A review of circular cities indicators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19( 9): 5177
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[26] |
GlöserS, SoulierM, Tercero EspinozaL A ( 2013). Dynamic analysis of global copper flows. Global stocks, postconsumer material flows, recycling indicators, and uncertainty evaluation. Environmental Science & Technology, 47( 12): 6564– 6572
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Glöser-ChahoudS, TerceroEspinoza L, WalzR, FaulstichM. (2016). Taking the step towards a more dynamic view on raw material criticality: an indicator based analysis for Germany and Japan. Resources, 5( 4): 45
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
GraedelT E, BarrR, ChandlerC, ChaseT, ChoiJ, ChristoffersenL, FriedlanderE, HenlyC, JunC, NassarN T, SchechnerD, WarrenS, YangM Y, ZhuC. (2012). Methodology of metal criticality determination. Environmental Science & Technology, 46( 2): 1063– 1070
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[29] |
GraedelT E, HarperE M, NassarN T, NussP, ReckB K. (2015). Criticality of metals and metalloids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112( 14): 4257– 4262
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[30] |
GraedelT E, NussP. (2014). Employing considerations of criticality in product design. Journal of the Minerals Metals & Materials Society, 66( 11): 2360– 2366
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
GraedelT E, vanBeers D, BertramM, FuseK, GordonR B, GritsininA, KapurA, KleeR J, LifsetR J, MemonL.
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[32] |
GruberN, GallowayJ N. (2008). An Earth-system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle. Nature, 451( 7176): 293– 296
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[33] |
HarperE M, DiaoZ, PanousiS, NussP, EckelmanM J, GraedelT E ( 2015a). The criticality of four nuclear energy metals. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 95( 0): 193– 201
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
HarperE M, KavlakG, BurmeisterL, EckelmanM J, ErbisS, Sebastian EspinozaV, NussP, GraedelT E. (2015b). Criticality of the Geological Zinc, Tin, and Lead Family. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19( 4): 628– 644
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
HodgesC A. (1995). Mineral resources, environmental issues, and land use. Science, 268( 5215): 1305– 1312
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[36] |
HoolA, SchrijversD, Van NielenS, CliftonA, GanzeboomS, HageluekenC, HaradaY, KimH Y, KuA, Meese-MarktscheffelJ, NemotoT. (2022). How companies improve critical raw material circularity: five use cases. Mineral Economics, 35( 2): 325– 335
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
HoornwegD, Bhada-TataP, KennedyC. (2013). Waste production must peak this century. Nature, 502( 7473): 615– 617
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
HouZ, ChenJ, ZhaiM. (2020). Current status and frontiers of research on critical mineral resources. Chinese Science Bulletin, 65( 33): 3561– 3652
|
[39] |
IranpourR, StenstromM, TchobanoglousG, MillerD, WrightJ, VossoughiM. (1999). Environmental engineering: energy value of replacing waste disposal with resource recovery. Science, 285( 5428): 706– 711
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[40] |
IRP
|
[41] |
JinM. (2014). Advance of cyclical chemistry. Chemical World, 55( 3): 187– 192
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[42] |
KanwalQ, LiJ, ZengX. (2021). Mapping recyclability of industrial waste for anthropogenic circularity: a circular economy approach. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 9( 35): 11927– 11936
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[43] |
KapurA, BertramM, SpatariS, FuseK, GraedelT E. (2003). The contemporary copper cycle of Asia. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 5( 2): 143– 156
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[44] |
KerrR A. (2014). The coming copper peak. Science, 343( 6172): 722– 724
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[45] |
KlotzM, HauptM, HellwegS ( 2022). Limited utilization options for secondary plastics may restrict their circularity. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 141: 251– 270
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[46] |
KnoblochV, ZimmermannT, Gößling-ReisemannS ( 2018). From criticality to vulnerability of resource supply: The case of the automobile industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 138: 272– 282
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[47] |
KrausmannF, LaukC, HaasW, WiedenhoferD. (2018). From resource extraction to outflows of wastes and emissions: the socioeconomic metabolism of the global economy, 1900–2015. Global Environmental Change, 52 : 131– 140
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[48] |
LambW F, WiedmannT, PongratzJ, AndrewR, CrippaM, OlivierJ G J, WiedenhoferD, MattioliG, KhourdajieA A, HouseJ.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[49] |
LiangY, SongQ, WuN, LiJ, ZhongY, ZengW. (2021). Repercussions of COVID-19 pandemic on solid waste generation and management strategies. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15( 6): 115
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[50] |
LinderM, SarasiniS, Van LoonP. (2017). A metric for quantifying product-level circularity. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21( 3): 545– 558
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[51] |
LiuS ( 2014). Analysis of Electronic Waste Recycling in the United States and Potential Application in China. New York: Columbia University
|
[52] |
LiuX, ShengH, JiangS, YuanZ, ZhangC, ElserJ J. (2016a). Intensification of phosphorus cycling in China since the 1600s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113( 10): 2609– 2614
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[53] |
LiuZ, GengY, UlgiatiS, ParkH S, TsuyoshiF, WangH. (2016b). Uncovering key factors influencing one industrial park’s sustainability: a combined evaluation method of emergy analysis and index decomposition analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114 : 141– 149
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[54] |
LuX, ZhangZ, HirakiT, TakedaO, ZhuH, MatsubaeK, NagasakaT. (2022). A solid-state electrolysis process for upcycling aluminium scrap. Nature, 606( 7914): 511– 515
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[55] |
MangoldH, Von VacanoB. (2022). The Frontier of Plastics Recycling: Rethinking Waste as a Resource for High-Value Applications. Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, 223( 13): 2100488
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[56] |
NassarN T, BarrR, BrowningM, DiaoZ, FriedlanderE, HarperE M, HenlyC, KavlakG, KwatraS, JunC, WarrenS, YangM Y, GraedelT E. (2012). Criticality of the geological copper family. Environmental Science & Technology, 46( 2): 1071– 1078
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[57] |
NassarN T, DuX Y, GraedelT E. (2015). Criticality of the rare Earth elements. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19( 6): 1044– 1054
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[58] |
NorgateT, HaqueN. (2010). Energy and greenhouse gas impacts of mining and mineral processing operations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18( 3): 266– 274
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[59] |
NussP, EckelmanM J. (2014a). Life cycle assessment of metals: a scientific synthesis. PLoS One, 9( 7): e101298
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[60] |
NussP, HarperE M, NassarN T, ReckB K, GraedelT E. (2014b). Criticality of iron and its principal alloying elements. Environmental Science & Technology, 48( 7): 4171– 4177
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[61] |
O’ConnorM P, ZimmermanJ B, AnastasP T, PlataD L. (2016). A strategy for material supply chain sustainability: enabling a circular economy in the electronics industry through green engineering. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 4( 11): 5879– 5888
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[62] |
OlivettiE A, CullenJ M. (2018). Toward a sustainable materials system. Science, 360( 6396): 1396– 1398
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[63] |
PanousiS, HarperE M, NussP, EckelmanM J, HakimianA, GraedelT E. (2016). Criticality of seven specialty metals. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20( 4): 837– 853
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[64] |
ParchomenkoA, NelenD, GillabelJ, RechbergerH. (2019). Measuring the circular economy: a multiple correspondence analysis of 63 metrics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210 : 200– 216
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[65] |
RaabeD, TasanC C, OlivettiE A. (2019). Strategies for improving the sustainability of structural metals. Nature, 575( 7781): 64– 74
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[66] |
RademakerJ H, KleijnR, YangY. (2013). Recycling as a strategy against rare earth element criticality: a systemic evaluation of the potential yield of NdFeB magnet recycling. Environmental Science & Technology, 47( 18): 10129– 10136
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[67] |
RauchJ N, GraedelT E. (2007). Earth’s anthrobiogeochemical copper cycle. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 21( 2): GB2010
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[68] |
RechbergerH, GraedelT E. (2002). The contemporary European copper cycle: statistical entropy analysis. Ecological Economics, 42( 1–2): 59– 72
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[69] |
ReckB K, GraedelT E. (2012). Challenges in metal recycling. Science, 337( 6095): 690– 695
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[70] |
RostekL, Tercero EspinozaL A, GoldmannD, LoiblA ( 2022). A dynamic material flow analysis of the global anthropogenic zinc cycle: p roviding a quantitative basis for circularity discussions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 180: 106154
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[71] |
Ruiz-PastorL, ChulviV, MuletE, RoyoM. (2022). A metric for evaluating novelty and circularity as a whole in conceptual design proposals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 337 : 130495
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[72] |
SondereggerT, PfisterS, HellwegS. (2015). Criticality of water: aligning water and mineral resources assessment. Environmental Science & Technology, 49( 20): 12315– 12323
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[73] |
SongQ, WangZ, LiJ. (2013). Sustainability evaluation of e-waste treatment based on emergy analysis and the LCA method: a case study of a trial project in Macau. Ecological Indicators, 30 : 138– 147
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[74] |
SoulierM, Glöser-ChahoudS, GoldmannD, Tercero EspinozaL A ( 2018). Dynamic analysis of European copper flows. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129: 143– 152
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[75] |
SpatariS, BertramM, FuseK, GraedelT E, RechbergerH ( 2002). The contemporary European copper cycle: 1 year stocks and flows. Ecological Economics, 42( 1– 2): 27– 42
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[76] |
SpatariS, BertramM, GordonR B, HendersonK, GraedelT E. (2005). Twentieth century copper stocks and flows in North America: a dynamic analysis. Ecological Economics, 54( 1): 37– 51
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[77] |
SteffenW, BroadgateW, DeutschL, GaffneyO, LudwigC. (2015). The trajectory of the Anthropocene: the great acceleration. Anthropocene Review, 2( 1): 81– 98
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[78] |
TanW, CuiD, XiB. (2021). Moving policy and regulation forward for single-use plastic alternatives. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15( 3): 50
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[79] |
Tercero Espinoza L, Schrijvers D, Chen W Q, Dewulf J, Eggert R, Goddin J, Habib K, Hagelüken C, Hurd A J, Kleijn R,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[80] |
TeseletsoL S, AdachiT. (2022). Long-term sustainability of copper and iron based on a system dynamics model. Resources, 11( 4): 37
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[81] |
UNEP and ISWA ( 2015). Global Waste Management Outlook. UNEP
|
[82] |
USEPA ( 2012). Electronics Environmental Benefits Calculator. FEC Publications and Resources: Life Cycle Assessment Data for Multi-Function Devices & Printers
|
[83] |
VelenturfA P M, PurnellP, JensenP D. (2021). Reducing material criticality through circular business models: Challenges in renewable energy. One Earth, 4( 3): 350– 352
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[84] |
WangA, WangG, DengX, ZhouF, AnH, ZhongW, LiH, LiuG, MaZ, HuD.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[85] |
WangM, ChenW, LiX ( 2015). Substance flow analysis of copper in production stage in the U.S. from 1974 to 2012. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 105: 36– 48
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[86] |
WangP, WangH, ChenW Q, PauliukS. (2022). Carbon neutrality needs a circular metal-energy nexus. Fundamental Research, 2( 3): 392– 395
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[87] |
WatersC N, ZalasiewiczJ, SummerhayesC, BarnoskyA D, PoirierC, GałuszkaA, CearretaA, EdgeworthM, EllisE C, EllisM.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[88] |
YanW, WangZ, CaoH, ZhangY, SunZ. (2021). Criticality assessment of metal resources in China. iScience, 24( 6): 102524
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[89] |
ZengX, LiJ. (2021). Emerging anthropogenic circularity science: principles, practices, and challenges. iScience, 24( 3): 102237
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[90] |
ZengX, XiaoT, XuG, AlbalghitiE, ShanG, LiJ. (2022). Comparing the costs and benefits of virgin and urban mining. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 7( 1): 98– 106
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[91] |
ZhangL, YangJ, CaiZ, YuanZ. (2014). Analysis of copper flows in China from 1975 to 2010. Science of the Total Environment, 478( 0): 80– 89
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[92] |
ZhouY, LiJ, RechbergerH, WangG, ChenS, XingW, LiP. (2020). Dynamic criticality of by-products used in thin-film photovoltaic technologies by 2050. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263 : 121599
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[93] |
ZhouY, LinX T, FanZ P, WongK H. (2022). Remanufacturing strategy choice of a closed-loop supply chain network considering carbon emission trading, green innovation, and green consumers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19( 11): 6782
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |