Same stimuli, different responses: a pilot study assessing air pollution visibility impacts on emotional well-being in a controlled environment

Jianxun Yang , Qi Gao , Miaomiao Liu , John S. Ji , Jun Bi

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (2) : 20

PDF (6393KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (2) : 20 DOI: 10.1007/s11783-023-1620-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Same stimuli, different responses: a pilot study assessing air pollution visibility impacts on emotional well-being in a controlled environment

Author information +
History +
PDF (6393KB)

Abstract

● Emotional responses to visibility-reducing haze was assessed in a controlled lab.

● Valence and arousal have non-linear responses to pollution-caused low visibility.

● Repetitive exposure aggravates negative emotions in severely polluted conditions.

● Emotional bias to pollution relates with gender, decisiveness, attitude to clean air.

A growing number of studies have shown that impaired visibility caused by particulate matter pollution influences emotional wellbeing. However, evidence is still scant on how this effect varies across individuals and over repetitive visual exposure in a controlled environment. Herein, we designed a lab-based experiment (41 subjects, 6 blocks) where participants were presented with real-scene images of 12 different PM2.5 concentrations in each block. Emotional valence (negative to positive) and arousal (calm to excited) were self-rated by participants per image, and the response time for each rating was recorded. We find that as pollution level increases from 10 to 260 µg/m3, valence scores decrease, whereas arousal scores decline first and then bounce back, following a U-shaped trend. When air quality deteriorates, individual variability decreases in hedonic valence but increases in arousal. Over blocks, repetitive visual exposure increases valence at a moderate pollution level but aggravates negative emotions in severely polluted conditions (> 150 µg/m3). Finally, we find females, people who are slow in making responses, and those who are highly aroused by clean air tend to express more negative responses (so-called negativity bias) to ambient pollution than their respective counterparts. These results provide deeper insights into individual-level emotional responses to dirty air in a controlled environment. Although the findings in our pilot study should only be directly applied to the conditions assessed herein, we introduce a framework that can be replicated in different regions to assess the impact of air pollution on local emotional wellbeing.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Air pollution / Emotional wellbeing / Variability / Visual exposure / Emotional bias

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jianxun Yang, Qi Gao, Miaomiao Liu, John S. Ji, Jun Bi. Same stimuli, different responses: a pilot study assessing air pollution visibility impacts on emotional well-being in a controlled environment. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(2): 20 DOI:10.1007/s11783-023-1620-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Baccarelli A , Barretta F , Dou C , Zhang X , McCracken J P , Díaz A , Bertazzi P A , Schwartz J , Wang S , Hou L . (2011). Effects of particulate air pollution on blood pressure in a highly exposed population in Beijing, China: a repeated-measure study. Environmental Health, 10( 1): 108

[2]

Bertram C , Rehdanz K . (2015). The role of urban green space for human well-being. Ecological Economics, 120 : 139– 152

[3]

Bradley M M , Lang P J . (1994). Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25( 1): 49– 59

[4]

Burki T . (2021). WHO introduces ambitious new air quality guidelines. Lancet, 398( 10306): 1117

[5]

Caplin A , Ghandehari M , Lim C , Glimcher P , Thurston G . (2019). Advancing environmental exposure assessment science to benefit society. Nature Communications, 10( 1): 1236

[6]

Chapman D A , Corner A , Webster R , Markowitz E M . (2016). Climate visuals: A mixed methods investigation of public perceptions of climate images in three countries. Global Environmental Change, 41 : 172– 182

[7]

Do K , Yu H , Velasquez J , Grell-Brisk M , Smith H , Ivey C E . (2021). A data-driven approach for characterizing community scale air pollution exposure disparities in inland Southern California. Journal of Aerosol Science, 152 : 105704

[8]

Dong R , Fisman R , Wang Y , Xu N . (2021). Air pollution, affect, and forecasting bias: evidence from Chinese financial analysts. Journal of Financial Economics, 139( 3): 971– 984

[9]

Ferreira S , Akay A , Brereton F , Cuñado J , Martinsson P , Moro M , Ningal T F . (2013). Life satisfaction and air quality in Europe. Ecological Economics, 88 : 1– 10

[10]

Fredrickson B L , Kahneman D . (1993). Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65( 1): 45– 55

[11]

Gao X , Coull B , Lin X , Vokonas P , Spiro A 3rd , Hou L , Schwartz J , Baccarelli A A . (2021). Short-term air pollution, cognitive performance, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in the Veterans Affairs normative aging study. Nature Aging, 1( 5): 430– 437

[12]

Hammitt J K , Zhou Y . (2006). The economic value of air-pollution-related health risks in China: a contingent valuation study. Environmental and Resource Economics, 33( 3): 399– 423

[13]

Hansstein F V , Echegaray F . (2018). Exploring motivations behind pollution-mask use in a sample of young adults in urban China. Globalization and Health, 14( 1): 122

[14]

Houben M , Van Den Noortgate W , Kuppens P . (2015). The relation between short-term emotion dynamics and psychological well-being: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141( 4): 901– 930

[15]

Huang J L , Liu M , Bowling N A . (2015). Insufficient effort responding: examining an insidious confound in survey data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100( 3): 828– 845

[16]

Jacobs N, Roman N, Pless R ( 2007). Consistent Temporal Variations in Many Outdoor Scenes, 1– 6

[17]

Jenkins-Smith H C , Ripberger J T , Silva C L , Carlson D E , Gupta K , Carlson N , Ter-Mkrtchyan A , Dunlap R E . (2020). Partisan asymmetry in temporal stability of climate change beliefs. Nature Climate Change, 10( 4): 322– 328

[18]

Joshanloo M ( 2019). Investigating the relationships between subjective well-being and psychological well-being over two decades. Emotion (Washington, DC), 19( 1): 183– 187

[19]

Lal R M , Das K , Fan Y , Barkjohn K K , Botchwey N , Ramaswami A , Russell A G . (2020). Connecting air quality with emotional well-being and neighborhood infrastructure in a US City. Environmental Health Insights, 14 : 1– 11

[20]

Lang P J , Bradley M M . (2010). Emotion and the motivational brain. Biological Psychology, 84( 3): 437– 450

[21]

Lehman B , Thompson J , Davis S , Carlson J M . (2019). Affective images of climate change. Frontiers in Psychology, 10( 960): 1– 10

[22]

Levinson A . (2012). Valuing public goods using happiness data: the case of air quality. Journal of Public Economics, 96( 9–10): 869– 880

[23]

Li Y , Guan D , Tao S , Wang X , He K . (2018). A review of air pollution impact on subjective well-being: survey versus visual psychophysics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184 : 959– 968

[24]

Li Y , Guan D , Yu Y , Westland S , Wang D , Meng J , Wang X , He K , Tao S . (2019). A psychophysical measurement on subjective well-being and air pollution. Nature Communications, 10( 1): 5473

[25]

Liu M , Bi J , Yang J , Qu S , Wang J . (2021). Social media never shake the role of trust building in relieving public risk perception. Journal of Cleaner Production, 282 : 124442

[26]

Marfori M T, Campbell S L, Garvey K, McKeown S, Veitch M, Wheeler A J, Borchers-Arriagada N, Johnston F H ( 2020). Public health messaging during extreme smoke eve nts: Are we hitting the m ark? Frontiers in Public Health, 8: 465

[27]

Menz T . (2011). Do people habituate to air pollution? Evidence from international life satisfaction data. Ecological Economics, 71 : 211– 219

[28]

Murray C J L , Aravkin A Y , Zheng P , Abbafati C , Abbas K M , Abbasi-Kangevari M , Abd-Allah F , Abdelalim A , Abdollahi M , Abdollahpour I , . GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators . . (2020). Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet, 396( 10258): 1223– 1249

[29]

Résibois M , Rotgé J Y , Delaveau P , Kuppens P , Van Mechelen I , Fossati P , Verduyn P . (2018). The impact of self-distancing on emotion explosiveness and accumulation: an fMRI study. PLoS One, 13( 11): e0206889

[30]

Seo M G , Barrett L F . (2007). Being emotional during decision making—Good or bad? An empirical investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 50( 4): 923– 940

[31]

Song H , Schwarz N . (2009). If it’s difficult to pronounce, it must be risky. Psychological Science, 20( 2): 135– 138

[32]

Yan T , Tourangeau R . (2008). Fast times and easy questions: the effects of age, experience and question complexity on web survey response times. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22( 1): 51– 68

[33]

Zhang J , Mu Q . (2018). Air pollution and defensive expenditures: evidence from particulate-filtering facemasks. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 92 : 517– 536

[34]

Zhang X , Chen X , Zhang X . (2018). The impact of exposure to air pollution on cognitive performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115( 37): 9193– 9197

[35]

Zhu Z , Zhao Y . (2021). Severe air pollution and psychological distress in China: the interactive effects of coping and perceived controllability. Frontiers in Psychology, 12 : 601964

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (6393KB)

Supplementary files

FSE-22068-OF-YJX_suppl_1

2233

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/