Salinity exchange between seawater/brackish water and domestic wastewater through electrodialysis for potable water
Mourin Jarin, Zeou Dou, Haiping Gao, Yongsheng Chen, Xing Xie
Salinity exchange between seawater/brackish water and domestic wastewater through electrodialysis for potable water
● Present a general concept called “salinity exchange”.
● Salts transferred from seawater to treated wastewater until completely switch.
● Process demonstrated using a laboratory-scale electrodialysis system.
● High-quality desalinated water obtained at ~1 mL/min consuming < 1 kWh/m 3 energy.
Two-thirds of the world’s population has limited access to potable water. As we continue to use up our freshwater resources, new and improved techniques for potable water production are warranted. Here, we present a general concept called “salinity exchange” that transfers salts from seawater or brackish water to treated wastewater until their salinity values approximately switch, thus producing wastewater with an increased salinity for discharge and desalinated seawater as the potable water source. We have demonstrated this process using electrodialysis. Salinity exchange has been successfully achieved between influents of different salinities under various operating conditions. Laboratory-scale salinity exchange electrodialysis (SEE) systems can produce high-quality desalinated water at ~1 mL/min with an energy consumption less than 1 kWh/m3. SEE has also been operated using real water, and the challenges of its implementation at a larger scale are evaluated.
Desalination / Potable water reuse / Ion-exchange membrane / Salinity gradient energy / Wastewater discharge
[1] |
AchilliA, CathT Y, ChildressA E ( 2009). Power generation with pressure retarded osmosis: a n experimental and theoretical investigation. Journal of Membrane Science, 343( 1– 2): 42– 52
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Al-KaraghouliA, RenneD, KazmerskiL L. (2010). Technical and economic assessment of photovoltaic-driven desalination systems. Renewable Energy, 35( 2): 323– 328
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
BaggettS, JeffreyP, JeffersonB. (2006). Risk perception in participatory planning for water reuse. Desalination, 187( 1–3): 149– 158
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
BitawT N, ParkK, YangD R. (2016). Optimization on a new hybrid forward osmosis-electrodialysis-reverse osmosis seawater desalination process. Desalination, 398 : 265– 281
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
BlandinG, VerliefdeA R D, ComasJ, Rodriguez-RodaI, Le-ClechP. (2016). Efficiently combining water reuse and desalination through forward osmosis-reverse osmosis (FO-RO) hybrids: a critical review. Membranes (Basel), 6( 3): 37
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[6] |
BraunsE ( 2010). An alternative hybrid concept combining seawater desalination, solar energy and reverse electrodialysis for a sustainable production of sweet water and electrical energy. Desalination and Water Treatment, 13( 1– 3): 53– 62
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
CipollinaA, MicaleG, TamburiniA, TedescoM, GurreriL, VeermanJ, GrasmanS. (2016). Sustainable Energy from Salinity Gradients. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing,
|
[8] |
DiegoC O S ( 2013). Water Purification Demonstration Project. Project Report
|
[9] |
DolnicarS, HurlimannA, GrünB ( 2011). What affects public acceptance of recycled and desalinated water? Water Research, 45( 2): 933– 943
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Dolnicar S, Schäfer A I (2006). Public perception of desalinated versus recycled water in Australia
|
[11] |
DolnicarS, SchäferA I. (2009). Desalinated versus recycled water: public perceptions and profiles of the accepters. Journal of Environmental Management, 90( 2): 888– 900
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Du PisaniP, MengeJ G. (2013). Direct potable reclamation in Windhoek: a critical review of the design philosophy of new Goreangab drinking water reclamation plant. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 13( 2): 214– 226
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
EkeJ, YusufA, GiwaA, SodiqA. (2020). The global status of desalination: an assessment of current desalination technologies, plants and capacity. Desalination, 495 : 114633
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
ElimelechM, PhillipW A. (2011). The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. Science, 333( 6043): 712– 717
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[15] |
ElsaidK, SayedE T, AbdelkareemM A, MahmoudM S, RamadanM, OlabiA G. (2020). Environmental impact of emerging desalination technologies: a preliminary evaluation. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 8( 5): 104099
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
EnglehardtJ D, WuT, BloetscherF, DengY, Du PisaniP, EilertS, ElmirS, GuoT, JacangeloJ, LechevallierM, LeverenzH, ManchaE, Plater-ZyberkE, SheikhB, Steinle-DarlingE, TchobanoglousG. (2016). Net-zero water management: achieving energy-positive municipal water supply. Environmental Science. Water Research & Technology, 2( 2): 250– 260
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
FanH, YipN Y. (2019). Elucidating conductivity-permselectivity tradeoffs in electrodialysis and reverse electrodialysis by structure-property analysis of ion-exchange membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 573 : 668– 681
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Fernandez-GonzalezC, Dominguez-RamosA, IbañezR, IrabienA. (2019). Current Trends and Future Developments on (Bio-) Membranes. Boston: Elsevier,
|
[19] |
FritzmannC, LöwenbergJ, WintgensT, MelinT. (2007). State-of-the-art of reverse osmosis desalination. Desalination, 216( 1): 1– 76
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
GalamaA H, SaakesM, BruningH, RijnaartsH H M, PostJ W. (2014). Seawater predesalination with electrodialysis. Desalination, 342 : 61– 69
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
GhernaoutD, ElboughdiriN, AlghamdiA. (2019). Direct potable reuse: the Singapore NEWater project as a role model. OAlib, 6( 12): 1– 10
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
GilstrapM C ( 2013). Renewable Electricity from Salinity Gradients Using Reverse Electrodialysis. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology
|
[23] |
GrantS B, SaphoresJ D, FeldmanD L, HamiltonA J, FletcherT D, CookP L M, StewardsonM, SandersB F, LevinL A, AmbroseR F.
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[24] |
GuoT, EnglehardtJ D. (2015). Principles for scaling of distributed direct potable water reuse systems: a modeling study. Water Research, 75 : 146– 163
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[25] |
IndusekharV K, KrishnaswamyN. (1985). Water transport studies on interpolymer ion-exchange membranes. Desalination, 52( 3): 309– 316
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
JohnsonA S, HillestadH O, ShanholtzerS F, ShanholtzerG F, ServiceU S N P ( 1974). An Ecological Survey of the Coastal Region of Georgia. Atlanta: National Park Service
|
[27] |
KalogirouS A. (2005). Seawater desalination using renewable energy sources. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 31( 3): 242– 281
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
KuriharaM. (2021). Current status and future trend of dominant commercial reverse osmosis membranes. Membranes (Basel), 11( 11): 906
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[29] |
LefebvreO. (2018). Beyond NEWater: an insight into Singapore’s water reuse prospects. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 2 : 26– 31
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
LeverenzH L, TchobanoglousG, AsanoT. (2011). Direct potable reuse: a future imperative. Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination, 1( 1): 2– 10
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
LiW, KrantzW B, CornelissenE R, PostJ W, VerliefdeA R D, TangC Y. (2013). A novel hybrid process of reverse electrodialysis and reverse osmosis for low energy seawater desalination and brine management. Applied Energy, 104 : 592– 602
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
LiuY, NieC, LiuX, XuX, SunZ, PanL. (2015). Review on carbon-based composite materials for capacitive deionization. RSC Advances, 5( 20): 15205– 15225
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
LoganB E, ElimelechM. (2012). Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water. Nature, 488( 7411): 313– 319
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[34] |
LuoF, WangY, JiangC, WuB, FengH, XuT. (2017). A power free electrodialysis (PFED) for desalination. Desalination, 404 : 138– 146
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
MarksJ S ( 2006). Taking the public seriously: the case of potable and non potable reuse. Desalination, 187( 1– 3): 137– 147
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
MekonnenM M, HoekstraA Y. (2016). Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Science Advances, 2( 2): e1500323
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[37] |
MorelA, ZuoK, XiaX, WeiJ, LuoX, LiangP, HuangX. (2012). Microbial desalination cells packed with ion-exchange resin to enhance water desalination rate. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 118( 1): 43– 48
Pubmed
|
[38] |
NamJ Y, HwangK S, KimH C, JeongH, KimH, JwaE, YangS, ChoiJ, KimC S, HanJ H, JeongN. (2019). Assessing the behavior of the feed-water constituents of a pilot-scale 1000-cell-pair reverse electrodialysis with seawater and municipal wastewater effluent. Water Research, 148 : 261– 271
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[39] |
PatelC G, BaradD, SwaminathanJ. (2022). Desalination using pressure or electric field? a fundamental comparison of RO and electrodialysis. Desalination, 530 : 115620
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
PatelS K, BiesheuvelP M, ElimelechM. (2021). Energy Consumption of Brackish Water Desalination: Identifying the Sweet Spots for Electrodialysis and Reverse Osmosis. ACS ES&T Engineering, 1( 5): 851– 864
|
[41] |
PecsonB M, TrioloS C, OlivieriS, ChenE C, PisarenkoA N, YangC C, OlivieriA, HaasC N, TrussellR S, TrussellR R. (2017). Reliability of pathogen control in direct potable reuse: Performance evaluation and QMRA of a full-scale 1 MGD advanced treatment train. Water Research, 122 : 258– 268
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[42] |
PellegrinoJ, GormanC, RichardsL. (2007). A speculative hybrid reverse osmosis/electrodialysis unit operation. Desalination, 214( 1): 11– 30
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[43] |
PilatB. (2001). Practice of water desalination by electrodialysis. Desalination, 139( 1): 385– 392
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[44] |
QasimM, BadrelzamanM, DarwishN N, DarwishN A, HilalN. (2019). Reverse osmosis desalination: a state-of-the-art review. Desalination, 459 : 59– 104
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[45] |
RajindarS ( 2015). Membrane Technology and Engineering for Water Purification, 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann
|
[46] |
RamonG Z, FeinbergB J, HoekE M V. (2011). Membrane-based production of salinity-gradient power. Energy & Environmental Science, 4( 11): 4423– 4434
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[47] |
RomanM, GutierrezL, Van DijkL H, VanoppenM, PostJ W, WolsB A, CornelissenE R, VerliefdeA R D. (2020). Effect of pH on the transport and adsorption of organic micropollutants in ion-exchange membranes in electrodialysis-based desalination. Separation and Purification Technology, 252 : 117487
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[48] |
RomanM, Van DijkL H, GutierrezL, VanoppenM, PostJ W, WolsB A, CornelissenE R, VerliefdeA R D. (2019). Key physicochemical characteristics governing organic micropollutant adsorption and transport in ion-exchange membranes during reverse electrodialysis. Desalination, 468 : 114084
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[49] |
SadrzadehM, MohammadiT. (2009). Treatment of sea water using electrodialysis: current efficiency evaluation. Desalination, 249( 1): 279– 285
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[50] |
SemiatR. (2008). Energy issues in desalination processes. Environmental Science & Technology, 42( 22): 8193– 8201
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[51] |
SemiatR, HassonD ( 2012). Water desalination. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 28( 1): 43– 60
|
[52] |
SetoT, EharaL, KomoriR, YamaguchiA, MiwaT. (1978). Seawater desalination by electrodialysis. Desalination, 25( 1): 1– 7
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[53] |
SinghR, HankinsN P ( 2016). Emerging Membrane Technology for Sustainable Water Treatment. Boston: Elsevier
|
[54] |
SkilhagenS E, DugstadJ E, AabergR J ( 2008). Osmotic power—power production based on the osmotic pressure difference between waters with varying salt gradients. Desalination, 220( 1– 3): 476– 482
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[55] |
SpieglerK S, El-SayedY M. (2001). The energetics of desalination processes. Desalination, 134( 1): 109– 128
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[56] |
SMCAPHA, AWWA, WEF( 2005). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. New York: Standard Methods Committee of the American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation
|
[57] |
SubramaniA, JacangeloJ G. (2015). merging desalination technologies for water treatment: a critical review. Water Research, 75 : 164– 187
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[58] |
ThampyS K, NarayananP K, HarkareW P, GovindanK P. (1988). Seawater desalination by electrodialysis. Part II: a novel approach to combat scaling in seawater desalination by electrodialysis. Desalination, 69( 3): 261– 273
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[59] |
Valladares LinaresR, LiZ, SarpS, BucsS S, AmyG, VrouwenvelderJ S. (2014). Forward osmosis niches in seawater desalination and wastewater reuse. Water Research, 66 : 122– 139
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[60] |
VanoppenM, BlandinG, DereseS, Le ClechP, PostJ, VerliefdeA R D. (2016). Sustainable Energy from Salinity Gradients. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing,
|
[61] |
VanoppenM, Van VoorenT, GutierrezL, RomanM, CrouéL J P, VerbekenK, PhilipsJ, VerliefdeA R D ( 2019). Secondary treated domestic wastewater in reverse electrodialysis: What is the best pre-treatment? Separation and Purification Technology, 218: 25– 42
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[62] |
VolfkovichY M. (2020). Capacitive deionization of water: a review. Russian Journal of Electrochemistry, 56( 1): 18– 51
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[63] |
Yangali-QuintanillaV, LiZ, Valladares R, LiQ, AmyG ( 2011). Indirect desalination of Red Sea water with forward osmosis and low pressure reverse osmosis for water reuse. Desalination, 280( 1– 3): 160– 166
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[64] |
YipN Y, ElimelechM. (2012). Thermodynamic and energy efficiency analysis of power generation from natural salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis. Environmental Science & Technology, 46( 9): 5230– 5239
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[65] |
YoussefP G, Al-DadahR K, MahmoudS M. (2014). Comparative analysis of desalination technologies. Energy Procedia, 61 : 2604– 2607
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |