Design of nanofibre interlayer supported forward osmosis composite membranes and its evaluation in fouling study with cleaning

Tao Ma , Haiqing Hui , Xiaofei You , Zhiqiang Pei , Miao Tian , Bing Wu

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (9) : 118

PDF (6952KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (9) : 118 DOI: 10.1007/s11783-022-1550-7
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Design of nanofibre interlayer supported forward osmosis composite membranes and its evaluation in fouling study with cleaning

Author information +
History +
PDF (6952KB)

Abstract

• A fine fibre (40–60 nm diameter) interlayer (~1 µm thickness) was electrospun.

• Fine fibre interlayer promoted formation of defect-free dense polyamide layer.

• FO membrane with dual-layer substrate had less organic fouling potential.

• High reverse salt flux accelerated organic fouling on FO membrane.

Nanofibre-supported forward osmosis (FO) membranes have gained popularity owing to their low structural parameters and high water flux. However, the nanofibrous membranes are less stable in long-term use, and their fouling behaviours with foulants in both feed solution (FS) and draw solution (DS) is less studied. This study developed a nanofibrous thin-film composite (TFC) FO membrane by designing a tiered dual-layer nanofibrous substrate to enhance membrane stability during long-term usage and cleaning. Various characterisation methods were used to study the effect of the electrospun nanofibre interlayer and drying time, which is the interval after removing the M-phenylenediamine (MPD) solution and before reacting with trimesoyl chloride (TMC) solution, on the intrinsic separation FO performance. The separation performance of the dual-layer nanofibrous FO membranes was examined using model foulants (sodium alginate and bovine serum albumin) in both the FS and DS. The dual-layer nanofibrous substrate was superior to the single-layer nanofibrous substrate and showed a flux of 30.2 L/m2/h (LMH) when using 1.5 mol/L NaCl against deionised (DI) water in the active layer facing draw solution (AL-DS) mode. In the fouling test, the water flux was effectively improved without sacrificing the water/solute selectivity under the condition that foulants existed in both the FS and DS. In addition, the dual-layer nanofibrous TFC FO membrane was more robust during the fouling test and cleaning.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Forward osmosis / Electro-spinning / Interfacial polymerisation / Fouling / Polyvinylidene fluoride

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tao Ma, Haiqing Hui, Xiaofei You, Zhiqiang Pei, Miao Tian, Bing Wu. Design of nanofibre interlayer supported forward osmosis composite membranes and its evaluation in fouling study with cleaning. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(9): 118 DOI:10.1007/s11783-022-1550-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abdullah N, Yusof N, Ismail A F, Lau W J (2021). Insights into metal-organic frameworks-integrated membranes for desalination process: A review. Desalination, 500: 114867

[2]

Ali A, Tufa R A, Macedonio F, Curcio E, Drioli E (2018). Membrane technology in renewable-energy-driven desalination. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81: 1–21

[3]

Blandin G, Ferrari F, Lesage G, Le-Clech P, Héran M, Martinez-Lladó X (2020). Forward osmosis as concentration process: Review of opportunities and challenges. Membranes (Basel), 10(10): 284

[4]

Cath T, Childress A, Elimelech M (2006). Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments. Journal of Membrane Science, 281(1–2): 70–87

[5]

Deng L, Wang Q, An X, Li Z, Hu Y (2020). Towards enhanced antifouling and flux performances of thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane via constructing a sandwich-like carbon nanotubes-coated support. Desalination, 479: 114311

[6]

Extrand C W (2002). Water contact angles and hysteresis of polyamide surfaces. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 248(1): 136–142

[7]

Extrand C W (2004). Contact angles and their hysteresis as a measure of liquid-solid adhesion. Langmuir, 20(10): 4017–4021

[8]

Gao F, Wang J, Zhang H, Hang M A, Cui Z, Yang G (2017). Interaction energy and competitive adsorption evaluation of different NOM fractions on aged membrane surfaces. Journal of Membrane Science, 542: 195–207

[9]

Holmes-Farley S R, Reamey R H, Mccarthy T J, Deutch J, Whitesides G M (1985). Acid-base behavior of carboxylic acid groups covalently attached at the surface of polyethylene: The usefulness of contact angle in following the ionization of surface functionality. Langmuir, 1(6): 725–740

[10]

Jones E, Qadir M, van Vliet M T H, Smakhtin V, Kang S M (2019). The state of desalination and brine production: A global outlook. Science of the Total Environment, 657: 1343–1356

[11]

Kim L H, Bucs S S, Witkamp G J, Vrouwenvelder J S (2020). Organic composition in feed solution of forward osmosis membrane systems has no impact on the boron and water flux but reduces scaling. Journal of Membrane Science, 611: 118306

[12]

Klaysom C, Hermans S, Gahlaut A, Van Craenenbroeck S, Vankelecom I F J (2013). Polyamide/Polyacrylonitrile (PA/PAN) thin film composite osmosis membranes: Film optimization, characterization and performance evaluation. Journal of Membrane Science, 445: 25–33

[13]

Lau W J, Ismail A F, Misdan N, Kassim M A (2012). A recent progress in thin film composite membrane: A review. Desalination, 287: 190–199

[14]

Li H, Fu M, Wang S Q, Zheng X, Zhao M, Yang F, Tang C Y, Dong Y (2021a). Stable Zr-based metal-organic framework nanoporous membrane for efficient desalination of hypersaline water. Environmental Science & Technology, 55(21): 14917–14927

[15]

Li R, Li J, Rao L, Lin H, Shen L, Xu Y, Chen J, Liao B Q (2021b). Inkjet printing of dopamine followed by UV light irradiation to modify mussel-inspired PVDF membrane for efficient oil-water separation. Journal of Membrane Science, 619: 118790

[16]

Liu Q, Li J, Zhou Z, Xie J, Lee J Y (2016). Hydrophilic mineral coating of membrane substrate for reducing internal concentration polarization (ICP) in forward osmosis. Scientific Reports, 6(1): 19593

[17]

Luo F, Wang J, Yao Z, Zhang L, Chen H (2021). Polydopamine nanoparticles modified nanofiber supported thin film composite membrane with enhanced adhesion strength for forward osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science, 618: 118673

[18]

Manju S, Sagar N (2017). Renewable energy integrated desalination: A sustainable solution to overcome future fresh-water scarcity in India. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73: 594–609

[19]

Martinetti C R, Childress A E, Cath T Y (2009). High recovery of concentrated RO brines using forward osmosis and membrane distillation. Journal of Membrane Science, 331(1–2): 31–39

[20]

McCutcheon J R, Elimelech M (2006). Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. Journal of Membrane Science, 284(1–2): 237–247

[21]

Mi B, Elimelech M (2008). Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 320(1–2): 292–302

[22]

Nasrul A, Bastian A, Sri M, Yoshikage O, Hideto M (2011). Improved fouling reduction of PES hollow fiber membranes by incorporation with non-ionic surfactant. Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment, 15(2): 212–216

[23]

Park M J, Gonzales R R, Abdel-Wahab A, Phuntsho S, Shon H K (2018). Hydrophilic polyvinyl alcohol coating on hydrophobic electrospun nanofiber membrane for high performance thin film composite forward osmosis membrane. Desalination, 426: 50–59

[24]

Peng L E, Yao Z, Yang Z, Guo H, Tang C Y (2020). Dissecting the role of substrate on the morphology and separation properties of thin film composite polyamide membranes: seeing is believing. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(11): 6978–6986

[25]

Qasim M, Darwish N A, Sarp S, Hilal N (2015). Water desalination by forward (direct) osmosis phenomenon: A comprehensive review. Desalination, 374: 47–69

[26]

Saleem H, Trabzon L, Kilic A, Zaidi S J (2020). Recent advances in nanofibrous membranes: Production and applications in water treatment and desalination. Desalination, 478: 114178

[27]

Sreedhar I, Khaitan S, Gupta R, Reddy B M, Venugopal A (2018). An odyssey of process and engineering trends in forward osmosis. Environmental Science. Water Research & Technology, 4(2): 129–168

[28]

Suwaileh W, Johnson D, Hilal N (2020). Membrane desalination and water re-use for agriculture: State of the art and future outlook. Desalination, 491: 114559

[29]

Tang C Y, Yang Z, Guo H, Wen J J, Nghiem L D, Cornelissen E (2018). Potable water reuse through advanced membrane technology. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(18): 10215–10223

[30]

Teng J H, Zhang H M, Tang C Y, Lin H J (2021). Novel molecular level insights into forward osmosis membrane fouling affected by reverse diffusion of draw solutions based on thermodynamic mechanisms. Journal of Membrane Science, 620: 118815

[31]

Tian M, Qiu C, Liao Y, Chou S, Wang R (2013). Preparation of polyamide thin film composite forward osmosis membranes using electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) nanofibers as substrates. Separation and Purification Technology, 118: 727–736

[32]

Tian M, Wang R, Goh K, Liao Y, Fane A G (2015). Synthesis and characterization of high-performance novel thin film nanocomposite PRO membranes with tiered nanofiber support reinforced by functionalized carbon nanotubes. Journal of Membrane Science, 486: 151–160

[33]

Tian M, Wang Y N, Wang R, Fane A G (2017). Synthesis and characterization of thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membranes supported by silica nanoparticle incorporated nanofibrous substrate. Desalination, 401: 142–150

[34]

Wang H, Gao B, Hou L A, Shon H K, Yue Q, Wang Z (2021). Fertilizer drawn forward osmosis as an alternative to 2nd pass seawater reverse osmosis: Estimation of boron removal and energy consumption. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(6): 135

[35]

Wang J, Dlamini D S, Mishra A K, Pendergast M T M, Wong M C Y, Mamba B B, Freger V, Verliefde A R D, Hoek E M V (2014). A critical review of transport through osmotic membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 454: 516–537

[36]

Wang R, Shi L, Tang C Y Y, Chou S R, Qiu C, Fane A G (2010). Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 355(1–2): 158–167

[37]

Wang Y, Zhang M K, Liu Y Q, Xiao Q Q, Xu S C (2016). Quantitative evaluation of concentration polarization under different operating conditions for forward osmosis process. Desalination, 398: 106–113

[38]

Wenzel R N (1949). Surface roughness and contact angle. Journal of Physical and Colloid Chemistry, 53(9): 1466–1467

[39]

Xiao K, Liang S, Wang X, Chen C, Huang X (2019). Current state and challenges of full-scale membrane bioreactor applications: A critical review. Bioresource Technology, 271: 473–481

[40]

Xu W X, Chen Q Z, Ge Q C (2017). Recent advances in forward osmosis (FO) membrane: Chemical modifications on membranes for FO processes. Desalination, 419: 101–116

[41]

Xue W, Zaw M, An X, Hu Y, Tabucanon A S (2020). Sea salt bittern-driven forward osmosis for nutrient recovery from black water: A dual waste-to-resource innovation via the osmotic membrane process. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(2): 32

[42]

Yadav S, Saleem H, Ibrar I, Naji O, Hawari A A, Alanezi A A, Zaidi S J, Altaee A, Zhou J (2020). Recent developments in forward osmosis membranes using carbon-based nanomaterials. Desalination, 482: 114375

[43]

Yang Z, Guo H, Tang C Y Y (2019). The upper bound of thin-film composite (TFC) polyamide membranes for desalination. Journal of Membrane Science, 590: 117297

[44]

Yang Z, Sun P F, Li X, Gan B, Wang L, Song X, Park H D, Tang C Y (2020). A critical review on thin-film nanocomposite membranes with interlayered structure: mechanisms, recent developments, and environmental applications. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(24): 15563–15583

[45]

Yu F Y, Shi H T, Shi J, Teng K Y, Xu Z W, Qian X M (2020). High-performance forward osmosis membrane with ultra-fast water transport channel and ultra-thin polyamide layer. Journal of Membrane Science, 616: 118611

[46]

Zhang K M, An X C, Bai Y, Shen C, Jiang Y P, Hu Y X (2021). Exploration of food preservatives as draw solutes in the forward osmosis process for juice concentration. Journal of Membrane Science, 635: 119495

[47]

Zhang M, Jin W, Yang F, Duke M, Dong Y, Tang C Y Y (2020). Engineering a nanocomposite interlayer for a novel ceramic-based forward osmosis membrane with enhanced performance. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(12): 7715–7724

[48]

Zhang S, Wang K Y, Chung T S, Chen H M, Jean Y C, Amy G (2010). Well-constructed cellulose acetate membranes for forward osmosis: Minimized internal concentration polarization with an ultra-thin selective layer. Journal of Membrane Science, 360(1–2): 522–535

[49]

Zhang X, Xiong S, Liu C X, Shen L, Ding C, Guan C Y, Wang Y (2019). Confining migration of amine monomer during interfacial polymerization for constructing thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane with low fouling propensity. Chemical Engineering Science, 207: 54–68

[50]

Zhou Z Y, Hu Y X, Boo C, Liu Z Y, Li J Q, Deng L Y, An X C (2018). High-performance thin-film composite membrane with an ultrathin spray-coated carbon nanotube interlayer. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 5(5): 243–248

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (6952KB)

Supplementary files

FSE-21129-OF-MT_suppl_1

4734

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/