An antibiotic composite electrode for improving the sensitivity of electrochemically active biofilm biosensor

Highlights

• Antibiotic azithromycin employed in graphite electrode for EAB biosensor.

• Azithromycin at 0.5% dosage increased the sensitivity for toxic formaldehyde.

• Azithromycin increased the relative abundance of Geobacter.

• Azithromycin regulated thickness of electroactive biofilm.

Abstract

Extensive research has been carried out for improved sensitivity of electroactive biofilm-based sensor (EAB-sensor), which is recognized as a useful tool in water quality early-warning. Antibiotic that is employed widely to treat infection has been proved feasible in this study to regulate the EAB and to increase the EAB-biosensor’s sensitivity. A novel composite electrode was prepared using azithromycin (AZM) and graphite powder (GP), namely AZM@GP electrode, and was employed as the anode in EAB-biosensor. Different dosages of AZM, i.e., 2 mg, 4 mg, and 8 mg, referred to as 0.25%, 0.5% and 1% AZM@GP were under examination. Results showed that EAB-biosensor was greatly benefited from appropriate dosage of AZM (0.5% AZM@GP) with reduced start-up time period, comparatively higher voltage output, more readable electrical signal and increased inhibition rate (30%-65% higher than control sensor with GP electrode) when exposing to toxic formaldehyde. This may be attributed to the fact that AZM inhibited the growth of non-EAM without much influence on the physiologic or metabolism activities of EAM under proper dosage. Further investigation of the biofilm morphology and microbial community analysis suggested that the biofilm formation was optimized with reduced thickness and enriched Geobacter with 0.5% AZM@GP dosage. This novel electrode is easily fabricated and equipped, and therefore would be a promising way to facilitate the practical application of EAB-sensors.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

AZM@GP composite electrode / EAB-biosensor / Water quality early-warning

References

[1] Adekunle A, Raghavan V, Tartakovsky B (2019). On-line monitoring of heavy metals-related toxicity with a microbial fuel cell biosensor. Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 132: 382–390

[2] Antonacci A, Scognamiglio V (2020). Biotechnological advances in the design of algae-based biosensors. Trends in Biotechnology, 38(3): 334–347

[3] Attili A R, Preziuso S, Ngu Ngwa V, Cantalamessa A, Moriconi M, Cuteri V (2016). Clinical evaluation of the use of enrofloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus clinical mastitis in sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 136: 72–77

[4] Catania C, Karbelkar A A, Furst A L (2021). Engineering the interface between electroactive bacteria and electrodes. Joule, 5(4): 743–747

[5] Cheng S, Xing D, Call D F, Logan B E (2009). Direct biological conversion of electrical current into methane by electromethanogenesis. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(10): 3953–3958

[6] Dong S, Yin C, Chen X (2020). Toxicity-oriented water quality engineering. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(5): 80

[7] Ejeian F, Etedali P, Mansouri-Tehrani H A, Soozanipour A, Low Z X, Asadnia M, Taheri-Kafrani A, Razmjou A (2018). Biosensors for wastewater monitoring: A review. Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 118: 66–79

[8] Hackbarth M, Jung T, Reiner J E, Gescher J, Horn H, Hille-Reichel A, Wagner M (2020). Monitoring and quantification of bioelectrochemical Kyrpidia spormannii biofilm development in a novel flow cell setup. Chemical Engineering Journal, 390: 124604

[9] Jiang Y, Chu N, Zeng R J (2019). Submersible probe type microbial electrochemical sensor for volatile fatty acids monitoring in the anaerobic digestion process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232: 1371–1378

[10] Jiang Y, Liang P, Liu P, Miao B, Bian Y, Zhang H, Huang X (2017). Enhancement of the sensitivity of a microbial fuel cell sensor by transient-state operation. Environmental Science. Water Research & Technology, 3(3): 472–479

[11] Li T, Chen F, Zhou Q, Wang X, Liao C, Zhou L, Wan L, An J, Wan Y, Li N (2020a). Unignorable toxicity of formaldehyde on electroactive bacteria in bioelectrochemical systems. Environmental Research, 183: 109143

[12] Li T, Liao C, An J, Zhou L, Tian L, Zhou Q, Li N, Wang X (2021). A highly sensitive bioelectrochemical toxicity sensor and its evaluation using immediate current attenuation. Science of the Total Environment, 766: 142646

[13] Li T, Zhou Q, Zhou L, Yan Y, Liao C, Wan L, An J, Li N, Wang X (2020b). Acetate limitation selects Geobacter from mixed inoculum and reduces polysaccharide in electroactive biofilm. Water Research, 177: 115776

[14] Lu H, Yu Y, Zhou Y, Xing F (2019). A quantitative evaluation method for wastewater toxicity based on a microbial fuel cell. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 183(2019): 109589

[15] Logan B E, Rossi R, Ragab A, Saikaly P E (2019). Electroactive microorganisms in bioelectrochemical systems. Nature Reviews. Microbiology, 17(5): 307–319

[16] Lovley D R (2008). The microbe electric: Conversion of organic matter to electricity. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 19(6): 564–571

[17] Pan J, Hu J, Liu B, Li J, Wang D, Bu C, Wang X, Xiao K, Liang S, Yang J, Hou H (2020). Enhanced quorum sensing of anode biofilm for better sensing linearity and recovery capability of microbial fuel cell toxicity sensor. Environmental Research, 181: 108906

[18] Peng X, Yu H, Wang X, Zhou Q, Zhang S, Geng L, Sun J, Cai Z (2012). Enhanced performance and capacitance behavior of anode by rolling Fe₃O₄ into activated carbon in microbial fuel cells. Bioresource Technology, 121: 450–453

[19] Pentassuglia S, Agostino V, Tommasi T (2018). Encyclopedia of Interfacial Chemistry. Wandelt, K. (ed). Oxford: Elsevier,110–123

[20] Qi X, Liu P, Liang P, Hao W, Li M, Huang X (2019). Dual-signal-biosensor based on luminescent bacteria biofilm for real-time online alert of Cu(II) shock. Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 142: 111500

[21] Qi X, Liu P, Liang P, Hao W, Li M, Li Q, Zhou Y, Huang X (2020a). Biofilm’s morphology design for high sensitivity of bioelectrochemical sensor: An experimental and modeling study. Science of the Total Environment, 729: 138908

[22] Qi X, Wang S, Li T, Wang X, Jiang Y, Zhou Y, Zhou X, Huang X, Liang P (2021). An electroactive biofilm-based biosensor for water safety: Pollutants detection and early-warning. Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 173: 112822

[23] Reguera G, McCarthy K D, Mehta T, Nicoll J S, Tuominen M T, Lovley D R (2005). Extracellular electron transfer via microbial nanowires. Nature, 435(7045): 1098–1101

[24] Ren L, McCuskey S R, Moreland A, Bazan G C, Nguyen T Q (2019). Tuning Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilm with conjugated polyelectrolyte for increased performance in bioelectrochemical system. Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 144: 111630

[25] Schröder U, Harnisch F, Angenent L T (2015). Microbial electrochemistry and technology: Terminology and classification. Energy & Environmental Science, 8(2): 513–519

[26] Shi L, Dong H, Reguera G, Beyenal H, Lu A, Liu J, Yu H Q, Fredrickson J K (2016). Extracellular electron transfer mechanisms between microorganisms and minerals. Nature Reviews. Microbiology, 14(10): 651–662

[27] Souza M J E, Bittencourt C F, Filho P D S E S (2004). Microbiological assay for enrofloxacin injection. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 271(1): 287–291

[28] Sui M, Li Y, Jiang Y, Zhang Y, Wang L, Zhang W, Wang X (2021). Light exposure interferes with electroactive biofilm enrichment and reduces extracellular electron transfer efficiency. Water Research, 188: 116512

[29] Summers Z M, Fogarty H E, Leang C, Franks A E, Malvankar N S, Lovley D R (2010). Direct exchange of electrons within aggregates of an evolved syntrophic coculture of anaerobic bacteria. Science, 330(6009): 1413–1415

[30] Tarushi A, Raptopoulou C P, Psycharis V, Terzis A, Psomas G, Kessissoglou D P (2010). Zinc(II) complexes of the second-generation quinolone antibacterial drug enrofloxacin: Structure and DNA or albumin interaction. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, 18(7): 2678–2685

[31] Wasito H, Fatoni A, Hermawan D, Susilowati S S (2019). Immobilized bacterial biosensor for rapid and effective monitoring of acute toxicity in water. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 170: 205–209

[32] Wen Q, Kong F, Zheng H, Cao D, Ren Y, Yin J (2011). Electricity generation from synthetic penicillin wastewater in an air-cathode single chamber microbial fuel cell. Chemical Engineering Journal, 168(2): 572–576

[33] Wu D, Sun F, Chua F J D, Zhou Y (2020). Enhanced power generation in microbial fuel cell by an agonist of electroactive biofilm–Sulfamethoxazole. Chemical Engineering Journal, 384: 123238

[34] Yi X, Gao Z, Liu L, Zhu Q, Hu G, Zhou X (2020). Acute toxicity assessment of drinking water source with luminescent bacteria: Impact of environmental conditions and a case study in Luoma Lake, East China. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(6): 109

[35] Yu D, Zhai J, Liu C, Zhang X, Bai L, Wang Y, Dong S (2017). Small microbial three-electrode cell based biosensor for online detection of acute water toxicity. ACS Sensors, 2(11): 1637–1643

[36] Zhou L, Li T, An J, Liao C, Li N, Wang X (2017). Subminimal inhibitory concentration (sub-MIC) of antibiotic induces electroactive biofilm formation in bioelectrochemical systems. Water Research, 125: 280–287

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52125001).

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-022-1518-7 and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 Higher Education Press