Preparation of reverse osmosis membrane with high permselectivity and anti-biofouling properties for desalination
Xinxia Tian, Hui Yu, Jun Yang, Xiaotai Zhang, Man Zhao, Yang Yang, Wei Sun, Yangyang Wei, Yin Zhang, Jian Wang, Zhun Ma
Preparation of reverse osmosis membrane with high permselectivity and anti-biofouling properties for desalination
• Nanoparticle incorporation and anti-biofouling grafting were integrated.
• Flux of modified membranes was enhanced without rejection sacrificing.
• Anti-biofouling property of modified membranes was improved.
High performance is essential for the polyamide (PA) reverse osmosis (RO) membranes during the desalination process. Herein, RO membranes with high permselectivity and anti-biofouling properties were fabricated by nanoparticles incorporation and anti-biofouling grafting. Hydrotalcite (HT) incorporation was performed with a dual role, enhancing water flux and acting as grafting sites. The HT incorporation increased the water flux without sacrificing the salt rejection, compensating for the loss caused by the following grafting reaction. The exposed surface of HT acted as grafting sites for anti-biofouling agent dimethyloctadecyl[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ammonium chloride (DMOTPAC). The combination of HT incorporation and DMOTPAC grafting endowed RO membranes with high permselectivity and anti-biofouling properties. The water flux of the modified membrane PA-HT-0.06 was 49.8 L/m2·h, which was 16.4% higher than that of the pristine membrane. The salt rejection of PA-HT-0.06 was 99.1%, which was comparable to that of the pristine membrane. As to the fouling of negatively charged lysozyme, the modified membrane’s water flux recovery was superior to that of the pristine membrane (e.g. 86.8% of PA-HT-0.06 compared to 78.2% of PA-pristine). The sterilization rates of PA-HT-0.06 for E. coli and B. subtilis were 97.3% and 98.7%, much higher than those of the pristine membrane (24.0% for E. coli and 26.7% for B. subtilis).
Anti-biofouling grafting / Nanoparticle incorporation / Sterilization rates / Water flux / Water flux recovery
[1] |
Chae H R, Lee J, Lee C H, Kim I C, Park P K (2015). Graphene oxide-embedded thin-film composite reverse osmosis membrane with high flux, anti-biofouling, and chlorine resistance. Journal of Membrane Science, 483: 128–135
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Dai R, Han H, Zhu Y, Wang X, Wang Z (2022). Tuning the primary selective nanochannels of MOF thin-film nanocomposite nanofiltration membranes for efficient removal of hydrophobic endocrine disrupting compounds. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 16(4): 40
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Díez B, Sotto A, Martín A, Arsuaga J, Rosal R (2020). Poly(vinyl chloride)-hyperbranched polyamidoamine ultrafiltration membranes with antifouling and antibiofouling properties. Reactive and Functional Polymers, 154: 104669
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Do V T, Tang C Y, Reinhard M, Leckie J O (2012). Degradation of polyamide nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes by hypochlorite. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(2): 852–859
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Dong H, Wu L, Zhang L, Chen H, Gao C (2015). Clay nanosheets as charged filler materials for high-performance and fouling-resistant thin film nanocomposite membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 494: 92–103
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Fane A G, Wang R, Hu M X (2015). Synthetic membranes for water purification: Status and future. Angewandte Chemie, 54(11): 3368–3386
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Flemming H C, Schaule G, Griebe T, Schmitt J, Tamachkiarowa A (1997). Biofouling—the Achilles heel of membrane processes. Desalination, 113: 215–225
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Gao C, Zhang M, Jiang Z, Liao J, Xie X, Huang T, Zhao J, Bai J, Pan F (2015). Preparation of a highly water-selective membrane for dehydration of acetone by incorporating potassium montmorillonite to construct ionized water channel. Chemical Engineering Science, 135: 461–471
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Ghosh A K, Jeong B H, Huang X, Hoek E M V (2008). Impacts of reaction and curing conditions on polyamide composite reverse osmosis membrane properties. Journal of Membrane Science, 311: 34–45
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Guo X, Li C, Li C, Wei T, Tong L, Shao H, Zhou Q, Wang L, Liao Y (2019). G-CNTs/PVDF mixed matrix membranes with improved antifouling properties and filtration performance. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13(6): 81
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Hailemariam R H, Woo Y C, Damtie M M, Kim B C, Park K D, Choi J S (2020). Reverse osmosis membrane fabrication and modification technologies and future trends: A review. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 276: 102100
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Henthorne L, Boysen B (2015). State-of-the-art of reverse osmosis desalination pretreatment. Desalination, 356: 129–139
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Herzberg M, Kang S, Elimelech M (2009). Role of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(12): 4393–4398
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Jeong B H, Hoek E M V, Yan Y, Subramani A, Huang X, Hurwitz G, Ghosh A K, Jawor A (2007). Interfacial polymerization of thin film nanocomposites: A new concept for reverse osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 294: 1–7
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Kang G D, Cao Y M (2012). Development of antifouling reverse osmosis membranes for water treatment: A review. Water Research, 46(3): 584–600
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Kang G D, Gao C J, Chen W D, Jie X M, Cao Y M, Yuan Q (2007). Study on hypochlorite degradation of aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membrane. Journal of Membrane Science, 300: 165–171
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Liao J, Wang Z, Gao C, Wang M, Yan K, Xie X, Zhao S, Wang J, Wang S (2015). A high performance PVAm-HT membrane containing high-speed facilitated transport channels for CO2 separation. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 3(32): 16746–16761
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Lin L, Lopez R, Ramon G Z, Coronell O (2016). Investigating the void structure of the polyamide active layers of thin-film composite membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 497: 365–376
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Liu W, Hu C, Zhang W, Liu Z, Shu J, Gu J (2020). Modification of birch wood surface with silane coupling agents for adhesion improvement of UV-curable ink. Progress in Organic Coatings, 148: 105833
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Meng J, Zhang X, Ni L, Tang Z, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang W (2015). Antibacterial cellulose membrane via one-step covalent immobilization of ammonium/amine groups. Desalination, 359: 156–166
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Saeki D, Tanimoto T, Matsuyama H (2014). Anti-biofouling of polyamide reverse osmosis membranes using phosphorylcholine polymer grafted by surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization. Desalination, 350: 21–27
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Shen H, Wang S, Xu H, Zhou Y, Gao C (2018). Preparation of polyamide thin film nanocomposite membranes containing silica nanoparticles via an in-situ polymerization of SiCl4 in organic solution. Journal of Membrane Science, 565: 145–156
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Tian X, Cao Z, Wang J, Chen J, Wei Y (2020). Development of high-performance mixed matrix reverse osmosis membranes by incorporating aminosilane-modified hydrotalcite. RSC Advances, 10(10): 5648–5655
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Wang F, Pi J, Li J Y, Song F, Feng R, Wang X L, Wang Y Z (2019). Highly-efficient separation of oil and water enabled by a silica nanoparticle coating with pH-triggered tunable surface wettability. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 557: 65–75
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Wang J, Wang Z, Wang J, Wang S (2015). Improving the water flux and bio-fouling resistance of reverse osmosis (RO) membrane through surface modification by zwitterionic polymer. Journal of Membrane Science, 493: 188–199
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Wang Y, Wang Z, Han X, Wang J, Wang S (2017). Improved flux and anti-biofouling performances of reverse osmosis membrane via surface layer-by-layer assembly. Journal of Membrane Science, 539: 403–411
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Wessels S, Ingmer H (2013). Modes of action of three disinfectant active substances: A review. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 67(3): 456–467
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Xu J, Wang Z, Wang J, Wang S (2015). Positively charged aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membrane with high anti-fouling property prepared by polyethylenimine grafting. Desalination, 365: 398–406
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Xu J, Wang Z, Yu L, Wang J, Wang S (2013). A novel reverse osmosis membrane with regenerable anti-biofouling and chlorine resistant properties. Journal of Membrane Science, 435: 80–91
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Yang C, Liao L, Lv G, Wu L, Mei L, Li Z (2016). Synthesis and characterization of Mn intercalated Mg-Al hydrotalcite. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 479(479): 115–120
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Yin J, Deng B (2015). Polymer-matrix nanocomposite membranes for water treatment. Journal of Membrane Science, 479: 256–275
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Zhang X, Huang H, Li Q, Yu H, Tian X, Zhao M, Zhang H (2020). Facile dual-functionalization of polyamide reverse osmosis membrane by a natural polypeptide to improve the antifouling and chlorine-resistant properties. Journal of Membrane Science, 604: 118044
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Zhao Q, Zhao D L, Chung T S (2021). Thin-film nanocomposite membranes incorporated with defective ZIF-8 nanoparticles for brackish water and seawater desalination. Journal of Membrane Science, 625: 119158
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Zhao X, Zhang R, Liu Y, He M, Su Y, Gao C, Jiang Z (2018). Antifouling membrane surface construction: Chemistry plays a critical role. Journal of Membrane Science, 551: 145–171
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Zhu J, Hou J, Zhang Y, Tian M, He T, Liu J, Chen V (2018). Polymeric antimicrobial membranes enabled by nanomaterials for water treatment. Journal of Membrane Science, 550: 173–197
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |