Mechanistic insight into the biofilm formation and process performance of a passive aeration ditch (PAD) for decentralized wastewater treatment

Abstract

• A Passive Aeration Ditch was developed to treat decentralized wastewater.

• A model was developed to describe the process performance.

• A high C/N ratio facilitates microbial growth but nitrification deteriorates.

• A high salinity decreases both organic and nitrogen contaminants removal.

Decentralized wastewater containing elevated salinity is an emerging threat to the local environment and sanitation in remote coastal communities. Regarding the cost and treatment efficiencies, we propose a passive aeration ditch (PAD) using non-woven polyester fabric as a feasible bubbleless aerator and biofilm carrier for wastewater treatment. Consideration has been first given to PAD’s efficacy in treating saline decentralized wastewater, and then to the impact of chemical oxygen demand-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio and salinity on biofilm formation. A multispecies model incorporating the salinity effect has been developed to depict the system performance and predict the microbial community. Results showed that the PAD system had great capacity for pollutants removal. The biofilm thickness increased at a higher C/N ratio because of the boost of aerobic heterotrophs and denitrifying bacteria, which consequently improved the COD and total nitrogen removal. However, this led to the deterioration of ammonia removal. Moreover, while a higher salinity benefited the biofilm growth, the contaminant removal efficiencies decreased because the salinity inhibited the activity of aerobic heterotrophs and reduced the abundance of nitrifying bacteria inside the biofilm. Based on the model simulation, feed water with salinity below 2% and C/N ratio in a range of 1 to 3 forms a biofilm that can reach relatively high organic matter and ammonia removal. These findings not only show the feasibility of PAD in treatment of saline decentralized wastewater, but also offer a systematic strategy to predict and optimize the process performance.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Decentralized wastewater / Passive aeration ditch / Biofilm formation / C/N ratio / Salinity / Model simulation

References

[1] Abou-Elela S I, Hellal M S, Aly O H, Abo-Elenin S A (2019). Decentralized wastewater treatment using passively aerated biological filter. Environmental Technology, 40(2): 250–260

[2] Boeije G, Corstanje R, Rottiers A, Schowanek D (1999). Adaptation of the CAS test system and synthetic sewage for biological nutrient removal. Chemosphere, 38(4): 699–709

[3] Lijklema L (1988). Water Pollution Research and Control Brighton. Brighton: Pergamon

[4] Chen H, Li A, Cui D, Cui C, Ma F (2019). Evolution of microbial community and key genera in the formation and stability of aerobic granular sludge under a high organic loading rate. Bioresource Technology Reports, 7: 100280

[5] Dinçer A, Kargi F (1999). Salt inhibition of nitrification and denitrification in saline wastewater. Environmental Technology, 20(11): 1147–1153

[6] Ding X, Wei D, Guo W, Wang B, Meng Z, Feng R, Du B, Wei Q (2019). Biological denitrification in an anoxic sequencing batch biofilm reactor: Performance evaluation, nitrous oxide emission and microbial community. Bioresource Technology, 285: 121359

[7] Gong Z, Yang F, Liu S, Bao H, Hu S, Furukawa K (2007). Feasibility of a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor to achieve single-stage autotrophic nitrogen removal based on Anammox. Chemosphere, 69(5): 776–784

[8] Guo X, Liu Z, Chen M, Liu J, Yang M (2014). Decentralized wastewater treatment technologies and management in Chinese villages. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 8(6): 929–936

[9] Huang H, Yu Q, Ren H, Geng J, Xu K, Zhang Y, Ding L (2018). Towards physicochemical and biological effects on detachment and activity recovery of aging biofilm by enzyme and surfactant treatments. Bioresource Technology, 247: 319–326

[10] Kargi F, Dincer A R (1996). Effect of salt concentration on biological treatment of saline wastewater by fed-batch operation. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 19(7): 529–537

[11] Lefebvre O, Moletta R (2006). Treatment of organic pollution in industrial saline wastewater: a literature review. Water Research, 40(20): 3671–3682

[12] Lin J, Zhang P, Li G, Yin J, Li J, Zhao X (2016). Effect of COD/N ratio on nitrogen removal in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 113: 74–79

[13] Liu C, Huang L, Liu M, Hao S, Zhai H, Shao X, Du Y (2019a). Effects of seawater irrigation on fruit quality of grapevine, soil properties and microbial diversity. Scientia Horticulturae, 253: 80–86

[14] Liu X, Dai J, Ng T L, Chen G (2019b). Evaluation of potential environmental benefits from seawater toilet flushing. Water Research, 162: 505–515

[15] Lu D, Bai H, Kong F, Liss S N, Liao B (2020). Recent advances in membrane aerated biofilm reactors. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 51(7): 1–55

[16] Ma J, Wang Z, Yang Y, Mei X, Wu Z (2013a). Correlating microbial community structure and composition with aeration intensity in submerged membrane bioreactors by 454 high-throughput pyrosequencing. Water Research, 47(2): 859–869

[17] Ma J, Wang Z, Zou X, Feng J, Wu Z (2013b). Microbial communities in an anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor (AnDMBR) for municipal wastewater treatment: Comparison of bulk sludge and cake layer. Process Biochemistry, 48(3): 510–516

[18] Massoud M A, Tarhini A, Nasr J A (2009). Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: applicability in developing countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(1): 652–659

[19] Matsumoto S, Terada A, Tsuneda S (2007). Modeling of membrane-aerated biofilm: Effects of C/N ratio, biofilm thickness and surface loading of oxygen on feasibility of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 37(1): 98–107

[20] Metcalf L, Eddy H P, Tchobanoglous G (1979). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal, and Reuse. New York: McGraw-Hill

[21] Nogueira R, Melo L F, Purkhold U, Wuertz S, Wagner M (2002). Nitrifying and heterotrophic population dynamics in biofilm reactors: effects of hydraulic retention time and the presence of organic carbon. Water Research, 36(2): 469–481

[22] Nurse L, Cashman A, Mwansa J (2012). Confronting the challenges of sewerage management in the caribbean: a case study from the island of barbados. Environment, 54(2): 30–43

[23] Phanwilai S, Kangwannarakul N, Noophan P, Kasahara T, Terada A, Munakata-Marr J, Figueroa L A (2020). Nitrogen removal efficiencies and microbial communities in full-scale IFAS and MBBR municipal wastewater treatment plants at high COD:N ratio. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(6): 115

[24] Reichert P (1998). AQUASIM 2.0-user manual, Computer program for the identification and simulation of aquatic systems. Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (EAWAG), 219: 4

[25] Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez J Y, White D J, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A (2012). Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods, 9(7): 676–682

[26] Shanahan J W, Semmens M J (2004). Multipopulation model of membrane-aerated biofilms. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(11): 3176–3183

[27] Singh N K, Kazmi A A, Starkl M (2015). A review on full-scale decentralized wastewater treatment systems: techno-economical approach. Water Science and Technology, 71(4): 468–478

[28] Sipma J, Osuna M B, Emanuelsson M A E, Castro P M L (2010). Biotreatment of industrial wastewaters under transient-state conditions: process stability with fluctuations of organic load, substrates, toxicants, and environmental parameters. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 40(2): 147–197

[29] Spirandelli D, Dean T, Babcock R Jr, Braich E (2019). Policy gap analysis of decentralized wastewater management on a developed pacific island. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(14): 2506–2528

[30] Syron E, Casey E (2008). Membrane-aerated biofilms for high rate biotreatment: Performance appraisal, engineering principles, scale-up, and development requirements. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(3): 459–467

[31] Tian H, Hui M, Pan P, Huang J, Chen L, Zhao J (2019). Performance and microbial ecology of biofilms adhering on aerated membrane with distinctive conditions for the treatment of domestic sewage. Environmental Technology, 42(3): 459–467

[32] Tian H, Liu J, Feng T, Li H, Wu X, Li B (2017). Assessing the performance and microbial structure of biofilms adhering on aerated membranes for domestic saline sewage treatment. RSC Advances, 7(44): 27198–27205

[33] Xu Y, Lu Z, Sun W, Zhang X (2021). Influence of pore structure on biologically activated carbon performance and biofilm microbial characteristics. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(6): 131

[34] Yang C, Zhang W, Liu R, Li Q, Li B, Wang S, Song C, Qiao C, Mulchandani A (2011). Phylogenetic diversity and metabolic potential of activated sludge microbial communities in full-scale wastewater treatment plants. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(17): 7408–7415

[35] Yuan C, Peng Y, Wang B, Li X, Zhang Q (2020). Facilitating sludge granulation and favoring glycogen accumulating organisms by increased salinity in an anaerobic/micro-aerobic simultaneous partial nitrification, denitrification and phosphorus removal (SPNDPR) process. Bioresource Technology, 313: 123698

[36] Zeng D, Liang K, Guo F, Wu Y, Wu G (2020). Denitrification performance and microbial community under salinity and MIT stresses for reverse osmosis concentrate treatment. Separation and Purification Technology, 242(1): 116799

[37] Zhang H, Lin Y, Men Z, Ihara M, Li W, He K (2020). Evaluation of pharmaceutical activities of G-protein coupled receptor targeted pharmaceuticals in Chinese wastewater effluent. Chinese Chemical Letters, 31(10): 2859–2863

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press