Electricity-driven ammonia oxidation and acetate production in microbial electrosynthesis systems

Qinjun Liang, Yu Gao, Zhigang Li, Jiayi Cai, Na Chu, Wen Hao, Yong Jiang, Raymond Jianxiong Zeng

PDF(1189 KB)
PDF(1189 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4) : 42. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-021-1476-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Electricity-driven ammonia oxidation and acetate production in microbial electrosynthesis systems

Author information +
History +

Highlights

• MES was constructed for simultaneous ammonia removal and acetate production.

• Energy consumption was different for total nitrogen and ammonia nitrogen removal.

• Energy consumption for acetate production was about 0.04 kWh/g.

• Nitrate accumulation explained the difference of energy consumption.

• Transport of ammonia and acetate across the membrane deteriorated the performance.

Abstract

Microbial electrosynthesis (MES) is an emerging technology for producing chemicals, and coupling MES to anodic waste oxidation can simultaneously increase the competitiveness and allow additional functions to be explored. In this study, MES was used for the simultaneous removal of ammonia from synthetic urine and production of acetate from CO2. Using graphite anode, 83.2%±5.3% ammonia removal and 28.4%±9.9% total nitrogen removal was achieved, with an energy consumption of 1.32 kWh/g N for total nitrogen removal, 0.45 kWh/g N for ammonia nitrogen removal, and 0.044 kWh/g for acetate production. Using boron-doped diamond (BDD) anode, 70.9%±12.1% ammonia removal and 51.5%±11.8% total nitrogen removal was obtained, with an energy consumption of 0.84 kWh/g N for total nitrogen removal, 0.61 kWh/g N for ammonia nitrogen removal, and 0.043 kWh/g for acetate production. A difference in nitrate accumulation explained the difference of total nitrogen removal efficiencies. Transport of ammonia and acetate across the membrane deteriorated the performance of MES. These results are important for the development of novel electricity-driven technologies for chemical production and pollution removal.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Biocathode / Carbon dioxide / Electrochemical oxidation / Graphite anode / Boron-doped diamond

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Qinjun Liang, Yu Gao, Zhigang Li, Jiayi Cai, Na Chu, Wen Hao, Yong Jiang, Raymond Jianxiong Zeng. Electricity-driven ammonia oxidation and acetate production in microbial electrosynthesis systems. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(4): 42 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1476-5

References

[1]
Bian B, Bajracharya S, Xu J, Pant D, Saikaly P E (2020). Microbial electrosynthesis from CO2: Challenges, opportunities and perspectives in the context of circular bioeconomy. Bioresource Technology, 302: 122863
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Chu N, Liang Q, Jiang Y, Zeng R J (2020a). Microbial electrochemical platform for the production of renewable fuels and chemicals. Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 150: 111922
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Chu N, Liang Q, Zhang W, Ge Z, Hao W, Jiang Y, Zeng R J (2020b). Waste C1 gases as alternatives to pure CO2 improved the microbial electrosynthesis of C4 and C6 carboxylates. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 8(23): 8773–8782
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Desmond-Le Quéméner E, Bridier A, Tian J H, Madigou C, Bureau C, Qi Y, Bouchez T (2019). Biorefinery for heterogeneous organic waste using microbial electrochemical technology. Bioresource Technology, 292: 121943
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Emerson D F, Woolston B M, Liu N, Donnelly M, Currie D H, Stephanopoulos G (2019). Enhancing hydrogen-dependent growth of and carbon dioxide fixation by Clostridium ljungdahlii through nitrate supplementation. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 116(2): 294–306
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Flexer V, Jourdin L (2020). Purposely designed hierarchical porous electrodes for high rate microbial electrosynthesis of acetate from carbon dioxide. Accounts of Chemical Research, 53(2): 311–321
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Garcia-Segura S, Ocon J D, Chong M N (2018). Electrochemical oxidation remediation of real wastewater effluents: A review. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 113: 48–67
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Gildemyn S, Verbeeck K, Jansen R, Rabaey K (2017). The type of ion selective membrane determines stability and production levels of microbial electrosynthesis. Bioresource Technology, 224: 358–364
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Huang L, Song S, Cai Z, Zhou P, Li Puma G (2021). Efficient conversion of bicarbonate (HCO3) to acetate and simultaneous heavy metal Cr(VI) removal in photo-assisted microbial electrosynthesis systems combining WO3/MoO3/g-C3N4 heterojunctions and Serratia marcescens electrotroph. Chemical Engineering Journal, 406: 126786
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Jiang Y, Chu N, Zhang W, Ma J, Zhang F, Liang P, Zeng R J (2019a). Zinc: A promising material for electrocatalyst-assisted microbial electrosynthesis of carboxylic acids from carbon dioxide. Water Research, 159: 87–94
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Jiang Y, May H D, Lu L, Liang P, Huang X, Ren Z J (2019b). Carbon dioxide and organic waste valorization by microbial electrosynthesis and electro-fermentation. Water Research, 149: 42–55
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Jiang Y, Zeng R J (2018). Expanding the product spectrum of value added chemicals in microbial electrosynthesis through integrated process design—A review. Bioresource Technology, 269: 503–512
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Kiefer D, Merkel M, Lilge L, Henkel M, Hausmann R (2021). From acetate to bio-based products: Underexploited potential for industrial biotechnology. Trends in Biotechnology, 39(4): 397–411
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Kong L C, Liu X T (2020). Emerging electrochemical processes for materials recovery from wastewater: Mechanisms and prospects. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(5): 14
[15]
Liu Y, Ngo H H, Guo W, Peng L, Wang D, Ni B (2019). The roles of free ammonia (FA) in biological wastewater treatment processes: A review. Environment International, 123: 10–19
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Liu Z, Wang K, Chen Y, Tan T, Nielsen J (2020). Third-generation biorefineries as the means to produce fuels and chemicals from CO2. Nature Catalysis, 3(3): 274–288
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Mandal P, Yadav M K, Gupta A K, Dubey B K (2020). Chlorine mediated indirect electro-oxidation of ammonia using non-active PbO2 anode: Influencing parameters and mechanism identification. Separation and Purification Technology, 247: 116910
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Prévoteau A, Carvajal-Arroyo J M, Ganigué R, Rabaey K (2020). Microbial electrosynthesis from CO2: Forever a promise? Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 62: 48–57
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Schranck A, Doudrick K (2020). Effect of reactor configuration on the kinetics and nitrogen byproduct selectivity of urea electrolysis using a boron doped diamond electrode. Water Research, 168: 115130
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Shaw D R, Ali M, Katuri K P, Gralnick J A, Reimann J, Mesman R, Van Niftrik L, Jetten M S M, Saikaly P E (2020). Extracellular electron transfer-dependent anaerobic oxidation of ammonium by anammox bacteria. Nature Communications, 11(1): 2058
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Shih Y J, Huang Y H, Huang C P (2017). Oxidation of ammonia in dilute aqueous solutions over graphite-supported α- and β-lead dioxide electrodes (PbO2@G). Electrochimica Acta, 257: 444–454
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Siddiqui O, Ishaq H, Dincer I (2020). Experimental investigation of improvement capability of ammonia fuel cell performance with addition of hydrogen. Energy Conversion and Management, 205: 112372
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Sun D, Hong X, Wu K, Hui K S, Du Y, Hui K N (2020). Simultaneous removal of ammonia and phosphate by electro-oxidation and electrocoagulation using RuO2–IrO2/Ti and microscale zero-valent iron composite electrode. Water Research, 169: 115239
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Yang Y (2020). Recent advances in the electrochemical oxidation water treatment: Spotlight on byproduct control. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(5): 12
[25]
Zhang G, Ruan J, Du T (2021). Recent advances on photocatalytic and electrochemical oxidation for ammonia treatment from water/wastewater. ACS ES&T Engineering, 1(3): 310–325
[26]
Zhang G, Zhou Y, Yang F (2019). Hydrogen production from microbial fuel cells-ammonia electrolysis cell coupled system fed with landfill leachate using Mo2C/N-doped graphene nanocomposite as HER catalyst. Electrochimica Acta, 299: 672–681
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Zöllig H, Fritzsche C, Morgenroth E, Udert K M (2015). Direct electrochemical oxidation of ammonia on graphite as a treatment option for stored source-separated urine. Water Research, 69: 284–294
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51908131), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (No. 2020J01563), and the Special Fund of State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (No. 19K05ESPCT), and the CAS Key Laboratory of Environmental and Applied Microbiology & Environmental Microbiology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. KLCAS-2019-1).

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1476-5 and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1189 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/