Cattle manure biochar and earthworm interactively affected CO2 and N2O emissions in agricultural and forest soils: Observation of a distinct difference

Xiaoqiang Gong, Jinbiao Li, Scott X. Chang, Qian Wu, Zhengfeng An, Chengpeng Huang, Xiangyang Sun, Suyan Li, Hui Wang

PDF(1915 KB)
PDF(1915 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3) : 39. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-021-1473-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Cattle manure biochar and earthworm interactively affected CO2 and N2O emissions in agricultural and forest soils: Observation of a distinct difference

Author information +
History +

Highlights

• Earthworms increase CO2 and N2O emissions in agricultural and forest soil.

• 10% biochar suppresses CO2 and N2O emissions in forest soil.

• Biochar interacted with earthworm to significant affect CO2 and N2O emissions.

Abstract

The application of manure-derived biochar offers an alternative to avoid the direct application of manure to soil causing greenhouse gas emission. Soil fauna, especially earthworms, can markedly stimulate carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from soil. This study therefore investigated the effect of cattle manure biochar (added at rates of 0, 2%, or 10%, coded as BC0, BC2 and BC10, respectively) application, with or without earthworm Aporrectodea turgida, on emissions of CO2 and N2O and changes of physic-chemical properties of agricultural and forest soils in a laboratory incubation experiment. The BC10 treatment significantly enhanced cumulative CO2 emissions by 27.9% relative to the untreated control in the agricultural soil. On the contrary, the BC2 and BC10 treatments significantly reduced cumulative CO2 emissions by 16.3%–61.1% and N2O emissions by 92.9%–95.1% compared to the untreated control in the forest soil. The addition of earthworm alone significantly enhanced the cumulative CO2 and N2O fluxes in agricultural and forest soils. Cumulative CO2 and N2O fluxes were significantly increased when BC2 and BC10 were applied with earthworm in the agricultural soil, but were significantly reduced when BC10 was applied with earthworm in the forest soil. Our study demonstrated that biochar application interacted with earthworm to affect CO2 and N2O emissions, which were also dependent on the soil type involved. Our study suggests that manure biochar application rate and use of earthworm need to be carefully studied for specific soil types to maximize the climate change mitigation potential of such management practices.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Carbon sequestration / Forest soil / Cattle manure biochar / Greenhouse gas emissions / Soil fauna

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiaoqiang Gong, Jinbiao Li, Scott X. Chang, Qian Wu, Zhengfeng An, Chengpeng Huang, Xiangyang Sun, Suyan Li, Hui Wang. Cattle manure biochar and earthworm interactively affected CO2 and N2O emissions in agricultural and forest soils: Observation of a distinct difference. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(3): 39 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1473-8

References

[1]
Ameloot N, De Neve S, Jegajeevagan K, Yildiz G, Buchan D, Funkuin Y, Prins W, Bouckaert L, Sleutel S (2013). Short-term CO2 and N2O emissions and microbial properties of biochar amended sandy loam soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 57: 401–410
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Araujo Y, Luizão F J, Barros E (2004). Effect of earthworm addition on soil nitrogen availability, microbial biomass and litter decomposition in mesocosms. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 39(3): 146–152
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Backer R G M, Saeed W, Seguin P, Smith R L (2017). Root traits and nitrogen fertilizer recovery efficiency of corn grown in biochar-amended soil under greenhouse conditions. Plant and Soil, 415(1–2): 465–477
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Bamminger C, Zaiser N, Zinsser P, Lamers M, Kammann C, Marhan S (2014). Effects of biochar, earthworms, and litter addition on soil microbial activity and abundance in a temperate agricultural soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 50(8): 1189–1200
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Brassard P, Godbout S, Palacios J H, Jeanne T, Hogue R, Dubé P, Limousy L, Raghavan V (2018). Effect of six engineered biochars on GHG emissions from two agricultural soils: A short-term incubation study. Geoderma, 327: 73–84
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Briones M J I, Barreal M E, Harrison A C, Gallego P P (2011). Earthworms and nitrogen applications to improve soil health in an intensively cultivated kiwifruit orchard. Applied Soil Ecology, 49: 158–166
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Cao H L, Xin Y, Yuan Q X (2016). Prediction of biochar yield from cattle manure pyrolysis via least squares support vector machine intelligent approach. Bioresource Technology, 202: 158–164
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Cely P, Tarquis A M, Paz-Ferreiro J, Méndez A, Gascó G (2014). Factors driving the carbon mineralization priming effect in a sandy loam soil amended with different types of biochar. Solid Earth, 5(1): 585–594
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Chen J, Li S, Liang C, Xu Q, Li Y, Qin H, Fuhrmann J J (2017). Response of microbial community structure and function to short-term biochar amendment in an intensively managed bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) plantation soil: Effect of particle size and addition rate. Science of the Total Environment, 574: 24–33
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Deng B L, Shi Y Z, Zhang L, Fang H F, Gao Y, Luo L C, Feng W X, Hu X F, Wan S Z, Huang W, Guo X M, Siemann E (2020). Effects of spent mushroom substrate-derived biochar on soil CO2 and N2O emissions depend on pyrolysis temperature. Chemosphere, 246: 125608
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Ersoy E, Ugurlu A (2020). The potential of Turkey’s province-based livestock sector to mitigate GHG emissions through biogas production. Journal of Environmental Management, 255: 109858
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Fest B J, Livesley S J, Drösler M, van Gorsel E, Arndt S K (2009). Soil–atmosphere greenhouse gas exchange in a cool, temperate Eucalyptus delegatensis forest in south-eastern Australia. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 149(3–4): 393–406
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Giannopoulos G, Pulleman M M, Van Groenigen J W (2010). Interactions between residue placement and earthworm ecological strategy affect aggregate turnover and N2O dynamics in agricultural soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 42(4): 618–625
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Gong X, Cai L, Li S, Chang S X, Sun X, An Z (2018). Bamboo biochar amendment improves the growth and reproduction of Eisenia fetida and the quality of green waste vermicompost. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 156: 197–204
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Hawthorne I, Johnson M S, Jassal R S, Black T A, Grant N J, Smukler S M (2017). Application of biochar and nitrogen influences fluxes of CO2, CH4 and N2O in a forest soil. Journal of Environmental Management, 192: 203–214
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Horn M A, Schramm A, Drake H L (2003). The earthworm gut: An ideal habitat for ingested N2O-producing microorganisms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69(3): 1662–1669
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Hu Y L, Wu F P, Zeng D H, Chang S X (2014). Wheat straw and its biochar had contrasting effects on soil C and N cycling two growing seasons after addition to a Black Chernozemic soil planted to barley. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 50(8): 1291–1299
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Jones D L, Murphy D V, Khalid M, Ahmad W, Edwards-Jones G, DeLuca T H (2011). Short-term biochar-induced increase in soil CO2 release is both biotically and abiotically mediated. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 43(8): 1723–1731
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Kong X W, Duan Y F, Schramm A, Eriksen J, Holmstrup M, Larsen T, Bol R, Petersen S O (2017). Mitigating N2O emissions from clover residues by 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) without adverse effects on the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 104: 95–107
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Li Y, Zhang J, Chang S X, Jiang P, Zhou G, Fu S, Yan E, Wu J, Lin L (2013). Long-term intensive management effects on soil organic carbon pools and chemical composition in Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) forests in subtropical China. Forest Ecology and Management, 303: 121–130
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Lu W, Ding W, Zhang J, Li Y, Luo J, Bolan N, Xie Z (2014). Biochar suppressed the decomposition of organic carbon in a cultivated sandy loam soil: a negative priming effect. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 76: 12–21
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Lubbers I M, van Groenigen K J, Fonte S J, Six J, Brussaard L, van Groenigen J W (2013). Greenhouse-gas emissions from soils increased by earthworms. Nature Climate Change, 3(3): 187–194
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Luo T X, Li H X, Wang T, Hu F (2008). Influence of nematodes and earthworms on the emissions of soil trace gases (CO2, N2O). Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28(3): 993–999
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Marhan S, Auber J, Poll C (2015). Additive effects of earthworms, nitrogen-rich litter and elevated soil temperature on N2O emission and nitrate leaching from an arable soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 86: 55–61
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Namoi N, Pelster D E, Rosenstock T, Mwangi L, Kamau S, Mutuo P, Barrios E (2019). Earthworms regulate ability of biochar to mitigate CO2 and N2O emissions from a tropical soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 140: 57–67
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Nelissen V, Saha B K, Ruysschaert G, Boeckx P (2014). Effect of different biochar and fertilizer types on N2O and NO emissions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 70: 244–255
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Paul B K, Lubbers I M, Groenigen J W V (2012). Residue incorporation depth is a controlling factor of earthworm-induced nitrous oxide emissions. Global Change Biology, 18(3): 1141–1151
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Paz-Ferreiro J, Fu S L, Méndez A, Gascó G (2014). Interactive effects of biochar and the earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus on plant productivity and soil enzyme activities. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 14(3): 483–494
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Pokharel P, Chang S X (2019). Manure pellet, woodchip and their biochars differently affect wheat yield and carbon dioxide emission from bulk and rhizosphere soils. Science of the Total Environment, 659: 463–472
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Sánchez-de León Y, Wise D H, Lugo-Pérez J, Norby R J, James S W, Gonzalez-Meler M A (2018). Endogeic earthworm densities increase in response to higher fine-root production in a forest exposed to elevated CO2. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 122: 31–38
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Senbayram M, Saygan E P, Chen R, Aydemir S, Kaya C, Wu D, Bladogatskaya E (2019). Effect of biochar origin and soil type on the greenhouse gas emission and the bacterial community structure in n fertilised acidic sandy and alkaline clay soil. Science of the Total Environment, 660: 69–79
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Sheng Y Q, Zhu L Z (2018). Biochar alters microbial community and carbon sequestration potential across different soil pH. Science of the Total Environment, 622–623: 1391–1399
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Sial T A, Khan M N, Lan Z L, Kumbhar F, Zhao Y, Zhang J G, Sun D Q, Li X (2019). Contrasting effects of banana peels waste and its biochar on greenhouse gas emissions and soil biochemical properties. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 122: 366–377
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Song Y, Li Y, Cai Y, Fu S, Luo Y, Wang H, Liang C, Lin Z, Hu S, Li Y, Chang S X (2019). Biochar decreases soil N2O emissions in Moso bamboo plantations through decreasing labile N concentrations, N-cycling enzyme activities and nitrification/denitrification rates. Geoderma, 348(15): 135–145
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Su P, Gao X, Zhang J, Djellabi R, Yang B, Wu Q, Wen Z (2021). Enhancing the adsorption function of biochar by mechanochemical graphitization for organic pollutant removal. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(6): 130
[36]
Taghizadeh-Toosi A, Clough T J, Condron L M, Sherlock R R, Anderson C R, Craigie R A (2011). Biochar incorporation into pasture soil suppresses in situ nitrous oxide emissions from ruminant urine patches. Journal of Environmental Quality, 40: 468–476
[37]
Troy S M, Lawlor P G, Flynn C J, Healy M G (2013). Impact of biochar addition to soil on greenhouse gas emissions following pig manure application. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 60: 173–181
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Wachendorf C, Potthoff M, Ludwig B, Joergensen R G (2014). Effects of addition of maize litter and earthworms on C mineralization and aggregate formation in single and mixed soils differing in soil organic carbon and clay content. Pedobiologia, 57(3): 161–169
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Wang Q, Kwak J H, Choi W J, Chang S X (2018a). Decomposition of trembling aspen leaf litter under long-term nitrogen and sulfur deposition: Effects of litter chemistry and forest floor microbial properties. Forest Ecology and Management, 412: 53–61
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Wang Y Q, Bai R, Di H J, Mo LY, Han B, Zhang L M, He J Z, (2018b). Differentiated mechanisms of biochar mitigating straw-induced greenhouse gas emissions in two contrasting paddy soils. Frontiers in Microbiolgy, 13: 1–9.9:2566
[41]
Wang Z Y, Kong T, Hu S, Sun H, Yang W C, Kou Y P, Mandlaa , Xu H (2015). Nitrification inhibitors mitigate earthworm-induced N2O emission—a mesocosm study. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 51(8): 1005–1011
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Wu H T, Lu M Z, Lu X G, Guan Q, He X H (2015). Interactions between earthworms and mesofauna has no significant effect on emissions of CO2 and N2O from soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 88: 294–297
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Wu Y, Liu J, Shaaban M, Hu R (2021). Dynamics of soil N2O emissions and functional gene abundance in response to biochar application in the presence of earthworms. Environmental Pollution, 268: 115670
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Xue C, Wu J, Wang K, Yi Y, Fang Z, Cheng W, Fang J (2021). Effects of different types of biochar on the properties and reactivity of nano zero-valent iron in soil remediation. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(5): 101
[45]
Zhang A, Liu Y M, Pan G X, Hussain Q, Li L Q, Zheng J W, Zhang X H (2012). Effect of biochar amendment on maize yield and greenhouse gas emissions from a soil organic carbon poor calcareous loamy soil from Central China Plain. Plant and Soil, 351(1–2): 263–275
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Zhu X Y, Chang L, Li J J, Liu J, Feng L C, Wu D H (2018). Interactions between earthworms and mesofauna affect CO2 and N2O emissions from soils under long-term conservation tillage. Geoderma, 332: 153–160
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
Zhu X Y, Chang L, Liu J, Zhou M H, Li J J, Gao B, Wu D H (2016). Exploring the relationships between soil fauna, different tillage regimes and CO2 and N2O emissions from black soil in China. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 103: 106–116
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Zimmerman A R, Gao B, Ahn M Y (2011). Positive and negative carbon mineralization priming effects among a variety of biochar-amended soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 43(6): 1169–1179
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

Financial support was provided by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) in the form of a Discovery grant to SXC (No. 249664-2013). This study was also supported by Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. 6202021). Xiaoqiang Gong would like acknowledge the scholarship from the China Scholarship Council (CSC No. 201706510040).

Disclosure Statement

The authors reported no potential conflict of interest. We also confirm that the studies did not involve endangered or protected species.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1915 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/