Cattle manure biochar and earthworm interactively affected CO2 and N2O emissions in agricultural and forest soils: Observation of a distinct difference

Xiaoqiang Gong , Jinbiao Li , Scott X. Chang , Qian Wu , Zhengfeng An , Chengpeng Huang , Xiangyang Sun , Suyan Li , Hui Wang

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3) : 39

PDF (1915KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (3) : 39 DOI: 10.1007/s11783-021-1473-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Cattle manure biochar and earthworm interactively affected CO2 and N2O emissions in agricultural and forest soils: Observation of a distinct difference

Author information +
History +
PDF (1915KB)

Abstract

• Earthworms increase CO2 and N2O emissions in agricultural and forest soil.

• 10% biochar suppresses CO2 and N2O emissions in forest soil.

• Biochar interacted with earthworm to significant affect CO2 and N2O emissions.

The application of manure-derived biochar offers an alternative to avoid the direct application of manure to soil causing greenhouse gas emission. Soil fauna, especially earthworms, can markedly stimulate carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from soil. This study therefore investigated the effect of cattle manure biochar (added at rates of 0, 2%, or 10%, coded as BC0, BC2 and BC10, respectively) application, with or without earthworm Aporrectodea turgida, on emissions of CO2 and N2O and changes of physic-chemical properties of agricultural and forest soils in a laboratory incubation experiment. The BC10 treatment significantly enhanced cumulative CO2 emissions by 27.9% relative to the untreated control in the agricultural soil. On the contrary, the BC2 and BC10 treatments significantly reduced cumulative CO2 emissions by 16.3%–61.1% and N2O emissions by 92.9%–95.1% compared to the untreated control in the forest soil. The addition of earthworm alone significantly enhanced the cumulative CO2 and N2O fluxes in agricultural and forest soils. Cumulative CO2 and N2O fluxes were significantly increased when BC2 and BC10 were applied with earthworm in the agricultural soil, but were significantly reduced when BC10 was applied with earthworm in the forest soil. Our study demonstrated that biochar application interacted with earthworm to affect CO2 and N2O emissions, which were also dependent on the soil type involved. Our study suggests that manure biochar application rate and use of earthworm need to be carefully studied for specific soil types to maximize the climate change mitigation potential of such management practices.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Carbon sequestration / Forest soil / Cattle manure biochar / Greenhouse gas emissions / Soil fauna

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiaoqiang Gong, Jinbiao Li, Scott X. Chang, Qian Wu, Zhengfeng An, Chengpeng Huang, Xiangyang Sun, Suyan Li, Hui Wang. Cattle manure biochar and earthworm interactively affected CO2 and N2O emissions in agricultural and forest soils: Observation of a distinct difference. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(3): 39 DOI:10.1007/s11783-021-1473-8

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ameloot N, De Neve S, Jegajeevagan K, Yildiz G, Buchan D, Funkuin Y, Prins W, Bouckaert L, Sleutel S (2013). Short-term CO2 and N2O emissions and microbial properties of biochar amended sandy loam soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 57: 401–410

[2]

Araujo Y, Luizão F J, Barros E (2004). Effect of earthworm addition on soil nitrogen availability, microbial biomass and litter decomposition in mesocosms. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 39(3): 146–152

[3]

Backer R G M, Saeed W, Seguin P, Smith R L (2017). Root traits and nitrogen fertilizer recovery efficiency of corn grown in biochar-amended soil under greenhouse conditions. Plant and Soil, 415(1–2): 465–477

[4]

Bamminger C, Zaiser N, Zinsser P, Lamers M, Kammann C, Marhan S (2014). Effects of biochar, earthworms, and litter addition on soil microbial activity and abundance in a temperate agricultural soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 50(8): 1189–1200

[5]

Brassard P, Godbout S, Palacios J H, Jeanne T, Hogue R, Dubé P, Limousy L, Raghavan V (2018). Effect of six engineered biochars on GHG emissions from two agricultural soils: A short-term incubation study. Geoderma, 327: 73–84

[6]

Briones M J I, Barreal M E, Harrison A C, Gallego P P (2011). Earthworms and nitrogen applications to improve soil health in an intensively cultivated kiwifruit orchard. Applied Soil Ecology, 49: 158–166

[7]

Cao H L, Xin Y, Yuan Q X (2016). Prediction of biochar yield from cattle manure pyrolysis via least squares support vector machine intelligent approach. Bioresource Technology, 202: 158–164

[8]

Cely P, Tarquis A M, Paz-Ferreiro J, Méndez A, Gascó G (2014). Factors driving the carbon mineralization priming effect in a sandy loam soil amended with different types of biochar. Solid Earth, 5(1): 585–594

[9]

Chen J, Li S, Liang C, Xu Q, Li Y, Qin H, Fuhrmann J J (2017). Response of microbial community structure and function to short-term biochar amendment in an intensively managed bamboo (Phyllostachys praecox) plantation soil: Effect of particle size and addition rate. Science of the Total Environment, 574: 24–33

[10]

Deng B L, Shi Y Z, Zhang L, Fang H F, Gao Y, Luo L C, Feng W X, Hu X F, Wan S Z, Huang W, Guo X M, Siemann E (2020). Effects of spent mushroom substrate-derived biochar on soil CO2 and N2O emissions depend on pyrolysis temperature. Chemosphere, 246: 125608

[11]

Ersoy E, Ugurlu A (2020). The potential of Turkey’s province-based livestock sector to mitigate GHG emissions through biogas production. Journal of Environmental Management, 255: 109858

[12]

Fest B J, Livesley S J, Drösler M, van Gorsel E, Arndt S K (2009). Soil–atmosphere greenhouse gas exchange in a cool, temperate Eucalyptus delegatensis forest in south-eastern Australia. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 149(3–4): 393–406

[13]

Giannopoulos G, Pulleman M M, Van Groenigen J W (2010). Interactions between residue placement and earthworm ecological strategy affect aggregate turnover and N2O dynamics in agricultural soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 42(4): 618–625

[14]

Gong X, Cai L, Li S, Chang S X, Sun X, An Z (2018). Bamboo biochar amendment improves the growth and reproduction of Eisenia fetida and the quality of green waste vermicompost. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 156: 197–204

[15]

Hawthorne I, Johnson M S, Jassal R S, Black T A, Grant N J, Smukler S M (2017). Application of biochar and nitrogen influences fluxes of CO2, CH4 and N2O in a forest soil. Journal of Environmental Management, 192: 203–214

[16]

Horn M A, Schramm A, Drake H L (2003). The earthworm gut: An ideal habitat for ingested N2O-producing microorganisms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69(3): 1662–1669

[17]

Hu Y L, Wu F P, Zeng D H, Chang S X (2014). Wheat straw and its biochar had contrasting effects on soil C and N cycling two growing seasons after addition to a Black Chernozemic soil planted to barley. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 50(8): 1291–1299

[18]

Jones D L, Murphy D V, Khalid M, Ahmad W, Edwards-Jones G, DeLuca T H (2011). Short-term biochar-induced increase in soil CO2 release is both biotically and abiotically mediated. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 43(8): 1723–1731

[19]

Kong X W, Duan Y F, Schramm A, Eriksen J, Holmstrup M, Larsen T, Bol R, Petersen S O (2017). Mitigating N2O emissions from clover residues by 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) without adverse effects on the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 104: 95–107

[20]

Li Y, Zhang J, Chang S X, Jiang P, Zhou G, Fu S, Yan E, Wu J, Lin L (2013). Long-term intensive management effects on soil organic carbon pools and chemical composition in Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) forests in subtropical China. Forest Ecology and Management, 303: 121–130

[21]

Lu W, Ding W, Zhang J, Li Y, Luo J, Bolan N, Xie Z (2014). Biochar suppressed the decomposition of organic carbon in a cultivated sandy loam soil: a negative priming effect. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 76: 12–21

[22]

Lubbers I M, van Groenigen K J, Fonte S J, Six J, Brussaard L, van Groenigen J W (2013). Greenhouse-gas emissions from soils increased by earthworms. Nature Climate Change, 3(3): 187–194

[23]

Luo T X, Li H X, Wang T, Hu F (2008). Influence of nematodes and earthworms on the emissions of soil trace gases (CO2, N2O). Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28(3): 993–999

[24]

Marhan S, Auber J, Poll C (2015). Additive effects of earthworms, nitrogen-rich litter and elevated soil temperature on N2O emission and nitrate leaching from an arable soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 86: 55–61

[25]

Namoi N, Pelster D E, Rosenstock T, Mwangi L, Kamau S, Mutuo P, Barrios E (2019). Earthworms regulate ability of biochar to mitigate CO2 and N2O emissions from a tropical soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 140: 57–67

[26]

Nelissen V, Saha B K, Ruysschaert G, Boeckx P (2014). Effect of different biochar and fertilizer types on N2O and NO emissions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 70: 244–255

[27]

Paul B K, Lubbers I M, Groenigen J W V (2012). Residue incorporation depth is a controlling factor of earthworm-induced nitrous oxide emissions. Global Change Biology, 18(3): 1141–1151

[28]

Paz-Ferreiro J, Fu S L, Méndez A, Gascó G (2014). Interactive effects of biochar and the earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus on plant productivity and soil enzyme activities. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 14(3): 483–494

[29]

Pokharel P, Chang S X (2019). Manure pellet, woodchip and their biochars differently affect wheat yield and carbon dioxide emission from bulk and rhizosphere soils. Science of the Total Environment, 659: 463–472

[30]

Sánchez-de León Y, Wise D H, Lugo-Pérez J, Norby R J, James S W, Gonzalez-Meler M A (2018). Endogeic earthworm densities increase in response to higher fine-root production in a forest exposed to elevated CO2. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 122: 31–38

[31]

Senbayram M, Saygan E P, Chen R, Aydemir S, Kaya C, Wu D, Bladogatskaya E (2019). Effect of biochar origin and soil type on the greenhouse gas emission and the bacterial community structure in n fertilised acidic sandy and alkaline clay soil. Science of the Total Environment, 660: 69–79

[32]

Sheng Y Q, Zhu L Z (2018). Biochar alters microbial community and carbon sequestration potential across different soil pH. Science of the Total Environment, 622623: 1391–1399

[33]

Sial T A, Khan M N, Lan Z L, Kumbhar F, Zhao Y, Zhang J G, Sun D Q, Li X (2019). Contrasting effects of banana peels waste and its biochar on greenhouse gas emissions and soil biochemical properties. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 122: 366–377

[34]

Song Y, Li Y, Cai Y, Fu S, Luo Y, Wang H, Liang C, Lin Z, Hu S, Li Y, Chang S X (2019). Biochar decreases soil N2O emissions in Moso bamboo plantations through decreasing labile N concentrations, N-cycling enzyme activities and nitrification/denitrification rates. Geoderma, 348(15): 135–145

[35]

Su P, Gao X, Zhang J, Djellabi R, Yang B, Wu Q, Wen Z (2021). Enhancing the adsorption function of biochar by mechanochemical graphitization for organic pollutant removal. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(6): 130

[36]

Taghizadeh-Toosi A, Clough T J, Condron L M, Sherlock R R, Anderson C R, Craigie R A (2011). Biochar incorporation into pasture soil suppresses in situ nitrous oxide emissions from ruminant urine patches. Journal of Environmental Quality, 40: 468–476

[37]

Troy S M, Lawlor P G, Flynn C J, Healy M G (2013). Impact of biochar addition to soil on greenhouse gas emissions following pig manure application. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 60: 173–181

[38]

Wachendorf C, Potthoff M, Ludwig B, Joergensen R G (2014). Effects of addition of maize litter and earthworms on C mineralization and aggregate formation in single and mixed soils differing in soil organic carbon and clay content. Pedobiologia, 57(3): 161–169

[39]

Wang Q, Kwak J H, Choi W J, Chang S X (2018a). Decomposition of trembling aspen leaf litter under long-term nitrogen and sulfur deposition: Effects of litter chemistry and forest floor microbial properties. Forest Ecology and Management, 412: 53–61

[40]

Wang Y Q, Bai R, Di H J, Mo LY, Han B, Zhang L M, He J Z, (2018b). Differentiated mechanisms of biochar mitigating straw-induced greenhouse gas emissions in two contrasting paddy soils. Frontiers in Microbiolgy, 13: 1–9.9:2566

[41]

Wang Z Y, Kong T, Hu S, Sun H, Yang W C, Kou Y P, Mandlaa , Xu H (2015). Nitrification inhibitors mitigate earthworm-induced N2O emission—a mesocosm study. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 51(8): 1005–1011

[42]

Wu H T, Lu M Z, Lu X G, Guan Q, He X H (2015). Interactions between earthworms and mesofauna has no significant effect on emissions of CO2 and N2O from soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 88: 294–297

[43]

Wu Y, Liu J, Shaaban M, Hu R (2021). Dynamics of soil N2O emissions and functional gene abundance in response to biochar application in the presence of earthworms. Environmental Pollution, 268: 115670

[44]

Xue C, Wu J, Wang K, Yi Y, Fang Z, Cheng W, Fang J (2021). Effects of different types of biochar on the properties and reactivity of nano zero-valent iron in soil remediation. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(5): 101

[45]

Zhang A, Liu Y M, Pan G X, Hussain Q, Li L Q, Zheng J W, Zhang X H (2012). Effect of biochar amendment on maize yield and greenhouse gas emissions from a soil organic carbon poor calcareous loamy soil from Central China Plain. Plant and Soil, 351(1–2): 263–275

[46]

Zhu X Y, Chang L, Li J J, Liu J, Feng L C, Wu D H (2018). Interactions between earthworms and mesofauna affect CO2 and N2O emissions from soils under long-term conservation tillage. Geoderma, 332: 153–160

[47]

Zhu X Y, Chang L, Liu J, Zhou M H, Li J J, Gao B, Wu D H (2016). Exploring the relationships between soil fauna, different tillage regimes and CO2 and N2O emissions from black soil in China. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 103: 106–116

[48]

Zimmerman A R, Gao B, Ahn M Y (2011). Positive and negative carbon mineralization priming effects among a variety of biochar-amended soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 43(6): 1169–1179

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1915KB)

6084

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/