Quantification of emission variability for off-road equipment in China based on real-world measurements

Kaili Pang, Kaishan Zhang, Shuai Ma, Xiangrui Meng

PDF(2176 KB)
PDF(2176 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (2) : 24. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-021-1455-x
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Quantification of emission variability for off-road equipment in China based on real-world measurements

Author information +
History +

Highlights

• Emissions from 53 in-use diesel-fueled off-road equipment were measured.

• There exists a large off-road equipment variability in emissions.

• Engine operations have significant impacts on real-world tailpipe emissions.

• Emission inventory development should take into account job duties and operations.

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to quantify the variability in emissions of off-road equipment using a portable emission measurement system. A total of 53 commonly used equipment for agriculture, base construction, paving construction, and material handling were selected. Time-based and fuel-based emissions were quantified by different duty and engine modes. Three duty modes (idling, moving, and working) were used. Ten engine modes were defined based on normalized engine revolutions-per-minute and manifold absolute pressure, respectively. Composite emission factors taking into account both duty modes and its corresponding time percentage during a typical duty cycle were estimated. Results showed that there existed a large off-road equipment variability in emissions. Depending on duty and engine modes, time-based NO emissions ranged from 3.1 to 237.9, 29.1‒1475.6, 83.2‒681.6, and 3.2‒385.2 g/h for agriculture, base construction, paving construction and material handling equipment, respectively while for fuel-based NO emissions these ranges were 5.3‒52.0, 11.7‒69.0, 4.8‒30.8, and 11.0‒54.6 g/kg, respectively. Furthermore, emission factors derived from this study exhibited a much larger variability compared to those used in NONROAD by US EPA and National Guideline for Off-road Equipment of China. This implied that localized measurements of emissions are needed for improvement of accuracy of emission inventory. Furthermore, both equipment types and operations should be considered for development of emission inventory and control strategy.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Off-road equipment / Portable emission measurement system (PEMS) / Real-world emissions / Diesel engine

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Kaili Pang, Kaishan Zhang, Shuai Ma, Xiangrui Meng. Quantification of emission variability for off-road equipment in China based on real-world measurements. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(2): 24 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1455-x

References

[1]
Cao T, Durbin T D, Russell R L, Cocker D R III, Scora G, Maldonado H, Johnson K C (2016). Evaluations of in-use emission factors from off-road construction equipment. Atmospheric Environment, 147: 234–245
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
CARB (California Air Resources Board) (2007). User’s Guide for OFFROAD2007. California: USA
[3]
CCMA (China Construction Machinery Association) (2018a). China Construction Machinery Industry Yearbook 2017. Beijing: China Mechanical Industry Publishing4–5 (in Chinese)
[4]
CCMA (China Construction Machinery Association) (2018b). China Agricultural Machinery Industry Yearbook 2017. Beijing: China Mechanical Industry Publishing , 174–193 (in Chinese)
[5]
Desouza C D, Marsh D J, Beevers S D, Molden N, Green D C (2020). Real-world emissions from non-road mobile machinery in London. Atmospheric Environment, 223: 117301
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Durbin T D, Johnson K, Cocker III D R, Miller J W, Maldonado H, Shah A, Ensfield C, Weaver C, Akard M, Harvey N, Symon J, Lanni T, Bachalo W D, Payne G, Smallwood G, Linke M (2007). Evaluation and comparison of portable emissions measurement systems and federal reference methods for emissions from a back-up generator and a diesel truck operated on a chassis dynamometer. Environmental Science & Technology, 41(17): 6199–6204
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7]
Fan C Y, Song C L, Lv G, Wang G Y, Zhou H, Jing X J (2018). Evaluation of carbonyl compound emissions from a non-road machinery diesel engine fueled with a methanol/diesel blend. Applied Thermal Engineering, 129: 1382–1391
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Frey H C, Rasdorf W, Lewis P (2010). Comprehensive field study of fuel use and emissions of nonroad diesel construction equipment. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2158(1): 69–76
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Frey H C, Unal A, Rouphail N M, Colyar J D (2003). On-road measurement of vehicle tailpipe emissions using a portable instrument. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 53(8): 992–1002
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[10]
Fu M, Ge Y, Tan J, Zeng T, Liang B (2012). Characteristics of typical non-road machinery emissions in China by using portable emission measurement system. Science of the Total Environment, 437: 255–261
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[11]
Gao A, Wang J, Luo J, Li A, Chen K, Wang P, Wang Y, Li J, Hu J, Zhang H (2021). Temporal variation of PM2.5-associated health effects in Shijiazhuang, Hebei. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(5): 9
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Grigoratos T, Fontaras G, Giechaskiel B, Zacharof N (2019). Real world emissions performance of heavy-duty Euro VI diesel vehicles. Atmospheric Environment, 201: 348–359
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Heidari B, Marr L C (2015). Real-time emissions from construction equipment compared with model predictions. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 65(2): 115–125
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[14]
Huai T, Shah S D, Durbin T D, Norbeck J M (2005). Measurement of operational activity for nonroad diesel construction equipment. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 6(4): 333–340
[15]
Jiang Y, Xing J, Wang S, Chang X, Liu S, Shi A, Liu B, Sahu S K (2021). Understand the local and regional contributions on air pollution from the view of human health impacts. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(5): 11
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Lewis P, Leming M, Rasdorf W (2012). Impact of engine idling on fuel use and CO2 emissions of nonroad diesel construction equipment. Journal of Management Engineering, 28(1): 31–38
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Li M, Liu H, Geng G N, Hong C P, Liu F, Song Y, Tong D, Zheng B, Cui H Y, Man H Y, Zhang Q, He K B (2017). Anthropogenic emission inventories in China: A review. National Science Review, 4(6): 834–866
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Li Z, Zhang K, Pang K, Di B (2016). A fuel-based approach for emission factor development for highway paving construction equipment in China. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 66(12): 1214–1223
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[19]
Lijewski P, Merkisz J, Fuc P (2013). The analysis of the operating conditions of farm machinery engines in regard to exhaust emissions legislation. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 29(4): 445–452
[20]
Lijewski P, Merkisz J, Fuć P, Ziółkowski A, Rymaniak Ł, Kusiak W (2017). Fuel consumption and exhaust emissions in the process of mechanized timber extraction and transport. European Journal of Forest Research, 136(1): 153–160
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Lindgren M, Larsson G, Hansson P A (2010). Evaluation of factors influencing emissions from tractors and construction equipment during realistic work operations using diesel fuel and bio-fuels as substitute. Biosystems Engineering, 107(2): 123–130
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Lv L, Ge Y, Ji Z, Tan J, Wang X, Hao L, Wang Z, Zhang M, Wang C, Liu H (2020). Regulated emission characteristics of in-use LNG and diesel semi-trailer towing vehicles under real driving conditions using PEMS. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 88: 155–164
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[23]
Ma S, Zhang K S, Wang F, Pang K L, Zhu Y J, Li Z, Mao H M, Hu B M, Yang J J, Wang B (2019). Characterization of tailpipe emissions from in-use excavators. Environmental Sciences (Ruse), 40(4): 1670–1679 (in Chinese)
Pubmed
[24]
Mamakos A, Bonnel P, Perujo A, Carriero M (2013). Assessment of portable emission measurement systems (PEMS) for heavy-duty diesel engines with respect to particulate matter. Journal of Aerosol Science, 57: 54–70
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
MEE PCR (Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China) (2014). National guideline for emission inventory development for off-road equipment in China. Available online at http://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgg/201501/W020150107594587960717.pdf (accessed February 4, 2021) (in Chinese)
[26]
MEE PCR (Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China) (2020). China Vehicle Environmental Management Annual Report. Available online at http://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/sthjzk/ydyhjgl/202008/P020200811521365906550.pdf (accessed April 4, 2021) (in Chinese)
[27]
Pang K, Zhang K, Ma S (2021). Tailpipe emission characterizations of diesel-fueled forklifts under real-world operations using a portable emission measurement system. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 100: 34–42
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[28]
Pirjola L, Rönkkö T, Saukko E, Parviainen H, Malinen A, Alanen J, Saveljeff H (2017). Exhaust emissions of non-road mobile machine: Real-world and laboratory studies with diesel and HVO fuels. Fuel, 202: 154–164
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Sandanayake M, Zhang G, Setunge S, Malcolm C M (2015). Environmental emissions of construction equipment usage in pile foundation construction process—A case study. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, Heidelberg.Berlin: Springer Press, 327–339
[30]
THU (Tsinghua university) (2012). Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China (MEIC). Available online at http://www.meicmodel.org/dataset–meic.html (accessed February 4, 2021) (in Chinese)
[31]
US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2005). User’s Guide for the Final NONROAD2005 Model. Washington, DC:USEPA
[32]
US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2014). Profile of the 2011 National Air Emissions Inventory (NEI). Available online at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018–06/documents/lite_finalversion_ver10.pdf (accessed February 4, 2021)
[33]
Vojtisek-Lom M, Allsop J E (2001). Development of heavy-duty diesel portable, on-board mass exhaust emissions monitoring system with NOx, CO2, and qualitative capabilities (No.2001–01–3641). In: SAE International Fall Fuels & Lubricants Meeting & Exhibition. SAE Technical Paper
[34]
Xia Z Q (2017). Study on Characteristics of Gaseous and Particulate Emission from Non-road Diesel Vehicles on Real-world Conditions. Dissertation for the Master’s Degree.Guangzhou: South China University of Technology (in Chinese)
[35]
Yan F, Winijkul E, Streets D G, Lu Z, Bond T C, Zhang Y (2014). Global emission projections for the transportation sector using dynamic technology modelling. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14(11): 5709–5733
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Ye X, Li C, Xia Z Q, Wang Y L, Bian Y H, Xiao X, Liao S D, Zheng J Y (2018). Characteristics of gaseous pollutants and fine particulates from diesel forklifts. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 38(4): 1392–1403 (in Chinese)
[37]
Zavala M, Huertas J I, Prato D, Jazcilevich A, Aguilar A, Balam M, Misra C, Molina L T (2017). Real-world emissions of in-use off-road vehicles in Mexico. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 67(9): 958–972
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[38]
Zhang K (2006). Micro-scale On-road Vehicle-specific Emissions Measurements and Modeling. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Raleigh: North Carolina State University

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the members of Atmospheric Modeling and Environmental Data Analysis research group at Sichuan University for their helps in real-world emission measurements in this study. This work was supported by the Public Environmental Service Project of the Ministry of Environmental Protection of PRC (No. 201409012) and the Research Project of the Bureau of Science and Technology of Sichuan (No. 2019YFS0498). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsor and the university.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2022 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(2176 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/