Moving policy and regulation forward for single-use plastic alternatives
Wenbing Tan, Dongyu Cui, Beidou Xi
Moving policy and regulation forward for single-use plastic alternatives
Single-use plastics are often used once or cannot be reused for extended periods. They are widely consumed with the rapid development of social economy. The waste generated by single-use plastics threatens ecosystem health by entering the environment and ultimately restricts sustainable human development. The innovation of sustainable and environmentally friendly single-use plastic alternative materials and the joint participation of governments, enterprises and the public are promising technologies and management approaches that can solve the problem of single-use plastics wastes. The development of single-use plastic alternative products can be promoted fundamentally only by improving relevant legislation and standards, providing differentiated industrial policies, encouraging scientific and technological innovation and expanding public participation.
Single-use plastic alternatives / Policy / Regulation / Sustainable development
[1] |
Ahamed A, Vallam P, Iyer N S, Veksha A, Bobacka J, Lisak G (2021). Life cycle assessment of plastic grocery bags and their alternatives in cities with confined waste management structure: A Singapore case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278: 123956
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Chen Y, Awasthi A K, Wei F, Tan Q, Li J (2021). Single-use plastics: Production, usage, disposal, and adverse impacts. Science of the Total Environment, 752: 141772
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Golwala H, Zhang X, Iskander S M, Smith A L (2021). Solid waste: An overlooked source of microplastics to the environment. Science of the Total Environment, 769: 144581
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Haider T, Völker C, Kramm J, Landfester K, Wurm F R (2019). Plastics of the future? The impact of biodegradable polymers on the environment and on society. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 58(1): 50–62
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Li Z, Zhao F (2017). An analytical hierarchy process-based study on the factors affecting legislation on plastic bags in the USA. Waste Management & Research, 35(8): 795–809
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Mohanan N, Montazer Z, Sharma P K, Levin D B (2020). Microbial and enzymatic degradation of synthetic plastics. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11: 580709
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Napper I E, Thompson R C (2019). Environmental deterioration of biodegradable, oxo-biodegradable, compostable, and conventional plastic carrier bags in the sea, soil, and open-air over a 3-year period. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(9): 4775–4783
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Plastic Oceans (2020). The facts “more than 8 million tons of plastic are dumped in our oceans every year”.https://plasticoceans.org/the-facts/
|
[9] |
Plastics Europe (2020). Plastics – The Facts 2020: An Analysis of European Plastics Production, Demand and Waste Data (Plastics Europe 2019)
|
[10] |
Rujnić-Sokele M, Pilipović A (2017). Challenges and opportunities of biodegradable plastics: A mini review. Waste Management & Research, 35(2): 132–140
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Shen M, Song B, Zeng G, Zhang Y, Huang W, Wen X, Tang W (2020). Are biodegradable plastics a promising solution to solve the global plastic pollution? Environmental Pollution, 263: 114469
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Wang L, Wu W, Bolan N S, Tsang D C W, Li Y, Qin M, Hou D (2021). Environmental fate, toxicity and risk management strategies of nanoplastics in the environment: Current status and future perspectives. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 401: 123415
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Wang Z, Huo J, Duan Y (2020). The impact of government incentives and penalties on willingness to recycle plastic waste: An evolutionary game theory perspective. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(2): 29
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Wu W M, Criddle G S (2021). Characterization of biodegradation of plastics in insect larvae. Methods in Enzymology, 648: 95–120
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |