Effective remediation of organic-metal co-contaminated soil by enhanced electrokinetic-bioremediation process

Fu Chen, Qi Zhang, Jing Ma, Qianlin Zhu, Yifei Wang, Huagen Liang

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6) : 113.

PDF(566 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. All Journals
PDF(566 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6) : 113. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-021-1401-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effective remediation of organic-metal co-contaminated soil by enhanced electrokinetic-bioremediation process

Author information +
History +

Highlights

• A new EK-BIO technology was developed to decontaminate e-waste contaminated soil.

• Adding sodium citrate in electrolyte was a good choice for decontaminating the soil.

• The system has good performance with low cost.

Abstract

This work investigates the influence of electrokinetic-bioremediation (EK-BIO) on remediating soil polluted by persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and heavy metals (mainly Cu, Pb and Ni), originated from electronic waste recycling activity. The results demonstrate that most of POPs and metals were removed from the soil. More than 60% of metals and 90% of POPs in the soil were removed after a 30-day EK-BIO remediation assisted by citrate. A citrate sodium concentration of 0.02 g/L was deemed to be suitable because higher citrate did not significantly improve treatment performance whereas increasing dosage consumption. Citrate increased soil electrical current and electroosmotic flow. After remediation, metal residues mainly existed in stable and low-toxic states, which could effectively lower the potential hazard of toxic metals to the surrounding environment and organisms. EK-BIO treatment influenced soil microbial counts, dehydrogenase activity and community structure.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Electrokinetic / Co-contamination / Debromination

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Fu Chen, Qi Zhang, Jing Ma, Qianlin Zhu, Yifei Wang, Huagen Liang. Effective remediation of organic-metal co-contaminated soil by enhanced electrokinetic-bioremediation process. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 113 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1401-y
This is a preview of subscription content, contact us for subscripton.

References

[1]
Acar Y B, Alshawabkeh A N (1993). Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environmental Science & Technology, 27(13): 2638–2647
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Cappuyns V, Swennen R, Niclaes M (2007). Application of the BCR sequential extraction scheme to dredged pond sediments contaminated by Pd-Zn mining: A combined geochemical and mineralogical approach. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 93(2): 78–90
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Chen F, Li X, Ma J, Qu J, Yang Y, Zhang S (2019). Remediation of soil co-contaminated with decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) and copper by enhanced electrokinetics-persulfate process. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 369: 448–455
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Dong Z, Huang W, Xing D, Zhang H (2013). Remediation of soil co-contaminated with petroleum and heavy metals by the integration of electrokinetics and biostimulation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 260: 399–408
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Gomes H I, Dias-Ferreira C, Ribeiro A B (2012). Electrokinetic remediation of organochlorines in soil: Enhancement techniques and integration with other remediation technologies. Chemosphere, 87(10): 1077–1090
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Han R, Dai H, Yang C, Wei S, Xu L, Yang W, Dou X (2018). Enhanced phytoremediation of cadmium and/or benzo (a) pyrene contaminated soil by hyperaccumlator Solanum nigrum L. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 20(9): 862–868
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Hassan I, Mohamedelhassan E, Yanful E K, Yuan Z C (2016). A review article: electrokinetic bioremediation current knowledge and new prospects. Advances in Microbiology, 06(01): 57–72
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Kakosová E, Hrabák P, Černík M, Novotný V, Czinnerová M, Trögl J, Popelka J, Kuráň P, Zoubková L, Vrtoch L (2017). Effect of various chemical oxidation agents on soil microbial communities. Chemical Engineering Journal, 314: 257–265
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Li F, Guo S, Wang S, Zhao M (2020). Changes of microbial community and activity under different electric fields during electro-bioremediation of PAH-contaminated soil. Chemosphere, 254: 126880
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Li H, Li X, Xiang L, Zhao H M, Li Y W, Cai Q Y, Zhu L, Mo C, Wong M H (2018). Phytoremediation of soil co-contaminated with Cd and BDE-209 using hyperaccumulator enhanced by AM fungi and surfactant. Science of the Total Environment, 613-614: 447–455
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Li Y, Yin Y, Liu G, Tachiev G, Roelant D, Jiang G, Cai Y (2012). Estimation of the major source and sink of methylmercury in the Florida Everglades. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(11): 5885–5893
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Lorenz P B (1969). Surface conductance and electrokinetic properties of kaolinite beds. Clays and Clay Minerals, 17(4): 223–231
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Lu M, Zhang Z, Sun S, Wang Q, Zhong W (2009). Enhanced degradation of bioremediation residues in petroleum-contaminated soil using a two-liquid phase bioslurry reactor. Chemosphere, 77(2): 161–168
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Lu M, Zhang Z, Wang J, Zhang M, Xu Y, Wu X (2014). Interaction of heavy metals and pyrene on their fates in soil and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). Environmental Science & Technology, 48(2): 1158–1165
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Ma J, Zhang Q, Chen F, Zhu Q, Wang Y, Liu G (2020). Remediation of resins-contaminated soil by the combination of electrokinetic and bioremediation processes. Environmental Pollution, 260: 114047
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Mahanta M J, Bhattacharyya K G (2011). Total concentrations, fractionation and mobility of heavy metals in soils of urban area of Guwahati, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 173(1-4): 221–240
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Naghipour D, Gharibi H, Taghavi K, Jaafari J (2016). Influence of EDTA and NTA on heavy metal extraction from sandy-loam contaminated soils. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 4(3): 3512–3518
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Nowack B (2002). Environmental chemistry of aminopolycarboxylate chelating agents. Environmental Science & Technology, 36(19): 4009–4016
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Pletcher D, Greff R, Peat R (2010). The electrical double layer. In: Instrumental Methods in Electrochemistry. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing lnc.
[20]
Pradas del Real A E, García-Gonzalo P, Lobo M C, Pérez-Sanz A (2014). Chromium speciation modifies root exudation in two genotypes of silene vulgaris. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 107: 1–6
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Ramadan B S, Sari G L, Rosmalina R T, Effendi A J, Hadrah (2018). An overview of electrokinetic soil flushing and its effect on bioremediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soil. Journal of Environmental Management, 218: 309–321
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Salzberg H W (1983). Gmelins Handbook of Inorganic Chemistry. Berlin: Spinger-Verlag
[23]
Sharma H D, Reddy K R (2004). Geoenvironmental Engineering. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[24]
Song Y, Ammami M, Benamar A, Mezazigh S, Wang H (2016). Effect of EDTA, EDDS, NTA and citric acid on electrokinetic remediation of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn contaminated dredged marine sediment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 23(11): 10577–10586
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Suanon F, Sun Q, Dimon B, Mama D, Yu C P (2016). Heavy metal removal from sludge with organic chelators: comparative study of N,N-bis (carboxymethyl) glutamic acid and citric acid. Journal of Environmental Management, 166: 341–347
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Tang W, Sun L, Shu L, Wang C (2020). Evaluating heavy metal contamination of riverine sediment cores in different land-use areas. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(6): 104
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Uddin M K (2017). A review on the adsorption of heavy metals by clay minerals, with special focus on the past decade. Chemical Engineering Journal, 308: 438–462
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Virkutyte J, Sillanpää M, Latostenmaa P (2002). Electrokinetic soil remediation-critical overview. Science of the Total Environment, 289(1-3): 97–121
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Wang S, Guo S, Li F, Yang X, Teng F, Wang J (2016). Effect of alternating bioremediation and electrokinetics on the remediation of n-hexadecane-contaminated soil. Scientific Reports, 6(1): 23833
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Weng C H, Yuan C (2001). Removal of Cr (III) from clay soils by electrokinetics. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 23(3): 281–285
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Yao Z, Xing J, Gu H, Wang H, Wu J, Xu J, Brookes P C (2016). Development of microbial community structure in vegetable-growing soils from open-field to plastic-greenhouse cultivation based on the PLFA analysis. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 16(8): 2041–2049
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Zhang M, Guo S, Li F, Wu B (2017). Distribution of ion contents and microorganisms during the electro-bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated saline soil. Journal of Environmental Science & Health Part A, 52(12): 1141–1149
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51974313 and 41907405) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20180641).

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1401-y and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(566 KB)

Supplementary files

FSE-20178-OF-CF_suppl_1 (68 KB)

4002

Accesses

17

Citations

1

Altmetric

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/