Effect of current density on groundwater arsenite removal performance using air cathode electrocoagulation
Yanxiao Si, Fang Zhang, Hong Chen, Guanghe Li, Haichuan Zhang, Dun Liu
Effect of current density on groundwater arsenite removal performance using air cathode electrocoagulation
• With the same charge, current density had little effect on As(III) removal in ACEC.
• ACEC had the lowest energy consumption compared with EC/O2 or EC/N2.
• There was a trade-off relationship between energy consumption and removal time.
• The ·OH concentration in ACEC was 1.5 times of that in the EC/O2 system.
Naturally occurring arsenic enrichment in groundwater poses a huge threat to human health. Air cathode electrocoagulation (ACEC) has recently been proposed to enhance As(III) oxidation and lower energy consumption. In this study, ACEC, EC/O2 and EC/N2 were evaluated with different current densities from 1 to 8 mA/cm2 to investigate the effect on As(III) removal in different redox environments. Current density had no appreciable effect on arsenic removal efficiency given the same charge in ACEC because the concentration ratio of Fe/H2O2 under different current densities remained stable. However, in EC/O2 and EC/N2, As(III) removal was inhibited at higher current densities (4–8 mA/cm2), likely because more Fe(II) competed with As(III) for the oxidant, leading to less effective oxidation of As(III). In all EC systems, the ·OH units generated per power consumption reached the highest value at the lowest current density. Compared with other EC systems, the ACEC system showed lower energy consumption at all current densities due to the low energy consumption of the electrode reaction and more free radical generation. A lower current density saved more energy at the expense of time, showing the trade-off relationship between energy consumption and removal time. The operation costs for As(III) removal under optimal conditions were calculated as 0.028 $/m3 for ACEC, 0.030 $/m3 for EC/O2, and 0.085 $/m3 for EC/N2
Electrocoagulation / Air cathode / Arsenic / Current density / Energy consumption
[1] |
Abdelwahab O, Amin N K, El-Ashtoukhy E S Z (2009). Electrochemical removal of phenol from oil refinery wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 163(2–3): 711–716
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Al-Shannag M, Al-Qodah Z, Bani-Melhem K, Qtaishat M R, Alkasrawi M (2015). Heavy metal ions removal from metal plating wastewater using electrocoagulation: Kinetic study and process performance. Chemical Engineering Journal, 260(Suppl. C): 749–756
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Arar O, Kabay N, Sanchez J, Rivas B L, Bryjak M, Pena C (2014). Removal of arsenic from water by combination of electro-oxidation and polymer enhanced ultrafiltration. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 33(3): 918–924
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Balasubramanian N, Kojima T, Basha C A, Srinivasakannan C (2009). Removal of arsenic from aqueous solution using electrocoagulation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 167(1–3): 966–969
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Barazesh J M, Hennebel T, Jasper J T, Sedlak D L (2015). Modular advanced oxidation process enabled by cathodic hydrogen peroxide production. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(12): 7391–7399
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Bayar S, Yıldız Y Ş, Yılmaz A E, İrdemez Ş (2011). The effect of stirring speed and current density on removal efficiency of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater by electrocoagulation method. Desalination, 280(1–3): 103–107
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Can B Z, Boncukcuoglu R, Yilmaz A E, Fil B A (2014). Effect of some operational parameters on the arsenic removal by electrocoagulation using iron electrodes. Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering, 12(1): 95
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Changmai M, Pasawan M, Purkait M K (2019). Treatment of oily wastewater from drilling site using electrocoagulation followed by microfiltration. Separation and Purification Technology, 210: 463–472
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Eisenberg G M (1943). Colorimetric determination of hydrogen peroxide. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry (Analytical Edition), 15(5): 327–328
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
He D, Ma J X, Collins R N, Waite T D (2016). Effect of structural transformation of nanoparticulate zero-valent iron on generation of reactive oxygen species. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(7): 3820–3828
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Holt P K, Barton G W, Wark M, Mitchell C A (2002). A quantitative comparison between chemical dosing and electrocoagulation. Colloids and Surfaces. A, Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 211(2–3): 233–248
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Jiang J, Li G, Li Z, Zhang X, Zhang F (2016). An Fe-Mn binary oxide (FMBO) modified electrode for effective electrochemical advanced oxidation at neutral pH. Electrochimica Acta, 194: 104–109
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Kobya M, Gebologlu U, Ulu F, Oncel S, Demirbas E (2011). Removal of arsenic from drinking water by the electrocoagulation using Fe and Al electrodes. Electrochimica Acta, 56(14): 5060–5070
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Kobya M, Ozyonar F, Demirbas E, Sik E, Oncel M S (2015). Arsenic removal from groundwater of Sivas-Şarkişla Plain, Turkey by electrocoagulation process: comparing with iron plate and ball electrodes. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 3(2): 1096–1106
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Li F, Guo H, Zhou X, Zhao K, Shen J, Liu F, Wei C (2017). Impact of natural organic matter on arsenic removal by modified granular natural siderite: Evidence of ternary complex formation by HPSEC-UV-ICP-MS. Chemosphere, 168: 777–785
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Li L, van Genuchten C M, Addy S E A, Yao J, Gao N, Gadgil A J (2012). Modeling As(III) oxidation and removal with iron electrocoagulation in groundwater. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(21): 12038–12045
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Martínez-Villafañe J F, Montero-Ocampo C, Garcia-Lara A M (2009). Energy and electrode consumption analysis of electrocoagulation for the removal of arsenic from underground water. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 172(2–3): 1617–1622
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Moussa D T, El-Naas M H, Nasser M, Al-Marri M J (2017). A comprehensive review of electrocoagulation for water treatment: Potentials and challenges. Journal of Environmental Management, 186(Part 1): 24–41
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Murthy Z V P, Parmar S (2011). Removal of strontium by electrocoagulation using stainless steel and aluminum electrodes. Desalination, 282: 63–67
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Nickson R, McArthur J, Burgess W, Ahmed K M, Ravenscroft P, Rahmann M (1998). Arsenic poisoning of Bangladesh groundwater. Nature, 395(6700): 338–338
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Ozyonar F, Bunyamin K (2011). Operating cost analysis and treatment of domestic wastewater by electrocoagulation using aluminum electrodes. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 20(1): 173–179
|
[22] |
Ozyonar F, Karagozoglu B (2014). Investigation of technical and economic analysis of electrocoagulation process for the treatment of great and small cattle slaughterhouse wastewater. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52(1–3): 74–87
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Ozyonar F, Karagozoglu B
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Ozyonar F, Sümeyye A (2016). Removal of salicylic acid from aqueous solutions using various electrodes and different connection modes by electrocoagulation. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 11: 3680–3696
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Shi W, Zhu L, Chen Q, Lu J, Pan G, Hu L, Yi Q (2017). Synergy of flocculation and flotation for microalgae harvesting using aluminium electrolysis. Bioresource Technology, 233(Suppl. C): 127–133
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Si Y, Li G, Wu Y, Zhang H, Yuan Y, Zhang H, Liu B, Zhang F (2018). Tradeoff between groundwater arsenite removal efficiency and current production in the self-powered air cathode electrocoagulation with different oxygen reduction pathways. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 357: 138–145
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Si Y, Li G, Zhang F (2017). Energy-efficient oxidation and removal of arsenite from groundwater using air-cathode iron electrocoagulation. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 4(2): 71–75
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Tai C, Peng J F, Liu J F, Jiang G B, Zou H (2004). Determination of hydroxyl radicals in advanced oxidation processes with dimethyl sulfoxide trapping and liquid chromatography. Analytica Chimica Acta, 527(1): 73–80
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
van Genuchten C M, Peña J (2017). Mn(II) oxidation in Fenton and Fenton type systems: Identification of reaction efficiency and reaction products. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(5): 2982–2991
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Wang Y, Zhao H, Chai S, Wang Y, Zhao G, Li D (2013). Electrosorption enhanced electro-Fenton process for efficient mineralization of imidacloprid based on mixed-valence iron oxide composite cathode at neutral pH. Chemical Engineering Journal, 223(Suppl. C): 524–535
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Xie S, Yuan S, Liao P, Tong M, Gan Y, Wang Y (2017). Iron-anode enhanced sand filter for arsenic removal from tube well water. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(2): 889–896
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Yang B, Han Y, Deng Y, Li Y, Zhuo Q, Wu J (2016). Highly efficient removal of perfluorooctanoic acid from aqueous solution by H2O2-enhanced electrocoagulation-electroflotation technique. Emerging Contaminants, 2(1): 49–55
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Yang W, He W, Zhang F, Hickner M A, Logan B E (2014). Single-step fabrication using a phase inversion method of poly (vinylidene fluoride)(PVDF) activated carbon air cathodes for microbial fuel cells. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 1(10): 416–420
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |