Effect of current density on groundwater arsenite removal performance using air cathode electrocoagulation

Yanxiao Si, Fang Zhang, Hong Chen, Guanghe Li, Haichuan Zhang, Dun Liu

PDF(1250 KB)
PDF(1250 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6) : 112. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-021-1399-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of current density on groundwater arsenite removal performance using air cathode electrocoagulation

Author information +
History +

Highlights

• With the same charge, current density had little effect on As(III) removal in ACEC.

• ACEC had the lowest energy consumption compared with EC/O2 or EC/N2.

• There was a trade-off relationship between energy consumption and removal time.

• The ·OH concentration in ACEC was 1.5 times of that in the EC/O2 system.

Abstract

Naturally occurring arsenic enrichment in groundwater poses a huge threat to human health. Air cathode electrocoagulation (ACEC) has recently been proposed to enhance As(III) oxidation and lower energy consumption. In this study, ACEC, EC/O2 and EC/N2 were evaluated with different current densities from 1 to 8 mA/cm2 to investigate the effect on As(III) removal in different redox environments. Current density had no appreciable effect on arsenic removal efficiency given the same charge in ACEC because the concentration ratio of Fe/H2O2 under different current densities remained stable. However, in EC/O2 and EC/N2, As(III) removal was inhibited at higher current densities (4–8 mA/cm2), likely because more Fe(II) competed with As(III) for the oxidant, leading to less effective oxidation of As(III). In all EC systems, the ·OH units generated per power consumption reached the highest value at the lowest current density. Compared with other EC systems, the ACEC system showed lower energy consumption at all current densities due to the low energy consumption of the electrode reaction and more free radical generation. A lower current density saved more energy at the expense of time, showing the trade-off relationship between energy consumption and removal time. The operation costs for As(III) removal under optimal conditions were calculated as 0.028 $/m3 for ACEC, 0.030 $/m3 for EC/O2, and 0.085 $/m3 for EC/N2

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Electrocoagulation / Air cathode / Arsenic / Current density / Energy consumption

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yanxiao Si, Fang Zhang, Hong Chen, Guanghe Li, Haichuan Zhang, Dun Liu. Effect of current density on groundwater arsenite removal performance using air cathode electrocoagulation. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 112 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1399-1

References

[1]
Abdelwahab O, Amin N K, El-Ashtoukhy E S Z (2009). Electrochemical removal of phenol from oil refinery wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 163(2–3): 711–716
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Al-Shannag M, Al-Qodah Z, Bani-Melhem K, Qtaishat M R, Alkasrawi M (2015). Heavy metal ions removal from metal plating wastewater using electrocoagulation: Kinetic study and process performance. Chemical Engineering Journal, 260(Suppl. C): 749–756
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Arar O, Kabay N, Sanchez J, Rivas B L, Bryjak M, Pena C (2014). Removal of arsenic from water by combination of electro-oxidation and polymer enhanced ultrafiltration. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 33(3): 918–924
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Balasubramanian N, Kojima T, Basha C A, Srinivasakannan C (2009). Removal of arsenic from aqueous solution using electrocoagulation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 167(1–3): 966–969
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Barazesh J M, Hennebel T, Jasper J T, Sedlak D L (2015). Modular advanced oxidation process enabled by cathodic hydrogen peroxide production. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(12): 7391–7399
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Bayar S, Yıldız Y Ş, Yılmaz A E, İrdemez Ş (2011). The effect of stirring speed and current density on removal efficiency of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater by electrocoagulation method. Desalination, 280(1–3): 103–107
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Can B Z, Boncukcuoglu R, Yilmaz A E, Fil B A (2014). Effect of some operational parameters on the arsenic removal by electrocoagulation using iron electrodes. Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering, 12(1): 95
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Changmai M, Pasawan M, Purkait M K (2019). Treatment of oily wastewater from drilling site using electrocoagulation followed by microfiltration. Separation and Purification Technology, 210: 463–472
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Eisenberg G M (1943). Colorimetric determination of hydrogen peroxide. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry (Analytical Edition), 15(5): 327–328
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
He D, Ma J X, Collins R N, Waite T D (2016). Effect of structural transformation of nanoparticulate zero-valent iron on generation of reactive oxygen species. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(7): 3820–3828
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Holt P K, Barton G W, Wark M, Mitchell C A (2002). A quantitative comparison between chemical dosing and electrocoagulation. Colloids and Surfaces. A, Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 211(2–3): 233–248
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Jiang J, Li G, Li Z, Zhang X, Zhang F (2016). An Fe-Mn binary oxide (FMBO) modified electrode for effective electrochemical advanced oxidation at neutral pH. Electrochimica Acta, 194: 104–109
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Kobya M, Gebologlu U, Ulu F, Oncel S, Demirbas E (2011). Removal of arsenic from drinking water by the electrocoagulation using Fe and Al electrodes. Electrochimica Acta, 56(14): 5060–5070
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Kobya M, Ozyonar F, Demirbas E, Sik E, Oncel M S (2015). Arsenic removal from groundwater of Sivas-Şarkişla Plain, Turkey by electrocoagulation process: comparing with iron plate and ball electrodes. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 3(2): 1096–1106
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Li F, Guo H, Zhou X, Zhao K, Shen J, Liu F, Wei C (2017). Impact of natural organic matter on arsenic removal by modified granular natural siderite: Evidence of ternary complex formation by HPSEC-UV-ICP-MS. Chemosphere, 168: 777–785
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Li L, van Genuchten C M, Addy S E A, Yao J, Gao N, Gadgil A J (2012). Modeling As(III) oxidation and removal with iron electrocoagulation in groundwater. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(21): 12038–12045
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Martínez-Villafañe J F, Montero-Ocampo C, Garcia-Lara A M (2009). Energy and electrode consumption analysis of electrocoagulation for the removal of arsenic from underground water. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 172(2–3): 1617–1622
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Moussa D T, El-Naas M H, Nasser M, Al-Marri M J (2017). A comprehensive review of electrocoagulation for water treatment: Potentials and challenges. Journal of Environmental Management, 186(Part 1): 24–41
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Murthy Z V P, Parmar S (2011). Removal of strontium by electrocoagulation using stainless steel and aluminum electrodes. Desalination, 282: 63–67
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Nickson R, McArthur J, Burgess W, Ahmed K M, Ravenscroft P, Rahmann M (1998). Arsenic poisoning of Bangladesh groundwater. Nature, 395(6700): 338–338
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Ozyonar F, Bunyamin K (2011). Operating cost analysis and treatment of domestic wastewater by electrocoagulation using aluminum electrodes. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 20(1): 173–179
[22]
Ozyonar F, Karagozoglu B (2014). Investigation of technical and economic analysis of electrocoagulation process for the treatment of great and small cattle slaughterhouse wastewater. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52(1–3): 74–87
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Ozyonar F, Karagozoglu B (2015). Treatment of pretreated coke wastewater by electrocoagulation and electrochemical peroxidation processes. Separation and Purification Technology, 150: 268–277
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Ozyonar F, Sümeyye A (2016). Removal of salicylic acid from aqueous solutions using various electrodes and different connection modes by electrocoagulation. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 11: 3680–3696
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Shi W, Zhu L, Chen Q, Lu J, Pan G, Hu L, Yi Q (2017). Synergy of flocculation and flotation for microalgae harvesting using aluminium electrolysis. Bioresource Technology, 233(Suppl. C): 127–133
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Si Y, Li G, Wu Y, Zhang H, Yuan Y, Zhang H, Liu B, Zhang F (2018). Tradeoff between groundwater arsenite removal efficiency and current production in the self-powered air cathode electrocoagulation with different oxygen reduction pathways. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 357: 138–145
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Si Y, Li G, Zhang F (2017). Energy-efficient oxidation and removal of arsenite from groundwater using air-cathode iron electrocoagulation. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 4(2): 71–75
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Tai C, Peng J F, Liu J F, Jiang G B, Zou H (2004). Determination of hydroxyl radicals in advanced oxidation processes with dimethyl sulfoxide trapping and liquid chromatography. Analytica Chimica Acta, 527(1): 73–80
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
van Genuchten C M, Peña J (2017). Mn(II) oxidation in Fenton and Fenton type systems: Identification of reaction efficiency and reaction products. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(5): 2982–2991
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Wang Y, Zhao H, Chai S, Wang Y, Zhao G, Li D (2013). Electrosorption enhanced electro-Fenton process for efficient mineralization of imidacloprid based on mixed-valence iron oxide composite cathode at neutral pH. Chemical Engineering Journal, 223(Suppl. C): 524–535
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Xie S, Yuan S, Liao P, Tong M, Gan Y, Wang Y (2017). Iron-anode enhanced sand filter for arsenic removal from tube well water. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(2): 889–896
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Yang B, Han Y, Deng Y, Li Y, Zhuo Q, Wu J (2016). Highly efficient removal of perfluorooctanoic acid from aqueous solution by H2O2-enhanced electrocoagulation-electroflotation technique. Emerging Contaminants, 2(1): 49–55
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Yang W, He W, Zhang F, Hickner M A, Logan B E (2014). Single-step fabrication using a phase inversion method of poly (vinylidene fluoride)(PVDF) activated carbon air cathodes for microbial fuel cells. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 1(10): 416–420
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42077171), the Special Fund of State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (No. 20Y02ESPCT), the Basic Foresight Project of China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation (JC-2020-KF008). Dr. Fang Zhang would also like to acknowledge the support from Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program by CAST (No. 2015QNRC001).

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1399-1 and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1250 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/