Comparative analysis of impact of human occupancy on indoor microbiomes

Liu Cao, Lu Yang, Clifford S. Swanson, Shuai Li, Qiang He

PDF(696 KB)
PDF(696 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5) : 89. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-020-1383-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparative analysis of impact of human occupancy on indoor microbiomes

Author information +
History +

Highlights

• Exposure to indoor microbiomes is a public health concern in educational facilities.

• Indoor microbiomes were characterized in two multifunctional university buildings.

• Human occupancy had significant impact on the composition of indoor microbiomes.

• The skin microbiota of occupants represented important sources of indoor microbiomes.

Abstract

Educational facilities serve as community hubs and consequently hotspots for exposure to pathogenic microorganisms. Therefore, it is of critical importance to understand processes shaping the indoor microbiomes in educational facilities to protect public health by reducing potential exposure risks of students and the broader community. In this study, the indoor surface bacterial microbiomes were characterized in two multifunctional university buildings with contrasting levels of human occupancy, of which one was recently constructed with minimal human occupancy while the other had been in full operation for six years. Higher levels of human occupancy in the older building were shown to result in greater microbial abundance in the indoor environment and greater proportion of the indoor surface bacterial microbiomes contributed from human-associated microbiota, particularly the skin microbiota. It was further revealed that human-associated microbiota had greater influence on the indoor surface bacterial microbiomes in areas of high occupancy than areas of low occupancy. Consistent with minimal impact from human occupancy in a new construction, the indoor microbiomes in the new building exhibited significantly lower influence from human-associated microbiota than in the older building, with microbial taxa originating from soil and plants representing the dominant constituents of the indoor surface bacterial microbiomes. In contrast, microbial taxa in the older building with extensive human occupancy were represented by constituents of the human microbiota, likely from occupants. These findings provide insights into processes shaping the indoor microbiomes which will aid the development of effective strategies to control microbial exposure risks of occupants in educational facilities.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Built environment / Indoor microbiome / Occupant / Building / Sequencing

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Liu Cao, Lu Yang, Clifford S. Swanson, Shuai Li, Qiang He. Comparative analysis of impact of human occupancy on indoor microbiomes. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(5): 89 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1383-1

References

[1]
Adams R I, Bateman A C, Bik H M, Meadow J F (2015). Microbiota of the indoor environment: A meta-analysis. Microbiome, 3: 49
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Al Atrouni A, Joly-Guillou M L, Hamze M, Kempf M (2016). Reservoirs of non-baumannii Acinetobacter species. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7: 49
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Allen J G, Marr L C (2020). Recognizing and controlling airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in indoor environments. Indoor Air, 30(4): 557–558
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
An S Q, Berg G (2018). Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Trends in Microbiology, 26(7): 637–638
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Baird‐Parker A C (1990). The staphylococci: An introduction. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 69: 1S–8S
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Bell K S, Philp J C, Aw D W J, Christofi N (1998). The genus Rhodococcus. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 85(2): 195–210
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Ben Maamar S, Hu J, Hartmann E M (2020). Implications of indoor microbial ecology and evolution on antibiotic resistance. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 30(1): 1–15
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
de Carvalho C C C R, da Fonseca M M R (2005). The remarkable Rhodococcus erythropolis. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 67(6): 715–726
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Gilbert J A, Stephens B (2018). Microbiology of the built environment. Nature Reviews. Microbiology, 16(11): 661–670
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Graham J E, Moore J E, Jiru X U, Moore J E, Goodall E A, Dooley J S, Hayes V E, Dartt D A, Downes C S, Moore T C (2007). Ocular pathogen or commensal: a PCR-based study of surface bacterial flora in normal and dry eyes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 48(12): 5616–5623
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Hayward A C, Fegan N, Fegan M, Stirling G R (2010). Stenotrophomonas and Lysobacter: Ubiquitous plant-associated gamma-proteobacteria of developing significance in applied microbiology. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 108(3): 756–770
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Hewitt K M, Gerba C P, Maxwell S L, Kelley S T (2012). Office space bacterial abundance and diversity in three metropolitan areas. PLoS One, 7(5): e37849
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Hirai Y (1991). Survival of bacteria under dry conditions; from a viewpoint of nosocomial infection. Journal of Hospital Infection, 19(3): 191–200
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Hoisington A, Maestre J P, Kinney K A, Siegel J A (2016). Characterizing the bacterial communities in retail stores in the United States. Indoor Air, 26(6): 857–868
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Kembel S W, Jones E, Kline J, Northcutt D, Stenson J, Womack A M, Bohannan B J, Brown G Z, Green J L (2012). Architectural design influences the diversity and structure of the built environment microbiome. ISME Journal, 6(8): 1469–1479
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Kembel S W, Meadow J F, O’Connor T K, Mhuireach G, Northcutt D, Kline J, Moriyama M, Brown G Z, Bohannan B J M, Green J L (2014). Architectural design drives the biogeography of indoor bacterial communities. PLoS One, 9(1): e87093
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Klepeis N E, Nelson W C, Ott W R, Robinson J P, Tsang A M, Switzer P, Behar J V, Hern S C, Engelmann W H (2001). The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 11(3): 231–252
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Knights D, Kuczynski J, Charlson E S, Zaneveld J, Mozer M C, Collman R G, Bushman F D, Knight R, Kelley S T (2011). Bayesian community-wide culture-independent microbial source tracking. Nature Methods, 8(9): 761–763
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Krismer B, Weidenmaier C, Zipperer A, Peschel A (2017). The commensal lifestyle of Staphylococcus aureus and its interactions with the nasal microbiota. Nature Reviews. Microbiology, 15(11): 675–687
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Lax S, Gilbert J A (2015). Hospital-associated microbiota and implications for nosocomial infections. Trends in Molecular Medicine, 21(7): 427–432
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Lax S, Nagler C R, Gilbert J A (2015). Our interface with the built environment: immunity and the indoor microbiota. Trends in Immunology, 36(3): 121–123
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Lax S, Smith D P, Hampton-Marcell J, Owens S M, Handley K M, Scott N M, Gibbons S M, Larsen P, Shogan B D, Weiss S, Metcalf J L, Ursell L K, Vazquez-Baeza Y, Van Treuren W, Hasan N A, Gibson M K, Colwell R, Dantas G, Knight R, Gilbert J A (2014). Longitudinal analysis of microbial interaction between humans and the indoor environment. Science, 345(6200): 1048–1052
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Masson-Boivin C, Giraud E, Perret X, Batut J (2009). Establishing nitrogen-fixing symbiosis with legumes: how many rhizobium recipes? Trends in Microbiology, 17(10): 458–466
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Meadow J F, Altrichter A E, Kembel S W, Moriyama M, O’Connor T K, Womack A M, Brown G Z, Green J L, Bohannan B J (2014). Bacterial communities on classroom surfaces vary with human contact. Microbiome, 2: 7
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Reasoner D J (2004). Heterotrophic plate count methodology in the United States. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 92(3): 307–315
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Rodrigues C J C, de Carvalho C C C R (2015). Rhodococcus erythropolis cells adapt their fatty acid composition during biofilm formation on metallic and non-metallic surfaces. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 91(12): fiv135
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Rose L, Jensen B, Peterson A, Banerjee S N, Arduino M J (2004). Swab materials and Bacillus anthracis spore recovery from nonporous surfaces. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 10(6): 1023–1029
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Ryan R P, Monchy S, Cardinale M, Taghavi S, Crossman L, Avison M B, Berg G, Van Der Lelie D, Dow J M (2009). The versatility and adaptation of bacteria from the genus Stenotrophomonas. Nature Reviews. Microbiology, 7(7): 514–525
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Sawada H, Kuykendall L D, Young J M (2003). Changing concepts in the systematics of bacterial nitrogen-fixing legume symbionts. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, 49(3): 155–179
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Sbihi H, Boutin R C, Cutler C, Suen M, Finlay B B, Turvey S E (2019). Thinking bigger: How early-life environmental exposures shape the gut microbiome and influence the development of asthma and allergic disease. Allergy, 74(11): 2103–2115
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Schweizer C, Edwards R D, Bayer-Oglesby L, Gauderman W J, Ilacqua V, Juhani MJantunen H K, Lai M, Nieuwenhuijsen N, Künzli (2007). Indoor time–microenvironment–activity patterns in seven regions of Europe. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 17(2): 170–181
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Song L, Wang C, Wang Y (2020). Optimized determination of airborne tetracycline resistance genes in laboratory atmosphere. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 14(6): 95
[33]
Towner K J (2009). Acinetobacter: an old friend, but a new enemy. Journal of Hospital Infection, 73(4): 355–363
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Treu L, Kougias P G, de Diego-Díaz B, Campanaro S, Bassani I, Fernández-Rodríguez J, Angelidaki I (2018). Two-year microbial adaptation during hydrogen-mediated biogas upgrading process in a serial reactor configuration. Bioresource Technology, 264: 140–147
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
US Census Bureau (2018). Classrooms More Racially and Ethnically Diverse. Suitland,: US Census Bureau
[36]
Wyckoff K N, Chen S, Steinman A J, He Q (2017). Impact of roadway stormwater runoff on microbial contamination in the receiving stream. Journal of Environmental Quality, 46(5): 1065–1071
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by US National Science Foundation awards 1952140 and 2026719. Any opinions, findings, recommendations, and conclusions in this paper are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF and the University of Tennessee, Knoxville of USA.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(696 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/