Characterising populations living close to intensive farming and composting facilities in England

Philippa Douglas, Daniela Fecht, Deborah Jarvis

PDF(615 KB)
PDF(615 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3) : 40. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-020-1332-z
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Characterising populations living close to intensive farming and composting facilities in England

Author information +
History +

Highlights

• Bioaerosol emitted from farming and composting facilities may pose health risks.

• We describe population characteristics around these sites and infer public concern.

• Sites were mapped and overlaid with population, demographic and school data.

• Approximately 16% of the population and 15% of schools are located near these sites.

• More community health studies need to be conducted around these sites.

Abstract

Bioaerosol exposure has been linked to adverse respiratory conditions. Intensive farming and composting facilities are important anthropogenic sources of bioaerosols. We aimed to characterise populations living close to intensive farming and composting facilities. We also infer whether the public are becoming more concerned about anthropogenic bioaerosol emissions, using reports of air pollution related incidents attributed to facilities. We mapped the location of 1,257 intensive farming and 310 composting facilities in England in relation to the resident population and its characteristics (sex and age), area characteristics (deprivation proxy and rural/urban classification) and school locations stratified by pre-defined distance bands from these bioaerosol sources. We also calculated the average number of air pollution related incidents per year per facility. We found that more than 16% of the population and 15% of schools are located within 4,828 m of an intensive farming facility or 4,000 m of a composting facility; few people (0.01%) live very close to these sites and tend to be older people. Close to composting facilities, populations are more likely to be urban and more deprived. The number of incidents were attributed to a small proportion of facilities; population characteristics around these facilities were similar. Results indicate that populations living near composting facilities (particularly>250 to≤4,000 m) are mostly located in urban areas (80%–88% of the population), which supports the need for more community health studies to be conducted. Results could also be used to inform risk management strategies at facilities with higher numbers of incidents.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Composting / Intensive farming / Bioaerosol / Population characteristics / Public health

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Philippa Douglas, Daniela Fecht, Deborah Jarvis. Characterising populations living close to intensive farming and composting facilities in England. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(3): 40 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1332-z

References

[1]
Allergy U K (2020). Allergy prevalence: Useful facts and figures. Available online at the website www.allergyuk.org/assets/000/001/369/Stats_for_Website_original.pdf?1505209830 (accessed March 31, 2020)
[2]
Asthma U K (2020). Asthma facts and statistics. Available online at the website www.asthma.org.uk/about/media/facts-and-statistics/ (accessed March 31, 2020)
[3]
Brooks J P, Gerba CBioaerosol contamination of produce: Potential issues from an unexplored contaminent route (2014). In: Matthews K R, Sapers G M, Gerba, C P, eds. The Produce Contamination Problem. Causes and solutions. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press
[4]
Carstairs V, Morris R (1989). Deprivation: Explaining differences in mortality between Scotland and England and Wales. British Medical Journal, 299(6704): 886–889
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Chief Medical Officer (2018). Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer 2017. Available online at the website www.gov.uk/government/publications/chief-medical-officer-annual-report-2017-health-impacts-of-all-pollution-what-do-we-know (accessed March 31, 2020).
[6]
Cloke P, Milbourne P, Thomas C (1997). Living lives in different ways? Deprivation, marginalization and changing lifestyles in rural England. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 22: 210–230
[7]
Defra (2019). Department of Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs. Fuel Poverty Statistics. Available online at the website www.gov.uk/government/statistics/fuel-energy-and-fuel-poverty-in-rural-areas (accessed March 31, 2020)
[8]
Douglas P, Bakolis I, Fecht D, Pearson C, Leal Sanzhez M, Kinnersley R, De Hoogh K, Hansell A L (2016). Respiratory hospital admission risk near large composting facilities. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 219(4–5): 372–379
[9]
Douglas P, Robertson S, Gay R, Hansell A L, Gant T W (2018). A systematic review of the public health risks of bioaerosols from intensive farming. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 221(2): 134–173
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Douwes J, Thorne P, Pearce N, Heederik D (2003). Bioaerosol health effects and exposure assessment: progress and prospects. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 47(3): 187–200
[11]
Environment Agency (2014). Waste Exemption: T23 Aerobic Composting and Associated Prior Treatment. Available online at the website www.gov.uk/guidance/waste-exemption-t23-aerobic-composting-and-associated-prior-treatment (accessed March 31, 2020)
[12]
Environment Agency Publication Environment Agency (2018a). England: Effective permits for an Installation Activity as at end December 2017. Environment Agency Publication
[13]
Environment Agency (2018b). Permitted composting activities and non-effective composting sites in England- End December 2017. Environment Agency Publication
[14]
Environment Agency (2018c). Guidance. Bioaerosol monitoring at regulated facilities – use of M9: RPS 209. Available online at the website www.gov.uk/government/publications/bioaerosol-monitoring-at-regulated-facilities-use-of-m9-rps-209/bioaerosol-monitoring-at-regulated-facilities-use-of-m9-rps-209 (accessed September 7, 2020)
[15]
Fecht D, Jones A, Hill T, Lindfield T, Thomson R, Hansell A L, Shukla R (2017). Inequalities in rural communities: adapting national deprivation indices for rural settings. Journal of Public Health, 40(2): 419–425
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Feeney P, Rodriguez S F, Molina R, Mcgillicuddy E, Hellebust S, Quirke M, Daly S, O’connor D, Sodeau J (2018). A comparison of on-line and off-line bioaerosol measurements at a biowaste site. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 76: 323–338
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Fröhlich-Nowoisky J, Kampf C J, Weber B, Huffman J A, Pöhlker C, Andreae M O, Lang-Yona N, Burrows S M, Gunthe S S, Elbert W, Su H, Hoor P, Thines E, Hoffmann T, Després V R, Pöschl U (2016). Bioaerosols in the Earth system: Climate, health, and ecosystem interactions. Atmospheric Research, 182: 346–376
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
GOV.UK (2017). Schools in England. Available online at the website www.gov.uk/government/publications/schools-in-england#history (accessed March 31, 2020)
[19]
Gov.Uk (2018). Intensive farming risk assessment for your environmental permit. Available online at the website www.gov.uk/guidance/intensive-farming-risk-assessment-for-your-environmental-permit (accessed April 21, 2020)
[20]
Hoopman M, Hehl O, Niesel F, Werfel T (2006). Associations between Bioaerosols coming from Livestock facilities and Asthmatic Symptoms in Children. Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Ärzte des Öffentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 68(8/9): 575–584
[21]
Huijskens E G W, Smit L a M, Rossen J W A, Heederik D, Koopmans M (2016). Evaluation of Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia Caused by Zoonotic Pathogens in an Area with a High Density of Animal Farms. Zoonoses and Public Health, 63: 160–166
[22]
Lacey J, Dutkiewicz J (1994). Bioaerosols and occupational lung disease. Journal of Aerosol Science, 25(8): 1371–1404
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Mirabelli M C, Wing S, Marshall S W, Wilcosky T C (2006). Asthma symptoms among adolescents who attend public schools that are located near confined swine feeding operations. Pediatrics, 118(1): 66–75
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
ONS (2020a). Office for National Statistics. National population projections: 2018-based. Available online at the website www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationprojections/bulletins/nationalpopulationprojections/2018based (accessed March 31, 2020)
[25]
ONS (2020b). Office for National Statistics. Census geography. Available online at the website www.ons.gov.uk/methodology/geography/ukgeographies/censusgeography#output-area-oa (accessed March 31, 2020)
[26]
ONS (2020c). Office for National Statistics. 2011 rural/urban classification. Available online at the website www.ons.gov.uk/methodology/geography/geographicalproducts/ruralurbanclassifications/2011ruralurbanclassification (accessed March 31, 2020)
[27]
Pankhurst L J, Deacon L J, Liu J, Drew G H, Hayes E T, Jackson S, Longhurst P J, Longhurst J W S, Pollard S J T, Tyrrel S F (2011). Spatial variations in airborne microorganism and endotoxin concentratinos at green waste composting facilities. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 214(5): 376–383
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Pavilonis B T, Sanderson W T, Merchant J A (2013). Relative exposure to swine animal feeding operations and childhood asthma prevalence in an agricultural cohort. Environmental Research, 122: 74–80
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Pawankar R S, Sánchez-Borges M, Bonini S, Kaliner M AThe burden of allergic diseases. (2013). In: Pawankar R, Canonica G W, Holgate S T, Lockey R F, Blaiss M S, eds. World Allergy Organization (WAO) white book on allergy: Update 2013. World Allergy Organization
[30]
Pearson C, Littlewood E, Douglas P, Robertson S, Gant T W, Hansell A L (2015). Exposures and health outcomes in relation to bioaerosol emissions from composting facilities: A systematic review of occupational and community studies. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part B, 18(1): 43–69
[31]
Pepper I L, Dowd S EAeromicrobiology (2009). In: Maier R M, Pepper I L, Gerba C P, eds. Envionmental Microbiology. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press
[32]
Radon K, Schulze A, Ehrenstein V, Van Strien R T, Praml G, Nowak D (2007). Environmental Exposure to Confined Animal Feeding Operations and Respiratory Health of Neighboring Residents. Epidemiology, 18(3): 300–308
[33]
Reinthaler F, Marth E, Eibel U, Enayat U, Feenstra O, Friedl H, Köck M, Pichler-Semmelrock F P, Pridnig G, Schlacher R (1997). The assessment of airborne microorganisms in large-scale composting facilities and their immediate surroundings. Aerobiologia, 13(3): 167–175
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Robertson S, Douglas P, Jarvis D, Marczylo E (2019). Bioaerosol exposure from composting facilities and health outcomes in workers and in the community: A systematic review update. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 222(3): 364–386
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Roca-Barcelo A, Douglas P, Fecht D, Sterrantino A F, Williams B, Blangiardo M, Gulliver J, Hayes E T, Hansell A L (2020). Risk of respiratory hospital admission associated with modelled concentrations of Aspergillus fumigatus from composting facilities in England. Environmental Research, 183: 108949
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Schinasi L, Horton R A, Guidry V T, Wing S, Marshall S W, Morland K B (2011). Air pollution, lung function, and physical symptoms in communities near concentrated swine feeding operations. Epidemiology, 22: 208–215
[37]
Smit L M, Hooiveld M, Van Der Sman-De Beer F, Opstal-Van Winden A W J, Beekhuizen J, Wouters I M, Yzermans C J, Heederik D (2014). Air pollution from livestock farms, and asthma, allergic rhinitis and COPD among neighbouring residents. Occupational Environmental Medicine, 71: 134–140
[38]
Sigurdarson S, Kline J (2006). School proximity to concentrated animal feeding operations and prevalence of Asthma in Students. Chest, 129(6): 1486–1491
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Swan J R M, Kelsey A, Crook B, Gilbert E J (2003). Occupational and Environmental Exposure to Bioaerosols from Composts and Potential Health Effects: A Critical Review of Published Data. London: Health and Safety Executive Publication
[40]
Sykes P, Jones K, Wildsmith J D (2007). Managing the potential public health risks from bioaerosol liberation at commercial composting sites in the UK: An analysis of the evidence base. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(2): 410–424
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Tamer Vestlund A, Al-Ashaab R, Tyrrel S F, Longhurst P J, Pollard S J T, Drew G H (2014). Morphological classification of bioaerosols from composting using scanning electron microscopy. Waste management, 34(7): 1101–1108
[42]
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2010). Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control). Available online at the website eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32010L0075&from=EN (accessed March 31, 2020)
[43]
The Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (2017). UK trends in infectiuos disease. Available online at the website post.parliament.uk/research-briefings/post-pn-0545/ (accessed March 31, 2020)
[44]
Thomas E T, Guppy M, Straus S E, Bell K J L, Glasziou P (2019). Rate of normal lung function decline in ageing adults: A systematic review of prosective cohort studies. BMJ Open, 9(6): e028150
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Walser S M, Gerstner D G, Brenner B, Bunger J, Eikmann T, Janssen B, Kolb S, Kolk A, Nowak D, Raulf M, Sagunski H, Sedlmaier N, Suchenwirth R, Wiesmuller G, Wollin K M, Tesseraux I, Herr C E (2015). Evaluation of exposure-response relationships for health effects of microbial bioaerosols: A systematic review. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 218(7): 577–589
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Wery N (2014). Bioaerosols from composting facilities: A review. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 4(42); 1–9
[47]
Williams B, Douglas P, Roca Barcelo A, Hansell A L, Hayes E (2019). Estimating Aspergillus fumigatus exposure from outdoor composting activities in England between 2005 and 2014. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 84: 235–244
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Williams M, Lamarre B, Butterfield D, Tyrrel S, Longhurst P, Drew G H, Al-Ashaab R, Nelson A, Gladding T, Simpson A, Coughlin D, Hansell A (2013). Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs Report WR1121 – Monitoring bioaerosol and odour emissions rom composting facilities. Available online at the website randd.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=Menu&Module=More&Location=None&Completed=0&ProjectID=17214 (accessed July 17, 2020)

Acknowledgements

Philippa Douglas was funded by the MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health via an early career research fellowship. The research was part funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Health Impact of Environmental Hazards at King’s College London in partnership with Public Health England (PHE) and Imperial College London. The work of the UK Small Area Health Statistics Unit is funded by Public Health England as part of the MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, funded also by the UK Medical Research Council. The views expressed are of the authors and not necessarily those of the MRC, the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health & Social Care or Public Health England. We thank the Environment Agency (EA) for providing the composting and intensive farming facility permit and CICs data, and for aiding with its interpretation; these data were provided to us via email under the Environment Agency Conditional Licence (at the website www.gov.uk/government/publications/environment-agency-conditional-licence/environment-agency-conditional-licence). The population data were supplied by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), derived from small area population estimates, data available under the UK Open Government License v.3.0 (Contains National Statistics data © Crown copyright and database right 2020. Contains OS data © Crown copyright (2020)). Schools data were obtained from the .GOV website (freely available online at website www.gov.uk/government/publications/schools-in-england#history). Data were provided to be used solely for academic, personal and/or non-commercial purposes.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Appendix is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1332-z and is accessible for authorized users.

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep. com.cn
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(615 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/