Mercury removal from aqueous solution using petal-like MoS2 nanosheets

Ragini Pirarath, Palani Shivashanmugam, Asad Syed, Abdallah M. Elgorban, Sambandam Anandan, Muthupandian Ashokkumar

PDF(1322 KB)
PDF(1322 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1) : 15. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-020-1307-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Mercury removal from aqueous solution using petal-like MoS2 nanosheets

Author information +
History +

Highlights

• Synthesized few-layered MoS2 nanosheets via surfactant-assisted hydrothermal method.

• Synthesized MoS2 nanosheets show petal-like morphology.

• Adsorbent showed 93% of mercury removal efficiency.

• The adsorption of mercury is attributed to negative zeta potential (-21.8 mV).

Abstract

Recently, different nanomaterial-based adsorbents have received greater attention for the removal of environmental pollutants, specifically heavy metals from aqueous media. In this work, we synthesized few-layered MoS2 nanosheets via a surfactant-assisted hydrothermal method and utilized them as an efficient adsorbent for the removal of mercury from aqueous media. The synthesized MoS2 nanosheets showed petal-like morphology as confirmed by scanning electron microscope and high-resolution transmission electron microscopic analysis. The average thickness of the nanosheets is found to be about 57 nm. Possessing high stability and negative zeta potential makes this material suitable for efficient adsorption of mercury from aqueous media. The adsorption efficiency of the adsorbent was investigated as a function of pH, contact time and adsorbent dose. The kinetics of adsorption and reusability potential of the adsorbent were also performed. A pseudo-second-order kinetics for mercury adsorption was observed. As prepared MoS2 nanosheets showed 93% mercury removal efficiency, whereas regenerated adsorbent showed 91% and 79% removal efficiency in the respective 2nd and 3rd cycles. The adsorption capacity of the adsorbent was found to be 289 mg/g at room temperature.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Anionic surfactant / 2D material / MoS2 nanosheets / Mercury removal / Adsorption capacity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ragini Pirarath, Palani Shivashanmugam, Asad Syed, Abdallah M. Elgorban, Sambandam Anandan, Muthupandian Ashokkumar. Mercury removal from aqueous solution using petal-like MoS2 nanosheets. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 15 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1307-0

References

[1]
Ai K, Ruan C, Shen M, Lu L (2016). MoS2 nanosheets with widened interlayer spacing for high-efficiency removal of mercury in aquatic systems. Advanced Functional Materials, 26(30): 5542–5549
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Anbazhagan R, Wang H J, Tsai H C, Jeng R J (2014). Highly concentrated MoS2 nanosheets in water achieved by thioglycolic acid as stabilizer and used as biomarkers. RSC Advances, 4(81): 42936–42941
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Bhardwaj V, Bhardwaj T, Sharma K, Gupta A, Chauhan S, Cameotra S S, Sharma S, Gupta R, Sharma S (2014). Drug-surfactant interaction: Thermo-acoustic investigation of sodium dodecyl sulfate and antimicrobial drug (levofloxacin) for potential pharmaceutical application. RSC Advances, 4(47): 24935–24943
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Chen B, Ma Q, Tan C, Lim T, Huang L, Zhang H (2015). Carbon-based sorbents with three-dimensional Architectures for Water Remediation. Small, 11(27): 3319–3336
[5]
Jawad A, Liao Z, Zhou Z, Khan A, Wang T, Ifthikar J, ShahzadA, Chen Z, Chen Z (2017). Fe-MoS4: An effective and stable LDH-based adsorbent for selective removal of heavy metals. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 9(34): 28451–28463
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Choi W, Choudhary N, Han G H, Park J, Akinwande D, Lee Y H (2017). Recent development of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides and their applications. Materials Today, 20(3): 116–130
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Fomina M, Gadd G M (2014). Biosorption: Current perspectives on concept, definition and application. Bioresource Technology, 160: 3–14
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Ganatra R, Zhang Q (2014). Few-layer MoS2: A promising layered semiconductor. ACS Nano, 8(5): 4074–4099
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Ganesan V, Louis C, Damodaran S P (2018). Graphene oxide-wrapped magnetite nanoclusters: A recyclable functional hybrid for fast and highly efficient removal of organic dyes from wastewater. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 6(2): 2176–2190
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Ghasemi E, Heydari A, Sillanpää M (2017). Superparamagnetic Fe3O4@EDTA nanoparticles as an efficient adsorbent for simultaneous removal of Ag(I), Hg(II), Mn(II), Zn(II), Pb(II) and Cd(II) from water and soil environmental samples. Microchemical Journal, 131: 51–56
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Guo X, Du B, Wei Q, Yang J, Hu L, Yan L, Xu W (2014). Synthesis of amino functionalized magnetic graphenes composite material and its application to remove Cr(VI), Pb(II), Hg(II), Cd(II) and Ni(II) from contaminated water. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 278: 211–220
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Hadavifar M, Bahramifar N, Younesi H, Rastakhiz M, Li Q, Yu J, Eftekhari E (2016). Removal of mercury(II) and cadmium(II) ions from synthetic wastewater by a newly synthesized amino and thiolated multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Journal of Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 67: 397–405
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Hadi P, To M H, Hui C W, Lin C S K, McKay G (2015). Aqueous mercury adsorption by activated carbons. Water Research, 73: 37–55
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Hsieh M, Li G, Chang W, Tuan H (2017). Germanium nanoparticles/molybdenum disulphide (MoS2) nanocomposite as a high-capacity, high-rate anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 5(8): 4114–4121
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Hua M, Zhang S, Pan B, Zhang W, Lv L, Zhang Q (2012). Heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by nanosized metal oxides: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 212: 317–331
[16]
Huang L, Peng C, Cheng Q, He M, Chen B, Hu B (2017). Thiol-functionalized magnetic porous organic polymers for highly efficient removal of mercury. ACS I&EC Research Journal, 56(46): 13696–13703
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Huang Z, Zhao M, Wang C, Wang S, Dai L, Zhang L, Xu L (2020). Selective removal mechanism of the novel Zr-based metal organic framework adorbents for gold ions from aqueous solutions. Chemical Engineering Journal, 384: 123343
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Jia F, Wang Q, Wu J, Li Y, Song S (2017a). Two-dimensional molybdenum disulfide as a Superb adsorbent for removing Hg2+ from water. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 5(8): 7410–7419
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Jia F, Zhang X, Song S (2017b). AFM study on the adsorption of Hg2+ on natural molybdenum disulfide in aqueous solutions. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 19(5): 3837–3844
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Jia X J, Wang J, Wu J, Du Y, Zhao B, Engelsen D (2015). Bouquet-like calcium sulfate dihydrate: A highly efficient adsorbent for Congo red dye. RSC Advances, 5(88): 72321–72330
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Jin X, Ning P, Tang L, Peng J, Li K, Bao S (2016). Highly effective removal of mercury and lead ions from wastewater by mercaptoamine-functionalised silica-coated magnetic nano-adsorbents: Behaviours and mechanisms. Applied Surface Science, 393: 457–466
[22]
Krishna Kumar A S, Jiang S J, Warchoł J K (2017). Synthesis and characterization of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide magnetic MoS2@Fe3O4 nanoparticles for adsorption of Cr(VI)/Cr(III). ACS Omega, 2(9): 6187–6200
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Landrigan P J (1982). Occupational and community exposures to toxic metals: Lead, cadmium, mercury and arsenic. Western Journal of Medicine, 137: 531–539
[24]
Lee C, Yan H, Brus L E, Heinz T F, Hone J, Ryu S (2010). Anomalous lattice vibrations of single- and few layer MoS2. ACS Nano, 4(5): 2695–2700
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Lin G, Hu T, Wang S, Xie T, Zhang L, Cheng S, Fu L, Xiong C (2019). Selective removal behavior and mechanism of trace Hg(II) using modified corn husk leaves. Chemosphere, 225: 65–72
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Liu X, Li L, Wei Y, Zheng Y, Xiao Q, Feng B (2015). Facile synthesis of boron- and nitride-doped MoS2 nanosheets as fluorescent probes for the ultrafast, sensitive, and label-free detection of Hg2+. Analyst (London), 140(13): 4654–4661
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Mas-Ballesté R, Gómez-Navarro C, Gómez-Herrero J, Zamora F (2011). 2D materials: To graphene and beyond. Nanoscale, 3(1): 20–30
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Nam K H, Gomez-Salazar S, Tavlarides L L (2003). Mercury(II) adsorption from wastewaters using a thiol functional adsorbent. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 42(9): 1955–1964
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Ramimoghadam D, Zobir M, Hussein B, Taufiq-yap Y (2012). The effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) on the properties of ZnO synthesized by hydrothermal method. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 13(12): 13275–13293
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Santhosh C, Velmurugan V, Jacob G, Jeong S K, Grace A N, Bhatnagar A (2016). Role of nanomaterials in water treatment applications: A review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 306: 1116–1137
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Song Y, Lu M, Huang B, Wang D, Wang G, Zhou L (2018). Decoration of defective MoS2 nanosheets with Fe3O4 nanoparticles as superior magnetic adsorbent for highly selective and efficient mercury ions Hg2+ removal. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 737: 113–121
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Wang X, Guo Y, Li Y, Han M, Zhao J, Cheng X (2012). Nanomaterials as sorbents to remove heavy metal ions in wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental & Analytical Toxicology, 02(07): 154
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Wang Z, Mi B (2017). Environmental applications of 2 molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) nanosheets. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(15): 8229–8244
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Zhang F S, Nriagu J O, Itoh H (2005). Mercury removal from water using activated carbons derived from organic sewage sludge. Water Research, 39(2–3): 389–395
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Zhang S, Chowdari B V R, Wen Z, Jin J, Yang J (2015a). Constructing highly oriented configuration by few-layer MoS2: Toward high-performance lithium-ion batteries and hydrogen evolution reactions. ACS Nano, 9(12): 12464–12472
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Zhang Y, Zhang S, Chung T S (2015b). Nanometric graphene oxide framework membranes with enhanced heavy metal removal via nanofiltration. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(16): 10235–10242
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Zhao M, Huang Z, Wang S, Zhang L, Zhou Y (2019). Design of L-cysteine functionalized UiO-66 MOFs for selective adsorption of Hg(II) in aqueous medium. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 11(50): 46973–46983
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

The research was financially supported by the Department of Science and Technology, India under Water Technology Initiative scheme (DST/TM/WTI/2K16/258(C)). The authors SA & MA thank MHRD, New Delhi for sanctioning them a joint Scheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration project (SPARC/2018-2019/P236/SL). The author Abdallah extend his appreciation to The Researchers supporting project (RSP-2020/56), King Saud University, Saudi Arabia.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1307-0 and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1322 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/