Forward osmosis coupled with lime-soda ash softening for volume minimization of reverse osmosis concentrate and CaCO3 recovery: A case study on the coal chemical industry

Jiandong Lu, Shijie You, Xiuheng Wang

PDF(3117 KB)
PDF(3117 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1) : 9. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-020-1301-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Forward osmosis coupled with lime-soda ash softening for volume minimization of reverse osmosis concentrate and CaCO3 recovery: A case study on the coal chemical industry

Author information +
History +

Highlights

• Forward osmosis (FO) coupled with chemical softening for CCI ROC minimization

• Effective removal of scale precursor ions by lime-soda ash softening

• Enhanced water recovery from 54% to 86% by mitigation of FO membrane scaling

• High-purity CaCO3 was recovered from the softening sludge

• Membrane cleaning efficiency of 88.5% was obtained by EDTA for softened ROC

Abstract

Reverse osmosis (RO) is frequently used for water reclamation from treated wastewater or desalination plants. The RO concentrate (ROC) produced from the coal chemical industry (CCI) generally contains refractory organic pollutants and extremely high-concentration inorganic salts with a dissolved solids content of more than 20 g/L contributed by inorganic ions, such as Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl, and SO42. To address this issue, in this study, we focused on coupling forward osmosis (FO) with chemical softening (FO-CS) for the volume minimization of CCI ROC and the recovery of valuable resources in the form of CaCO3. In the case of the real raw CCI ROC, softening treatment by lime-soda ash was shown to effectively remove Ca2+/Ba2+ (>98.5%) and Mg2+/Sr2+/Si (>80%), as well as significantly mitigate membrane scaling during FO. The softened ROC and raw ROC corresponded to a maximum water recovery of 86% and 54%, respectively. During cyclic FO tests (4 × 10 h), a 27% decline in the water flux was observed for raw ROC, whereas only 4% was observed for softened ROC. The cleaning efficiency using EDTA was also found to be considerably higher for softened ROC (88.5%) than that for raw ROC (49.0%). In addition, CaCO3 (92.2% purity) was recovered from the softening sludge with an average yield of 5.6 kg/m3 treated ROC. This study provides a proof-of-concept demonstration of the FO-CS coupling process for ROC volume minimization and valuable resources recovery, which makes the treatment of CCI ROC more efficient and more economical.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Coal chemical industry / Forward osmosis / Chemical softening / Reverse osmosis concentrate

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jiandong Lu, Shijie You, Xiuheng Wang. Forward osmosis coupled with lime-soda ash softening for volume minimization of reverse osmosis concentrate and CaCO3 recovery: A case study on the coal chemical industry. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1301-6

References

[1]
Cornwell D A, Davis M L (2012). Introduction to Environmental Engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill Education
[2]
Fang F, Han H (2018). Effect of catalytic ozonation coupling with activated carbon adsorption on organic compounds removal treating RO concentrate from coal gasification wastewater. Ozone Science and Engineering, 40(4): 275–283
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Gabelich C J, Rahardianto A, Northrup C R, Yun T I, Cohen Y (2011). Process evaluation of intermediate chemical demineralization for water recovery enhancement in production-scale brackish water desalting. Desalination, 272(1-3): 36–45
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Gabelich C J, Williams M D, Rahardianto A, Franklin J C, Cohen Y (2007). High-recovery reverse osmosis desalination using intermediate chemical demineralization. Journal of Membrane Science, 301(1–2): 131–141
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Gui X, Xu W, Cao H, Ning P, Zhang Y, Li Y, Sheng Y (2019). A novel phenol and ammonia recovery process for coal gasification wastewater altering the bacterial community and increasing pollutants removal in anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic system. Science of the Total Environment, 661: 203–211
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Guo C, Cao Q, Chen B, Yang S, Qian Y (2019). Development of synergistic extraction process for highly efficient removal of phenols from coal gasification wastewater. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211: 380–386
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Jamil S, Jeong S, Vigneswaran S (2016). Application of pressure assisted forward osmosis for water purification and reuse of reverse osmosis concentrate from a water reclamation plant. Separation and Purification Technology, 171: 182–190
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Jamil S, Loganathan P, Kazner C, Vigneswaran S (2015). Forward osmosis treatment for volume minimisation of reverse osmosis concentrate from a water reclamation plant and removal of organic micropollutants. Desalination, 372: 32–38
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Jia S, Han Y, Zhuang H, Han H, Li K (2017). Simultaneous removal of organic matter and salt ions from coal gasification wastewater RO concentrate and microorganisms succession in a MBR. Bioresource Technology, 241: 517–524
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Lan M, Li M, Liu J, Quan X, Li Y, Li B (2018). Coal chemical reverse osmosis concentrate treatment by membrane-aerated biofilm reactor system. Bioresource Technology, 270: 120–128
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Latour I, Miranda R, Blanco A (2016). Optimization of silica removal with magnesium chloride in papermaking effluents: mechanistic and kinetic studies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 23(4): 3707–3717
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Lee S, Kim Y C (2017). Calcium carbonate scaling by reverse draw solute diffusion in a forward osmosis membrane for shale gas wastewater treatment. Journal of Membrane Science, 522: 257–266
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Li X, Hasson D, Semiat R, Shemer H (2019). Intermediate concentrate demineralization techniques for enhanced brackish water reverse osmosis water recovery: A review. Desalination, 466: 24–35
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Liu Z Q, You L, Xiong X, Wang Q, Yan Y, Tu J, Cui Y H, Li X Y, Wen G, Wu X (2019). Potential of the integration of coagulation and ozonation as a pretreatment of reverse osmosis concentrate from coal gasification wastewater reclamation. Chemosphere, 222: 696–704
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
McCutcheon J R, McGinnis R L, Elimelech M (2006). Desalination by ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis: Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance. Journal of Membrane Science, 278(1–2): 114–123
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
McGinnis R L, Hancock N T, Nowosielski-Slepowron M S, Mcgurgan G D (2013). Pilot demonstration of the NH3/CO2 forward osmosis desalination process on high salinity brines. Desalination, 312: 67–74
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Mohammadesmaeili F, Badr M K, Abbaszadegan M, Fox P (2010). Byproduct recovery from reclaimed water reverse osmosis concentrate using lime and soda-ash treatment. Water Environment Research, 82(4): 342–350
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Parks J L, Edwards M (2006). Precipitative removal of As, Ba, B, Cr, Sr, and V using sodium carbonate. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 132(5): 489–496
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Pramanik B K, Shu L, Jegatheesan V (2017). A review of the management and treatment of brine solutions. Environmental Science. Water Research & Technology, 3(4): 625–658
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Rioyo J, Aravinthan V, Bundschuh J (2019). The effect of ‘High-pH pretreatment’ on RO concentrate minimization in a groundwater desalination facility using batch air gap membrane distillation. Separation and Purification Technology, 227: 115699
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Rioyo J, Aravinthan V, Bundschuh J, Lynch M (2018). Research on ‘high-pH precipitation treatment’ for RO concentrate minimization and salt recovery in a municipal groundwater desalination facility. Desalination, 439: 168–178
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Shaffer D L, Werber J R, Jaramillo H, Lin S, Elimelech M (2015). Forward osmosis: Where are we now? Desalination, 356: 271–284
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Shi J, Dang Y, Qu D, Sun D (2019a). Effective treatment of reverse osmosis concentrate from incineration leachate using direct contact membrane distillation coupled with a NaOH/PAM pre-treatment process. Chemosphere, 220: 195–203
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Shi J, Han Y, Xu C, Han H (2019b). Anaerobic bioaugmentation hydrolysis of selected nitrogen heterocyclic compound in coal gasification wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 278: 223–230
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Shi J, Xu C, Han Y, Han H (2019c). Enhanced anaerobic biodegradation efficiency and mechanism of quinoline, pyridine, and indole in coal gasification wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal, 361: 1019–1029
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Subramani A, Cryer E, Liu L, Lehman S, Ning R Y, Jacangelo J G (2012). Impact of intermediate concentrate softening on feed water recovery of reverse osmosis process during treatment of mining contaminated groundwater. Separation and Purification Technology, 88: 138–145
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Tong T, Elimelech M (2016). The global rise of zero liquid discharge for wastewater management: Drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(13): 6846–6855
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Wang W, Han H (2012). Recovery strategies for tackling the impact of phenolic compounds in a UASB reactor treating coal gasification wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 103(1): 95–100
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Wang Y N, Jarvela E, Wei J, Zhang M, Kyllonen H, Wang R, Tang C Y (2016). Gypsum scaling and membrane integrity of osmotically driven membranes: The effect of membrane materials and operating conditions. Desalination, 377: 1–10
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Xie M, Tang C Y, Gray S R (2016). Spacer-induced forward osmosis membrane integrity loss during gypsum scaling. Desalination, 392: 85–90
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Xue W, Zaw M, An X, Hu Y, Tabucanon A S (2020). Sea salt bittern-driven forward osmosis for nutrient recovery from black water: A dual waste-to-resource innovation via the osmotic membrane process. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(2): 32
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
You S J, Wang X H, Zhong M, Zhong Y J, Yu C, Ren N Q (2012). Temperature as a factor affecting transmembrane water flux in forward osmosis: Steady-state modeling and experimental validation. Chemical Engineering Journal, 198–199: 52–60
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Zhang M, Hou D, She Q, Tang C Y (2014). Gypsum scaling in pressure retarded osmosis: Experiments, mechanisms and implications. Water Research, 48: 387–395
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Zhang M, She Q, Yan X, Tang C Y (2017). Effect of reverse solute diffusion on scaling in forward osmosis: A new control strategy by tailoring draw solution chemistry. Desalination, 401: 230–237
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Zhang X, Lin J, Ye W, Zhou W, Jia X, Zhao S, Ye C (2019). Potential of coagulation/GAC adsorption combined with UV/H2O2 and ozonation for removing dissolved organic matter from secondary RO concentrate. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 94(4): 1091–1099
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Zhao S, Zou L, Tang C Y, Mulcahy D (2012). Recent developments in forward osmosis: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Membrane Science, 396: 1–21
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Zhao X, Wu Y, Zhang X, Tong X, Yu T, Wang Y, Ikuno N, Ishii K, Hu H (2019). Ozonation as an efficient pretreatment method to alleviate reverse osmosis membrane fouling caused by complexes of humic acid and calcium ion. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13(4): 55
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Zheng L, Wang X, Wang X (2015). Reuse of reverse osmosis concentrate in textile and dyeing industry by combined process of persulfate oxidation and lime-soda softening. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108: 525–533
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Zhu H, Han Y, Ma W, Han H, Ma W, Xu C (2018). New insights into enhanced anaerobic degradation of coal gasification wastewater (CGW) with the assistance of graphene. Bioresource Technology, 262: 302–309
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Technology R&D Program (No. 2019YFC0408503) and State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment (No. 20180X09).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(3117 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/