Locally enhanced electric field treatment (LEEFT) for water disinfection

Jianfeng Zhou, Ting Wang, Cecilia Yu, Xing Xie

PDF(1803 KB)
PDF(1803 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (5) : 78. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-020-1253-x
REVIEW ARTICLE
REVIEW ARTICLE

Locally enhanced electric field treatment (LEEFT) for water disinfection

Author information +
History +

Highlights

• Nanowire-assisted LEEFT is applied for water disinfection with low voltages.

• LEEFT inactivates bacteria by disrupting cell membrane through electroporation.

• Multiple electrodes and device configurations have been developed for LEEFT.

• The LEEFT is low-cost, highly efficient, and produces no DBPs.

• The LEEFT can potentially be applicable for water disinfection at all scales.

Abstract

Water disinfection is a critical step in water and wastewater treatment. The most widely used chlorination suffers from the formation of carcinogenic disinfection by-products (DBPs) while alternative methods (e.g., UV, O3, and membrane filtration) are limited by microbial regrowth, no residual disinfectant, and high operation cost. Here, a nanowire-enabled disinfection method, locally enhanced electric field treatment (LEEFT), is introduced with advantages of no chemical addition, no DBP formation, low energy consumption, and efficient microbial inactivation. Attributed to the lightning rod effect, the electric field near the tip area of the nanowires on the electrode is significantly enhanced to inactivate microbes, even though a small external voltage (usually<5 V) is applied. In this review, after emphasizing the significance of water disinfection, the theory of the LEEFT is explained. Subsequently, the recent development of the LEEFT technology on electrode materials and device configurations are summarized. The disinfection performance is analyzed, with respect to the operating parameters, universality against different microorganisms, electrode durability, and energy consumption. The studies on the inactivation mechanisms during the LEEFT are also reviewed. Lastly, the challenges and future research of LEEFT disinfection are discussed.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Water treatment / Nanotechnology / Pathogen inactivation / Electroporation / Nanowire / Chemical-free

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jianfeng Zhou, Ting Wang, Cecilia Yu, Xing Xie. Locally enhanced electric field treatment (LEEFT) for water disinfection. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 78 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1253-x

References

[1]
Akhavan O, Ghaderi E (2010). Toxicity of graphene and graphene oxide nanowalls against bacteria. ACS Nano, 4(10): 5731–5736
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[2]
Barba F J, Parniakov O, Pereira S A, Wiktor A, Grimi N, Boussetta N, Saraiva J A, Raso J, Martin-Belloso O, Witrowa-Rajchert D, Lebovka N, Vorobiev E (2015). Current applications and new opportunities for the use of pulsed electric fields in food science and industry. Food Research International, 77: 773–798
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1999). A Century of U.S. Water Chlorination and Treatment: One of the Ten Greatest Public Health Achievements of the 20th Century. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 48(29): 621–629
Pubmed
[4]
Chang B Y, Park S M (2010). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.), 3(1): 207–229
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[5]
Chang Y, Reardon D J, Kwan P, Boyd G, Brant J, Rakness K L, Furukawa D (2008). Evaluation of dynamic energy consumption of advanced water and wastewater treatment technologies. AWWA Research Foundation & California Energy Commission, Denver
[6]
Cho K, Qu Y, Kwon D, Zhang H, Cid C A, Aryanfar A, Hoffmann M R (2014). Effects of anodic potential and chloride ion on overall reactivity in electrochemical reactors designed for solar-powered wastewater treatment. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(4): 2377–2384
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7]
Deborde M, von Gunten U (2008). Reactions of chlorine with inorganic and organic compounds during water treatment-Kinetics and mechanisms: A critical review. Water Research, 42(1-2): 13–51
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[8]
Ding W, Zhou J, Cheng J, Wang Z, Guo H, Wu C, Xu S, Wu Z, Xie X, Wang Z L (2019). TriboPump: A low-cost, hand-powered water disinfection system. Advanced Energy Materials, 9(27): 1901320
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Edd J F, Horowitz L, Davalos R V, Mir L M, Rubinsky B (2006). In vivo results of a new focal tissue ablation technique: irreversible electroporation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 53(7): 1409–1415
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[10]
Flemming C, Trevors J (1989). Copper toxicity and chemistry in the environment: A review. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 44(1-2): 143–158
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Gusbeth C, Frey W, Volkmann H, Schwartz T, Bluhm H (2009). Pulsed electric field treatment for bacteria reduction and its impact on hospital wastewater. Chemosphere, 75(2): 228–233
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[12]
Haas C N, Aturaliye D (1999). Semi-quantitative characterization of electroporation-assisted disinfection processes for inactivation of Giardia and Cryptosporidium. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 86(6): 899–905
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
Huo Z Y, Liu H, Wang W L, Wang Y H, Wu Y H, Xie X, Hu H Y (2019a). Low-voltage alternating current powered polydopamine-protected copper phosphide nanowire for electroporation-disinfection in water. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 7(13): 7347–7354
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Huo Z Y, Liu H, Yu C, Wu Y H, Hu H Y, Xie X (2019b). Elevating the stability of nanowire electrodes by thin polydopamine coating for low-voltage electroporation-disinfection of pathogens in water. Chemical Engineering Journal, 369: 1005–1013
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Huo Z Y, Luo Y, Xie X, Feng C, Jiang K, Wang J, Hu H Y (2017). Carbon-nanotube sponges enabling highly efficient and reliable cell inactivation by low-voltage electroporation. Environmental Science. Nano, 4(10): 2010–2017
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Huo Z Y, Xie X, Yu T, Lu Y, Feng C, Hu H Y (2016). Nanowire-modified three-dimensional electrode enabling low-voltage electroporation for water disinfection. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(14): 7641–7649
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17]
Huo Z Y, Zhou J F, Wu Y, Wu Y H, Liu H, Liu N, Hu H Y, Xie X (2018). A Cu 3p nanowire enabling high-efficiency, reliable, and energy-efficient low-voltage electroporation-inactivation of pathogens in water. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 6(39): 18813–18820
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Jiang C, Davalos R V, Bischof J C (2015). A review of basic to clinical studies of irreversible electroporation therapy. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 62(1): 4–20
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[19]
Kotnik T,Bobanovic F, Miklavčič D (1997). Sensitivity of transmembrane voltage induced by applied electric fields—A theoretical analysis. Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 43(2): 285–291
[20]
Kotnik T, Frey W, Sack M, Haberl Meglič S, Peterka M, Miklavčič D (2015). Electroporation-based applications in biotechnology. Trends in Biotechnology, 33(8): 480–488
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[21]
Kotnik T, Rems L, Tarek M, Miklavčič D (2019). Membrane electroporation and electropermeabilization: Mechanisms and models. Annual Review of Biophysics, 48(1): 63–91
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[22]
Liu C, Xie X, Zhao W, Liu N, Maraccini P A, Sassoubre L M, Boehm A B, Cui Y (2013). Conducting nanosponge electroporation for affordable and high-efficiency disinfection of bacteria and viruses in water. Nano Letters, 13(9): 4288–4293
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[23]
Liu C, Xie X, Zhao W, Yao J, Kong D, Boehm A B, Cui Y (2014). Static electricity powered copper oxide nanowire microbicidal electroporation for water disinfection. Nano Letters, 14(10): 5603–5608
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[24]
Mizuno A, Inoue T, Yamaguchi S, Sakamoto K I, Saeki T, Matsumoto Y, Minamiyama K (1990). Inactivation of viruses using pulsed high electric field: IEEE, 713–719
[25]
Morris R D, Audet A M, Angelillo I F, Chalmers T C, Mosteller F (1992). Chlorination, chlorination by-products, and cancer: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 82(7): 955–963
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[26]
Pethig R, Markx G H (1997). Applications of dielectrophoresis in biotechnology. Trends in Biotechnology, 15(10): 426–432
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[27]
Plewa M J, Wagner E D, Jazwierska P, Richardson S D, Chen P H, McKague A B (2004). Halonitromethane drinking water disinfection byproducts: chemical characterization and mammalian cell cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(1): 62–68
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[28]
Poudineh M, Mohamadi R M, Sage A, Mahmoudian L, Sargent E H, Kelley S O (2014). Three-dimensional, sharp-tipped electrodes concentrate applied fields to enable direct electrical release of intact biomarkers from cells. Lab on a Chip, 14(10): 1785–1790
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[29]
Rojas-Chapana J A, Correa-Duarte M A, Ren Z, Kempa K, Giersig M (2004). Enhanced introduction of gold nanoparticles into vital Acidothiobacillus ferrooxidans by carbon nanotube-based microwave electroporation. Nano Letters, 4(5): 985–988
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Saldaña G, Álvarez I, Condón S, Raso J (2014). Microbiological aspects related to the feasibility of PEF technology for food pasteurization. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 54(11): 1415–1426
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[31]
Saulis G (2010). Electroporation of cell membranes: The fundamental effects of pulsed electric fields in food processing. Food Engineering Reviews, 2(2): 52–73
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Schoen D T, Schoen A P, Hu L, Kim H S, Heilshorn S C, Cui Y (2010). High speed water sterilization using one-dimensional nanostructures. Nano Letters, 10(9): 3628–3632
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[33]
Sedlak D L, von Gunten U (2011). Chemistry. The chlorine dilemma. Science, 331(6013): 42–43
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[34]
Shahini M, Yeow J T (2013). Cell electroporation by CNT-featured microfluidic chip. Lab on a Chip, 13(13): 2585–2590
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[35]
Spilimbergo S, Dehghani F, Bertucco A, Foster N R (2003). Inactivation of bacteria and spores by pulse electric field and high pressure CO2 at low temperature. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 82(1): 118–125
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[36]
Stewart M P, Langer R, Jensen K F (2018). Intracellular delivery by membrane disruption: mechanisms, strategies, and concepts. Chemical Reviews, 118(16): 7409–7531
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[37]
Tieleman D P, Leontiadou H, Mark A E, Marrink S J (2003). Simulation of pore formation in lipid bilayers by mechanical stress and electric fields. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 125(21): 6382–6383
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[38]
USEPA (2009). National Primary Drinking Water Regulations
[39]
Vecitis C D, Schnoor M H, Rahaman M S, Schiffman J D, Elimelech M (2011). Electrochemical multiwalled carbon nanotube filter for viral and bacterial removal and inactivation. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(8): 3672–3679
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[40]
Wang T, Chen H, Yu C, Xie X (2019). Rapid determination of the electroporation threshold for bacteria inactivation using a lab-on-a-chip platform. Environment International, 132: 105040
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[41]
Weaver J C, Chizmadzhev Y A (1996). Theory of electroporation: A review. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics, 41(2): 135–160
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Westerhoff P, Yoon Y, Snyder S, Wert E (2005). Fate of endocrine-disruptor, pharmaceutical, and personal care product chemicals during simulated drinking water treatment processes. Environmental Science & Technology, 39(17): 6649–6663
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[43]
Zhou J, Wang T, Chen W, Lin B, Xie X (2019a). Emerging investigator series: Locally enhanced electric field treatment (LEEFT) with nanowire modified electrodes for water disinfection in pipes. Environmental Science: Nano, Advance Article,
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Zhou J, Wang T, Xie X (2019b). Rationally designed tubular coaxial-electrode copper ionization cells (CECICs) harnessing non-uniform electric field for efficient water disinfection. Environment International, 128: 30–36
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support from the National Science Foundation via Grant CBET 1845354. J. Z. acknowledges the support from the NWRI/BioLargo, Inc. Fellowship. T.W. is grateful for the financial support provided by the China Scholarship Council.

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep. com.cn
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1803 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/