Real-world fuel consumption of light-duty passenger vehicles using on-board diagnostic (OBD) systems

Xuan Zheng, Sheng Lu, Liuhanzi Yang, Min Yan, Guangyi Xu, Xiaomeng Wu, Lixin Fu, Ye Wu

PDF(867 KB)
PDF(867 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (2) : 33. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-019-1212-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Real-world fuel consumption of light-duty passenger vehicles using on-board diagnostic (OBD) systems

Author information +
History +

Highlights

• Fuel consumption (FC) from LDPVs is measured using on-board diagnostic method (OBD).

• The FC of the OBD is 7.1% lower than that of the carbon balance results.

• The discrepancy between the approved FC and real-world FC is 13%±18%.

• There is a strong relationship (R2=0.984) between the average speed and relative FC.

Abstract

An increasing discrepancy between real-world and type-approval fuel consumption for light-duty passenger vehicles (LDPVs) has been reported by several studies. Normally, real-world fuel consumption is measured primarily by a portable emission measurement system. The on-board diagnostic (OBD) approach, which is flexible and offers high-resolution data collection, is a promising fuel consumption monitoring method. Three LDPVs were tested with a laboratory dynamometer based on a type-approval cycle, the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC). Fuel consumption was measured by the OBD and constant-volume sampling system (CVS, a regulatory method) to verify the accuracy of the OBD values. The results of the OBD method and the regulatory carbon balance method exhibited a strong linear correlation (e.g., R2 = 0.906-0.977). Compared with the carbon balance results, the fuel consumption results using the OBD were 7.1%±4.3% lower on average. Furthermore, the real-world fuel consumption of six LDPVs was tested in Beijing using the OBD. The results showed that the normalized NEDC real-world fuel consumption of the tested vehicles was 13%±17% higher than the type-approval-based fuel consumption. Because the OBD values are lower than the actual fuel consumption, using a carbon balance method may result in a larger discrepancy between real-word and type-approval fuel consumption. By means of the operating mode binning and micro trip methods, a strong relationship (R2 = 0.984) was established between the average speed and relative fuel consumption. For congested roads (average vehicle speed less than 25 km/h), the fuel consumption of LDPVs is highly sensitive to changes in average speed.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Fuel consumption / Light-duty passenger vehicles / On-board diagnostic systems

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xuan Zheng, Sheng Lu, Liuhanzi Yang, Min Yan, Guangyi Xu, Xiaomeng Wu, Lixin Fu, Ye Wu. Real-world fuel consumption of light-duty passenger vehicles using on-board diagnostic (OBD) systems. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 33 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1212-6

References

[1]
Baek S, Jang J W (2015). Implementation of integrated OBD-II connector with external network. Information Systems, 50: 69–75
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Bielaczyc P, Woodburn J, Szczotka A (2015). A comparison of carbon dioxide exhaust emissions and fuel consumption for vehicles tested over the NEDC, FTP-75 and WLTC chassis dynamometer test cycles. SAE Technical Paper, No. 2015–01–1065. Michigan, USA: Society of Automobile Engineers
[3]
CPEA (China Petroleum Enterprise Association) (2019). Blue Book of Analysis and Prospect of China’s Oil and Gas Industry Development (2018–2019). Beijing: China Petrochemical Press (in Chinese)
[4]
DeFries T H, Sabisch M, Kishan S, Posada F, German J, Bandivadekar A (2014). In-use fuel economy and CO2 emissions measurement using OBD data on US light-duty vehicles. SAE International Journal of Engines, 7(3): 1382–1396
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Farrugia M, Azzopardi J P, Xuereb E, Caruana C, Farrugia M (2016). The usefulness of diesel vehicle onboard diagnostics (OBD) information. In: 17th International Conference on Mechatronics-Mechatronika (ME). Brno, Czech Republic: IEEE, 1–5
[6]
Fontaras G, Kouridis H, Samaras Z, Elst D, Gense R (2007). Use of a vehicle-modelling tool for predicting CO2 emissions in the framework of European regulations for light goods vehicles. Atmospheric Environment, 41(14): 3009–3021
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
He L, Hu J, Yang L, Li Z, Zheng X, Xie S, Zu L, Chen J, Li Y, Wu Y (2019). Real-world gaseous emissions of high-mileage taxi fleets in China. Science of the Total Environment, 659(1): 267–274
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[8]
He X, Wu Y, Zhang S, Tamor M A, Wallington T J, Shen W, Han W, Fu L, Hao J (2016). Individual trip chain distributions for passenger cars: Implications for market acceptance of battery electric vehicles and energy consumption by plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Applied Energy, 180(15): 650–660
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Huo H, Yao Z, He K, Yu X (2011). Fuel consumption rates of passenger cars in China: Labels versus real-world. Energy Policy, 39(11): 7130–7135
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
ISSRC (The International Sustainable Systems Research Center) (2008). IVE Model User Manual:Version 2.0. La Habra: The International Sustainable Systems Research Center
[11]
Jimenez-Palacios J L (1998). Understanding and Quantifying Motor Vehicle Emissions with Vehicle Specific Power and TILDAS Remote Sensing. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
[12]
Liu C, Dai H, Zhang L, Feng C (2019). The impacts of economic restructuring and technology upgrade on air quality and human health in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in China. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13(5): 70https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1155-y
[13]
Ma R, He X, Zheng Y, Zhou B, Lu S, Wu Y (2019). Real-world driving cycles and energy consumption informed by large-sized vehicle trajectory data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 223(20): 564–574
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Malekian R, Moloisane N R, Nair L, Maharaj B T, Chude-Okonkwo U A (2017). Design and implementation of a wireless OBD II fleet management system. IEEE Sensors Journal, 17(4): 1154–1164
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Marotta A, Pavlovic J, Ciuffo B, Serra S, Fontaras G (2015). Gaseous emissions from light-duty vehicles: Moving from NEDC to the new WLTP test procedure. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(14): 8315–8322
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[16]
Mickūnaitis V, Pikūnas A, Mackoit I (2007). Reducing fuel consumption and CO2 emission in motor cars. Transport, 22(3): 160–163 doi:10.1080/16484142.2007.9638119
[17]
Qin L, Dror M B, Kang L, An F (2016). Passenger car actual fuel consumption and working condition fuel consumption. Beijing: Innovation Center of Energy and Transportation (in Chinese)
[18]
SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) (2008). Electrical/Electronic Systems Diagnostic Terms, Definitions, Abbreviations and Acronyms. Standards. J1930_200810. Michigan: Society of Automobile Engineers
[19]
Saliba G, Saleh R, Zhao Y, Presto A A, Lambe A T, Frodin B, Sardar S, Maldonado H, Maddox C, May A A, Drozd G T, Goldstein A H, Russell L M, Hagen F, Robinson A L (2017). Comparison of gasoline direct-injection (GDI) and port fuel injection (PFI) vehicle emissions: Emission certification standards, cold-start, secondary organic aerosol formation potential, and potential climate impacts. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(11): 6542–6552
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[20]
Tietge U, Diaz S, Mock P, Bandivadekar A, Dornoff J, Ligterink N (2018). From Laboratory to Road. 2018 Update of Official and “Real-World” Fuel Consumption and CO2 Values for Passenger Cars in Europe. Berlin, Germany: International Council on Clean Transportation
[21]
Tietge U, Diaz S, Mock P, German J, Bandivadekar A, Ligterink N (2016). From Laboratory to Road. 2016 Update of Official and “Real-World” Fuel Consumption and CO2 Values for Passenger Cars in Europe. Berlin: International Council on Clean Transportation
[22]
Tietge U, Mock P, Franco V, Zacharof N (2017). From laboratory to road: Modeling the divergence between official and real-world fuel consumption and CO2 emission values in the German passenger car market for the years 2001–2014. Energy Policy, 103: 212–222
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
U.S. EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2010). Development of Emission Rates for Heavy-duty Vehicles in the Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (Final Report). MOVES2010. Prepared for US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-420-B-12–049. Washington, DC, USA: USEPA
[24]
U.S. EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2015). On-board Diagnostics (OBD). Washington, DC, USA: USEPA
[25]
Wagner D V, An F, Wang C (2009). Structure and impacts of fuel economy standards for passenger cars in China. Energy Policy, 37(10): 3803–3811
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Walsh M P (2014). PM2.5: Global progress in controlling the motor vehicle contribution. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 8(1): 1–17
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Wang L, Fu J, Wei W, Wei Z, Meng C, Ma S, Wang J (2018). How aerosol direct effects influence the source contributions to PM2.5 concentrations over Southern Hebei, China in severe winter haze episodes. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 12(3): 13https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1014-2
[28]
Wang Z, Jin Y, Wang M, Wei W (2010). New fuel consumption standards for Chinese passenger vehicles and their effects on reductions of oil use and CO2 emissions of the Chinese passenger vehicle fleet. Energy Policy, 38(9): 5242–5250
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Wen Y, Wang H, Larson T, Kelp M, Zhang S, Wu Y, Marshall J D (2019). On-highway vehicle emission factors, and spatial patterns, based on mobile monitoring and absolute principal component score. Science of the Total Environment, 676(1): 242–251
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[30]
Wu X, Wu Y, Zhang S, Liu H, Fu L, Hao J (2016). Assessment of vehicle emission programs in China during 1998–2013: Achievement, challenges and implications. Environmental Pollution, 214: 556–567
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[31]
Wu X, Zhang S, Guo X, Yang Z, Liu J, He L, Zheng X, Han L, Liu H, Wu Y (2019). Assessment of ethanol blended fuels for gasoline vehicles in China: Fuel economy, regulated gaseous pollutants and particulate matter. Environmental Pollution, 253: 731–740
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[32]
Wu X, Zhang S, Wu Y, Li Z, Zhou Y, Fu L, Hao J (2015). Real-world emissions and fuel consumption of diesel buses and trucks in Macao: From on-road measurement to policy implications. Atmospheric Environment, 120: 393–403
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Wu Y, Zhang S, Hao J, Liu H, Wu X, Hu J, Walsh M P, Wallington T J, Zhang K M, Stevanovic S (2017). On-road vehicle emissions and their control in China: A review and outlook. Science of the Total Environment, 574(1): 332–349
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[34]
Yang D, Zhang S, Niu T, Wang Y, Xu H, Zhang K M, Wu Y (2019). High-resolution mapping of vehicle emissions of atmospheric pollutants based on large-scale, real-world traffic datasets. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19(13): 8831–8843
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Yang L (2016). Evaluating Vehicle Fuel Consumption and Nitrogen Oxides Emission Characteristics Based on On-board Diagnostic Approach. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Beijing: Tsinghua University (in Chinese)
[36]
Yang Z, Yang L (2018). Evaluation of real-world fuel consumption of light-duty vehicles in China. International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) Report. Beijing: International Council on Clean Transportation
[37]
Yue X, Wu Y, Huang X, Ma Y, Pang Y, Bao X, Hao J (2012). Impact of gasoline engine deposits on light duty vehicle emissions: In-use case study in Beijing, China. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 6(5): 717–724
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Zacharof N, Fontaras G, Ciuffo B, Tsiakmakis S, Anagnostopoulos K, Marotta A, Pavlovic J (2016). Review of In Use Factors Affecting the Fuel Consumption and CO2 Emissions of Passenger Cars. Brussels: European Commission
[39]
Zhang S, Wu Y, Hu J, Huang R, Zhou Y, Bao X, Fu L, Hao J (2014a). Can Euro V heavy-duty diesel engines, diesel hybrid and alternative fuel technologies mitigate NOx emissions? New evidence from on-road tests of buses in China. Applied Energy, 132(1): 118–126
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Zhang S, Wu Y, Liu H, Huang R, Un P, Zhou Y, Fu L, Hao J (2014b). Real-world fuel consumption and CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions by driving conditions for light-duty passenger vehicles in China. Energy, 69 (1): 247–257
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Zhang S, Wu Y, Liu H, Huang R, Yang L, Li Z, Fu L, Hao J (2014c). Real-world fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of urban public buses in Beijing. Applied Energy, 113: 1645–1655
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Zhang S, Wu Y, Wu X, Li M, Ge Y, Liang B, Xu Y, Zhou Y, Liu H, Fu L, Hao J (2014d). Historic and future trends of vehicle emissions in Beijing, 1998–2020: A policy assessment for the most stringent vehicle emission control program in China. Atmospheric Environment, 89: 216–229
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Zheng X, Wu X, He L, Guo X, Wu Y (2019). Black carbon emissions from light-duty passenger vehicles using ethanol blended gasoline fuels. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 19(7): 1645–1654
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Zheng X, Wu Y, Jiang J, Zhang S, Liu H, Song S, Li Z, Fan X, Fu L, Hao J (2015). Characteristics of on-road diesel vehicles: black carbon emissions in Chinese cities based on portable emissions measurement. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(22): 13492–13500
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[45]
Zheng X, Wu Y, Zhang S, He L, Hao J (2018). Evaluating real-world emissions of light-duty gasoline vehicles with deactivated three-way catalyst converters. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 9(1): 126–132
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Nos. 2017YFC0211100 and 2017YFC0212100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51708327, 91544222 and 51978404) and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China’s International Science and Technology Cooperation Program (No. 2016YFE0106300). The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the sponsors.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1212-6 and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(867 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/