Real-world fuel consumption of light-duty passenger vehicles using on-board diagnostic (OBD) systems
Xuan Zheng , Sheng Lu , Liuhanzi Yang , Min Yan , Guangyi Xu , Xiaomeng Wu , Lixin Fu , Ye Wu
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (2) : 33
Real-world fuel consumption of light-duty passenger vehicles using on-board diagnostic (OBD) systems
• Fuel consumption (FC) from LDPVs is measured using on-board diagnostic method (OBD). • The FC of the OBD is 7.1% lower than that of the carbon balance results. • The discrepancy between the approved FC and real-world FC is 13%±18%. • There is a strong relationship (R2=0.984) between the average speed and relative FC.
An increasing discrepancy between real-world and type-approval fuel consumption for light-duty passenger vehicles (LDPVs) has been reported by several studies. Normally, real-world fuel consumption is measured primarily by a portable emission measurement system. The on-board diagnostic (OBD) approach, which is flexible and offers high-resolution data collection, is a promising fuel consumption monitoring method. Three LDPVs were tested with a laboratory dynamometer based on a type-approval cycle, the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC). Fuel consumption was measured by the OBD and constant-volume sampling system (CVS, a regulatory method) to verify the accuracy of the OBD values. The results of the OBD method and the regulatory carbon balance method exhibited a strong linear correlation (e.g., R2 = 0.906-0.977). Compared with the carbon balance results, the fuel consumption results using the OBD were 7.1%±4.3% lower on average. Furthermore, the real-world fuel consumption of six LDPVs was tested in Beijing using the OBD. The results showed that the normalized NEDC real-world fuel consumption of the tested vehicles was 13%±17% higher than the type-approval-based fuel consumption. Because the OBD values are lower than the actual fuel consumption, using a carbon balance method may result in a larger discrepancy between real-word and type-approval fuel consumption. By means of the operating mode binning and micro trip methods, a strong relationship (R2 = 0.984) was established between the average speed and relative fuel consumption. For congested roads (average vehicle speed less than 25 km/h), the fuel consumption of LDPVs is highly sensitive to changes in average speed.
Fuel consumption / Light-duty passenger vehicles / On-board diagnostic systems
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
CPEA (China Petroleum Enterprise Association) (2019). Blue Book of Analysis and Prospect of China’s Oil and Gas Industry Development (2018–2019). Beijing: China Petrochemical Press (in Chinese) |
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
ISSRC (The International Sustainable Systems Research Center) (2008). IVE Model User Manual:Version 2.0. La Habra: The International Sustainable Systems Research Center |
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) (2008). Electrical/Electronic Systems Diagnostic Terms, Definitions, Abbreviations and Acronyms. Standards. J1930_200810. Michigan: Society of Automobile Engineers |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
U.S. EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2010). Development of Emission Rates for Heavy-duty Vehicles in the Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (Final Report). MOVES2010. Prepared for US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-420-B-12–049. Washington, DC, USA: USEPA |
| [24] |
U.S. EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2015). On-board Diagnostics (OBD). Washington, DC, USA: USEPA |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
Supplementary files
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |