Bacterial inactivation, DNA damage, and faster ATP degradation induced by ultraviolet disinfection

Highlights

• Long amplicon is more effective to test DNA damage induced by UV.

• ATP in bacteria does not degrade instantly but does eventually after UV exposure.

• After medium pressure UV exposure, ATP degraded faster.

Abstract

The efficacy of ultraviolet (UV) disinfection has been validated in numerous studies by using culture-based methods. However, the discovery of viable but non-culturable bacteria has necessitated the investigation of UV disinfection based on bacterial viability parameters. We used quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to investigate DNA damage and evaluated adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to indicate bacterial viability. The results of qPCR effectively showed the DNA damage induced by UV when using longer gene amplicons, in that sufficiently long amplicons of both 16S and gadA indicated that the UV induced DNA damages. The copy concentrations of the long amplicons of 16S and gadA decreased by 2.38 log/mL and 1.88 log/mL, respectively, after exposure to 40 mJ/cm² low-pressure UV. After UV exposure, the ATP level in the bacteria did not decrease instantly. Instead it decreased gradually at a rate that was positively related to the UV fluence. For low-pressure UV, this rate of decrease was slow, but for medium pressure UV, this rate of decrease was relatively high when the UV fluence reached 40 mJ/cm². At the same UV fluence, the ATP level in the bacteria decreased at a faster rate after exposure to medium-pressure UV.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

UV disinfection / DNA damage / qPCR / ATP

References

[1] Ayala-Torres S, Chen Y, Svoboda T, Rosenblatt J, Van Houten B (2000). Analysis of gene-specific DNA damage and repair using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 22(2): 135–147

[2] Blatchley E R 3rd, Dumoutier N, Halaby T N, Levi Y, Laîné J M (2001). Bacterial responses to ultraviolet irradiation. Water Science and Technology, 43(10): 179–186

[3] Blatchley E R, Oguma K, Sommer R (2017). Comment on ‘UV disinfection induces a VBNC state in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa’. IUVA News, 18(3): 12–16

[4] Bolton J R, Linden K G (2003). Standardization of methods for fluence (UV dose) determination in bench-scale UV experiments. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 129(3): 209–215

[5] Eischeid A C,Thurston J A, Linden K G (2011). UV disinfection of adenovirus: present state of the research and future directions. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 41(15): 1375–1396

[6] Fang J, Liu H, Shang C, Zeng M, Ni M, Liu W (2014). E. coli and bacteriophage MS2 disinfection by UV, ozone and the combined UV and ozone processes. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 8(4): 547–552

[7] Gaudy A F Jr, Abu-Niaaj F, Gaudy E T (1963). Statistical study of the spot-plate technique for viable-cell counts. Applied Microbiology, 11(4): 305–309

[8] Guo M, Hu H, Bolton J R, El-Din M G (2009). Comparison of low- and medium-pressure ultraviolet lamps: Photoreactivation of Escherichia coli and total coliforms in secondary effluents of municipal wastewater treatment plants. Water Research, 43(3): 815–821

[9] He H, Zhou P, Shimabuku K K, Fang X, Li S, Lee Y, Dodd M C (2019). Degradation and deactivation of bacterial antibiotic resistance genes during exposure to free chlorine, monochloramine, chlorine dioxide, ozone, ultraviolet light, and hydroxyl radical. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(4): 2013–2026

[10] Hijnen W A, Beerendonk E F, Medema G J (2006). Inactivation credit of UV radiation for viruses, bacteria and protozoan (oo)cysts in water: A review. Water Research, 40(1): 3–22

[11] Jagger J (1967). Introduction to Research in Ultraviolet Photobiology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

[12] Kong X, Ma J, Wen G, Wei Y (2016). Considerable discrepancies among HPC, ATP, and FCM detection methods in evaluating the disinfection efficiency of Gram-positive and-negative bacterium by ultraviolet radiation and chlorination. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(37): 17537–17546

[13] Lehtola M J, Miettinen I T, Vartiainen T, Rantakokko P, Hirvonen A, Martikainen P J (2003). Impact of UV disinfection on microbially available phosphorus, organic carbon, and microbial growth in drinking water. Water Research, 37(5): 1064–1070

[14] Linden K G, Darby J L (1997). Estimating effective germicidal dose from medium pressure UV lamps. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 123(11): 1142–1149

[15] Liu Y, Zhang Q, Hong Y (2017). Formation of disinfection byproducts from accumulated soluble products of oleaginous microalga after chlorination. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 11(6): 1

[16] Lu S, Wang N, Wang C (2018). Oxidation and biotoxicity assessment of microcystin-LR using different AOPs based on UV, O₃ and H₂O₂. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 12(3): 12

[17] Murray K E, Manitou-Alvarez E I, Inniss E C, Healy F G, Bodour A A (2015). Assessment of oxidative and UV-C treatments for inactivating bacterial biofilms from groundwater wells. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 9(1): 39–49

[18] Nie X, Liu W, Chen M, Liu M, Ao L (2016). Flow cytometric assessment of the effects of chlorine, chloramine, and UV on bacteria by using nucleic acid stains and 5-cyano-2,3-ditolyltetrazolium chloride. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 10(6): 12

[19] Nie X, Liu W, Zhang L, Liu Q (2017). Genotoxicity of drinking water treated with different disinfectants and effects of disinfection conditions detected by umu-test. Journal of Environmental Sciences-China, 56: 36–44

[20] Oguma K, Katayama H, Mitani H, Morita S, Hirata T, Ohgaki S (2001). Determination of pyrimidine dimers in Escherichia coli and Cryptosporidium parvum during UV light inactivation, photoreactivation, and dark repair. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67(10): 4630–4637

[21] Oliver J D (2000). The Public Health Significance of Viable but Nonculturable Bacteria. Boston: Springer, 277–300

[22] Pecson B M, Ackermann M, Kohn T (2011). Framework for using quantitative PCR as a nonculture based method to estimate virus infectivity. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(6): 2257–2263

[23] Pinto D, Santos M A, Chambel L (2015). Thirty years of viable but nonculturable state research: Unsolved molecular mechanisms. Critical Reviews in Microbiology, 41(1): 61–76

[24] Pirnie M, Linden K G, Malley J P, Schmelling D, Usa O O W (2006). Ultraviolet Disinfection Guidance Manual for the Final Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule: EPA 815-R-06–007. Washington, DC: EPA, 2–8

[25] Rauth A M (1965). The physical state of viral nucleic acid and the sensitivity of viruses to ultraviolet light. Biophysical Journal, 5(3): 257–273

[26] Reckhow D A, Linden K G, Kim J, Shemer H, Makdissy G (2010). Effect of UV treatment on DBP formation. Journal-American Water Works Association, 102(6): 100–113

[27] Smith C A, Baeten J, Taylor J S (1998). The ability of a variety of polymerases to synthesize past site-specific cis-syn, trans-syn-II, (6-4), and Dewar photoproducts of thymidylyl-(3′→5′)-thymidine. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 273(34): 21933–21940

[28] Snowball M R, Hornsey I S (1988). Purification of water supplies using ultraviolet light. Developments in Food Microbiology, 3: 171–191

[29] Sommer R, Haider T, Cabaj A, Pribil W, Lhotsky M (1998). Time dose reciprocity in UV disinfection of water. Water Science and Technology, 38(12): 145–150

[30] Sommer R, Lhotsky M, Haider T, Cabaj A (2000). UV inactivation, liquid-holding recovery, and photoreactivation of Escherichia coli O157 and other pathogenic Escherichia coli strains in water. Journal of Food Protection, 63(8): 1015–1020

[31] Wang F, Li W, Li Y, Zhang J, Chen J, Zhang W, Wu X (2018). Molecular analysis of bacterial community in the tap water with different water ages of a drinking water distribution system. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 12(3): 6

[32] Wang N Y, Wang K, Wang C (2017). Comparison of different algicides on growth of Microcystis aeruginosa and microcystin release, as well as its removal pathway in riverways. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 11(6): 3

[33] Xu H S, Roberts N, Singleton F L, Attwell R W, Grimes D J, Colwell R R (1982). Survival and viability of nonculturable Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae in the estuarine and marine environment. Microbial Ecology, 8(4): 313–323

[34] Xu L, Zhang C, Xu P, Wang X C (2018). Mechanisms of ultraviolet disinfection and chlorination of Escherichia coli: Culturability, membrane permeability, metabolism, and genetic damage. Journal of Environmental Sciences-China, 65: 356–366

[35] Yang C, Sun W, Ao X (2019). Using mRNA to investigate the effect of low-pressure ultraviolet disinfection on the viability of E. coli. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13(2): 26

[36] Zhang S, Ye C, Lin H, Lv L, Yu X (2015). UV disinfection induces a VBNC state in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(3): 1721–1728

[37] Zimmer J L, Slawson R M (2002). Potential repair of Escherichia coli DNA following exposure to UV radiation from both medium- and low-pressure UV sources used in drinking water treatment. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68(7): 3293–3299

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Chinese Major National R&D Project (Nos. 2017ZX07108-003 and 2017ZX07502003).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature