The impact of ultrasonic treatment on activity of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in activated sludge

Siqi Li, Min Zheng, Shuang Wu, Yu Xue, Yanchen Liu, Chengwen Wang, Xia Huang

PDF(1019 KB)
PDF(1019 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (6) : 82. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-019-1166-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The impact of ultrasonic treatment on activity of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in activated sludge

Author information +
History +

Highlights

Conditions for ultrasonic treatment to achieve partial nitritation are optimized.

Ultrasound reduces metabolic activity and releases intracellular metabolites.

Mechanical shearing is essential to inhibit nitrite oxidation.

Abstract

The ultrasonic treatment of sludge has been considered as an effective method to facilitate the partial nitritation of municipal sewage. This study aims to reveal the effects of ultrasound on ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB). The impact factors including ultrasonic irradiation time and intensity, sludge concentration, thermal effect and released free radicals were studied. The maximized difference between the changes in AOB and NOB activities were obtained with 10 g mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS)/L, using 0.9 kJ/mL ultrasonic energy density and 12 h interval time. The increased ultrasonic intensity destroyed the floc structure of activated sludge, increased the microbial death, and decreased the cellular ATP level. Further, the mechanism exploration indicated that the mechanical shearing could be a critical factor in achieving the nitritation with inhibitory effect on nitrite oxidation.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Ultrasonic treatment / Optimal control / Nitrifying bacteria / Mechanism analysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Siqi Li, Min Zheng, Shuang Wu, Yu Xue, Yanchen Liu, Chengwen Wang, Xia Huang. The impact of ultrasonic treatment on activity of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in activated sludge. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(6): 82 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1166-8

References

[1]
Bashari M, Eibaid A, Wang J, Tian Y, Xu X, Jin Z (2013). Influence of low ultrasound intensity on the degradation of dextran catalyzed by dextranase. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 20(1): 155–161
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[2]
Blackburne R, Yuan Z, Keller J (2008). Demonstration of nitrogen removal via nitrite in a sequencing batch reactor treating domestic wastewater. Water Research, 42(8–9): 2166–2176
[3]
Cao Y, van Loosdrecht M C M, Daigger G T (2017). Mainstream partial nitritation-anammox in municipal wastewater treatment: Status, bottlenecks, and further studies. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 101(4): 1365–1383
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
Chisti Y (2003). Sonobioreactors: Using ultrasound for enhanced microbial productivity. Trends in Biotechnology, 21(2): 89–93
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[5]
Ciccolini L, Taillandier P, Wilhem A M, Delmas H, Strehaiano P (1997). Low frequency thermo-ultrasonication of Saccharomyces cerevisiae suspensions: Effect of temperature and of ultrasonic power. Chemical Engineering Journal, 65(2): 145–149
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Gao D, Peng Y, Wu W M (2010). Kinetic model for biological nitrogen removal using shortcut nitrification-denitrification process in sequencing batch reactor. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(13): 5015–5021
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7]
Gao S, Hemar Y, Ashokkumar M, Paturel S, Lewis G D (2014a). Inactivation of bacteria and yeast using high-frequency ultrasound treatment. Water Research, 60: 93–104
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[8]
Gao S, Lewis G D, Ashokkumar M, Hemar Y (2014b). Inactivation of microorganisms by low-frequency high-power ultrasound: 1. Effect of growth phase and capsule properties of the bacteria. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 21(1): 446–453
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[9]
Guerrero S, López-Malo A, Alzamora S M (2001). Effect of ultrasound on the survival of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Influence of temperature, pH and amplitude. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 2(1): 31–39
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Han Z, Miao Y, Dong J, Shen Z, Zhou Y, Liu S, Yang C (2019). Enhanced nitrogen removal and microbial analysis in partially saturated constructed wetland for treating anaerobically digested swine wastewater. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13(4): 52
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Huang G, Chen S, Dai C, Sun L, Sun W, Tang Y, Xiong F, He R, Ma H (2017). Effects of ultrasound on microbial growth and enzyme activity. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 37: 144–149
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[12]
Liu Y, Li X, Kang X, Yuan Y, Du M (2014). Short chain fatty acids accumulation and microbial community succession during ultrasonic-pretreated sludge anaerobic fermentation process: Effect of alkaline adjustment. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 94: 128–133
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Ma Y, Peng Y, Wang S, Yuan Z, Wang X (2009). Achieving nitrogen removal via nitrite in a pilot-scale continuous pre-denitrification plant. Water Research, 43(3): 563–572
[14]
Marchesini G, Fasolato L, Novelli E, Balzan S, Contiero B, Montemurro F, Andrighetto I, Segato S (2015). Ultrasonic inactivation of microorganisms: A compromise between lethal capacity and sensory quality of milk. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 29: 215–221
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Nickel K, Neis U (2007). Ultrasonic disintegration of biosolids for improved biodegradation. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 14(4): 450–455
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[16]
Peng Y, Zhu G (2006). Biological nitrogen removal with nitrification and denitrification via nitrite pathway. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 73(1): 15–26
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17]
Pitt W G, McBride M O, Lunceford J K, Roper R J, Sagers R D (1994). Ultrasonic enhancement of antibiotic action on gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 38(11): 2577–2582
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[18]
Piyasena P, Mohareb E, McKellar R C (2003). Inactivation of microbes using ultrasound: A review. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 87(3): 207–216
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[19]
Quan X, Huang K, Li M, Lan M, Li B (2018). Nitrogen removal performance of municipal reverse osmosis concentrate with low C/N ratio by membrane-aerated biofilm reactor. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 12(6): 5
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Raso J, Pagán R, Condón S, Sala F J (1998). Influence of temperature and pressure on the lethality of ultrasound. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 64(2): 465–471
Pubmed
[21]
Rokhina E V, Lens P, Virkutyte J (2009). Low-frequency ultrasound in biotechnology: State of the art. Trends in Biotechnology, 27(5): 298–306
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[22]
Song X, Liu R, Chen L, Dong B, Kawagishi T (2017). Advantages of intermittently aerated SBR over conventional SBR on nitrogen removal for the treatment of digested piggery wastewater. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 11(3): 13
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Song Y, Hahn T, Thompson I P, Mason T J, Preston G M, Li G, Paniwnyk L, Huang W E (2007). Ultrasound-mediated DNA transfer for bacteria. Nucleic Acids Research, 35(19): e129
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[24]
Subhedar P B, Gogate P R (2014). Enhancing the activity of cellulase enzyme using ultrasonic irradiations. Journal of Molecular Catalysis. B, Enzymatic: 101: 108–114
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Turk O, Mavinic D S (1986). Preliminary assessment of a shortcut in nitrogen removal from wastewater. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 13(6): 600–605
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Wang M, Li R, Zhao Q (2019). Distribution and removal of antibiotic resistance genes during anaerobic sludge digestion with alkaline, thermal hydrolysis and ultrasonic pretreatments. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13(3): 43
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Wang Q, Kuninobu M, Kakimoto K, I-Ogawa H, Kato Y (1999). Upgrading of anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge by ultrasonic pretreatment. Bioresource Technology, 68(3): 309–313
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Wu S, Zheng M, Dong Q, Liu Y, Wang C (2018). Evaluating the excess sludge reduction in activated sludge system with ultrasonic treatment. Water Science & Technology, 77(9–10): 2341–2347
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[29]
Yang Q, Liu X, Peng C, Wang S, Sun H, Peng Y (2009). N2O production during nitrogen removal via nitrite from domestic wastewater: Main sources and control method. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(24): 9400–9406
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[30]
Zheng M, Duan H, Dong Q, Ni B J, Hu S, Liu Y, Huang X, Yuan Z (2019a). Effects of ultrasonic treatment on the ammonia-oxidizing bacterial (AOB) growth kinetics. Science of the Total Environment, 690: 629–635
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[31]
Zheng M, Liu Y C, Xin J, Zuo H, Wang C W, Wu W M (2016). Ultrasonic treatment enhanced ammonia-oxidizing bacterial (AOB) activity for nitritation process. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(2): 864–871
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[32]
Zheng M, Liu Y C, Xu K N, Wang C W, He H, Zhu W, Dong Q (2013). Use of low frequency and density ultrasound to stimulate partial nitrification and simultaneous nitrification and denitrification. Bioresource Technology, 146: 537–542
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[33]
Zheng M, Wu S, Dong Q, Huang X, Yuan Z, Liu Y (2019b). Achieving mainstream nitrogen removal via the nitrite pathway from real municipal wastewater using intermittent ultrasonic treatment. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 51: 406–411
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51678337 and 51708326), Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment of China (Nos. 2017ZX07103007 and 2018ZX07111006).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1019 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/