River Chief System (RCS): An experiment on cross-sectoral coordination of watershed governance

Longfei Wang, Jiaxin Tong, Yi Li

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4) : 64.

PDF(918 KB)
PDF(918 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4) : 64. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-019-1157-9
VIEWS & COMMENTS
VIEWS & COMMENTS

River Chief System (RCS): An experiment on cross-sectoral coordination of watershed governance

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The trans-regional characteristics of watershed governance produce more problems beyond the capacity of each individual water-related department, leading to the fragmentation of watershed management. The River Chief System (RCS) has experienced swift developments over the past decade in China by appointing the local government heads as river chiefs. RCS works efficiently in the short-term due to its superiority in the inclusion of clear responsibility, authority, and multi-sectoral collaboration. However, the characteristics of the authority-based vertical coordination of the hierarchical system remain unchanged, and therefore the problems of organizational logic and the responsibility dilemma still exist. Tasks including perfecting of laws, integrated watershed management, and public participation still need to be completed. RCS reflects the routine and characteristics of the migration of national governance, and as such provides new insights for other developing countries in the design of river management systems.

Keywords

River Chief System / Watershed governance / Cross-sectoral coordination / Environmental protection

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Longfei Wang, Jiaxin Tong, Yi Li. River Chief System (RCS): An experiment on cross-sectoral coordination of watershed governance. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 64 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1157-9

References

[1]
Borowski I, Le Bourhis J P, Pahl-Wostl C, Barraqué B (2008). Spatial misfit in participatory river basin management: Effects on social learning, a comparative analysis of German and French case studies. Ecology and Society, 13(1): 7
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Guo M, Xu Y, Chen Y D (2014). Fracking and pollution: Can China rescue its environment in time? Environmental Science & Technology, 48(2): 891–892
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[3]
Huang Q D, Xu J J (2019). Rethinking environmental bureaucracies in River Chiefs System (RCS) in China: A critical literature study. Sustainability, 11(6): 1608
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Reed J, Van Vianen J, Deakin E L, Barlow J, Sunderland T (2016). Integrated landscape approaches to managing social and environmental issues in the tropics: learning from the past to guide the future. Global Change Biology, 22(7): 2540–2554
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[5]
Zuo Q T, Liu J (2015). China’s river basin management needs more efforts. Environmental Earth Sciences, 74(12): 7855–7859
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2018B47814), the Foundation of Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51421006) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(918 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/