An integrated optimization and simulation approach for air pollution control under uncertainty in open-pit metal mine

Highlights

Air Pollution Control model is developed for open-pit metal mines.

Model will aid decision makers to select a cost-effective solution.

Abstract

Open-pit metal mines contribute toward air pollution and without effective control techniques manifests the risk of violation of environmental guidelines. This paper establishes a stochastic approach to conceptualize the air pollution control model to attain a sustainable solution. The model is formulated for decision makers to select the least costly treatment method using linear programming with a defined objective function and multi-constraints. Furthermore, an integrated fuzzy based risk assessment approach is applied to examine uncertainties and evaluate an ambient air quality systematically. The applicability of the optimized model is explored through an open-pit metal mine case study, in North America. This method also incorporates the meteorological data as input to accommodate the local conditions. The uncertainties in the inputs, and predicted concentration are accomplished by probabilistic analysis using Monte Carlo simulation method. The output results are obtained to select the cost-effective pollution control technologies for PM_2.5, PM₁₀, NO_x, SO₂ and greenhouse gases. The risk level is divided into three types (loose, medium and strict) using a triangular fuzzy membership approach based on different environmental guidelines. Fuzzy logic is then used to identify environmental risk through stochastic simulated cumulative distribution functions of pollutant concentration. Thus, an integrated modeling approach can be used as a decision tool for decision makers to select the cost-effective technology to control air pollution.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Air pollution / Decision analysis / Linear programming / Mining / Optimization / Fuzzy / Monte Carlo

References

[1] Asif Z, Chen Z (2016). Environmental management in North American mining sector. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 23(1): 167–179

[2] Asif Z, Chen Z, Guo J (2018). A study of meteorological effects on PM_2.5 concentration in mining area. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 9(4): 688–696

[3] Bradley MJ, (2005) Best available technology for air pollution control: Analysis guidance and case studies for North America

[4] Bugarski A D, Janisko S J, Cauda E G, Patts L D, Hummer J A, Westover C, Terrillion T (2014). Aerosols and criteria gases in an underground mine that uses FAME biodiesel blends. The Annals of occupational hygiene, 58(8): 971–982

[5] Chen Z, Huang G, Chakma A (2003). Hybrid fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach for assessing environmental risks at contaminated groundwater systems. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 129(1): 79–88

[6] Chen Z, Zhao L, Lee K (2010). Environmental risk assessment of offshore produced water discharges using a hybrid fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(6): 782–792

[7] CIEEDAC (2015) Canadian Industrial Energy End Use Data and Analysis Center. In: Met. Ore Min. 12200. Website of www2.cieedac.sfu.ca/index.html,accessed 21 Apr. 2015

[8] Cristóbal J, Guillén-Gosálbez G, Jiménez L, Irabien A (2012). Optimization of global and local pollution control in electricity production from coal burning. Applied Energy, 92: 369–378

[9] Driussi C, Jansz J (2006). Technological options for waste minimisation in the mining industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(8): 682–688

[10] Dwayne D T, Regensburg B (2001) Guidelines for mine haul road design. Applied Science, Faculty of Engineering, School of (Okanagan), University of British Columbia

[11] ECC (2017) Reducing Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions BY Environment and Climate Change Canada. Website of www.ec.gc.ca, accessed 13 Dec. 2017.

[12] Eglinton T, Hinkley J, Beath A, Dell’Amico M (2013). Potential applications of concentrated solar thermal technologies in the Australian minerals processing and extractive metallurgical industry. JOM. Journal of the Minerals Metals & Materials Society, 65(12): 1710–1720

[13] Gopal S, Tang X, Phillips N, Nomack M, Pasquarella V, Pitts J (2016). Characterizing urban landscapes using fuzzy sets. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 57: 212–223

[14] Grandinetti L, Guerriero F, Lepera G, Mancini M (2007). A niched genetic algorithm to solve a pollutant emission reduction problem in the manufacturing industry: A case study. Computers & Operations Research, 34(7): 2191–2214

[15] Kaya I, Kahraman C (2009). Fuzzy robust process capability indices for risk assessment of air pollution. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 23(4): 529–541

[16] Kaya I, Kahraman C (2011). A new tool for risk assessment of air pollution: Fuzzy process capability indices. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 17(3): 613–630

[17] Leili M, Naddafi K, Nabizadeh R, Yunesian M, Mesdaghinia A (2008). The study of TSP and PM₁₀ concentration and their heavy metal content in central area of Tehran, Iran. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 1(3): 159–166

[18] Li J, Huang G H, Zeng G, Maqsood I, Huang Y (2007). An integrated fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach for risk assessment of groundwater contamination. Journal of Environmental Management, 82(2): 173–188

[19] Liao K J, Hou X (2015). Optimization of multipollutant air quality management strategies: A case study for five cities in the United States. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 65(6): 732–742

[20] Liu L, Huang G H, Liu Y, Fuller G A, Zeng G M (2003). A fuzzy-stochastic robust programming model for regional air quality management under uncertainty. Engineering Optimization, 35(2): 177–199

[21] Ma X M, Zhang F (2002). A genetic algorithm based stochastic programming model for air quality management. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 14(3): 367–374

[22] NPRI (2013) National Pollutant Release Inventory, NPRI Facility Reported Data by Substance, Environment Canada Website of www.ec.gc.ca/inrpnpri,accessed 12 Apr. 2015

[23] Onkal-Engin G, Demir I, Hiz H (2004). Assessment of urban air quality in Istanbul using fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Atmospheric Environment, 38(23): 3809–3815

[24] Ping J, Chen B, Husain T (2010). Risk assessment of ambient air quality by stochastic-based fuzzy approaches. Environmental Engineering Science, 27(3): 233–246

[25] Prostański D (2013). Use of air-and-water spraying systems for improving dust control in mines. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 12(2): 29–34

[26] Qin X S, Huang G H (2009). Characterizing uncertainties associated with contaminant transport modeling through a coupled fuzzy-stochastic approach. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 197: 331–348

[27] Ren H, Zhou W, Nakagami K, Gao W, Wu Q (2010). Multi-objective optimization for the operation of distributed energy systems considering economic and environmental aspects. Applied Energy, 87(12): 3642–3651

[28] Rio Tinto (2017) Air quality. Website of www.kennecott.com,accessed 5 Sept. 2017

[29] Shaban H I, Elkamel A, Gharbi R (1997). An optimization model for air pollution control decision making. Environmental Modelling & Software, 12(1): 51–58

[30] Sheoran V, Sheoran A S, Poonia P (2013). Phytomining of gold: A review. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 128: 42–50

[31] Soriano A, Pallarés S, Pardo F, Vicente A B, Sanfeliu T, Bech J (2012). Deposition of heavy metals from particulate settleable matter in soils of an industrialised area. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 113: 36–44

[32] Upadhyaya G, Dashore N (2011). Fuzzy logic based model for monitoring air quality index. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 4: 215–218

[33] USEPA (1999) Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Why and How They are Controlled? Technical Report, EPA 456/F-99–006R. Website of www3.epa.gov, accessed 28 Sept. 2017

[34] USEPA (2002) EPA air pollution control cost manual. Manual 6th edition, EPA/452/B-02–001. Website of www3.epa.gov, accessed 5 Sept. 2017

[35] Vivaldini M, Pires S R I, Souza F B (2012). Improving logistics services through the technology used in fleet management. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 9(3): 541–562

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1156-x and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature