A comprehensive simulation approach for pollutant bio-transformation in the gravity sewer
Nan Zhao, Huu Hao Ngo, Yuyou Li, Xiaochang Wang, Lei Yang, Pengkang Jin, Guangxi Sun
A comprehensive simulation approach for pollutant bio-transformation in the gravity sewer
A comprehensive pollutant transformation model for sewer systems is established.
The model comprises fermentation, sulfate reduction and ammonification processes.
Biochemical reactions related to distinct carbon sources are depicted in the model.
Pollutant transformation is attributed to different biochemical reaction processes.
Presently, several activated sludge models (ASMs) have been developed to describe a few biochemical processes. However, the commonly used ASM neither clearly describe the migratory transformation characteristics of fermentation nor depict the relationship between the carbon source and biochemical reactions. In addition, these models also do not describe both ammonification and the integrated metabolic processes in sewage transportation. In view of these limitations, we developed a new and comprehensive model that introduces anaerobic fermentation into the ASM and simulates the process of sulfate reduction, ammonification, hydrolysis, acidogenesis and methanogenesis in a gravity sewer. The model correctly predicts the transformation of organics including proteins, lipids, polysaccharides, etc. The simulation results show that the degradation of organics easily generates acetic acid in the sewer system and the high yield of acetic acid is closely linked to methanogenic metabolism. Moreover, propionic acid is the crucial substrate for sulfate reduction and ammonification tends to be affected by the concentration of amino acids. Our model provides a promising tool for simulating and predicting outcomes in response to variations in wastewater quality in sewers.
Gravity sewer / Modeling / Pollutant transformation / Biochemical reaction process
[1] |
Abdul-Talib S, Hvitved-Jacobsen T, Vollertsen J, Ujang Z (2002). Half saturation constants for nitrate and nitrite by in-sewer anoxic transformations of wastewater organic matter. Water Science and Technology, 46(9): 185–192
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Barrera E L, Spanjers H, Solon K, Amerlinck Y, Nopens I, Dewulf J (2015). Modeling the anaerobic digestion of cane-molasses vinasse: Extension of the Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1) with sulfate reduction for a very high strength and sulfate rich wastewater. Water Research, 71: 42–54
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Bentler P M, Bonett D G (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structure. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3): 588–606
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Cravo-Laureau C, Labat C, Joulian C, Matheron R, Hirschler-Réa A (2007). Desulfatiferula olefinivorans gen. nov., sp. nov., a long-chain n-alkene-degrading, sulfate-reducing bacterium. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 57(11): 2699–2702
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Fedorovich V, Lens P, Kalyuzhnyi S (2003). Extension of Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 with processes of sulfate reduction. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 109(1-3): 33–46
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Fu G, Makropoulos C, Butler D (2010). Simulation of urban wastewater systems using artificial neural networks: Embedding urban areas in integrated catchment modelling. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 12(2): 140–149
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Garsdal H, Mark O, Dorge J, Jepsen S (1995). Mousetrap: Modelling of water quality processes and the interaction of sediments and pollutants in sewers. Water Science and Technology, 31(7): 33–41
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Guisasola A, Sharma K R, Keller J, Yuan Z (2009). Development of a model for assessing methane formation in rising main sewers. Water Research, 43(11): 2874–2884
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Higashioka Y, Kojima H, Nakagawa T, Sato S, Fukui M (2009). A novel n-alkane-degrading bacterium as a minor member of p-xylene-degrading sulfate-reducing consortium. Biodegradation, 20(3): 383–390
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Huisman J L, Gujer W (2002). Modelling wastewater transformation in sewers based on ASM3. Water Science and Technology, 45(6): 51–60
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Hvitved-Jacobsen T, Vollertsen J, Nielsen P H (1998). A process and model concept for microbial wastewater transformations in gravity sewers. Water Science and Technology, 37(1): 233–241
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Jiang F, Leung D H, Li S, Chen G H, Okabe S, van Loosdrecht M C (2009). A biofilm model for prediction of pollutant transformation in sewers. Water Research, 43(13): 3187–3198
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Jiang F, Leung H W, Li S Y, Lin G S, Chen G H (2007). A new method for determination of parameters in sewer pollutant transformation process model. Environmental Technology, 28(11): 1217–1225
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Jie W, Peng Y, Ren N, Li B (2014). Volatile fatty acids (VFAs) accumulation and microbial community structure of excess sludge (ES) at different pHs. Bioresource Technology, 152: 124–129
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Jin P, Shi X, Sun G, Yang L, Cai Y, Wang X C (2018). Co-variation between distribution of microbial communities and biological metabolization of organics in urban sewer systems. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(3): 1270–1279
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Jin P, Wang B, Jiao D, Sun G, Wang B, Wang X C (2015). Characterization of microflora and transformation of organic matters in urban sewer system. Water Research, 84: 112–119
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Jing Z, Hu Y, Niu Q, Liu Y, Li Y Y, Wang X C (2013). UASB performance and electron competition between methane-producing archaea and sulfate-reducing bacteria in treating sulfate-rich wastewater containing ethanol and acetate. Bioresource Technology, 137: 349–357
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Kreisberg R A, Siegal A M, Owen W C (1971). Glucose-lactate interrelationships: Effect of ethanol. Journal of clinical investigation, 50(1): 175–185
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Li H, Song Y, Li Q, He J, Song Y (2014). Effective microbial calcite precipitation by a new mutant and precipitating regulation of extracellular urease. Bioresource Technology, 167: 269–275
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Li Y F, Wei S, Yu Z (2013). Feedstocks affect the diversity and distribution of propionate CoA-transferase genes (pct) in anaerobic digesters. Microbial Ecology, 66(2): 351–362
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Liu H, Yu T, Liu Y (2015). Sulfate reducing bacteria and their activities in oil sands process-affected water biofilm. The Science of the total environment, 536: 116–122
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Liu Y, Boone D R (1991). Effects of salinity on methanogenic decomposition. Bioresource Technology, 35(3): 271–273
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Mackey H R, Rey Morito G, Hao T, Chen G H (2016). Pursuit of urine nitrifying granular sludge for decentralised nitrite production and sewer gas control. Chemical Engineering Journal, 289: 17–27
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Nie Y Q, Liu H, Du G C, Chen J (2007). Enhancement of acetate production by a novel coupled syntrophic acetogenesis with homoacetogenesis process. Process Biochemistry, 42(4): 599–605
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Onifade A A, Al-Sane N A, Al-Musallam A A, Al-Zarban S (1998). A review: Potentials for biotechnological applications of keratin-degrading microorganisms and their enzymes for nutritional improvement of feathers and other keratins as livestock feed resources. Bioresource Technology, 66(1): 1–11
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Pandey S K, Kim K H, Kwon E E, Kim Y H (2016). Hazardous and odorous pollutants released from sewer manholes and stormwater catch basins in urban areas. Environmental Research, 146: 235–244
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Pereyra L P, Hiibel S R, Prieto Riquelme M V, Reardon K F, Pruden A (2010). Detection and quantification of functional genes of cellulose- degrading, fermentative, and sulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic archaea. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 76(7): 2192–2202
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Rahman A, Kumashiro M, Ishihara T (2011). Direct synthesis of formic acid by partial oxidation of methane on H-ZSM-5 solid acid catalyst. Catalysis Communications, 12(13): 1198–1200
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Rajagopal R, Massé D I, Singh G (2013). A critical review on inhibition of anaerobic digestion process by excess ammonia. Bioresource Technology, 143: 632–641
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Ramsing N B, Kühl M, Jørgensen B B (1993). Distribution of sulfate-reducing bacteria, O2, and H2S in photosynthetic biofilms determined by oligonucleotide probes and microelectrodes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 59(11): 3840–3849
Pubmed
|
[31] |
Rawsthorne H, Dock C N, Jaykus L A (2009). PCR-based method using propidium monoazide to distinguish viable from nonviable Bacillus subtilis spores. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75(9): 2936–2939
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Ren N, Wang B, Huang J C (1997). Ethanol-type fermentation from carbohydrate in high rate acidogenic reactor. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 54(5): 428–433
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Ren N, Wang Q, Wang Q, Huang H, Wang X (2017). Upgrading to urban water system 3.0 through sponge city construction. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 11(4): 9
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Ross T (1996). Indices for performance evaluation of predictive models in food microbiology. The Journal of applied bacteriology, 81(5): 501–508
Pubmed
|
[35] |
Rudelle E, Vollertsen J, Hvitved-Jacobsen T, Nielsen A H (2011). Anaerobic transformations of organic matter in collection systems. Water Environment Research A: Research Publication of the Water Environment Federation, 83(6): 532–540
|
[36] |
Schmitt F, Seyfried C F (1992). Sulfate reduction in sewer sediments. Water Science and Technology, 25(8): 83–90
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
Sepers A B J (1981). Diversity of ammonifying bacteria. Hydrobiologia, 83(2): 343–350
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Sharma K, Derlon N, Hu S, Yuan Z (2014). Modeling the pH effect on sulfidogenesis in anaerobic sewer biofilm. Water Research, 49: 175–185
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[39] |
Sharma K, Ganigue R, Yuan Z (2013). pH dynamics in sewers and its modeling. Water Research, 47(16): 6086–6096
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Song X, Zhang Z (2011). Notice of Retraction Sulfate Reducing Rate of SRB with Acetic, Propionic, n-Butyric Acids as Carbon Sources. In: The 5th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Wuhan. New York: Curran Associates, 1–4
|
[41] |
Steinberg L M, Regan J M (2009). mcrA-targeted real-time quantitative PCR method to examine methanogen communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75(13): 4435–4442
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[42] |
Sun Y, Zhao J, Chen L, Liu Y, Zuo J (2018). Methanogenic community structure in simultaneous methanogenesis and denitrification granular sludge. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 12(4): 10
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[43] |
Taconi K A, Zappi M E, Todd French W, Brown L R (2008). Methanogenesis under acidic pH conditions in a semi-continuous reactor system. Bioresource Technology, 99(17): 8075–8081
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[44] |
Uggetti E, Sialve B, Latrille E, Steyer J P (2014). Anaerobic digestate as substrate for microalgae culture: the role of ammonium concentration on the microalgae productivity. Bioresource Technology, 152(152): 437–443
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[45] |
Vavilin V A (2002).The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1. London: IWA Publishing
|
[46] |
Widdel F, Pfennig N (1977). A new anaerobic, sporing, acetate-oxidizing, sulfate-reducing bacterium, Desulfotomaculum (emend.) acetoxidans. Archives of Microbiology, 112(1): 119–122
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[47] |
Yuan D, Rao K, Relue P, Varanasi S (2011). Fermentation of biomass sugars to ethanol using native industrial yeast strains. Bioresource Technology, 102(3): 3246–3253
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |