Enhanced nitrogen removal and microbial analysis in partially saturated constructed wetland for treating anaerobically digested swine wastewater

Zhenfeng Han, Ying Miao, Jing Dong, Zhiqiang Shen, Yuexi Zhou, Shan Liu, Chunping Yang

PDF(1088 KB)
PDF(1088 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4) : 52. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-019-1133-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Enhanced nitrogen removal and microbial analysis in partially saturated constructed wetland for treating anaerobically digested swine wastewater

Author information +
History +

Highlights

Anaerobically digested swine wastewater was treated by a novel constructed wetland.

Tidal operation was better for total nitrogen removal than intermittent flow.

Mechanism of nitrogen removal by biozeolite-based constructed wetland was discussed.

Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification were determined in zeolite layer.

Abstract

Nitrogen removal of wastewater containing high-strength ammonium by the constructed wetlands (CWs) has been paid much attention. In this study, the ability of a partially saturated CW to treat anaerobically-digested decentralized swine wastewater under varying operating parameters from summer to winter was investigated. The partially saturated CW achieved better NH4+-N and TN removal by tidal flow than intermittent flow. With surface loading rates of 0.108, 0.027, and 0.029 kg/(m2·d) for COD, NH4+-N, and TN, the partially saturated CW by tidal operation achieved corresponding removal efficiencies of 85.94%, 61.20%, and 57.41%, respectively, even at 10°C. When the rapid-adsorption of NH4+-N and the bioregeneration of zeolites reached dynamically stable, the simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in the aerobic zeolite layer was observed and accounted for 58.82% of the total denitrification of CW. The results of Illumina high-throughput sequencing also indicated that nitrifiers (Nitrospira and Rhizomicrobium) and denitrifiers (Rhodanobacter and Thauera) simultaneously existed in the zeolite layer. The dominant existence of versatile organic degraders and nitrifiers/denitrifiers in the zeolite layer was related to the removal of most COD and nitrogen in this zone. The contribution of the possible nitrogen removal pathways in the CW was as follows: nitrification-denitrification (86.55%)>substrate adsorption (11.70%)>plant uptake (1.15%)>microbial assimilation (0.60%).

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Constructed wetland / Decentralized swine wastewater / Biozeolite / Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification / Nitrogen removal pathway

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhenfeng Han, Ying Miao, Jing Dong, Zhiqiang Shen, Yuexi Zhou, Shan Liu, Chunping Yang. Enhanced nitrogen removal and microbial analysis in partially saturated constructed wetland for treating anaerobically digested swine wastewater. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 52 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1133-4

References

[1]
Arroyo P, Saenz L E, Ansola G (2015). Influence of environmental variables on the structure and composition of soil bacterial communities in natural and constructed wetlands. Science of the Total Environment, 506: 380–390
[2]
Cardinali-Rezende J, Pereira Z L, Sanz J L, Chartone-Souza E, Nascimento A M (2012). Bacterial and archaeal phylogenetic diversity associated with swine sludge from an anaerobic treatment lagoon. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 28: 3187–3195
[3]
Chen C, Xu X J, Xie P, Yuan Y, Zhou X, Wang A J, Lee D J, Ren N Q (2017). Pyrosequencing reveals microbial community dynamics in integrated simultaneous desulfurization and denitrification process at different influent nitrate concentrations. Chemosphere, 171: 294–301
[4]
Chen Y, Wen Y, Zhou Q, Vymazal J (2014). Effects of plant biomass on nitrogen transformation in subsurface-batch constructed wetlands: A stable isotope and mass balance assessment. Water Research, 63: 158–167
[5]
Cheng C, Xie H, Yang E, Shen X, Dai P, Zhang J (2016). Nutrient removal and microbial mechanisms in constructed wetland microcosms treating high nitrate/nitrite polluted river water. RSC Advances, 75: 70848–70854
[6]
Cheng J, Chen Y, He T, Liao R, Liu R, Yi M, Huang L, Yang Z, Fu T, Li X (2017). Soil nitrogen leaching decreases as biogas slurry DOC/N ratio increases. Applied Soil Ecology, 111: 105–113
[7]
Hu Y, Zhao Y, Rymszewicz A (2014). Robust biological nitrogen removal by creating multiple tides in a single bed tidal flow constructed wetland. Science of the Total Environment, 470–471: 1197–1204
[8]
Huang X, Dong W, Wang H, Jiang S (2017a). Biological nutrient removal and molecular biological characteristics in an anaerobic-multistage anaerobic/oxic (A-MAO) process to treat municipal wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 241: 969–978
[9]
Huang X, Zheng J, Liu C, Liu L, Liu Y, Fan H, Zhang T (2017b). Performance and bacterial community dynamics of vertical flow constructed wetlands during the treatment of antibiotics-enriched swine wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal, 316: 727–735
[10]
Jetten M, Niftrik L V, Strous M, Kartal B, Keltjens J K, Op den Camp H (2009). Biochemistry and molecular biology of anammox bacteria. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 44(2–3): 65–84
[11]
Jung J Y, Chung Y C, Shin H S, Son D H (2004). Enhanced ammonia nitrogen removal using consistent biological regeneration and ammonium exchange of zeoite in modified SBR process. Water Research, 38: 347–354
[12]
Kindaichi T, Yamaoka S, Uehara R, Ozaki N, Ohashi A, Albertsen M, Nielsen P H, Nielsen J L (2016). Phylogenetic diversity and ecophysiology of Candidate phylum Saccharibacteria in activated sludge. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 92(6): fiw078
[13]
Knight R L, Jr V W E P, Borer R E, Jr R A C, Pries J H (2000). Constructed wetlands for livestock wastewater management. Ecological Engineering, 15: 41–55
[14]
Kyongmi C, Yunah K, Chang N I, Jaeweon C, Kedem O, Wilf M (2015). Evaluating wastewater stabilizing constructed wetland, through diversity and abundance of the nitrite reductase gene nirS, with regard to nitrogen control. Desalination, 264(3): 201–205
[15]
Lee S, Maniquiz-Redillas M C, Choi J, Kim L H (2014). Nitrogen mass balance in a constructed wetland treating piggery wastewater effluent. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 26(6): 1260–1266
[16]
Li X, Zhang M, Liu F, Chen L, Li Y, Li Y, Xiao R, Wu J (2017). Seasonality distribution of the abundance and activity of nitrification and denitrification microorganisms in sediments of surface flow constructed wetlands planted with Myriophyllum elatinoides during swine wastewater treatment. Bioresoure Technology, 248(Part B): 89–97
[17]
Liu M, Wu S, Chen L, Dong R (2014). How substrate influences nitrogen transformations in tidal flow constructed wetlands treating high ammonium wastewater? Ecological Engineering, 73: 478–486
[18]
Liu R, Zhao Y, Doherty L, Hu Y, Hao X (2015). A review of incorporation of constructed wetland with other treatment processes. Chemical Engineering Journal, 279: 220–230
[19]
Luo L, He H, Yang C, Wen S, Zeng G, Wu M, Zhou Z, Lou W (2016). Nutrient removal and lipid production by Coelastrella sp. in anaerobically and aerobically treated swine wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 216: 135–141
[20]
Luo W, Yang C, He H, Zeng G, Yan S, Cheng Y (2014). Novel two-stage vertical flow biofilter system for efficient treatment of decentralized domestic wastewater. Ecological Engineering, 64: 415–423
[21]
Martínez N B, Tejeda A, Del Toro A, Sánchez M P, Zurita F (2018). Nitrogen removal in pilot-scale partially saturated vertical wetlands with and without an internal source of carbon. Science of the Total Environment, 645: 524–532
[22]
Meng J, Li J, Li J, Sun K, Antwi P, Deng K, Wang C, Buelna G (2016). Efficiency and bacterial populations related to pollutant removal in an upflow microaerobic sludge reactor treating manure-free piggery wastewater with low COD/TN ratio. Bioresource Technology, 201: 166–173
[23]
Pelissari C, Guivernau M, VinasM, Garcia J, Velasco M, Souza , S S, Sezerino, P H, Avila C (2018). Effects of partially saturated conditions on the metabolically active microbiome and on nitrogen removal in vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Water Research, 141: 185–195
[24]
Prigent S, Paing J, Andres Y, Chazarenc F (2013). Effects of a saturated layer and recirculation on nitrogen treatment performances of a single stage Vertical Flow Constructed Wetland (VFCW). Water Science and Technology, 68(7): 1461–1467
[25]
Remmas N, Melidis P, Zerva I, Kristoffersen J B, Nikolaki S, Tsiamis G, Ntougias S (2017b). Dominance of candidate Saccharibacteria in a membrane bioreactor treating medium age landfill leachate: Effects of organic load on microbial communities, hydrolytic potential and extracellular polymeric substances. Bioresource Technology, 238: 48–56
[26]
Saeed T, Sun G (2017). Pollutant removals employing unsaturated and partially saturated vertical flow wetlands: A comparative study. Chemical Engineering Journal, 325: 332–341
[27]
Silveira D D, Filho P B, Philippi L S, Kim B, Molle P (2015). Influence of partial saturation on total nitrogen removal in a single-stage French constructed wetland treating raw domestic wastewater. Ecological Engineering, 77: 257–264
[28]
State Environmental Protection Administration of China (SEPA) (2002). Monitoring and Analysis Methods of Water and Wastewater, 4th ed. China Environtal Science Press, Beijing
[29]
Vymazal J (2007). Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Science of the Total Environment, 380: 48–65
[30]
Wang X, Du S, Ya T, Shen Z, Dong J, Zhu X (2019). Removal of tetrachlorobisphenol and the effects on bacterial communities in a hybrid sequencing biofilm batch reactor-constructed wetland system. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13(1): 14
[31]
Wen Y, Chao X U, Liu G, Chen Y, Zhou Q (2012). Enhanced nitrogen removal reliability and efficiency in integrated constructed wetland microcosms using zeolite. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 6(1): 140–147
[32]
Wu J, Joergensen R G, Pommerening B, Chaussod R, Brookes P C (1990). Measurement of soil microbial biomass C by fumigation-extraction-an automated procedure. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 22(8): 1167–1169
[33]
Yang Q, Xiong P, Ding P, Chu L, Wang J (2015). Treatment of petrochemical wastewater by microaerobic hydrolysis and anoxic/oxic processes and analysis of bacterial diversity. Bioresource Technology, 196: 169–175
[34]
Yu G, Peng H, Fu Y, Yan X, Du C, Chen H (2019). Enhanced nitrogen removal of low C/N wastewater in constructed wetlands with co-immobilizing solid carbon source and denitrifying bacteria. Bioresource Technology, 280: 337–344
[35]
Zhang T, Shao M F, Ye L (2012). 454 pyrosequencing reveals bacterial diversity of activated sludge from 14 sewage treatment plants. ISME Journal, 6: 1137–1147
[36]
Zhang W, Zhou Z, An Y, Du S, Ruan D, Zhao C, Ren N, Tian X (2017). Optimization for zeolite regeneration and nitrogen removal performance of a hypochlorite-chloride regenerant. Chemosphere, 178: 565–572
[37]
Zhang W, Lei Q, Li Z, Han H (2016).Temporal variation of nitrogen balance within constructed wetlands treating slightly polluted water using a stable nitrogen isotope experiment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 23: 2677–2683
[38]
Zhang Y, Cheng Y, Yang C, Luo W, Zeng G, Lu L (2015). Performance of system consisting of vertical flow trickling filter and horizontal flow multi-soil-layering reactor for treatment of rural wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 193: 424–432
[39]
Zhi W, Ji G (2014). Quantitative response relationships between nitrogen transformation rates and nitrogen functional genes in a tidal flow constructed wetland under C/N ratio constraints. Water Research, 64: 32–41
[40]
Zhong Z, Wu X, Gao L, Lu X, Zhang B (2016). Efficient and microbial communities for pollutant removal in a distributed-inflow biological reactor (DBR) for treating piggery wastewater. RSC Advances, 98: 95987–95998

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the National Scientific and Technological Supporting Project, China (No. 2012BAJ21B01-02), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51508538), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2012M520351), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. 8164054), and the Beijing talented backbones program (No. 2015000021733G171) for their financial support.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(1088 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/