Comparison of CNT-PVA membrane and commercial polymeric membranes in treatment of emulsified oily wastewater

Abstract

CNT-PVA membrane was fabricated and compared with polymeric membranes.

The separation performance was evaluated by homemade and cutting fluid emulsions.

The three membranes show similar oil retention rates.

CNT-PVA membranes have higher permeation fluxes compared with polymeric membranes.

CNT-PVA membrane shows higher fouling resistance.

Membrane separation is an attractive technique for removal of emulsified oily wastewater. However, polymeric membranes which dominate the current market usually suffer from severe membrane fouling. Therefore, membranes with high fouling resistance are imperative to treat emulsified oily wastewater. In this study, carbon nanotube-polyvinyl alcohol (CNT-PVA) membrane was fabricated. And its separation performance for emulsified oily wastewater was compared with two commercial polymeric membranes (PVDF membrane and PES membrane) by filtration of two homemade emulsions and one cutting fluid emulsion. The results show that these membranes have similar oil retention efficiencies for the three emulsions. Whereas, the permeation flux of CNT-PVA membrane is 1.60 to 3.09 times of PVDF membrane and 1.41 to 11.4 times of PES membrane, respectively. Moreover, after five consecutive operation circles of filtration process and back flush, CNT-PVA membrane can recover 62.3% to 72.9% of its initial pure water flux. However, the pure water flux recovery rates are only 24.1% to 35.3% for PVDF membrane and 6.0% to 26.3% for PES membrane, respectively. Therefore, CNT-PVA membrane are more resistant to oil fouling compared with the two polymeric membranes, showing superior potential in treatment of emulsified oily wastewater.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Oily wastewater / Microfiltration / Carbon nanotube membrane / Commercial polymeric membrane

References

[1] Chakrabarty B, Ghoshal A K, Purkait M K (2008). Ultrafiltration of stable oil-in-water emulsion by polysulfone membrane. Journal of Membrane Science, 325(1): 427–437

[2] Chakrabarty B, Ghoshal A K, Purkait M K (2010). Cross-flow ultrafiltration of stable oil-in-water emulsion using polysulfone membranes. Chemical Engineering Journal, 165(2): 447–456

[3] Chen W, Peng J, Su Y, Zheng L, Wang L, Jiang Z (2009). Separation of oil/water emulsion using Pluronic F127 modified polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes. Separation and Purification Technology, 66(3): 591–597

[4] Coca J, GutiÉRrez G, Benito J (2011). Treatment Of Oily Wastewater. In: Water Purification and Management. Dordrecht: Springer

[5] Cui J, Zhang X, Liu H, Liu S, Yeung K L (2008). Preparation and application of zeolite/ceramic microfiltration membranes for treatment of oil contaminated water. Journal of Membrane Science, 325(1): 420–426

[6] Dumee L, Velleman L, Sears K, Hill M, Schutz J, Finn N, Duke M, Gray S (2010). Control of porosity and pore size of metal reinforced carbon nanotube membranes. Membranes (Basel), 1(1): 25–36

[7] Dumée L F, Sears K, Schütz J, Finn N, Huynh C, Hawkins S, Duke M, Gray S (2010). Characterization and evaluation of carbon nanotube Bucky-Paper membranes for direct contact membrane distillation. Journal of Membrane Science, 351(1–2): 36–43

[8] Fan X, Zhao H, Liu Y, Quan X, Yu H, Chen S (2015). Enhanced permeability, selectivity, and antifouling ability of CNTs/Al₂O₃ membrane under electrochemical assistance. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(4): 2293–2300

[9] Hesampour M, Krzyzaniak A, Nyström M (2008). Treatment of waste water from metal working by ultrafiltration, considering the effects of operating conditions. Desalination, 222(1–3): 212–221

[10] Hilal N, Busca G, Hankins N, Mohammad A W (2004). The use of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes in the treatment of metal-working fluids. Desalination, 167: 227–238

[11] Križan Milić J, Murić A, Petrinić I, Simonič M (2013). Recent developments in membrane treatment of spent cutting-oils: A review. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52(23): 7603–7616

[12] Li Y, He G, Wang S, Yu S, Pan F, Wu H, Jiang Z (2013). Recent advances in the fabrication of advanced composite membranes. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 1(35): 10058

[13] Liu D, Li D, Du D, Zhao X, Qin A, Li X, He C (2015). Antifouling PVDF membrane with hydrophilic surface of terry pile-like structure. Journal of Membrane Science, 493: 243–251

[14] Lu D, Zhang T, Gutierrez L, Ma J, Croué J P (2016). Influence of surface properties of filtration-layer metal oxide on ceramic membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of oil/water emulsion. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(9): 4668–4674

[15] Miyoshi T, Nguyen T P, Tsumuraya T, Tanaka H, Morita T, Itokawa H, Hashimoto T (2018). Energy reduction of a submerged membrane bioreactor using a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) hollow-fiber membrane. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 12(3): 1

[16] Muppalla R, Jewrajka S K, Reddy A V R (2015). Fouling resistant nanofiltration membranes for the separation of oil–water emulsion and micropollutants from water. Separation and Purification Technology, 143: 125–134

[17] Padaki M, Surya Murali R, Abdullah M S, Misdan N, Moslehyani A, Kassim M A, Hilal N, Ismail A F (2015). Membrane technology enhancement in oil–water separation: A review. Desalination, 357: 197–207

[18] Rao G, Brastad K S, Zhang Q, Robinson R, He Z, Li Y (2016). Enhanced disinfection of Escherichia coli and bacteriophage MS₂ in water using a copper and silver loaded titanium dioxide nanowire membrane. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 10(4): 11

[19] Rashid M H O, Pham S Q T, Sweetman L J, Alcock L J, Wise A, Nghiem L D, Triani G, Panhuis M, Ralph S F (2014). Synthesis, properties, water and solute permeability of MWNT buckypapers. Journal of Membrane Science, 456: 175–184

[20] Rho H, Chon K, Cho J (2018). Surface charge characterization of nanofiltration membranes by potentiometric titrations and electrophoresis: Functionality vs. zeta potential. Desalination, 427: 19–26

[21] Sears K, Dumée L, Schütz J, She M, Huynh C, Hawkins S, Duke M, Gray S (2010). Recent developments in carbon nanotube membranes for water purification and gas separation. Materials (Basel), 3(1): 127–149

[22] Van der Bruggen B, Mänttäri M, Nyström M (2008). Drawbacks of applying nanofiltration and how to avoid them: A review. Separation and Purification Technology, 63(2): 251–263

[23] Wei G, Chen S, Fan X, Quan X, Yu H (2015). Carbon nanotube hollow fiber membranes: High-throughput fabrication, structural control and electrochemically improved selectivity. Journal of Membrane Science, 493: 97–105

[24] Wei G, Yu H, Quan X, Chen S, Zhao H, Fan X (2014). Constructing all carbon nanotube hollow fiber membranes with improved performance in separation and antifouling for water treatment. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(14): 8062–8068

[25] Yi G, Chen S, Quan X, Wei G, Fan X, Yu H (2018). Enhanced separation performance of carbon nanotube–polyvinyl alcohol composite membranes for emulsified oily wastewater treatment under electrical assistance. Separation and Purification Technology, 197: 107–115

[26] Yi X S, Yu S L, Shi W X, Sun N, Jin L M, Wang S, Zhang B, Ma C, Sun L P (2011). The influence of important factors on ultrafiltration of oil/water emulsion using PVDF membrane modified by nano-sized TiO₂/Al₂O₃. Desalination, 281: 179–184

[27] Zhang G, Jiang J, Zhang Q, Gao F, Zhan X, Chen F (2016). Ultralow oil-fouling heterogeneous poly (ether sulfone) ultrafiltration membrane via blending with novel amphiphilic fluorinated gradient copolymers. Langmuir, 32(5): 1380–1388

[28] Zhu Y, Wang D, Jiang L, Jin J (2014). Recent progress in developing advanced membranes for emulsified oil/water separation. NPG Asia Materials, 6(5): e101

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature